Additional information, images, videos & links from LOR on June 22, 2024.
As usual, this is just my opinion, arrived at by personal research, come to by following mainstream clues.
Boy, I didn't see this one coming.
I had no intention of writing about Tiger Woods, but as many of you know, the Masters was televised this weekend.
Woods at the White House in May 2019
2.86 MB
View full-sizeDownload Eldrick Tont "Tiger" Woods (born December 30, 1975) is an American professional golfer. He is tied for first in PGA Tour wins, ranks second in men's major championships, and holds numerous golf records. Woods is widely regarded as one of the greatest golfers of all time and is one of the most famous athletes in modern history. He is an inductee of the World Golf Hall of Fame.
So, I was sort of pulled toward Tiger like a magnet.
Although Tiger didn't play, whether or not he would play was the biggest story before the tournament.
Since I have no TV reception, I didn't watch the tournament.
All you have to do is pay off a few key people on the opposite side, and maybe a couple of referees.
We saw that in this year's Super Bowl, where Cam Newton fumbled at opportune times, and then didn't even bother to fall on the ball when it bounced back to him.
If that didn't look suspicious to you, you aren't awake.
Anything can be fixed, and we have discovered that most things have been fixed, including:
the stock markets
the elections
the lotteries
the inter-banking rates
and so on and on.
Not only that, but most of recent history has been faked in one way or another.
I hadn't realized I considered Tiger a bit of a hero, but apparently, I did.
I like records as much as anyone else, and I won't really like seeing his records take a tumble.
I also don't like seeing “great men” take a tumble.
I would prefer they didn't. I would prefer the great men and women stay great, since I happen to like greatness.
It gives us all something to shoot for.
However, the truth is the truth, and I guess I like the truth even more than heroes.
I certainly like the truth more than fake heroes.
The next thing that pushed me into this paper was a quick search on Tiger's dad, Earl Woods.
image.png
557 KB
View full-sizeDownload Earl Dennison Woods (March 5, 1932 – May 3, 2006) was the father of American professional golfer Tiger Woods. Woods started his son in golf at a very early age and coached him exclusively over his first years in the sport. He later published two books about the process. He was previously a U.S. Army infantry officer who served two tours of duty in South Vietnam and retired with the rank of lieutenant colonel.
Oh my god, the red flags on this guy!
The first thing I saw was LIEUTENANT COLONEL.
Those who have followed my papers of the past three years will understand why that by itself almost knocked me over.
We have found lieutenant colonels running many of the biggest Intelligence PSYOPS of the past century.
In the Manson event, we saw that Sharon Tate's dad Paul Tate was a lieutenant colonel in Intelligence.
Not only was Earl Woods a lt. colonel, but he was also in Intelligence.
He started out with Special Forces, which is of course linked to Intelligence.
He then graduated from the Defense Information School, which is not only an arm of Intelligence, but also the specific arm of Intel involved with media propaganda.
For instance, in 2002, AOL Time Warner bought the largest tin producer in Thailand, Thaisarco.
Kultida's father may have been at Thaisarco, for all we know.
Or, he may have sold out to one of these large companies before that.
As for a possible connection to Thaisarco, we find that before the sell-out to AOL, the company was owned by Billiton.
Billiton is a Dutch company with roots back to 1860.
It was bought by Shell in 1970, and of course Shell is also Dutch.
Shell is also involved in the PGA Tour, the Houston Open now being called the Shell Houston Open.
Regardless, finding Tiger's grandfather both Dutch and the owner of a tin mine in Thailand is a huge clue here, one no one else has seemed to notice.
Also suspicious are Tiger's early endorsement deals.
Upon joining the tour—and before entering much less winning a single tournament—Tiger already had a $40 million deal with Nike and a $20 million deal with Titleist.
It is admitted that these were the largest endorsement contracts in the history of golf, and among the largest in the history of sports, for an athlete with no professional history.
How does that make any sense?
Phenoms come out of the junior and amateur ranks almost every year, but never before or since has one of these guys been signed to such huge endorsement deals before winning a tournament.
Why not?
I guess because they don't have the connections to Intelligence and the billionaires that Tiger had.
Remember, IMG, Tiger's promoter, had been around since the 1960s.
It had worked with Palmer and Nicklaus back in the day.
It didn't just arrive on the scene in 1996.
So, you should ask yourself why Tiger was promoted at a level lightyears beyond anyone before him.
It also makes no sense that Tiger won Sports Illustrated's Sportsman of the Year in 1996.
