Many researchers around the world have found evidence to show that an estimated 1000 years of fake history, was artificially created during and after the Renaissance.
In simple words, researchers say that they have found 1000 years of fraudulent world history that was artificially invented during and after the Renaissance, by the Church and its allies around the world.
This means that the history of the world is a lie.
This subject has now become a major topic for researchers around the world.
This subject is very important, because if it is true, it means that Jesus Christ did not live 2000 years ago.
It means that Jesus Christ lived more recently, around 1000 years ago.
Did Jesus Christ live 1000 years ago?
According to historians, the history of Europe, the Middle Ages or medieval period lasted approximately from the 5th to the late 15th centuries, similarly to the post-classical period of global history.
It began with the fall of the Western Roman Empire and transitioned into the Renaissance and the Age of Discovery.
This period of time is an estimated 1000 years.
Start Date:
The Middle Ages are typically considered to have begun around the 5th century, with the most commonly cited start date being 476 AD, which marks the fall of the Western Roman Empire.
End Date:
While there's no single universally agreed-upon end date, historians generally place the end of the Middle Ages around the late 15th century, transitioning into the Renaissance and the Age of Discovery.
Historical Context:
The Middle Ages followed classical antiquity and preceded the modern period, and it is a key period in the three-part traditional division of Western history.
Significance:
The Middle Ages saw a transformation of European society, with the emergence of new political structures, the decline of centralized authority, population changes, the rise of the Catholic Church's influence, and various cultural and technological developments.
Subdivisions:
The Middle Ages are commonly divided into the:
Early
High
Late
Middle Ages.
The end of this period is known as the Renaissance, which started around the 14th century.
It's also important to note that term "Middle Ages" was coined by Renaissance scholars who viewed the preceding thousand years as a period of decline after the classical era.
Some scholars refer to the Middle Ages as the "medieval period" instead, as "Middle Ages" can imply a less significant or "dark" time, a view that is not universally accepted today.
Researchers are not sure how many total years of fraudulent history were created, and they are still investigating how much fake history was fraudulently invented.
Many researchers agree that the entire history of the “ancient” world was falsified.
Some researchers say that around 1000 years was added to world history, some say 900 years and some say 800 years.
Challenges to Traditional Historical Narratives:
Revisionism:
Historically, the field of history is constantly being revised as new evidence emerges, or existing information is reinterpreted from different perspectives.
This is a normal and necessary process in understanding the past.
Alternative Chronologies:
There are researchers who propose alternative timelines for ancient history, suggesting that events commonly attributed to antiquity actually occurred later, in the Middle Ages.
Limited Sources and Interpretations:
Our understanding of the ancient world relies on limited sources, which can be fragmentary, biased, or even fabricated.
This necessitates careful evaluation and interpretation by historians.
Archaeological Discoveries:
Archaeological findings sometimes challenge established timelines and reveal sophisticated technologies in ancient societies that weren't previously acknowledged.
Examples of Historical Inaccuracies and Forgery:
Ptolemy's Astronomy:
Ptolemy, a renowned astronomer, was later discovered to have plagiarized some of the observations attributed to him, implying inaccuracies in some of his stated results.
Piltdown Man:
This famous archaeological hoax, discovered in 1912, involved a fabricated fossil that misled researchers regarding human evolution for a period of time.
Herodotus's Accounts:
The ancient Greek historian Herodotus, while influential, was also criticized for including fabricated accounts in his writings, potentially to entertain his readers.
Important Considerations:
Mainstream Consensus:
It's crucial to differentiate between legitimate historical revisionism and pseudohistorical theories that lack scholarly consensus.
Rigorous Methods:
Historians employ rigorous methodologies, including the examination of multiple sources, analysis of artifacts, and cross-referencing information, to construct the most accurate picture of the past possible.
Ongoing Research:
The investigation into the accuracy of historical accounts and the possibility of historical fraud is an ongoing process within the academic community.
There are ongoing discussions and research within the field regarding the reliability and interpretation of historical sources.
A lot of evidence has been found, which shows that Christianity was created and invented during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance.
Professor Anatoly Fomenko, from Moscow State University, has shown a lot of evidence which shows that Jesus Christ lived in the 11th or 12th century, and that Christianity was formed after this time.
