We turn our attention now to the weighty problem of identifying the gods. Some mistakes have been made in the past when people tried to cross match the pantheons of contemporary civilizations. For example the Egyptian goddess Hathor became identified with the Roman goddess Venus and so on.

The mistakes are easy to make because the Goddess Hathor was actually originally the Sumerian Nin-Khursag, the Mother of Inanna, who is also known as the Akkadian Ishtar, the Semitic Astaroth, the Greek Aphrodite, the Norse Freja and finally the Roman Venus etc.

As we know the positions of the gods in the various pantheons and their attributes and relationships to each other, we can re-identify who they really are. Surprisingly we find that all the separate pantheons of the Aryans, the Sumerians, the Egyptians, the Greeks, the Romans, the Vikings and so on, all appear to be derived from a very ancient family genealogy of "gods". These gods furthermore seem to stem from the early Sumerian pantheon.

However, recent research confirms that the original Sumerians were descended from the Ubaid, a proto-Aryan, Pictish culture which originated in the region encompassing Carpathia, Transylvania and the White Mountains where the Greek gods originated, which later became known as Scythia.

It is suggested therefore that the Sumerian gods (the ancient deific royal family) were imported with the Ubaid Picts from Transylvania, Carpathia and Scythia. Scholars relate that the name Sumer is pronounced Shumer, the sh for s indicating a linguistic relationship with early Goidelic, and thus it is closely related by pronunciation to the Gaelic Sumaire, meaning, as we know, a vampire and a "reptile" - a Dragon.

Reminiscent of the racial term "Gallic" (Gaelic) the word GALL in Sumerian means "navigator" (nautonnier) and implies guardianship and overlordship. In Barker’s theory of Cybernetics, (management systems) the entity or mechanism controlling any system, be it social or mechanical, must operate at a technologically (or genetically) higher frequency or capacity than the system that it controls, otherwise chaos will ensue and the system will spin out of control. This guiding entity or facility, is termed in cybernetics the ’nautonnier’ or navigator.

In Gaelic, the language of the Nautonniers, stated by many scholars to be, in an early form, a precursive language of the Aryans, the dialectic u is pronounced i when it follows a consonant at the beginning of a word, and so the first syllable of both Sumaire and Sumer would then have been pronounced Shee, directly related to Sidhe and the Sidheans or Scythians. Both would then be pronounced the same - Sheemar.

And indeed evidence for just such a case lands in our laps from the pages of the Bible’s Book of Genesis, where it states that "the cities of Babylon, Akkad and Erech are in the land of Shin’Ar". Shin’Ar is Sumeria and so our Shee pronunciation finds credence in the very word of God itself!

Furthermore if we look at Shin’Ar with "our vampire eyes" (apologies to Anne Rice) and remember the Ubaid origin of Sumerian and hence, via Akkadian, the "Gaelic" origin of Hebrew as well, we will see Shin as Sidhean and Ar as Arya. Sidhean was the name of King Elinus of Albany in the 7th century A.D. His full name was Gille Sidhean (Jille-She’en) meaning Steward of the Fey. Sidhean was pronounced with the dh remaining dialectically silent as it sometimes does in Sidhe or Shee, giving us Sheen for Sidhean.

The Ar component can be found in Takla Makan where it forms part of the phrase Arshi Cantu or Arya-Sidhe Canto (Tocharian ’A’), the devotional, "power-wisdom" language of the Aryan Scythian inhabitants of western China (Aryan Sanskrit: China [soft ch - as in the French word - chat] or Shin’Ar!), who were named the Tocharians.

It would appear then that the ’Ar-shi’ phrase used by the eastern Scythian-Aryans to describe their spiritual language is reversed and repeated in the Hebrew name Shin’Ar, or Sidhean-Arya. And what does Shin’Ar mean? Exactly the same as it means in Sumerian - SU.ME. - Lord of the Powers.

