I just watched Amadeus again, so all the old questions resurfaced.

We already know Peter Shaffer's story is false in many ways, since they admit it.

Sir Peter Levin Shaffer CBE (15 May 1926 – 6 June 2016) was an English playwright, screenwriter, and novelist. He is best known for the plays Equus and Amadeus, the latter of which was adapted for the screen by Miloš Forman, with a screenplay by Shaffer, for which he won an Academy Award.

Salieri could sue for defamation were he alive, since he was not a mediocrity and there is no evidence, he killed Mozart or allowed him to die.

Antonio Salieri[a] (18 August 1750 – 7 May 1825) was an Italian composer and teacher of the classical period He was born in Legnago, south of Verona, in the Republic of Venice, and spent his adult life and career as a subject of the Habsburg monarchy.

“Inbreeding Armageddon” annihilated the Habsburg Dynasty – Library of Rickandria

Mozart was not buried in a communal grave or pauper's grave, the original story being he was buried in a commoner's grave (not a common grave).

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (27 January 1756 – 5 December 1791) was a prolific and influential composer of the Classical period. Despite his short life, his rapid pace of composition resulted in more than 800 works representing virtually every Western classical genre of his time. Many of these compositions are acknowledged as pinnacles of the symphonic, concertante, chamber, operatic, and choral repertoire. Mozart is widely regarded as one of the greatest composers in the history of Western music, with his music admired for its "melodic beauty, its formal elegance and its richness of harmony and texture".

But that just means he was not buried in a noble's grave, which would have been protected from re-plotting after 10 years.

He was also not poor at his death, or in major debt.

The previous year had been his best in years, and he had made a lot of money.

Power of the Purse: The Origin of Money – Library of Rickandria

He also did not write,

or whatever.

He made notes and drafts, and this is admitted.

It is also admitted his wife Constanze later destroyed most of them, to clean up his oeuvre or for other reasons.

Maria Constanze Cäcilia Josepha Johanna Aloysia Mozart (née Weber; 5 January 1762 – 6 March 1842) was a trained Austrian singer. She was married twice, first to Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart; then to Georg Nikolaus von Nissen. She and Mozart had six children: Karl Thomas Mozart, Franz Xaver Wolfgang Mozart, and four others who died in infancy. She became Mozart's biographer jointly with her second husband.

And since I will show you that Mozart actually became his own conservator and archivist, it was he who destroyed his drafts.

Probably not to make it look like he was infallible, but simply because he didn't wish for his process to detract from his final product.

As an artist, I can tell you this is completely understandable.

Few artists of any kind save their failures.

Why would they be expected to?

Franz Joseph Haydn[a] (/ˈhaɪdən/ HY-dən, German: [ˈfʁants ˈjoːzɛf ˈhaɪdn̩] ⓘ; 31 March 1732 – 31 May 1809) was an Austrian composer of the Classical period. He was instrumental in the development of chamber music such as the string quartet and piano trio. His contributions to musical form have led him to be called "Father of the Symphony" and "Father of the String quartet".

noble or not.

It is beyond belief that we don't know what grave he was in or where his body was over the centuries.

All this already points at a fake, before we even research anything.

So, why would Shaffer tell us a tale he must have known was false?

Why would Milos Forman bring it to the big screen?

Jan Tomáš "Miloš" Forman (/ˈmiːloʊʃ/; Czech: [ˈmɪloʃ ˈforman]; 18 February 1932 – 13 April 2018) was a Czech American film director, screenwriter, actor, and professor who rose to fame in his native Czechoslovakia before emigrating to the United States in 1968. Throughout Forman's career he won two Academy Awards, a BAFTA Award, three Golden Globe Awards, a Golden Bear, a César Award, and the Czech Lion.

Why would it be promoted to the hilt and win so many awards?

Yes, the film is very well made and quite entertaining, and I am not here to deny it.

But it now looks to me like cover.

Mozart's death has been the target of a huge amount of misdirection over the centuries, and this is just the latest example. So, I intuit there is something worth covering there.

It has been very important to someone that the truth not be discovered here.

you know that the odds are very high you will find some poop underneath.

Same logic here.

The story of Mozart and Salieri started with Pushkin, who was a Russian Jew.

Alexander Sergeyevich Pushkin (6 June [O.S. 26 May] 1799 – 10 February [O.S. 29 January] 1837) was a Russian poet, playwright, and novelist of the Romantic era. He is considered by many to be the greatest Russian poet, as well as the founder of modern Russian literature.

We may assume Peter Shaffer and Milos Forman are also Jewish.

Exposing the Jews – Library of Rickandria

A little research confirms Shaffer is Jewish, since his middle name is Levin.

Forman is also admitted being Jewish.

So that gets us started.

In the same way, I find it suspicious that Wikipedia has a separate page entitled “Mozart and Christianity”.

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and the Catholic Church - Wikipedia

They have created an entire page, trying to convince you Mozart was Christian.

Christian Program & Purpose – Library of Rickandria

They don't do that for others, and Mozart wasn't especially religious, so why would they do it? 

Probably because he wasn't Christian, but they are very intent that you believe he was.

