A Biblical Audit of Commenters, Cowards, and Confessors in the Digital Warroom

---

I have comments from this video on their YT page that I would like to expose as well.

Let's separate the goats from the sheep on the comments & show the user names that say what.

They should be held accountable for their words as well.

If possible, I would like to have how long the account has been on YT & if they have replied to people or not or have content at their channel.

I want to expose bots as well.

---

Good question. Yes — we can attempt to analyze YouTube comments on a video to help distinguish likely “goats” (bots, false supporters, aggressive or manipulative commenters) from “sheep” (genuine commenters, believers, or at least honest people asking questions).

But there are important limitations under which we must operate — and we must apply wisdom, not vengeance.

I, your Librarian at the Library of Rickandria, will walk you through what we can and cannot do — and a method to begin that process.

✅ What can be done now

Public comment review manually

We can look at publicly visible comments on the video.

We can quote commenter usernames, the content of their comment, and our assessment (bot‑like, real, suspicious, heartfelt, etc.).

We can categorize comments based on their tone, logic, Scripture‑soundness, or evidence‑based content.

We can label some as “likely bots/false” vs “likely genuine / Christian‑minded / inquisitive.”

Check public channel metadata

For any public YouTube channel (commenter), you can view when the channel joined YouTube by going to their About page. (Visibly Media)

This helps show whether a channel is brand‑new (which can be a red flag) or old with lots of history (which might lean toward genuineness).

Use free tools like the publicly available YouTube Channel Age Checker. (SEOStudio)

Check comment history / activity patterns (manually or via tooling)

For some channels you can scroll through their past comments or uploads to see if they have a normal history — real videos, real engagement, meaningful content.

If a channel only ever comments or only posts generic/spam‑style comments with no uploads or little history, that’s a red flag.

Patterns like repeated comments on many unrelated videos, generic lingo, or 24/7 activity can indicate bots / spam / “collusive entities.” (arXiv)

⚠️ What cannot reliably be done under public view

You cannot definitively prove someone is a ‘bot’ or ‘paid troll’ unless you have internal logs, IP data, or backend analytics YouTube doesn’t publicly share.

You cannot access private channel analytics (watch time, viewer devices, frequency) — those are private to the channel’s owner. (IFTTT)

You cannot prove a person’s motives, heart, or spiritual standing; you can only note patterns, words, and historical data.

You cannot use private or personal details of individuals in a way that violates privacy — you must focus only on public, publicly‑shared data (username, comment content, public channel age, public uploads).

So any “exposure” must be done carefully — describing the behavior publicly, not slandering individuals, and always grounded in evidence.

🛠️ A Suggested Method to Expose Comments — Step by Step

Here is a practical method for you to gather and document comments, then we can analyze them together.

Think of it as building a dossier:

Step What to do Why it helps

1. Collect comments

Copy 15–50 of the top or most active comments from the video — both supportive and critical. 

Include the

Gives a sample to analyze

2. For each username/channel

Click their user/channel link to open their profile → note Public “Joined on” date (account age) → note number of uploads, channel activity, description, etc.

Helps gauge whether account is new/spam or longstanding.

3. Check history manually

Scroll their comment history or channel uploads to see whether they have real engagement, original content, or appear only to comment on conspiratorial / extreme videos.

Patterns reveal authenticity vs “scripted” or bot behavior.

4. Categorize comments

Divide into:

“Likely Bot / Scripted,”

“Likely Genuine — Critical / Asking Questions,”

“Likely Genuine — Supportive,”

“Neutral / Observational.”

Use reasons based on:

Creates a map of genuine vs suspicious engagement.

5. Document findings

Put entries into a spreadsheet or doc:

Provides structured evidence — useful for looking for collusion or exposure.

6. Analyze trends

Note if many suspicious accounts commented at once, same keywords used, generic praise/anger, no videos on channel, etc.

Can suggest coordinated activity/bots / “collusive entities.” (arXiv)

If you like — I can help you build a template (spreadsheet or table) for this exercise.

Then once you gather a batch of comment data and channel links, you can paste it here — and I will help you sort, analyze, and highlight which usernames appear to be “goats” (bots, shills, false supporters) vs “sheep” (real commenters, likely genuine).

