Analysis: November 10, 2043
I'm comparing the responses that ChatGPT generated for Van Buren's questions to Gemini's.
Question: So how do we communicate this to the American people? How do we make this vision not just understandable, but persuasive?”
ChatGPT:
Question: So how do we communicate this to the American people? How do we make this vision not just understandable, but persuasive?”
ChatGPT:
Carmody: (With a marketer’s instinct) “We need to humanize it. Show real stories—families whose lives have been transformed, workers who’ve gained new skills, students who’ve overcome learning disabilities. We position it as the next great American project, one that every citizen has a stake in. And we don’t just talk about the tech—we talk about the people it’s helping.”
Gemini:
CARMODY (Leans forward, eyes sparkling) With hope, Senator. We paint a picture of a brighter future, where every American has the chance to reach their full potential. We emphasize the benefits: enhanced education, improved healthcare, a more vibrant economy. And we address concerns head-on, with transparency and empathy.
I think ChatGPT has generated the better response, but there are segments of Gemini's response that I like. We might combine them.
Let's compare another.
Question: As a candidate, what pledges should I make?
Barnes: (Leaning forward) “Promise to democratize access to this technology. Guarantee that it won’t just be for the wealthy or the connected but for every American. Pledge to protect individual rights and privacy as we move forward with these innovations. And, most importantly, vow to use this technology to strengthen, not weaken, our democracy.”
Gemini:
RAO: Universal access to NB/CI, regardless of income or background. Investment in research and development. A commitment to ethical and responsible use of the technology.
Again, we can easily combine these in our final version.