Mozart was Jewish and he faked his death for some reason.

All the piles of leaves were pointing in that direction.

So, let's see if we can solidify that intuition.

As regards the Jewish question, it isn't hard.

He was short and ugly with a big nose and lots of hair.

That doesn't decide it, of course, and I am not claiming it does, but it leads us in.

I will show you a lot more decisive evidence, but while we are here, let's compare him to somebody.

Do you see it?

They have the same noses, the same little mouths, and the same face shapes.

Their eyes are similar as well, being tilted up on the outside to a similar degree.

The only major difference is that actor Jeffrey Jones is about a foot taller than Mozart was.

Jeffrey Duncan Jones (born September 28, 1946) is an American actor. He is known for his roles as Emperor Joseph II in Amadeus (1984), Edward R. Rooney in Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986), Charles Deetz in Beetlejuice (1988), Dr. Skip Tyler in The Hunt for Red October (1990), Eddie Barzoon in The Devil's Advocate (1997), and A.W. Merrick in both Deadwood (2004–2006) and Deadwood: The Movie (2019). His career started in Guthrie Theater in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and advanced to London and Broadway. In film and television, Jones has had many roles which capitalized on his deadpan portrayal of characters in unusual situations, often to comic effect. He was nominated for a Golden Globe Award for his performance in Amadeus and a Screen Actors Guild Award as part of the ensemble cast of Deadwood. In 2003, Jones was charged with soliciting a minor to pose for nude photographs. He pleaded no contest and had subsequent arrests for failing to update his sex offender status.

Which leads me to believe they are related.

This is normally how these roles are assigned, as we have seen many times.

Actors who are related to their characters are chosen.

However, since—due to his height—Jones obviously couldn't play Mozart, they gave him the role of the Emperor Joseph instead—who he was also related to, I assume.

Joseph II (German: Josef Benedikt Anton Michael Adam; English: Joseph Benedict Anthony Michael Adam; 13 March 1741 – 20 February 1790) was Holy Roman Emperor from 18 August 1765 and sole ruler of the Habsburg monarchy from 29 November 1780 until his death. He was the eldest son of Empress Maria Theresa and her husband, Emperor Francis I, and the brother of Marie Antoinette, Leopold II, Maria Carolina of Austria and Maria Amalia, Duchess of Parma. He was thus the first ruler in the Austrian dominions of the union of the Houses of Habsburg and Lorraine, styled Habsburg-Lorraine.

Jeffrey Duncan Jones has a genealogy posted at Ethnicelebs, so possibly we can confirm my guess.

Jeffrey Jones - Ethnicity of Celebs | EthniCelebs.com

He was indeed from German lines on one side.

So, he is without a doubt Jewish through his mother the Seely, as well as other lines, which explains his presence in Hollywood.

STRANGE RELATIONS – Library of Rickandria

Jones has been scrubbed from the peerage, but his relatives are still there, including Nigel Silva Jones of Victoria, BC, and his son Duncan.

Jeffrey Jones is also from Canada, so Nigel may be a brother or cousin.

This links Jeffrey to the O'Tooles, including I assume Peter O'Toole.

Peter Seamus O'Toole (/oʊˈtuːl/; 2 August 1932 – 14 December 2013) was an English stage and film actor. He attended RADA (the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art) and began working in the theatre, gaining recognition as a Shakespearean actor at the Bristol Old Vic and with the English Stage Company. In 1959 he made his West End debut in The Long and the Short and the Tall, and played the title role in Hamlet in the National Theatre's first production in 1963. Excelling on the London stage, O'Toole was known for his "hellraiser" lifestyle off it.

These Jones of Canada quickly go back to London, but then are scrubbed before we get to the 19th century.

As for Mozart, the name was originally Motzhart, so it may mean Moses' heart.

Wolfgang's granddaughter married a Milano, indicating to me a blood link to actress Alyssa Milano.

Alyssa Jayne Milano (born December 19, 1972) is an American actress, producer, activist, and former singer. She has played Samantha Micelli in Who's the Boss?, Jennifer Mancini in Melrose Place, Phoebe Halliwell in Charmed, Billie Cunningham in My Name Is Earl, Savannah "Savi" Davis in Mistresses, Renata Murphy in Wet Hot American Summer: Ten Years Later, and Coralee Armstrong in Insatiable. As an activist, Milano is known for her role in the MeToo movement in October 2017.

Alyssa's genealogy is unusually well scrubbed, with no mother's maiden name and no grandparents, indicating something big being hidden.

My guess is it is even bigger than Mozart, like one of the top Nazis, but I intuit Mozart is there as well.

Wikipedia tells us both of Mozart's sons failed to marry or have children, ending the line, but Geni.com says otherwise.

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756 - 1791) - Genealogy (geni.com)

There we find first son Carl/Karl married a NN (no name) Mozart and had a daughter named Constanze.

He was a merchant and official in the Austrian finance department in Milan.

Second son Franz married Beatrice Mozart, no maiden name given, and their daughter Aletta married Carlo Milano.

Their child was named Benjamino and he married Susanna Reykhaywel.