In addition the Sumerian SI means righteous, pertaining to a god - (related to the Gothic - guth [and hence the Goths and the Godthi druids of the Danes] - one who has power over the fate or destiny of others, a fairy). SHU in Sumerian means Supreme, also used in relation to the gods so SHU.MER would, in any case, mean Supreme Lords, which is the same as Power Lords (Arya-Sidhe) whilst the word supreme is related to Uber and therefore denotes a Vampire and an Overlord - A Guardian.

If the m in either Sumer or Sumaire was originally intended to be mh then both Sumer and Sumaire would have been pronounced Shiva or Sidha, both of which are connected with the Elves, the Aryan god ’Siva the Destroyer’ and the siddhis - the powers. Sumer is thought to mean "land of the guardians".

A guardian - a "Watcher" - is an overseer, and from this meaning we obtain the Scythian word uber, meaning a vampire or Overlord (by association, we also obtain from "watcher" the word Nefilim, which relates to the Anunnagi or Anunnaki).

Here we remember again the proto-Sumerian Ubaid Pictish culture which migrated in about 5000 BC from Scythian Carpathia, a land which had a Dragon Culture also as early as 5000 BC. Monumental stone carvings of winged serpents from 3500 BC have been found in Transylvania, along with a "proto"-Sumerian script dating back as far as 8000 BC. The figures incorporated on the clay tablets found at Tartaria in Transylvania are almost identical with Sanskrit and early Egyptian pictograms.

Tantalizingly, the Goidelic mh couplet is exactly the same as the Goidelic bh, both of which are pronounced v. It isn’t fantastical to suggest that both bh and mh lost their h’s and have been substituted and re-substituted arbitrarily, one for the other over the course of the centuries. It has happened everywhere else, why not here? Further, the mer and maire syllables in Sumer and Sumaire are related in the Sumerian Me and the Gaelic Mor.

In Sumerian ME means Lord or Master (an Overseer or Overlord) and in Gaelic Mor means ’high’ (also related to mountain and thus ’dweller on the mountain’ one who soars to the heights - a druid or Merlin) and is used as a suffix to the names of Scotic chieftains or kings as in - ’The Conor Mor’ - the High King (or Overlord) of the Clan Conor, for example.

If Sumer means guardian and thus overlord, then so does sumaire and the SU component thus means ’the Power’ - the Sidhe or Siddhi. ME is also, it seems, specifically related to wisdom and knowledge (the Aryas) and in both senses therefore the ’sumer’ or ’sumaire’, being one and the same thing - is a derkesthai, a dragon - a fact born out by every other piece of evidence you might care to mention. Sumer and Sumaire mean therefore - Lord of the Powers - SU.ME.

The Ubaid culture was named after the place where in 1919 H.R. Hall discovered the ruins of an ancient settlement. Since then archaeologists made significant finds of blue-spiralled or labyrinthine decorated pottery and, up to the late 1960’s, stone tools had also been found.

This "Ubaid" people who had been "cast down" (Nefilim) from their lofty abodes in the mountains of the North, fleeing south to Sumeria in about 5000 BC are now considered by academics to be the founders of Sumerian civilization.

According to Zechariah Sitchin - in 1852 the Reverend Charles Foster (’The One Primeval Language’) proved that all languages, including early Chinese and other Far Eastern languages, stemmed from one primeval source - thereafter shown to be Sumerian.

This is palpably untrue as we now know, because the Sumerian civilization and its language were brought to Mesopotamia by the Ubaid, who were early "proto" (?) Scythian-Aryan migrants who fled the Black sea region at the onset of the first Flood.

It follows therefore that all languages stemmed, not from Sumerian, but from the "proto-Sumerian" language of the early Scythian-Aryan Homelands, examples of which we know were discovered in Tartaria in Transylvania.

This language, called by most scholars "proto Indo-European" (and I wish they wouldn’t), was called Gaelic by Canon Beck and other respected academics who were contemporaries of Charles Foster. The Very Reverend Beck quipped that this Aryan Tongue, the mother of modern Irish, was the language of the Garden of Eden. Proto Indo-European is thought to come from an earlier group called Dene-Caucasian, which tends to stress Canon Beck’s point even more.

Recent archaeological discoveries prove that there is many a true word spoken in jest! The present and seemingly vast differences in the varied languages that developed from "Gaelic" can be explained by one phrase - Chronologically Diversified Dialectics.