He wasn't even the best golfer that year, much less the best in all sports.
Although Woods won two late tournaments on the PGA tour in October (Las Vegas and Walt Disney), they weren't majors or even semi-majors.
At least five golfers on the PGA Tour had more impressive years, including:
Tom Lehman, who won two tournaments including the British Open and the prestigious Tour Championship
She just missed a Grand Slam, being injured for the Australian Open.
1996 was also the year Michael Johnson won the 200m and 400m at the Summer Olympics, setting a world record in the 200m of 19.32 which stood for 12 years.
He had a law degree from Yale and—like Earl Woods—also came out of the military.
But the strangest thing about McCormack is that he also “handled special projects” for:
Margaret Thatcher
Mikhail Gorbachev
Pope John-Paul II
Say what?
Another client was chairman of General Electric Jack Welch.
Could you find a bigger red flag, or a more obvious tie to Military Intelligence?
McCormack was listed as one of the richest men in the world by Forbes in:
1995
1998
2001
Even curiouser is that he was named the most powerful man in sports in 1990 by Sporting News.
He was called the most powerful man in golf by GOLF magazine, the most powerful man in tennis by Tennis magazine, and the most powerful man in sports by Sports Illustrated.
In McCormack's 2003 obituary, the New York Times admitted of IMG that:
“Its broadcast division is the largest producer of televised sports programming, other than the networks, and the largest seller of sports television rights.”
Since the Modern business of sports is making money by any and all methods (and delivering propaganda), I think you can see the evidence is building against the career of Tiger Woods.
Was Mark McCormack related to Colonel Alfred Toal McCormack, b. 1901, Director of Intelligence, Military Intelligence Service, one of the founders of the CIA?
The ages are right for Alfred to be his father.
We are told Mark's father was Ned, but that is a nickname.
More likely is that Alfred was Mark's uncle or cousin.
Is Mark related to Robert C. McCormack, b. 1939, also from New York and Chicago?
Robert C. McCormack in 1988
13.7 MB
View full-sizeDownload Robert Cornelius McCormack (born November 7, 1939) was United States Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Production Support from 1987 to 1988; Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Industrial and International Programs from 1988 to 1990; and Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management and Comptroller) from 1990 to 1993.
In the late 1990s, at the time of the start of the Tiger Woods project, he was the founder and CEO of Trident Capital.
He may link to this event since Trident made investments in CSG Systems, which would become the largest cable-television billing service in the United States.
The Golf Channel is of course on cable TV.
Robert's parents are not given in his bio.
My guess is all three of these prominent McCormacks are closely related.
My guess is they are also related to the famous McCormicks, since the two spellings are just a variant.
It is usually the same family, hailing originally from Ireland.
My Irish ancestors did a similar thing, appearing to split into Malloy and Maloy in the late 19th century, but it was all the same family.
Cyrus McCormick invented the reaper and founded what would become International Harvester.
His son Harold married Edith Rockefeller.
But back to Tiger.
image.png
79.6 KB
View full-sizeDownload The 2010 Nike commercial is also very weird, and now looks like a prominent clue.
But instead of hunkering down as asking me to answer all questions for you, you should ask yourself why Nike would make that ad or why Tiger would agree to it?
It couldn't do him any good and hasn't.
It couldn't do Nike any good and hasn't.
No one really trying to rebuild Tiger's reputation would make that ad or run it.
So, why did you ever have to look at it?
Think about it.
That conspiracy site I linked to above suggests Tiger was a mind-controlled slave.
But I suggest you go in another direction.
As usual, I don't think we need mind-control to explain any of this.
Also as usual, these conspiracy sites look like purposeful misdirection.
They know that the only people coming to those sites are already suspicious and asking questions.
So, Intelligence creates these sites, manufacturing stories that are so weird even the most jaded readers can't follow them.
This has the effect of either driving those readers back to the safety of the mainstream story, or off the internet altogether.
These readers go hide under the bed and hope the crazy pedophile Satanists won't find them there.
But I don't recommend you do that.
I recommend you avoid those conspiracy sites and look for explanations that make more sense.
So, let's go back to the evidence.
You may ask yourself why Tiger Woods and his father chose to give a press conference from Fort Bragg in 2004.
Woods and his father Earl at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, in 2004
2.99 MB
View full-sizeDownload
Fort Bragg is the largest US Army installation in the world.
We get another clue in 1996, when Tiger won the Disney tournament by one stroke over Payne Stewart.