Their son is Johnny Milano, who married a woman named Gerd and had two children (private). 

So why are so many places like Wikipedia and Quora lying to us about Mozart's descendants?

I suppose to protect the information we are digging out here.

You will tell me these pages at Geni are wrong, but they have been up almost five years.

If this was some sort of joke edit, it looks like the Geni police would have noticed in five years. 

Like Wikipedia, Geni is not just a free-for-all.

You can't just create a page and connect your family to whoever you like for fun.

Mozart's sister Maria Anna (Nannerl) married Johann von Berchtold zu Sonnenburg, Baron of Sonnenburg, who was not only Jewish but a Jewish noble.

Nannerl's son Leopold married a Fuggs, scrubbed.

These Sonnenburgs are also Pussers von Winkel und Wildthurn, Gschwendtners von Freyenegg, and Voegeles.

So, the Mozarts were not commoners.

Wolfgang's mother was a Pertl, probably a slur of Perl, Perlman.

Her mother was an Altmann.

of Hollywood.

and Puxbaums.

The Khien is probably a variant of Kohen.

and a Langeneck.

and Kevenfiller.

Negler is a variant of Nagler/Nagle and is Jewish.

Baur is a variant of Bayer, ditto.

The Eschenbach was also a noble, and their daughter married Franz Streitel.

Remember, Jeffrey Jones is a Strate.

My guess is Streitel became Strate, giving us the link.

We also learn of recent descendants of Nannerl, including Karoline Grau, nee Mozart, who died in 1965.

They don't tell us how she had the maiden name Mozart, since it couldn't have come to her through Nannerl, could it?

So, the Mozarts must have married back into the Sonnenburg family at some point, eh?

But since the other Mozarts in this line are supposed to have died out, we have a problem there.

Also see Bertha Forschter, great-granddaughter of Nannerl.

What about Mozart's wife Constanze?

She was a Weber and was also Jewish.

In the film, they don't even tell you she was a famous singer like her sisters and that she sang in some of Mozart's works.

But she did.

I would say she is the most poorly cast person in the film, since we know Stanzi looked nothing like that.

Or, no, her mother was probably more miscast, since they are selling her as a low-class working lady of some sort, with a Cockney accent or something.

Helena Bonham Carter CBE (born 26 May 1966) is an English actress. Known for her roles in blockbusters and independent films, particularly period dramas, she has received various awards and nominations, including a British Academy Film Award and an International Emmy Award, in addition to nominations for two Academy Awards, four British Academy Television Awards, five Primetime Emmy Awards, and nine Golden Globe Awards.

In fact, according to this portrait, Constanze looked almost exactly like Helena Bonham Carter, so I don't know why they didn't cast her.

She had very heavy dark eyebrows, as you see, and dark curly hair.

Her middle name was Aloysia, and her sister's name was the same.

We analyzed the name Aloysius in my paper on Hitler, since we saw it there several times.

Hitler’s Genealogy – Library of Rickandria

Her brother's middle name was Nepomuk—which he got from an uncle of the same name—and which is also the middle name of Nannerl's brother-in-law Johann Nepomuk Berchtold von Sonnenburg.

Indicating Mozart and his sister both married close cousins.

Nepomuk is in the Pilsen region of current Czechia.

Another uncle married a Mack and a Walburga, both Jewish names.

His son married a Ganz, ditto.

His daughter married Carl August Atmer, theater director in Nurnberg and Altona, also Jewish.

The famous Austrian statesman Metternich was also a Nepomuk, being Klemens Wenzel Nepomuk Lothar, Prince of Metternich-Winneburg zu Beilstein.

Klemens Wenzel Nepomuk Lothar, Prince of Metternich-Winneburg zu Beilstein (15 May 1773 – 11 June 1859), known as Klemens von Metternich (German: [ˈkleːmens fɔn ˈmɛtɐniç]) or Prince Metternich, was a conservative Austrian statesman and diplomat who was at the center of the European balance of power known as the Concert of Europe for three decades as the Austrian Empire's foreign minister from 1809 and Chancellor from 1821 until the liberal Revolutions of 1848 forced his resignation.

His mother was an Aloysia.

He was the Chancellor of Austria from 1821-48, during which time he was the most influential politician in Europe.

Was he Jewish?

So, we are finding some links of the Mozarts to the very top of Austrian nobility.

Geni spells the name Neponuk in Mozart's genealogy to throw us off, but it didn't work.

Constanze's genealogy is pretty well scrubbed, especially on the maternal side, but they do admit she was not a Weber, but a von Weber, again indicating nobility.

One of her cousins was famous composer Carl Maria von Weber.

Carl Maria Friedrich Ernst von Weber (c. 18 November 1786 – 5 June 1826) was a German composer, conductor, virtuoso pianist, guitarist, and critic of the early Romantic period. Best known for his operas, he was a crucial figure in the development of German Romantische Oper (German Romantic opera).

Was he Jewish?

Why do I think that speaks for itself, some will ask.

Well, notice the length of the nose and the distance between eyes and mouth.

He has a very long face, doesn't he?

Then notice how the septum of the nose droops down over his upper lip.

