4.2.1 - AIBD Email Blast Annual Report, FY 2025/2026

Steve Mickley Last updated 

Summary#


This report reviews AIBD email blast performance from July 2025 through June 2026. To keep year-over-year communication performance comparable, the core analysis emphasizes broad-distribution campaigns sent to 4,000 or more recipients; smaller segmented, chapter, and administrative sends are referenced as tactical outliers rather than the central trend.

Executive overview#


AIBD sent 264 broad-distribution campaigns during the fiscal year, generating 1,122,698 delivered opportunities, 614,790 opens, and 57,462 clicks across the primary list.


The average open rate across those campaigns was 54.95 percent, the average click rate was 5.14 percent, and the average click-to-open rate was 9.29 percent, indicating a healthy pattern of both attention and downstream engagement.


The primary audience size moved from 3,963 recipients at the start of the year to 4,081 by year-end, a net increase of 118 recipients or 2.98 percent.


Performance pattern#


Open performance remained consistently strong through most of the year, with the monthly average open rate generally clustering in the low-to-high 50 percent range and peaking above 60 percent in several periods.


Click performance was more uneven, with the strongest results concentrated in content that paired a clear curiosity hook with immediate professional relevance, while routine promotional or operational notices tended to underperform on click rate.


Unsubscribe pressure stayed low overall, with an average unsubscribe rate of 0.06 percent across the primary list, suggesting that frequency and topic mix remained acceptable to most subscribers.


Monthly results#

Month

Campaigns

Recipients

Avg. open rate

Avg. click rate

Avg. CTOR

Unsubscribes

2025-07

23

91,366

53.46%

3.03%

5.62%

51

2025-08

20

78,413

56.98%

5.01%

8.75%

55

2025-09

23

98,453

56.99%

3.96%

6.92%

80

2025-10

26

107,817

55.07%

3.43%

6.12%

71

2025-11

20

96,413

55.50%

5.14%

9.17%

83

2025-12

21

96,275

55.29%

4.84%

8.62%

68

2026-01

19

83,974

54.73%

4.03%

7.32%

58

2026-02

19

84,604

55.04%

5.94%

10.65%

44

2026-03

23

97,410

55.65%

7.03%

12.54%

51

2026-04

22

92,242

56.67%

5.99%

10.58%

59

2026-05

23

95,572

51.00%

4.36%

8.41%

35

2026-06

25

100,159

53.57%

8.77%

16.39%

23


Monthly data shows stronger click performance in the second half of the fiscal year, especially in March and June, when editorial and educational content appeared to align well with member interests and current industry questions.


By contrast, some mid-year promotional and event-oriented campaigns drew acceptable open rates but materially weaker click response, implying that the subject line promise was stronger than the body-offer pull in those sends.


Content themes#

Category

Campaigns

Avg. open rate

Avg. click rate

Avg. CTOR

General

109

53.43%

4.62%

8.60%

Monday Minute

51

56.06%

6.83%

12.17%

Midweek feature

50

58.17%

4.89%

8.34%

Education/Webinar

34

54.85%

4.81%

8.70%

Conference

10

54.60%

5.00%

9.17%

ARDA

8

52.27%

5.23%

9.79%

Membership

2

43.54%

2.52%

5.80%


Two recurring editorial franchises stood out. Monday Minute regularly delivered strong opens when the topic combined industry change with a practical angle, and Midweek Meander/Midweek Vibe often produced some of the year’s best engagement when the subject line leaned into story, curiosity, or architectural history.


Campaigns tied to awards, conferences, and webinars produced mixed results. They performed best when the reader benefit was concrete and immediate; they performed worst when the message felt primarily promotional or assumed prior context.


Notable campaigns#


The strongest broad-list open-rate performers were these five campaigns:


Date

Subject

Recipients

Open rate

Click rate

2025-08-22

We have two small projects that could use some volunteers.

4,452

65.81%

5.80%

2026-02-18

The Upside-Down Draftsman [Midweek Meander]

4,346

65.21%

7.71%

2026-02-12

January 2026 Employment Trends

4,375

63.84%

7.25%

2025-09-12

Your September-October 2025 AIBD Magazine Is Here!

4,046

63.67%

7.54%

2025-11-05

When Architectural Ambitions Lead to Unconventional Career Paths [Midweek Meander]

4,619

63.52%

6.58%


The strongest broad-list click-rate performers were these five campaigns:


Date

Subject

Recipients

Open rate

Click rate

2026-06-17

Mid-century modern meets Aderondack-style [Midweek Meander]

4,111

61.08%

11.97%

2025-12-01

Architecture is no longer considered a "professional degree" in the US [Monday Minute]

4,674

57.06%

10.68%

2026-03-09

The Architectural Sketch is Back [Monday Minute]

4,279

61.32%

10.54%

2025-10-27

Why Designers Are Ditching Traditional Layouts for "Broken Floor Plans" [Monday Minute]

4,008

63.07%

10.40%

2025-08-12

Announcing the 2025 ARDA Winners

3,951

58.34%

10.40%


The weakest broad-list click-rate performers were these five campaigns:


Date

Subject

Recipients

Open rate

Click rate

2026-05-07

Meet ARDA Judge Michael J. Battaglia

4,163

47.95%

0.84%

2025-11-20

Your Input Needed on IRC Improvements

4,698

56.66%

0.98%

2026-01-21

The Age of Discernment: Designing for Presence Over Progress [Midweek Meander]

4,390

56.49%

1.07%

2026-02-27

Soon: the spotlight turns to you.

4,336

49.26%

1.08%

2025-07-06

Call for Speakers – AIBD “Tuesday at 2:00” Residential Design Webinar Series

3,964

57.52%

1.19%


Several patterns emerge from these outliers. High performers typically used one of three formulas: a compelling design or business question, a strong implied payoff, or a timely issue connected to daily practice.


Low click-rate campaigns were often highly promotional, vague about the next step, or dependent on an offer that may have felt too narrow for the full list.


Interpretation#


The fiscal-year data suggests that AIBD’s email program is strongest when it behaves like a trusted editorial channel first and a marketing channel second.


Messages that teach, provoke curiosity, interpret market or code developments, or frame design issues through a useful lens consistently outperform straightforward announcements.


The list also appears resilient: audience size expanded during the year while engagement remained stable to improving, which is a positive sign for list quality and brand trust.


Recommendations#

  1. Preserve the editorial backbone. Continue recurring formats such as Monday Minute and Midweek Meander, because they appear to sustain list attention and create reliable open behavior over time.
  2. Rework promotional emails around a single concrete payoff. Event, conference, and webinar messages should lead with the benefit, outcome, or problem solved rather than the announcement itself.
  3. Tighten segmentation for narrow offers. Chapter, renewal, and highly specific operational messages can perform well in their intended micro-audiences, but they should not be used to judge broad-list health.
  4. Replicate subject-line structures from top performers. Question-led, curiosity-led, and insight-led subject lines outperformed generic event or product language across the year.
  5. Audit weak-click campaigns for body-copy friction. Several emails earned acceptable opens but low clicks, which usually indicates a need for clearer calls to action, stronger visual hierarchy, or better alignment between subject line and landing-page promise.

Closing assessment#


Overall, the FY 2025/2026 email program performed well. AIBD maintained strong open rates, improved list size, generated substantial click activity, and demonstrated that mission-driven editorial content can coexist effectively with membership, education, events, and advocacy communications.