Stewart in August 1998
1.56 MB
View full-sizeDownload William Payne Stewart (January 30, 1957 – October 25, 1999) was an American professional golfer who won 11 PGA Tour events, including three major championships, the last of which came just a few months before his death in an airplane accident at the age of 42.
That's curious, since of course Stewart was alleged to have died just three years later in a mysterious plane crash.
So, let's study that event for a moment.
Like Bob Dylan, William Payne Stewart was a Phi Gamma Delta, or Fiji.
Know who else was a Fiji?
Philip Knight, founder and president of Nike.
So were:
Jack Nicklaus
Hale Irwin
Jerry Pate
So was the founder of Merrill Lynch.
So was William Crowe, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1994 to 1997 (Crowe was also on the board at Merrill Lynch).
So was Robert McNamara, Secretary of Defense under Kennedy and Johnson.
So was Johnny Carson.
Stewart didn't own the Learjet that he was traveling in.
It was hired from Sunjet Aviation in Orlando, FL.
The crash was on October 25, 1999.
Sunjet declared bankruptcy almost immediately and had sold all assets just seven months later
This despite having allegedly broken ground on their facilities in Orlando on March 17, 1999.
The owner of Sunjet is listed as JetShares One Inc., which actually wasn't incorporated until September 8, 1999—the month before the crash.
Turns out Wilmington has been tied to many other CIA planes, including Clyde O'Connor's notorious cocaine plane, registered to Mellon Investments in Wilmington.
Rendition is the process of moving prisoners internationally, and the US rendition planes are all registered in Wilmington, DE.
Many of them are Learjets.
You shouldn't need any more evidence than that address match that the Payne Stewart event was a CIA event, since that is solid proof that would hold up in a court of law.
It isn't circumstantial.
It isn't a coincidence those two companies have the same address.
But I will continue with the Payne Stewart event just for fun.
The FAA number of the Learjet is said to be N47BA, but according to my research no such number was ever issued to a Learjet.
Also notice that it includes the CIA number 47.
The plane is said to have crashed just ½ mile from Northern State University, South Dakota, and two miles from Aberdeen Regional Airport.
However, the Wikipedia page does not match the report at Skybrary.aero above.
There we are told the plane crashed outside Mina, several miles from Aberdeen, in a cornfield.
That is curious since it reminds us of Buddy Holly's plane crash.
Holly in 1957
6.81 MB
View full-sizeDownload Charles Hardin Holley (September 7, 1936 – February 3, 1959), known as Buddy Holly, was an American singer and songwriter who was a central and pioneering figure of mid-1950s rock and roll.
The wreckage of the Bonanza at the crash site
1.71 MB
View full-sizeDownload On February 3, 1959, American rock and roll musicians Buddy Holly, Ritchie Valens, and "The Big Bopper" J. P. Richardson were all killed in a plane crash near Clear Lake, Iowa, together with pilot Roger Peterson. The event became known as "The Day the Music Died" after singer-songwriter Don McLean referred to it as such in his 1971 song "American Pie".
Holly was scheduled to play in Moorhead, MN, about 100 miles from Aberdeen.
His plane allegedly crashed in northern Iowa, also not far away.
This reminds us that two big Air Force Bases are in the area, Minot and Ellsworth.
Which contradicts other parts of the Stewart story.
At the time of the crash, we are told at Wikipedia that the fighter planes were at this point forced to break off their pursuit and had to land at local airports, having reached the limit of their endurance.
How's that?
Ellsworth AFB is only about 150 miles from Aberdeen.
Beyond that, in an NBC report the next day, October 26, it is admitted the fighter jet that had been following the Lear from the southern part of the US had re-fueled in the air from a tanker plane.
In that report, we are shown video from the camera aboard the F16, but we never see the Lear or any other plane.
The announcer tells us that is because the Lear was to the side.
Then why show us video of empty sky?
Why couldn't the F16 tail the Lear for a moment to get it in the picture?
We also have misdirection with the range of the Lear 35.
It can carry 1100 gallons of fuel with a range of about 3200 miles.
The distance from Orlando to Aberdeen is only about half that, or 1600 miles as the crow flies, so the Lear should have flown well into Canada before crashing.
The story tries to spin this by saying the Lear was only partially fueled for the trip to Dallas, but the story isn't believable.
We are told the jet was fueled with 2400 kg of fuel, which is a peculiar way of listing the fuel.
Normally you would be told the number in gallons or liters.
At any rate, 2400 kg of jet fuel comes out to about 3000 liters, which is about 71% full.