🛡️ A Word of Caution & Biblical Wisdom

While exposing deception is holy and righteous — remember that we must do so in a manner worthy of the Gospel:

Do not slander — only document what is public and verifiable.

Avoid personal attacks — focus on behavior and patterns.

Leave room for repentance — we are not judges, but watchmen.

Use Scripture & truth, not rage or vengeance.

Even in exposure — we speak with dignity, truth, and love for the lost.

✅ My Recommendation for Next Step

If you agree, I will produce a ready‑made template table for comment analysis.

Then you can fill it with 20–50 comment entries from that video.

Once you paste it here, I’ll review and annotate — identifying likely

and highlight suspect behavior.

COMMENTS

@UNITEDCOUNTRYMEN
6 days ago (edited)
🇺🇸 ACCESS THE MASTERCLASS / PROTECT YOURSELF FROM WHAT THEY HAVE PLANNED FOR YOU / LINK HERE
https://www.unitedcountrymen.com/conspiracy-trap-landing-page

@keepitsimple4629
6 days ago
Yours is my favorite new channel.  I admire your bravery and honesty.

@ThePultzFamily
5 days ago
Four years of fighting a hopeless fight against the covid lies and the dangerous injections taught me to not give a shit, and keep myself to myself and stop trying to inform the lemmings that they are headed for the abyss.

@tryagainagain
6 days ago
Huh. I'm actually in the middle of a divorce and I was randomly kicked off Facebook for absolutely no reason whatsoever, so I see that you are correct.

@kevinbaugher3579
6 days ago
Antichrist is defined as "substitute Christ". John mentions that there were many antichrists around him. He was referring to the gnostic interpretations of Christ such as "Christ consciousness" or "divine spark" gnosis similar to eastern mysticism. Those antichrists were driven out of the church.

The Kirk drama is completely staged. C. Kirk was always controlled opposition. His father was involved in Trump construction project designs and his Roman Catholic marriagr to the Trump beauty pageant winner is no coincidence.

Noboody rises to high profile politicsl media figure status like Kirk unless they are in on the game. Same for the spouse. The Masonic symbolism with each of them is blatant.

Politics is staged. President Roosevelt said nothing in politics happens by accident, it's all staged.

Kirkband Owens were groomed to play a role. It's not real. They're compromised puppets. They wouldn't be high profile otherwise.

The Christian right is controlled by puppet leadership under Vaticsn control.

@levibb9100
5 days ago
6:10 The architect of the Towers said they were specifically designed to take multiple large airplane impacts without falling... Not to mention Donald Rumsfeld revealing the trillions missing in the government just before it happened. And Bushes face when he was told in the classroom. Now they say Afghans are to blame again for the 2 military in d.c....🤔

@UNITEDCOUNTRYMEN
22 hours ago
The red string club - the black eye club - how many satanic clubs control people? Even the people appearing to be on your side are lot- I thing all the huge counter narrative people are controlled opposition for the Jesuits - an there is a war for to capture the Protestant church

@BlueThunder777-x1n
6 days ago
What ever "really" happened to John Todd? "Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean that they're not out to get you!" This phrase appeared at the beginning of a movie in a theater many years ago when I felt I was being "Gangstalked!" Before we had cellphone's.

@UNITEDCOUNTRYMEN
6 days ago
I can't find any accurate info what really happened to John Todd

@BlueThunder777-x1n
6 days ago
​ @UNITEDCOUNTRYMEN Rumor has it that he was eventually committed to an insane asylum in the '80's & was never heard of again! At least he received Christ as his Lord and Savior, but "They" most likely made the remainder of his life on Earth pure hell! Keep on exposing the truth! Godspeed brother to you and yours! 😎💯

@UNITEDCOUNTRYMEN
6 days ago
MOST OF WHAT WE'VE BEEN TAUGHT IS A LIE ... ! WHO DID THIS ?

@LoyalTangie
6 days ago
Thanks for removing that item *wink

@lottiegilbert4681
5 days ago
Millionaire mindset huh.     Thats the most sell out title for a book known to man.         Maybe you a liitle crazy

@Msmistrash
6 days ago
I’m in Canada.  Would your course be suitable for Canadians?