In the last four hundred years English has changed so much that the bulk of the resident British population would never be able to read Chaucer in the original script. Imagine what happens to a language over, for example, one millennium and several thousand miles.

From northern Mesopotamia to the foothills of Zagros, archaeologists working in the area from the 1970’s onwards, have ascertained that the Ubaid people had built cities which were the first to use: clay bricks, (cf: the Aryan, Mohenjo-Daro and Harrapo settlements of the Indus Valley: 2300 BC, which were controlled by Sumeria) plastered walls, mosaic decorations, cemeteries with brick-lined graves, copper mirrors, beads with imported turquoise, copper-headed tomahawks, cloth, houses, and above all, monumental temple buildings.

However, south in Eridu - the first truly Sumerian city according to the ancient texts - nothing could be excavated from beneath the foundations of the temple of Enki that was any older than 3500 BC. This is clear enough evidence that Sumeria was founded by the Elven queens and kings of the Transylvanian Picts, and the most up to date academic studies and archaeological discoveries corroborate this fact.

In the 1990’s it was revealed by academics that the Ubaid priesthood wore leopard (Panther) skins (cf. Jesus ben Panther!) and tattooed themselves in a similar fashion to the British Picts and the Tocharian Aryans of Takla Makan. The pointy shamanic headdress, (worn by the god-kings and queens of the Indus pantheon as well), was also of Aryan origin, with or without the horns.

Moving from Romania, via Anatolia to Mesopotamia, the Ubaid left a trail of Tells or Raths, wall decorations, spirally decorated pottery and brick built structures. In Northern Mesopotamia, which has very little workable stone, they continued to use clay and plaster, whilst in the south, where rocks are plentiful, they built the Ziggurats or sacred mountains that reminded them of the holy peaks of their Carpathian homelands. When the Sumerians took over Magan or Egypt, their Ziggurats became Pyramids.

In very little time at all after their arrival in Mesopotamia they had found and were working copper - centuries before other people’s bronze ages. Their chief god-king Enki had been an adept at mining (earning him the epithet "The Lord of Mining" - Bel Nimiki) and had, according to the later Sumerian texts, invented brickmaking, the planning and building of cities and metallurgy, which earned him the name Nidimmud - "He who makes things".

His fairy descendants since then have all earned epithets associated with mines and alchemy, such as Dwarves, Goblins, Kobelins, Trolls, Gnomes, etc., and, as in the case of the Tuadha d’Anu, they have always been renowned for their skill in many crafts and arts.

The place was called Al’Ubaid and was located just north or Ur, or Eridu as it was once called. The article Al in Al’Ubaid denotes that the location was named "of the Ubaids" and rather than the culture merely being named after its site of discovery, the actual site itself was named after the Ubaids in the first place, who had migrated south via Anatolia and Galatia, from whence we originally derived the word vampire - the Uber.

Although the meanings are self evident and the implications thereof are quite plain, It might be educative to meditate on the further implications of Sumer spelt Subher in connection with the Scythian (Ubaid) uber and the possible common European migration of the consonants b and p which give rise to our word super - as in supervisor - a guardian or overlord - an Ubaid.

In so doing and in heeding all above, we are left with the conclusion that the so-called Sumerian gods, repeatedly symbolized by serpents or dragons, are an Aryan-Scythian import of the earlier Ubaid settlers whose gods were the dragons incarnate themselves - the Uber or vampire queens and kings - the Ubaid Overlords. The overseer or one who sees over or "beyond" is one who sees above others and one who thus sees clearly. One who sees clearly is a derkesthai, a dragon.

That these serpent gods were later referred to by the Sumerian people themselves as the Anunnagi from whence is derived naga, a serpent or dragon god of the Vedas, seems fairly conclusive. That the Nagas themselves were Devas - meaning shining ones - repeating the meaning of the name Anunnagi as shining ones (shimmerers - Sumerers) squeezes one into a corner.