Even if we accept that they started a cross-country flight without filling the tank, the given figure would still put them way up into Canada on the given heading.
3200 miles times 71% is 2270 miles, way beyond the 1600 miles to Aberdeen.
The plane could have gone all the way to Edmonton, Alberta.
But of course, they couldn't have that, because then they would have to include Canadian authorities in the hoax.
The pictures we get from the crash site show no recognizable wreckage.
They look somewhat like the alleged wreckage from Shanksville, PA, except here we at least get some white debris.
But he didn't take that position until 2001 and didn't become a Monsignor until 2006.
At the time of the Payne Stewart event, he is alleged to have been an associate pastor at St. Matthew's in DC. Problem is, St. Matthew's has no such position as associate pastor.
Another clue is that this James Watkins was a Second Lieutenant in the Air Force Chaplain Reserve.
Also remember that Sunjet was a temporary operation, on the books for only a year.
It may have existed only on paper.
Remember, it is said to have been incorporated in September of 1999, so it would have just opened its doors in October of that year.
Strange that a company that had just opened its doors should find itself in national headlines almost immediately.
I would say Payne Stewart faked his death for some reason.
He was 42 and his golf career was about over.
Possibly Intelligence had graduated him to some more interesting project.
Maybe he was bored playing golf every day.
I would be.
Or maybe he just wanted to spend the 12 million he had won for bashing a little white ball about on the grass.
Frankly, I would be embarrassed to accept a million dollars for playing golf for four days, no matter how good I was or who I had beaten.
But that sort of embarrassment never occurs to these heroes of sports.
That is assuming the numbers we are given are true, and I no longer assume that.
It makes no sense that one golf tournament would have a purse of $10 million.
There are 51 tournaments on the PGA Tour with an average purse of about $6 million, which comes out to over $300 million a year in total prize money.
They could show up and play for room and board and still be filthy rich.
Plus, we are told they are paid to be signboards for the various big corporations, so they don't need any prize money at all.
Not that I believe the endorsement numbers, either.
I don't doubt they are paid something, but again, I subtract one or more zeroes from any number the mainstream feeds me.
Given what we discovered about the Sunjet plane being a CIA plane, I would say the best guess is Stewart and the others said to be aboard were all CIA agents.
They were all members of the same project until 1999, but the project was over.
They needed to move on.
The faked plane crash was their exit from the project.
But since Payne was apparently a member of the PGA Tour, playing almost every week, that would mean his project was being a player.
Which means that either all of or part of the PGA Tour is a CIA project.
Which takes us smoothly back to the Tiger project.
As we have seen, Payne may have thrown the Disney to Tiger in 1996.
Stewart had won his first big tournament at Disney in 1983.
In 1985, he appeared to throw the Byron Nelson tournament to Bob Eastwood, making double bogey on the 72nd hole in strange fashion.
The analysts say he should have laid up out of the fairway bunker, but that wasn't the strange part, since his long iron out of that bunker made the bunker just short of the green.
Pros would always rather be in a bunker than in the tall grass around a green, so the long iron shot was actually a good one.
What was strange was that he bladed the short bunker shot.
Since it wasn't buried, there was no reason for him to do that.
Pros never miss a shot like that.
That bunker is not a tough one.
Getting down in three would have been terrible.
He took four from there, and his putts were as strangely bad as his bunker shot.
What is stranger still is that this meltdown is never mentioned when you read about worst meltdowns in golf.
It wasn't quite as colorful as Van de Velde's triple, but it was nearly as bad.
It was just as incredible, by which I mean unbelievable.
Both now look scripted to me. †
Stewart and Bernhard Langer also appeared to throw the British Open that year to Sandy Lyle.
At the time of his death, Stewart ranked third on the all-time money list, which is peculiar seeing that he only won 11 times on the Tour.
He is ranked 98 on the wins list.
Of course, it is not so strange to see the PGA Tour inhabited by spook babies.
These are the sons of wealthy families, as we know.
Payne Stewart was from several wealthy families, not only the Paynes and the Stewarts, but also the:
Gores
Palmers
Hamptons
The Paynes and Gores are closely related.
That links him to Gore Vidal and Al Gore, among many others.
Also note the Palmer.
Stewart is related to Arnold Palmer, though you have to go back several generations.
Edgar Alwin Payne married Elsie Palmer in 1912.
I have long known about Elsie Palmer through the work of John Singer Sargent.
Oliver Hazard Payne lived in the mid-West, like Edgar and Payne Stewart, dying in Cleveland.
