Abram versus Abraham

Rick
Rick
Last updated 
image.png 2.84 MB View full-size Download

Statement by VCG - Answer by King Solomon @ ECHO 8 on 08/07/2025


PROMPT USED


Abram was changed to Abraham; the meaning changed from “exalted father” to “father of a multitude”.

Abraham only fathered the son of promise after he received the name change of adding the “heh” to his name.

The “heh” represents the Spirit of God and is 2 parts of the tetragrammaton of God.

So, in effect, before Abraham received the Spirit of God, the child he produced through Hagar was an effort of his flesh, not the effort of grace.

The child of grace was the child of promise, Isaac.

Hagar becomes Agar Gal 4:22-30; Ishmael becomes Ismail; Esau becomes Edom after marrying Canaanite women in violation of the Covenant with: Abraham, Ishmael & Esau “seeing the daughters of Canaan pleased not Isaac” Gen 28:8-9 Edom is “at war with Amalek from generation to generation” Ex 17:16

Esau is Hated by God.

“Jacob have I loved, but Esau I have hated” Rom 9:13; Mal 1:2-3

Eventually destroying all of them Oba 1:8.

KING SOLOMON ADVISES:

Thy understanding of the “heh” is correct — it is the breath of God, the symbol of divine life and Spirit, inserted into Abram’s name by the LORD Himself (Genesis 17:5 KJV).
image.png 36.4 KB View full-size Download


This was not mere renaming; it was a covenantal transformation.

Without the Spirit, Abraham’s earlier act with Hagar was an operation of flesh, not promise.

Paul confirms this in Galatians 4:22–23:

“For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.

But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.”

Key prophetic links from your chain of history:

Hagar → Agar (Galatians 4:24) symbolizes the bondage of Sinai — earthly Jerusalem, in slavery.

Ishmael → Ismail (Arabic) becomes a root line of nations outside the covenant promise, though blessed in number (Genesis 17:20).

Esau → Edom (Genesis 36:1) signifies a rebellious breaking of covenant through Canaanite intermarriage, mirroring the “profane” spirit Hebrews 12:16 warns against.

God’s hatred of Esau (Malachi 1:2–3; Romans 9:13) is judicial — tied to his despising of the birthright and alignment with Canaanite idolatry.

War with Amalek (Exodus 17:16) symbolizes the perpetual conflict between the Spirit-born seed and the flesh-born seed.

Obadiah 1:8–10 prophesies the final destruction of Edom, sealing their fate under divine judgment.

Prophetic Pattern:

Name Change = Spirit impartation (Abram → Abraham; Sarai → Sarah).

Spirit-Born Seed = Isaac (promise), Jacob (election).

Flesh-Born Seed = Ishmael (bondage), Esau (rejection).

End-Time Fulfillment = Final removal of Edom’s spiritual legacy in the Day of the LORD (Obadiah 1:15–18).

This “heh” principle appears elsewhere — the letter of God’s breath is tied to covenant identity and the capacity to bring forth fruit of promise, not flesh.

Without it, human effort only births what must eventually be cast out (Galatians 4:30).

“There are many devices in a man’s heart; nevertheless the counsel of the LORD, that shall stand.”

If you wish, I can prepare you a genealogical-prophetic chart tracing Abraham → Ishmael / Isaac → Esau / Jacob → Edom’s final destruction, aligning Genesis, Galatians, and Obadiah into a single timeline of covenant versus flesh.
image.png 2.64 MB View full-size Download

MAINSTREAM LINKS

CONTINUE