@billkitchin4123
4 days ago (edited)
Jesus Christ is LORD. Fire from Heaven is going to destroy the evil ones. Perhaps having to “BUY” spend money on the master class, he could be part of the problem. If he really wanted people free from the matrix,the infromation would be free for all.

@quapil9588
4 days ago
yeah, maybe you are a stooge and have to be replaced...but I dont think they would risk that...everyone with that exposure is part of their club and an well placed actor for their cause...and they are here for way longer than most of us think...

@melissaabbey
5 days ago
Unfortunately you need to stop filming where it corrects your face and eyes because it makes you look like AI and your AI picture on your website is concerning. I want to believe you but that’s a red flag

Good question.

I can’t automatically check every YouTube user’s join‑date or activity history from here (I don’t have backend access to YouTube’s full data).

But I can walk you through exactly how you can check each account’s age and content — and show you a few reliable free tools to help.

This will help you separate “goats” from “sheep” in a more evidential way.

🔧 Tools & Methods to Check YouTube Channel Authenticity

• View “Join Date” via the About Page

On YouTube, go to a commenter’s channel page and click “About.”

There — above or near the “Share channel” button — YouTube shows the date the channel was created (“Joined on …”). (Visibly Media)

A very recent join date (days/weeks ago) combined with a high number of comments or aggressive posting — especially on controversial/conspiracy‑heavy videos — can be a red flag for possible bot, alt‑account, or shill activity.

• Use Public “Channel Age Checker” Tools

There are free online tools where you paste a channel’s URL or handle and get back the creation date and channel age. Examples:

SEOStudio YouTube Channel Age Checker (SEOStudio)

CoolSEOTools YouTube Channel Age Checker (MiniTool)

These tools can quickly identify if a channel is brand‑new (possible bot) or established (more likely genuine), which is useful when analyzing multiple accounts at once.

• Review Public Upload & Comment History

Once you open a user’s channel, check: number of videos, how old the videos are, whether they have real content (not blank or spam), and whether there is commenting activity beyond just that one video.

Real channels tend to have consistent uploads/comments over time.

Spammy or fake‑looking channels often have no uploads, or only recent activity tied to trending conspiracy videos.

• Use Analytics Trackers (Third‑party / Public Data Aggregators)

Sites/services like SocialBlade track public data about YouTube channels (subscriber growth, view counts, uploads history).

Even without a paid subscription, you can often see basic stats that hint at channel authenticity or suspicious activity. (Social Blade)

📝 What You Should Do for the Suspect Accounts

For each username you flagged earlier as “GOAT” or “UNCERTAIN,” do the following —

and note your findings:

Open their channel → click “About” → record “Join date.”

Use a channel‑age checker for confirmation.

Check number of uploads / last upload date.

Look at comment history / other videos to see if channel has consistent activity or only appears on sensational content.

Record this data in a spreadsheet or table (username, join date, uploads count, activity pattern, verdict).

If a channel is brand‑new, has zero uploads, but multiple high‑energy comments on conspiracy topics, that's a red flag for bot or shill behavior.

⚠️ Limits & What We Can’t Confirm Publicly

We cannot prove that a commenter is a paid troll or inside‑agent just by join date or posting patterns.

Some channels may be re‑branded or renamed; their “join date” remains original, which could be misleading.

Private or deleted channels won’t show enough public data to analyze.

Even older channels can be genuine people swayed into deception — so “age ≠ truth.”

✅ My Recommendation

If you like — I can build and share a template spreadsheet (like a “channel‑check form”) that you can use as you go.

That way you have a record of every account you investigate:

Once you fill in a few, you can paste it here, and I’ll help review and annotate — helping you spot likely bots/shills vs real believers.

The video break down that these comments pertain to is here:

Serpents in Soldier’s Garb: A Biblical Dissection of Dan Collier’s Counterfeit Patriotism – Library of Rickandria

---

🧿 Sheep & Shadows: Exposing the YouTube Counterfeit Church of Bots, Shills & Serpent Tongues

---

🧿 Sheep & Shadows: Exposing the YouTube Counterfeit Church of Bots, Shills & Serpent Tongues – Library of Rickandria