The largest estate ever appraised in New York before WW2 was that of William Payne Whitney, nephew of Oliver Hazard Payne.
Notice the match not only in middle name but in first name.
Payne Stewart's first name was also William.
Then we have the Stewart family.
The fantastic wealth of this family descended from Alexander Turney Stewart, who first married into the wealthy Clinch family and then made a fortune in dry goods.
image.png
178 KB
View full-sizeDownload Alexander Turney Stewart (October 12, 1803 – April 10, 1876) was an American entrepreneur who moved to New York and made his multimillion-dollar fortune in the most extensive and lucrative dry goods store in the world.
Rising in the 1840s, his stores under the name A. T. Stewart became the largest in the world by the time of the Civil War.
He was probably helped in his success by his link through his wife to the Tweed ring, a machine of political corruption in New York led by Boss Tweed.
This is the Tweed who was ultimately convicted of stealing up to $200 million from taxpayers.
See Tammany Hall, a Democratic Party Society that ran New York in the mid-1800s.
Although Stewart allegedly died without issue, his wife bequeathed large sums to both the Stewart and Clinch families.
However, Stewart's death was surrounded with mystery, and one of the few cases of posthumous libel attended it.
Joseph Pulitzer, among others, accused Stewart of “a dark and secret crime”, one that had something to do with mistresses.
So, it is probable Stewart himself secretly bequeathed large sums to bastard children, also of the name Stewart.
Regarding the name Stewart, we also have this from the London Telegraph in 2014:
A groundbreaking DNA study has found that half of all the men who carry the surnames Stewart, or Stuart, are descended from Scotland’s royal dynasty.
He isn't on the Mayflower list but came over the year after on the Fortune.
Before we leave Payne Stewart, it is worth mentioning that he went to grade school at the Greenwood Laboratory School on the campus of Missouri State University.
Like Hotchkiss, New Trier, and other schools we have looked at, it is a spook feeder.
But in some ways, it is even spookier.
Whereas these other schools list their famous alumni, Greenwood holds its cards closer to the vest.
It tells you only a couple of them, and those are ones they think are very non-suspicious, like Payne Stewart.
They also list John Wilkinson, who toured with Elvis Presley.
Unfortunately for them, I can now show that even that one is a red flag.
The graduating class of Greenwood is only about 30 each year, making it possibly the most exclusive prep school in the country (for comparison, Hotchkiss graduates about 140 each year).
Children are put on a waiting list at birth.
There is also a strange gap in Stewart's bio.
He graduated from SMU in 1979, and allegedly won a tournament in Asia in 1981.
So, it is not clear what he was doing from summer of 1979 to summer of 1981.
We are told Stewart failed Q-school in 1979, which is curious for someone with his swing and later stature in the game.
We would have expected him to win one of the top spots.
Also curious is that the SMU golf team did nothing while he was there.
In 1979, the ladies team won the NCAAs, but the men's team didn't even win the SWC Championship.
SMU has graduated nine NCAA AllAmericans, but Stewart is not one of them.
Anyway, let's return to Tiger.
Everything to do with Tiger is a red flag, including his marriage to Elin Nordegren.
Her father Thomas was a foreign correspondent for Sveriges Radio, which is the Swedish National Radio.
Like everything else, it is a propaganda machine.
Although it is sold as a national radio, it isn't.
If it were, it would be funded by Sweden and owned by the country.
In fact, it is a public traded company, and is owned by an independent foundation.
As usual, the real owners are hidden.
We see the same thing in the US with PBS and NPR, which are supposed to be national but are privately funded.
Some of this funding isn't hidden, as when you are told the rich people or big corporations making the broadcasts possible, like the MacArthur Foundation, ExxonMobil, etc.
No one seems to find it strange that public television and radio is funded by billionaires—although that funding of course means the media isn't public or national.
It is private, by definition.
So, Tiger's father-in-law was basically a hire of Swedish Intelligence, working to disseminate worldwide propaganda.
He has also been a professor at New York University—more confirmation of what I just said.
Elin's mother also worked for the government as a Minister of Immigration.
Barbro Holmberg was married twice, but her other husband is hidden, which is a red flag.
More problems are seen with Elin herself.
We are told Nordegren was hired by the wife of Swedish golfer Jesper Parnevik to be their nanny.
Why would the rich Nordegren need to work as a nanny?
Obviously, this story was just made up to get Elin to the US. Parnevik is also a red flag, since his father also worked in the media in Sweden.