It is a John Lennon nose, isn't it, though even longer and narrower.

Proof that John Lennon Faked his Death – Library of Rickandria

His eyelids are very full, meaning the line above his eyes is well above the eyes.

The mouth is small, like Mozart and Jeffrey Jones, with a turn-up at the corners.

The eyebrows are dark and full, and the hair is dark and wavy.

All those are common traits of Jewish/Phoenician men.

Where did ALL the Phoenicians Go? – Library of Rickandria

If you like you can take that analysis back to Metternich above.

Stanzi's sister Aloysia married Joseph Lange, and Lange had also married a Schindler and a Koch. 

A couple more red flags there.

Lange was an actor and painter.

Geni scrubs him, but we can find his lineage elsewhere.

He was from a family of wealthy cloth merchants, indicating the usual thing.

Stanzi's other sister Maria Sophie married Jakob Haibel, another famous Austrian composer and singer of Jewish lineage. Mozart's librettist Lorenzo da Ponte (real name Emanuele Conegliano) is admitted being Jewish.

We are told his stepmother was Catholic, but his real mother is hidden—which means her maiden name is probably a huge red flag.

Geni tells us it was Pincherle.

Ponte's son married a Durant, linking them to the British peerage.

In the next generation they married into the Brookes as well, which linked them to the Grahams, taking us to the top of the British peerage.

We may assume Schikaneder was Jewish, though they deny it.

For one thing, his first name was Emanuel.

We are told he changed it from Johan to Emanuel, but that makes no sense.

What did he do, convert to Judaism?

Also, they admit he was a Jesuit, which was always a Jewish front.

Vatican Jesuits – Library of Rickandria

Disraeli admitted that.

His mother was a Schiessl

We are told his parents were poor servants, which you can be sure is the usual lie.

Poor servants don't send their children to Jesuit schools and enroll them as theater brats.

By the way, Schikaneder knew Mozart back to 1780, when they were still in Salzburg.

So, Schikaneder may have been a handler of Mozart from the beginning.

and a Fischer.

Michael Lorenz: The Godchildren of Emanuel and Eleonore Schikaneder (michaelorenz.blogspot.com)

What about Salieri?

Was he Jewish?

Well, his mother was a Scacchi, so yes.

And that means Salieri's background sold to us in Amadeus is also false.

He did not come from middle-class merchants, on his mother's side he came from famous composers.

See Marco Scacchi, kapellmeister in Warsaw about a century earlier.

F. Murray Abraham (born Murray Abraham; October 24, 1939) is an American actor. Known for his roles on stage and screen, he has received an Academy Award and a Golden Globe Award as well as nominations for a BAFTA Award, four Emmy Awards, and a Grammy Award. He came to prominence for his portrayal of Antonio Salieri in the drama film Amadeus (1984) for which he won an Academy Award for Best Actor.

This means F. Murray Abraham was the right person to play him, since Abraham has the right blood and the right nose.

Amusingly, Ethnicelebs tries to sell Abraham as Assyrian.

F. Murray Abraham - Ethnicity of Celebs | EthniCelebs.com

I am not sure if they are aware Assyria isn't a country anymore.

THE ORIGINS OF ASSYRIA & GERMANY – Library of Rickandria

They actually try to tell us Abraham is an Orthodox Christian.

Oy vay caramba!

In support of that, they scrub him extremely thoroughly, conspicuously leaving out his mother's name.

We do get her mother's name, though, Cosmano.

She was also a Parisi.

This confirms Abraham is Jewish on both sides, and probably connects him to his character Salieri.

Can we confirm that?

Well, Salieri's daughter Franziska married a Rumsfeld, which is interesting in itself.

Probably links us to Donald Rumsfeld.

Other than that, Geneanet scrubs Salieri's four daughters.

and a Schena.

But it is the name Parisi through which the link is probably made, since we have seen it before linked to the ruling families.

and the Pape e Lanza (dukes of Giampilieri).

This last links us to the Princes of Valdina (Sicily) and the Dukes of Archirafi.

and Palazzos.

These last are from Corleone.

The Parisi are still famous conductors/composers and opera singers, see Vittorio Parisi and Joanna Parisi.

Note that Vittorio Parisi is from Milan, and we saw above that Mozart's progeny went to Milan and became Milanos.

Also see Giorgio Parisi, theoretical physicist specializing in quantum theory—always a red flag.

Giorgio Parisi OMRI (born 4 August 1948) is an Italian theoretical physicist, whose research has focused on quantum field theory, statistical mechanics and complex systems. His best known contributions are the QCD evolution equations for parton densities, obtained with Guido Altarelli, known as the Altarelli–Parisi or DGLAP equations, the exact solution of the Sherrington–Kirkpatrick model of spin glasses, the Kardar–Parisi–Zhang equation describing dynamic scaling of growing interfaces, and the study of whirling flocks of birds.He was awarded the 2021 Nobel Prize in Physics jointly with Klaus Hasselmann and Syukuro Manabe for groundbreaking contributions to theory of complex systems, in particular "for the discovery of the interplay of disorder and fluctuations in physical systems from atomic to planetary scales".