Archaeological discoveries in the 1960’s, of what was to become known as ’proto-Sumerian’ script, dug up from ash pits in Transylvania should be compared with Tartarian traditions there, which assert that Lilith and her brother were born in Transylvania as a result of a mating between the "Keshalyi", the queen of the mountain fairies, and the "Locolico", the king of the dwellers of the underworld mounds, situated in the forests and plains.

This is echoed in the marriage of Nergal (Nagal - Naga) of the underworld and Eresh Kigal, a netherworld goddess in whom one can see the prototype of Persephone. As with all ancient tales, the plot become confused but by looking at comparable stories, some light can be shed on the truth.

Eresh Kigal was not a lady or queen of the mountains, but Ninkhursag her grand-mother, was. It is interesting to see how the identity of the grandmother filtered down to the grand-daughter however, indicating that the myth of the region once included all the characters who elsewhere still feature in relationship to each other.

As interesting though is the possibility that we might find a clue to the triple goddess concept in the very grandmother- mother-daughter theme suggested by the muddling of characteristics in the Transylvanian story. It is quite feasible that triple goddesses are not solely depictions of the three stages of womanhood, the moon, earth or what have you, but the half-forgotten relationships of a holy dynasty.

As I have indicated above, in Greek mythology there is a relationship between Demeter, Persephone, Kore and Diana-Hecate. If we transpose this series into the Sumerian, we have Ninkhursag, Ningal, Eresh Kigal and Lilith as linear descendants.

In Transylvania the Keshalyi queen becomes Eresh Kigal, and the Lilith of the Transylvanians and the Sumerians becomes the Diana-Hecate of the Greeks who, as a moon goddess, one might be tempted to turn into the Egyptian Isis, but stay your hand I say, and read on!

If we read descriptions of the "Sumerian" Lilith, taken from Hebrew sources, we discover that she, like her Grandfather Enlil (Zeus) and her uncles Minos and Rhadamanthus, and her cousin Ariadne of the labyrinth, had red hair and pale skin, and was called the Alien Queen of the North, indicating that both by her complexion and her stated geographical origin, she was a proto-Aryan or proto-Scythian. So the indications are that Lilith, along with the entire holy family of gods, was a Ubaid import from Carpathia who later became a Sumerian goddess.

It would be fair to say therefore that if Lilith was born in the mountainous regions that stood next door to where Zeus and Prometheus battled, (who were also identified with "Sumerian" gods), then so were her kin. It would then be simplistic to say that the gods of all the pantheons were descended from the Sumerian. It is more likely that they all, including the Sumerian, originated from the proto-Scythian Aryan culture.

As each group migrated and their descendants settled in their respective domains, becoming isolated by geography, and the passing centuries, from the source of their original spiritual culture, and also because of the inevitable influence of the belief systems of the aboriginal cultures that the migrants either vanquished or co-habited and integrated with, the names of their gods changed.

In some historical comparisons of the various pantheons, and indeed in the pantheons themselves, there will have been mistakes made because there was no understanding or overview of the relationships between the deities. In the case of the Vedas, as Sitchin remarks, consistency and precision are not the hallmarks of this Sanskrit literature. Such an observation holds true for much of spiritual literature worldwide, as memory fades and the gaps are filled in to create myth out of history.

By a comparative study of the pantheons and beliefs, we may discover a consistent vein by which we may adjust all the pantheons, where such stem from a recognizable common source. One example is the case of the Aryan God Kasyapa who was the father of the Asuras, the elder gods. One pantheon has him down as Dyaus Pater and identifies him with Zeus. Zeus or Enlil was the father of the younger gods, the Olympians who in the Aryan pantheon are called the Adityas, who were also fathered by Kasyapa who fathered the elder gods which Zeus didn’t.

Thus there is an anomaly which, I am pleased to report, is easily resolved when we learn that Kasyapa means Sky Father and so does Anu! In Sumeria the elder and younger gods are the offspring of Anu and the elder gods are led by Enki, whilst the younger gods are led by his brother Enlil. Enki’s followers are the Asher, corresponding to the Asura of the Aryans, the Aesir of the Danes and the Aes Danu - the Tuadha d’Anu of the Irish.