Bosse Parnevik was a famous actor and comedian back in the 1970s, known for impressions.
In Sweden it is the same as in the US:
the media is controlled by Intelligence.
So, we may assume the Parneviks also have Intel connections.
So why was Elin chosen?
Hold onto your hat. It may be because she is a twin.
She has a twin sister, Josephin.
When the Parneviks brought Elin to the US to be their nanny, they brought Josephin as well.
We have seen in many previous papers that Intel loves twins.
Although Tiger and Elin were married for over five years, there aren't that many pictures of them together, and none of the pictures of them together are convincing.
He later dated Lindsey Vonn, but she looks to me like another paid escort, and is probably gay herself.
She was previously married to skier Thomas Vonn, but according to the internet he has never been seen or photographed with any other woman besides Lindsey.
As you see, Maria is very mannish, and is almost six feet tall.
Before she married her wimpy manager in 2011, she had never been connected to any men.
Another girlfriend they dredged up for Tiger in 2011 was 22-year-old Alyse Lahti Johnson, who just happened to be the daughter of one of the reps at IMG, Tiger's promoter.
There is no real evidence linking him to any of them.
They are just a b-list of pornstars and cocktail waitresses.
The best evidence we get is a few voicemails that Tiger could have faked in about five minutes.
None of them came forward with babies or paternity suits, as happens with real straight guys —especially straight guys who allegedly won't wear condoms.
Plus, take that information back a step.
If Tiger was known to have been sleeping with all these hodogs in 2008-2009, and admitted it, why would his own rep set him up with his 22-year-old daughter?
Did this rep want to see his daughter come down with a cocktail of STD's?
C'mon, make sense!
I am certainly not the first to claim Tiger is gay.
Just google on it and you will find pages of claims, including first-hand eyewitness claims from one of the ladies above, Loredana Ferriolo.
These are some of the evilest companies in the world, and they are owned by the same billionaires and trillionaires that own everything else.
As with porn, the government pretends to want to clean up sports, but it is all a show.
They don't want to clean up anything, not porn, not gambling, not prostitution, and especially not the drug market.
They profit magnificently from all of them and want to keep expanding the markets.
Even the major scandals like that of Lance Armstrong only help them sell more PEDs, since the scandals prove to your average athletes that the drugs work.
With this in mind, we see why Tiger began taking them, bulking up in the early 2000s in ways that can only come from PEDs.
As I said, he didn't need them.
You don't really need to enhance your performance after you have won the Masters by 12 strokes, do you?
You just need to maintain.
But part of the Tiger Woods project was selling drugs.
It is now part of just about every project.
So, he was paid to take them.
He was the first poster boy for the ripped golfer, and his example led quickly to a takeover of the entire field, and then to a takeover of the entire sport at all levels.
50-year-old duffers are now on PEDs.
They may not be able to break 90, but they can strip fat from their bodies with no effort.
They can wear that shirt that is a size too small and show off their biceps while shooting 108.
All professional sports are just managed games, so it doesn't really matter whether they are clean or not.
Would it have mattered if professional wrestling had been clean in 1975?
No, because it was a big fake.
Well, you can say the same about all sports now.
If you took all the drugs out of the sports, they would still be faked.
That is, managed.
Professional sports are a form of entertainment, and as such they can play by their own internal rules.
There is no real oversight, because—as with everything else —there is no one left to regulate anything.
The trillionaires who own everything also own the government, and they are not going to regulate themselves.
So, they do whatever they want.
What they want to do at this point in history is fool you into buying as much of their worthless shit as they can, and that includes:
PEDs
fabulously overpriced sports equipment
exorbitant green fees
bloated cable packages
and a raft of other:
products
cures
surgeries
and therapies.
I am not saying that sports are totally faked.
In other words, in golf they aren't manipulating ball flights with camera tricks or something (as far as I know).
That would require paying off on-site galleries, or hiring them, and I don't imagine that is happening.
No, these guys on Tour can play golf extremely well, and in some cases, we may be seeing natural outcomes.
But since all sports are managed for maximum profit (and maximum propaganda delivery), many outcomes are not natural.
They are scripted.
As I said, it doesn't take much to script a golf tournament, since you only have to script the top few finishers.
It doesn't matter who loses or by how much, so everything below 2nd place can be unscripted.
Which means you only need to be in control of the top five guys each week, and maybe the top 10 or 20 in the country.
Almost no one else has a look-in.
This is even more true in tennis, where the same people win almost every week.