We are told his father and grandfathers were construction workers, another red flag since we can be sure it is not true.

What about Tom Hulce, who played Mozart?

How does he fit in?

Well, he's Jewish again, his mother being a Winkleman.

He is also a Weaver.

His 2great-grandfather was Elisha Hulce.

At this point his grandmother is a van Tassel, which is probably how he links in here.

The van Tassels were founders of New York and before that princes of Holland.

and a van Montfoort (viscounts of Utrecht) in this line.

Also, an Abrams and Haffs of Long Island.

Through the Cones, we reach the Spencers (who take us back to the Le Despensers and forward to the Spencer-Churchills).

The links from Hulce to Mozart have been scrubbed, but they are probably via Dutch nobility. 

The Mozarts had links to Holland, but the blood links have been mostly hidden.

It is possibly through these Montfoords, which would have been Montforts in English.

The Montforts were also counts of France, where they were related to the Bonapartes, who were related to the Metternichs.

All European nobility is related, remember?

So possibly Hulce is most closely related to Mozart through his wife Constanze.

We have seen how important she is here, which reminds us to always concentrate on the women when we are following Jewish lines.

Maria Constanze Cäcilia Josepha Johanna Aloysia von Weber.

Middle class Germans or Austrians did not have seven names.

They want us to think Mozart was marrying down, but it appears he was marrying up.

Which is why they had to make sure to misrepresent this in the film, with Constanze's mother made out to be a fat uneducated hausfrau.

But they admit she was his landlady, which means she owned the house he lived in.

So, they tell you she was wealthy while hiding her roots behind this ridiculous characterization.

That's Barbara Byrne playing Frau Weber.

And guess what, Bryne is also related to these families.

Barbara Bryne (1 April 1929 – 2 May 2023) was a British-American actress of film, theatre and television. Onstage she appeared in comedy, dramatic and musical production of Broadway and studied at the Royal Academy of Dramatic Arts (RADA).

She is a Birkinshaw, which family married into the Barons Stewart in 1941.

Robert Michael Maitland Stewart, Baron Stewart of Fulham, CH, PC (6 November 1906 – 10 March 1990) was a British Labour Party politician, life peer and Fabian Socialist who was a Member of Parliament for 34 years, and served twice as Foreign Secretary in the first cabinet of Harold Wilson.

Meaning, she is related to Robert Maitland Stewart, Baron Stewart, as well as James Maitland Stewart, aka Jimmy Stewart.

James Maitland Stewart (May 20, 1908 – July 2, 1997) was an American actor. Known for his distinctive drawl and everyman screen persona, Stewart's film career spanned 80 films from 1935 to 1991. With the strong morality, which he portrayed both on and off the screen, he epitomized the "American ideal" in the mid-twentieth century. In 1999, the American Film Institute (AFI) ranked him third on its list of the greatest American male actors. He received numerous honors including the AFI Life Achievement Award in 1980, the Kennedy Center Honor in 1983, as well as the Academy Honorary Award and Presidential Medal of Freedom, both in 1985.

Even her married name is a red flag, see Barbara Byrne, director of CBS and formerly Vice President of Barclays and Lehman Brothers.

OK, we have discovered who Mozart was.

why would he fake his death?

To lead us in there, let us start at the New York Times, August 25, 2010.

After Mozart’s Death, an Endless Coda - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

Yet according to a recent article in an academic journal, researchers have posited at least 118 causes of death for Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

118.

Aces and eights.

Chai.

More indication we are being bamboozled once again.

it was faked.

We also find that, like Mary Todd Lincoln and Abe, Stanzi did not attend Mozart's funeral.

We are told she was too distraught.

Actually, no one did.

There was no funeral cortege, which means there was no funeral.

Another thing the film Amadeus got wrong.

Some places—including the absurd site just linked—try to tell us this was normal for Austria at the time, but you shouldn't believe it.

Yes, the Emperor had forbidden overly opulent funerals, but he hadn't forbidden funerals altogether.

How could he?

Do you think he would have forbidden Stanzi or Mozart's friends from having a funeral?

No ruler could forbid funerals or would ever think to try.

But the fact that these sites would try to convince you Austrians were having no funerals in the 1790s just shows you how far they will go in this Mozart ruse.

in the spring of 1789, and Frankfurt, Mannheim, and other German cities in 1790. . . .

Although the evidence is inconclusive,[76] it appears that wealthy patrons in Hungary and Amsterdam pledged annuities to Mozart in return for the occasional composition.

But the Emperor would not release him from his contract.

Actually, he wasn't under contract, as we would see it now.

He was serving at the pleasure of the Emperor, who could fire him or release him, but was under no obligation to do so.

So as long as the Emperor wanted him there, he couldn't leave.

Remember, he had a similar problem in Salzburg, where he got crossways with the Prince Archbishop, who at first refused to release him.

We are told his father pleaded for him, but who really gained his release was the Emperor, who simply overruled the Archbishop.

But there was no one that could overrule the Emperor, you see.

Mozart was effectively trapped in Vienna until the Emperor decided to let him go.