This means that Jesus Christ may have lived around 800 or 900 or 1000 years ago, - and not 2000 years ago.
Professor Anatoly Fomenko has also shown evidence that the Book of Revelation in the New Testament was not old, and was written around 500 years ago in the 15th century.
During the Renaissance the letter “J” was introduced.
Specifically, it's generally accepted that the first instance of the letter "J" being used as a distinct character occurred in 1524.
Before the letter "J" was introduced, the letter "I" was used for both the vowel sound /i/ (like the 'i' in "machine") and the consonant sound now associated with "J" in many European languages.
Gian Giorgio Trissino, an Italian grammarian, is credited with proposing the separation of "I" and "J" as distinct letters in 1524.
Gian Giorgio Trissino, portrayed in 1510 by Vincenzo Catena
1.64 MB
View full-sizeDownload Gian Giorgio Trissino (8 July 1478 – 8 December 1550), also called Giovan Giorgio Trissino and self-styled as Giovan Giωrgio Trissino, was a VenetianRenaissancehumanist, poet, dramatist, diplomat, grammarian, linguist, and philosopher. He first proposed adding letters to the Italian alphabet to distinguish J from I, and V from U.
The printing press, which became widespread during the 16th century, helped standardize "J" as a separate letter, making its use consistent in printed materials.
While some sources state "J" was not adopted in English until the 17th century (such as the King James Bible in 1629 and a grammar book in 1633), the idea of distinguishing "I" and "J" began during the Renaissance in the early 16th century.
The widespread use of the letter “J” did not happen until after the mid-18th century.
The Latin alphabets were being updated.
This raised the question, was Latin really an ancient language or was it created during and after the Renaissance?
If Latin was an old language, why did they need to improve and update it in the 16th century?
Jesus was known as Iesu or Isau for centuries in Europe, until the name was changed to Jesus.
Many historians claim that Jesus was originally called Joshua or Yeheshua, but the Bible itself says that Joshua was originally called Osea or Isea.
This change in spelling and pronunciation occurred during the late Middle English period, influenced by the Great Vowel Shift and the evolving distinction between the letters "I" and "J".
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Iesu:
The name of Jesus in early European languages, like Latin, was rendered as "Iesus". This "Iesus" then made its way into early Middle English as "Iesu".
The Great Vowel Shift in Middle English (roughly 15th century) caused the vowel sounds to shift, leading to a pronunciation where "Iesu" sounded more like "Jesus".
The distinction between the letters "I" and "J" was not widely established until the 16th century, when the Frenchman Pierre Ramus made the first clear distinction. However, the letter "J" didn't become commonplace in English until the 17th century, with early 17th-century works like the first edition of the King James Bible (1611) still using the "I" spelling.
Germanic Influence:
The German language, which uses "J" to represent the "y" sound, also contributed to the evolution of the name.
Common Usage:
By the 17th century, the spelling "Jesus" became more common in English, though the transition was gradual.
For many centuries the common people of England defied the Catholic edict that the name of the Savior must be “Iesus”.
According to the Oxford Dictionary, in the 1400's his name was “Healand” (Old English), then “Iefus” (Middle English) during the 1500's, and finally “Jesus” in modern English.
The name "Jesus" is a Westernized version of the Greek name "Iesous", which was derived from the Hebrew name "Yeshua" or "Yehoshua".
The Bible uses "Yeshua" for the Hebrew version of Jesus' name, while the Greek New Testament uses "Iesous".
The Latin version is "Iesus," which was further translated into English as "Jesus".
The Bible also references Joshua, whose Hebrew name was "Yehoshua," and who is sometimes called "Yeshua" in the Old Testament.
So, while the assertion that Jesus was originally called Joshua is not entirely inaccurate (as they share the same Hebrew root), the more accurate statement is that the name "Jesus" is derived from "Yeshua" or "Yehoshua".
The name Iesu or Iesa or Isau, is used today mainly by Muslims.
For example, the Jesuits, the Society of Jesus are called “Societas - Iesu”.
Iesu or Iesa was the original name for Jesus Christ Today we use the letters “A.D.” to show how many years have passed after Jesus Christ is born.
Early Use of "I":
In Latin, the letter "I" originally represented both vowel and consonant sounds, which are now represented by "I" and "J".