In golf, the field is actually somewhat broader than in most sports, but to counteract that, the field is narrower in another way:
almost without exception, these guys are from rich Republican families, families that are already running the country.
As such, they are pretty easy to buy off, as long as they get theirs in some way.
Most of them don't want to be Tiger Woods, since they don't have the stamina or the acting chops to pull it off.
They just want to be seen looking snazzy on TV and making an easy paycheck.
Which brings us back to Tiger's divorce, which I said also looks scripted to me.
But why would they script that?
It caused Tiger to lose his sponsors and is said to have cost shareholders at least $5 billion.
It looks like it will keep him from breaking Nicklaus' record.
And it has cost the PGA Tour huge losses in revenues.
Yes, so there must be even greater gains somewhere, gains you are missing.
Let's start by defusing the losses.
The billionaires don't care about shareholder losses, unless they are the shareholders.
But of course they have ways around such losses.
Since they know what is going to happen before it happens, they can sell stocks before any event, letting others take the losses.
As for the record, they don't care about that.
And a lot of the people they paid off probably agreed to be part of the con only if Tiger wasn't allowed to break Jack's record.
As for the PGA Tour's losses, they also don't care about that.
That is just written off as a business expense.
The Tour is a front for more important things, and the gains far outweigh the losses.
For instance?
Tiger Woods' divorce is just another card played in the break-up of the sexes.
The trillionaires wish to totally dissolve the family and the heterosexual relationship, since they have found they can profit magnificently from that break-up.
That is why they are now pushing:
trannies
porn
metrosexuality
omnisexuality
and every other oddity they can come up with.
In short, they don't want men and women gratifying one another for free anymore in any way.
They want you to have to pay in a multitude of ways every time you get horny.
A lot of these new programs are aimed at women, because if they wean heterosexual women off men altogether, the job is as good as done.
They figured out decades ago they don't have to target both sexes.
If you ruin one, both are ruined.
So, the main goal of the Tiger Woods project in 2009 was to make men look like pigs to women.
The Tiger Woods project was just one arm of the nationwide and worldwide project, a project that included just about every famous man on the planet, living, dead, or animated, including Homer Simpson and the Family Guy.
It included John Mayer, remember, in the same year, apologizing for everything, but especially just being male.
Am I saying all these guys are not creeps and are innocent?
No.
But I am saying that a large number of these cases, like that of Tiger Woods, may be manufactured for the same reason his was:
to dissolve society and especially the male-female relationship.
Destroying the family and the male-female relationship is incredibly profitable across the board, because it requires compensatory acts of a thousand varieties, and all these acts cost money.
As I said, men and women who get along can gratify one another directly for free.
They can entertain themselves.
But once that is gone, it has to be replaced by other forms of entertainment—which aren't free.
In the same way, the family is self-supporting and self-entertaining as well, or once was.
It used to be able to grow its own food, cook its own meals, and make up its own games and exercise.
No more.
Now all of these things have to be purchased.
And since the purchased replacements aren't as natural or satisfying as the originals, everyone is left hungry even after being “entertained”.
To fill this void requires a thousand other stop-gaps, including:
therapy
drugs
alcohol
tobacco
garbage snack food
candy
porn
and body alteration.
All these have also become multi-billion-dollar businesses.
So your misery is no accident.
It has been caused on purpose.
Your entire world has been manufactured to push you into unnecessary purchases and actions.
This, while at the same time all your necessary actions have been prevented.
All the things you should be doing you aren't doing, and this is just as your controllers want it.
Which brings us to the last goal of the Tiger project I will cover here.
It is no accident that Tiger's infidelities came to light at the end of 2009.
All during 2009 the billionaires and trillionaires were siphoning fantastic sums directly from the treasury, and Congress was just sitting by and watching.
Remember how Timothy Geithner was brought in that year to dole out billions to the banks?
They called it TARP and P-PIP and various other things, but it was basically just a massive steal in broad daylight.
P-PIP was an “investment program” to buy toxic assets from ailing banks.
Great investment, right?
If the assets had been worth anything, they wouldn't have been “toxic”.
So why was Congress buying them in your name?
Why were poor people bailing out rich people?
We never got an answer to that, just a series of raises in the debt ceiling so that the rich could steal more.
In other words, these front-page stories like Tiger's divorce were created so that they didn't have to put real news on the front page.
The same can be said for all of sports, which are basically a diversion from real events.
They want you following sports and Hollywood rather than paying attention to their grand thefts from the treasury.