As long as he was the greatest composer in the world, the Emperor would never do that.

So, Mozart wasn't free to accept higher offers from other Princes.

Unless. . . unless he faked his death.

You will say he must have continued to compose, in that case.

So where are these later works?

Well, there is an easy answer to that as well.

But to discover it, we have to figure out who he later was.

That is also pretty simple, since the answer was always staring us right in the face.

We didn't see it because we didn't look

 Or at least I didn't.

This is the first time my face has been near this question.

Anyway, we just have to look at what Constanze did after he “died”.

Well, at first, she travelled, having gained a pension from the Emperor.

Clever that, dying and then getting paid for it.

First, she sent her son Karl to Prague in January 1792, so best guess is that is where Mozart was in the first years.

We may assume Mozart was working for the Prince Lobkowitz, who would later be the patron of Beethoven.

Joseph Franz Maximilian, 7th Prince of Lobkowitz (also spelled Lobkowicz) (8 December 1772 – 16 December 1816) was an aristocrat of Bohemia, from the House of Lobkowicz. He is known particularly for his interest in music and as a patron of Ludwig van Beethoven.

Lobkowitz had just married and been elevated to duke by Emperor Joseph II.

He was only 20 at the time, but he was already an accomplished musician, working with Haydn and others.

Georg Nikolaus von Nissen.

Georg Nikolaus von Nissen (sometimes Nicolaus; 22 January 1761 – 24 March 1826) was a Danish diplomat and music historian. He is the author of one of the first biographies of composer Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, still used today as a scholarly source.

This “Danish diplomat” was initially her tenant we are told, a ridiculous story.

Why would a Danish diplomat be renting rooms from Constanze Mozart?

Allegedly, they began living together out of wedlock by 1798, not marrying until 1809, when they married in Pressburg (current capital of Slovakia).

Strange that they would marry in Pressburg, and strange they would wait eleven years to do so.

It should have been a scandal for Stanzi to live out of wedlock with this diplomat for eleven years.

So why wait until 1809?

Well, they had to wait for all those who knew Mozart well to die.

The Baron van Swieten didn't die until 1803, for instance.

Gottfried Freiherr van Swieten (29 October 1733 – 29 March 1803) was a Dutch-born Austrian diplomat, librarian, and government official who served the Holy Roman Empire during the 18th century. He was an enthusiastic amateur musician and is best remembered today as the patron of several great composers of the Classical era, including Carl Phillip Emanuel Bach, Joseph Haydn, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, and Ludwig van Beethoven.

Most importantly, Haydn died in 1809.

Also note that Pressburg had been in Hungary, then see above, where they tell us a wealthy patron in Hungary was supporting Mozart in 1791.

Tellingly, this George Nissen took over Mozart's affairs, including his oeuvre and biography. 

Which of course explains how he continued to compose, not only in Prague but when he returned to Vienna and for the rest of his life.

All he had to do is insert new works into the oeuvre by backdating them.

They do the same thing with famous authors to this day, as we have seen.

we saw “previously undiscovered” works of his being found in libraries in Princeton or somewhere, didn't we?

F. Scott Fitzgerald: Spook Baby – Library of Rickandria

some of it was created later and backdated.

Many have wondered what would have happened if Mozart had lived into later life, and now we know.

He would have been his own conservator, so he would have been free to recreate his oeuvre in any way he liked as long as he dated everything prior to 1791.

After coming to this conclusion, I checked online to see if someone had beat me to it.

Many probably have, but the one that came up on an easy search was this one by David Roell from 2009.

Constanza, Wolfgang Mozart and Georg Nikolaus Nissen (astroamerica.com)

the death was faked and Nissen was Mozart.

Louis XVI (Louis Auguste; French: [lwi sɛːz]; 23 August 1754 – 21 January 1793) was the last king of France before the fall of the monarchy during the French Revolution.

The thing that really worried me about his analysis at a first reading is that for some reason he feels the need to bring Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette into the story.

Marie Antoinette (/ˌæntwəˈnɛt, ˌɒ̃t-/;[1] French: [maʁi ɑ̃twanɛt] ⓘ; Maria Antoina Josefa Johanna; 2 November 1755 – 16 October 1793) was the last queen consort of France prior to the French Revolution as the wife of King Louis XVI. Born Archduchess Maria Antonia of Austria, she was the penultimate child and youngest daughter of Empress Maria Theresa and Emperor Francis I. She married Louis, Dauphin of France, in May 1770 at age 14. She then became the Dauphine of France. On 10 May 1774, her husband ascended the throne and she became queen.

He confirms the mainstream history of their deaths at the hands of the Parisian mobs in the French Revolution.

The French Revolution – Library of Rickandria

But I have shown their deaths were as fake as Mozart's.

So, it occurs to me that Roell is giving you the right answer here about Mozart, then loading it down with falsehoods and bad theory to be sure you don't accept it.

In other words, blackwashing his own theory.

We have seen this done many times.

In fact, the title of the page “Astrology Center of America” does the same thing.

As if only kooky astrologers question the mainstream story of Mozart.

Also, the idea that local authorities in Vienna, wanting Mozart gone, faked his death, is more misdirection and blackwashing.