This includes the consonant sound similar to the "y" in "yes".
"Iesus" and "Iulius":
Before the letter "J" was distinct, names such as "Jesus" and "Julius" were spelled with "I" and pronounced accordingly, for example, "Iesus" with an "ee" sound and "Iulius" with a "y" sound.
Emergence of "J":
The letter "J" emerged later, around the 16th and 17th centuries, as a way to distinguish the consonant "I" from the vowel "I".
Trissino's Contribution:
The Italian grammarian Gian Giorgio Trissino is credited with explicitly distinguishing "I" and "J" as separate sounds in 1524, which helped pave the way for the letter "J" to be adopted into the English alphabet.
"J" in Names:
As the use of "J" became standardized, the spelling of names previously using "I" for the consonant sound, such as "Jesus" and "Joseph," changed to include the letter "J".
"IHS" as a shorthand:
The letters "IHS" found in Christian art and architecture are a shorthand for "Jesus", used from the early church and popularized by St. Bernardino of Sienna.
In summary, the letter "J" developed from the letter "I" to represent a distinct consonant sound.
This historical evolution explains why researchers link the letters "I" and "J" found on older artifacts to the word "Jesus" (or its variations).
Did the letter “i” and the letter “J” original show how many years have passed, after Jesus Christ was born?
The letter “i” and the letter “J” was found on many coins and in many other places.
Many researchers concluded that the letter “i” found in many coins represented the word Iesu or Isea, and the letter “J” represented the word Jesu or Jesus.
The letter “i” was replaced by the letter “J” after the Renaissance.
This created a bigger problem.
It means that i-618 could mean the year 618 AD - and - J-709 could mean the year 709 AD.
If this is true, it means that 1000 years of fake history has been added to world history.
If this is true, it means that civilizations such as:
According to historians, the idea of the “Middle Ages”, the 1000 years between the 5th century and the 15th century, was introduced by Italian “humanists” during the Renaissance.
They did this with “invidious” or “bad” intentions.
Renaissance humanists like Petrarch and Leonardo Bruni, viewed the period after the fall of the Roman Empire as a "dark age" of decline and ignorance that separated their time from the glories of classical antiquity.
The Concept:
The idea of a "Middle Ages," or "middle time" (media tempestas), emerged during the Renaissance.
The Humanists: Italian humanists, including Petrarch and later historians like Leonardo Bruni, conceptualized this period as a time of decline, contrasting it with the "light" of classical antiquity and the revival they saw in their own time.
The Intentions:
They were engaged in a revival of classical learning and culture.
The notion of a thousand-year period of darkness and ignorance separating them from the ancient world served to highlight their own work and ideals.
In summary, Renaissance humanists introduced the concept of the Middle Ages, often with a view of it as a period of decline and intellectual stagnation, in contrast to their own time which they saw as a rebirth of classical learning and culture.
The Italian “humanists” invented the idea of 1000 years of “darkness” which separated them from the Ancient Greeks and the Ancient Romans.
This idea served the work and ideals, - or served the plans of the Italian “humanists”.
The Italian Humanists and the "Dark Ages":
Origin of the Term: The concept of a "Dark Age" separating their time from the classical world originated with Italian humanists, most notably Petrarch.
They were engaged in a revival of classical learning and culture and saw the intervening thousand years (roughly from the fall of the Roman Empire) as a period lacking this classical enlightenment.
Highlighting Their Work:
This notion of a "dark age" served to emphasize their own work and ideals.
By portraying the period between ancient Greece and Rome and their own time as dark and ignorant, they highlighted the value and significance of their efforts to revive classical learning and culture.
A Tool to Promote Humanism:
They sought to create a populace capable of eloquent communication and active participation in civic life, drawing inspiration from classical models.
The idea of a "dark age" helped to create a narrative where their embrace of classical antiquity was seen as a "rebirth" or "renaissance".
Important Considerations:
Bias:
It's important to remember that this "dark age" narrative was born from the humanists' own enthusiasm for classical antiquity and can be seen as biased.
Medieval Achievements:
While there was a decline in certain aspects of classical knowledge after the fall of Rome, the Middle Ages saw significant advancements in various fields, including:
Agriculture:
Innovations like the heavy plow and horse collar revolutionized farming in Northern Europe.