Tiger's entire career has been a diversion of that sort, and so has every other “major story” of the past century.
The press does not exist to report real events, you know, it exists to divert you away from real events at all costs.
Tiger's rise in 1997 was exactly the same sort of diversion.
Princess Diana's death was faked that summer, the North Hollywood Shootout was faked in February, the fake Tim McVeigh trials were that year, Gianni Versace's death was faked, Harry Potter hit the shelves, and the faked Lewinsky Scandal was scheduled for 1998.
Every year has to have its share of huge faked and managed events, to drown out all real and important events.
How managed was Tiger's career?
We will probably never know, unless some insider spills the beans.
Most of the evidence I have shown you above is circumstantial, and so anything I have said or could say is just speculative.
In other words, we have a mountain of red flags all pointing in the same direction, but that isn't proof any of his wins were faked or managed, much less all of them.
His fame and influence was obviously manufactured, but the extent to which his stats were manufactured is beyond my calculation.
His record could be tweaked here and there, or it could be manufactured from the ground up.
To find out, it would take a lot more digging than I am interested in doing.
For now, all I can do it report what I discovered above, and let you come to your own conclusions.
One last bit of evidence for you, and this bit is statistical.
Tiger's win rate relative to his other stats doesn't really pan out relative to the other greats.
Here is what I mean:
if we look at how many times Tiger won when he was in contention, the rate is fantastically high.
Sam Snead's ratio of wins to top tens in the majors, for instance, was 7/48.
or .15.
Tom Watson's was 8/46, or .17.
Gary Player's was 9/44, or .2.
Ben Hogan's was 9/40, or .23.
Nicklaus' ratio was 18/73, or .25.
Tiger's is 14/38, or .37.
That is a statistical anomaly not easy to explain.
You will say Tiger was just that much better when in contention, but do you really think he was 48% better than Jack Nicklaus under pressure?
Almost half again better than the second best?
Statistically, it is very unlikely.
An easier way for you to see, perhaps, is to compare the number of times Nicklaus came in 2nd in the majors to the number of times Woods did.
Nicklaus' ratio of wins to 2nds is 18/19.
Tiger's is 14/6.
We see the same lack of 2nds and 3rds in Woods stats beyond the majors as well.
Again, you will say it is because Tiger cowed his competition, even more than Nicklaus.
Maybe.
But what we have discovered in our research yields another possibility:
maybe the competition wasn't so much cowed or wowed as it was managed.
Whatever you may think of that, my educated opinion is that a lot of outcomes on the PGA Tour were managed, and not only the outcomes of Tiger. † Since I have shown in dozens of papers that everything else has been faked or managed, it would be the height of foolishness to assume all outcomes on the PGA Tour are real.
Assumptions should be based on past experience, and given what we know now, our assumption should be that nothing is as it appears.
You are not going to be presented with it naturally, at least not by the media we now have.
Update May 2019:
the Masters this year was the most suspicious tournament I have ever watched.
Tiger walked to a victory without even putting any pressure on his competitors.
His final round 70 was a yawn, and everyone else folded for no apparent reason.
It looks like they were instructed to take their dives on 12.
The long hitters Johnson and Koepka were the worst actors, not even making the fix believable.
The post tournament interviews were a dead giveaway, with everyone crying tears of joy that Tiger had beaten them.
They were honored to get second to such a champion, blah blah.
If they have these guys wired, feeding them lines, they really need to hire better scriptwriters.
Even my dad commented on how phony it sounded.
Also suspicious was all the money made in betting on Tiger's win.
Betting on golf is always a long shot, due to the number of players involved.
It isn't just two teams.
So, the huge sums of money placed on Tiger indicate insider knowledge.
It reminds us of the put options placed on airlines before 911.
And the first thing Tiger said in his interview?
Pay attention:
“It was unreal.”
Yeah.
And a couple of weeks later he won the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
For winning golf tournaments.
What does that have to do with freedom?
What use is that to a President, or to anyone?
I guess it is useful to the corporate sponsors of the US government.
“The President of the United States. . . brought to you by J. P. Morgan Chase, Comcast, and Nike.”
*Londino, Lawrence J. Tiger Woods: a Biography, 2005. p. 21.
Tiger Woods: A Biography - Lawrence J. Londino - Google Books ** The Tonya Harding event wasn't faked to split up the sexes, obviously, but I do think it was manufactured. † While we are at it, Greg Norman's shot on 18 at the 1986 Masters also looked suspicious, and I now suspect it was scripted.