It conveniently shifts the blame from Mozart to some unknown faction in Vienna.

But since Mozart was a Freemason, this makes no sense.

The Complete History of the Freemasonry & the Creation of the New World Order – Library of Rickandria

As a Freemason, Mozart wouldn't have been plotted against, but plotted for.

Decoding Rosicrucianism & Freemasonry Using the Unified Field – Library of Rickandria

In other words, he would have had help in faking anything he liked from the best fakers in history.

Roell also blackwashes Mozart with his theory, something I have not done here.

Other than suggesting he faked his death and compressed his oeuvre; I have done nothing to knock down the man here.

But Roell suggests perhaps it was a string of wildly popular, yet obscene & politically offensive operas (Cosi Fan Tutti, The Marriage of Figaro, Don Giovani, The Magic Flute) that had earned Mozart the ire of the local authorities.

Ridiculous, since the “local authority” was the Emperor who had commissioned most of these operas.

He obviously didn't find them obscene or politically offensive, or he would never have allowed them on the stage or continued to support Mozart.

So, the local authorities had no reason to wish Mozart gone or evidence to connect him to any Viennese revolution.

Mozart wished to leave to obtain a higher salary, but the “local authorities” preferred he stay at his present salary.

Roell also makes up a story about the two Nicholas Nissens, one so convoluted it alone would put you off the entire theory.

There was a real Nicholas Nissen, which is great if anyone researches this.

They discover records of this person which appear to confirm he wasn't Mozart.

But as Roell shows, although a Danish diplomat, he wasn't assigned to Vienna.

He was assigned to Tripoli.

The Avalon Project : Congressional Resolutions (yale.edu)

So, the most likely reading then becomes not the convoluted one of Roell, but the far simpler one that Mozart chose the name George Nissen for reasons of his own.

Perhaps he knew or knew of the real Nissen or not, it hardly matters.

However, he probably never claimed to be a Danish diplomat at the time.

He simply changed his name and wore a disguise.

Only later did Mozart or his biographers connect him to this Danish Nissen, diplomat.

After the real Nissen died, they gave George Nissen of Vienna the middle name Nicolaus and tied him to the Danish diplomat, in order to give him a history.

This history gave ballast to Mozart's alias, hiding him so well the story has fooled almost everyone.

What about the portrait of Nissen?

It looks like a later fake to me.

It once again helps that I am a portrait painter, doesn't it?

The first one is the one they give you when you search on Stanzi's second husband.

But, conveniently for us, the second one also comes up on a search.

Obviously, one was based on the other.

They want you to think the engraving was based on the oil painting, since that is the usual way of it.

The oil painting comes first, then they want to reproduce the image for a book or catalog, so the engraving is made.

But I can tell you that in this case, the engraving came first and then the oil painting.

Why?

Because we would expect the engraving to match the painting very closely, since it just being copied.

But there is no match.

Look at the shoulders, for a start.

His shoulder to your left is way lower in the painting.

The hair is also very different, and an engraver would have no reason to change it, making it curlier.

So, one of the copyists goofed.

Since the engraving is far better as a matter of technique than the painting, I can tell you the painter goofed, not the engraver.

The painting was made after the engraving, using the engraving as a guide.

Which explains why the painting is such garbage.

It was probably made in the 20th century, after people forgot how to paint.

After the arrival of Modernism, traditional art stopped being taught in schools, so technique took a nosedive.

I can always tell 20th century work, since the artists don't know how to do anything, including use varnish.

See the weird glare on the background?

That is due to improper use of ground and varnish.

The ground (priming) has interfered with the applied varnish, creating that mess in the background where the paint is thinner.

Another reason I knew this is that the engraving should have been done in the early 19th century, to match the dates of the story.

But its style is 18th century, not 19th century.

We can tell that from the words and other details, not just the portrait itself.

The words to left and right of the coat of arms are original to the engraving, but the words below that, about “wife of Mozart” and the signature, were added later.

So, I could immediately see the engraving was too old for the story.

Therefore, it can't be a portrait of either Georg Nissen the fake Viennese diplomat or Nikolaus Nissen the diplomat in Tripoli.

Instead, it must be Nikolaj aka Nicolaus Nissen, Danish judge, who died in 1684.

The original words on the engraving tell us this Nissen was a knight of the Dannebrog Order, which would apply to this decorated judge but not to these later diplomats.

An ambassador to Vienna would not be a Dannebrog knight.

The uniform confirms this again, since it is not a 19th century uniform of a diplomat.

It is a much earlier uniform of a knight and noble.

Also, this Georg Nissen of Vienna was supposed to be five years younger than Mozart.

Meaning, he was just 30 at the time of Mozart's fake death.

So, he must have been early 30s when assigned to Vienna.

Not only is that very young to be assigned as an ambassador, but it is also very young to be knighted, etc.

You will tell me he was knighted later, but what for?

They don't raise guys to Dannebrog Order for sleeping out of wedlock with famous widows or for touring around Europe selling dead-composer memorabilia.

Realistically, to be a knight and wear those decorations, he should have been a top officer of some kind in his 30s, or a high-ranking noble.