Technology:
The development of:
watermills
windmills
mechanical clocks
and the printing press occurred during the Middle Ages.
Learning:
Monasteries preserved ancient texts, and universities were established, fostering intellectual life.
The humanists' focus on classical learning and secular studies led to a shift away from the dominant religious and theological concerns of the Middle Ages.
They emphasized:
human dignity
reason
pursuit of knowledge
For some reason, these people had so much hatred and anger with those 1000 years, and they had bad intentions.
Why did these people have bad intentions and so much hatred?
In simple terms, the “humanists” and their friends invented the Middle Ages, in order to separate or remove certain things in world history.
Many “humanists” wanted to remove or destroy the 1000 year history of the Middle Ages, as if it had no value.
Who were the “humanists” during the Renaissance?
What were the plans of these “humanists”?
Why did these people have bad intentions and so much hatred against the Middle Ages?
During the Renaissance, particularly in 15th-century Italy, humanists played a significant role in government and society.
This intellectual movement, which emphasized the study of classical texts and the potential of human beings, had a profound impact on various aspects of life, including politics and education.
Many humanists served as civil servants, diplomats, and state officials in Italian city-states.
They held positions such as lawyers and chancellors, utilizing their education to influence public life and government.
Notable examples include Niccolò Machiavelli, who served as a senior official in the Florentine Republic with responsibilities in diplomatic and military affairs.
Humanists were instrumental in establishing a culture of diplomacy, applying their knowledge of classical rhetoric and literature to international relations.
They even wrote the first handbooks for ambassadors in the 15th century, contributing to the development of modern diplomatic practices.
Education and Training of Humanists:
The humanist educational program gained rapid acceptance in Italy, and by the mid-15th century, many individuals from the upper classes had received humanist educations.
Humanist educators established schools and taught in universities, focusing on the study of classical languages and texts (Latin and Greek), grammar, rhetoric, history, poetry, and moral philosophy (known as the studia humanitatis).
This education aimed to cultivate well-rounded individuals capable of engaging in civic life and contributing to the welfare of their communities.
The emphasis on individual potential, civic virtue, and the ability to speak and write eloquently prepared humanists for roles in government and public service.
Civic Humanism:
An important aspect of Renaissance humanism was civic humanism, which emphasized the importance of active citizenship and participation in public life.
Drawing inspiration from the republican ideals of ancient Rome, civic humanists believed that educated individuals had a duty to serve the state.
Thinkers like Leonardo Bruni advocated for active citizenship as essential for a healthy republic.
The cultivation of moral character and practical wisdom through education was seen as crucial for effective governance.
In essence, Renaissance humanism provided a new model for education and public service, emphasizing:
classical learning
individual potential
civic engagement
This fostered the rise of humanists as key players in the political and administrative spheres of Italian city-states during the 15th century.
Italian humanists introduced the concept of the "Dark Ages" to highlight their own revival of classical learning.
However, it's crucial to acknowledge that this view is not a complete or unbiased representation of the entire medieval period, which saw its own unique advancements and contributions to European civilization.
What did these people want to recreate or change?
These “humanists” promoted the culture of Ancient Rome and Ancient Greece, and their plan was to produce a new culture in Europe or rebirth of Europe.
They wanted the old culture dead and wanted the birth of a new culture.
They hated the old world culture and wanted a new world culture.
During this time period, the rise of the Jesuits took place, and they shared similar goals and plans as the “humanists”.
Many of them were “humanists”.
They wanted to promote Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome and destroy the original culture and learning of Europe.
Historians tell the world that the Renaissance was the time that the civilizations of Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome were “mysteriously” rediscovered.
They mysteriously found art and sculpture and told the world that they just found it, after 1000 years.
At that time, historians say that the world was not modern and had no technology and they used horses and donkeys.
But these “humanists” said that they found many things, and “they” knew that these things were 1000 years old.
They “mysteriously” found many classical books and found lost history that was missing for 1000 years.
It was lost history that no one knew at the time.
Was it really lost history or did they invent it themselves?
The Renaissance was also a time, when many people were caught creating fake history and fake art and fake ancient literature.
Fake history…?
The people in power at the time, - “they” decided what was true history.
The people in power included the Church and its allies such as the Jesuits and the “humanists”