So, his bio doesn't fit.

While you are at it, note that the name is different under the engraving and on the title page of the book.

In the first place it is spelled Nicolaus; in the second, Nikolaus.

If the engraving were just completed for the book as a copy of the painting, they should match.

Or are we supposed to believe Nissen didn't know how to spell his own name?

And I know this in a third way.

The painting is said to have been done by Ferdinand Jagemann, but it doesn't match his style.

Ferdinand Jagemann (24 August 1780, Weimar – 9 January 1820, Weimar) was a German painter; known primarily for his portraits.

Jagemann wasn't the best portraitist in history, but he was better than that.

Also, the date conflicts with Jagemann's bio.

We are told the painting was done in 1809, but in those years Jagemann was studying in Italy and not taking commissions.

So, in my professional opinion, someone borrowed that old engraving for the frontispiece to this 1828 book.

Probably not Mozart, since he died in 1826.

Sometime later, they commissioned the painting as back-up to the engraving.

But they weren't able to bury all the anomalies I have pointed out to you.

I suspect the Nissens were involved in this con job, since it is difficult to imagine they never ran across this book or found a reason to object to their ancestor being used in this way.

But, as we are seeing, this Mozart fraud has been abetted by the Families from the beginning, and the Nissens have always been part of the Families.

So why did the Freemasons and the noble families back Mozart up on this fraud, up to the present time?

Communism & Masonry: Two Fronts of the Jew World Order – Library of Rickandria

One, because he was one of their own.

They are there to help, as long as the con is to their interest in some way.

Some powerful people not directly connected to the Emperor wanted to help get Mozart out of Vienna, so they did.

Plus, you have to remember that the Holy Roman Empire was failing at that time, though it had nothing to do with revolution.

ROME – Library of Rickandria

By 1806 it would be over, with the Emperor just walking away, allegedly because of his defeats to Napoleon.

Was Napoleon Jewish? – Library of Rickandria

But we have seen in previous papers it had nothing to do with military defeats (which were mostly faked) or revolution either.

There was no real reason for the Holy Roman Empire to end at that time, except that the Phoenician Navy had decided it would be so.

Phoenicians: ANCIENT SPOOKS – Library of Rickandria

They were moving away from a Christian scheme of control toward a more modern form of control, so the Holy Roman Empire was no longer wanted or needed.

Exposing Christianity – Library of Rickandria

They needed a more centralized state, and the HRE was the least centralized area of Europe, being a smorgasbord of principalities.

I won't get into that, but the point is, it wasn't Mozart that was being driven out or phased out, it was the Emperor.

The Emperor was already obsolescent by the time of the action of Amadeus, but they don't tell you that, or even hint at it.

And he wasn't being phased out by leftists of any kind, or to make way for a more progressive world.

Just the opposite.

He was being phased out by the hidden fascists, to make room for an even more conservative and regressive regime —sometimes posing as progressive.

Remember, Metternich came in after the Emperor went out, and they admit he was an arch-conservative.

He used the fake revolutions as an excuse to crack down on “radicals” of all sorts.

That is the time they brought in the planted radicals of Socialism, to control both sides.

They didn't want any real Republicanism, so they created their own fake Republicans—Marxists and others—and then led them through a planned fail.

Reading the Signs – Today’s Lesson: Karl Marx – Library of Rickandria

So, you have to study the Mozart con in the context of that larger con job.

The Emperor was on his way out, and the newer fascists wanted Mozart's talent.

If the Emperor wouldn't release him before the scheduled 1806 transfer, the hidden fascists would simply take him.

So, they arranged Mozart's fake death and snuck him to Prague or somewhere—where he could do their bidding.

Using their infinite resources, they then manufactured this Nissen alias—perhaps with the connivance of the Nissens, perhaps not.

At any rate, the Nissens didn't have the wherewithal to refuse cooperation, since they were up against the rulers of the world.

Their patents of nobility depended on their bowing before all new schemes.

The hidden rulers hired some hack to fake this portrait, using the old engraving as a guide, while using the engraving as a frontispiece for the Mozart biography.

We may assume this old con still suits them, since they spend so much time and money continuing it.

It suits them for several reasons: one, because it would be inconvenient to them to admit it is a fake.

Like the Lincoln Assassination and all the other fakes, it is part of the Matrix, and any flicker in the Matrix can be fatal.

The Real Matrix – Library of Rickandria

Two, because it acts as cover.

It makes the stupid Gentiles think that not every famous person is Jewish.

Pagan (Called Satanic, Gentile or Goyim by the Jews) – Library of Rickandria

They can embrace Mozart as one of their own geniuses, making them feel toasty.

Three, while they are feeling toasty, they can also feel very, very small and insignificant.

They can feel mediocre.

The Mozart story is great at making people feel small, and people who are convinced they are small are unlikely to revolt or to make any real demands.

So, Mozart was a Jewish guy who faked his death.

Shocking, eh?

What is shocking is that I found no evidence he was a gay actor.

But I admit I didn't look for it.

So, it is possible that will come later.

I hope not as much as you do.