Building on millennia of learning how to structure and manage an economy to accumulate and consolidate control and wealth in particular hands, the Global Elite launched its final coup in January 2020 under cover of the fake Covid-19 'pandemic'.
Using the health threat supposedly implied by the existence of a pathogenic 'virus', the bulk of the world population was terrorized into submitting to an onerous series of violations of their human rights which was tantamount to a declaration of martial law.
...people were compelled to wear masks, use QR codes, stay locked down in their homes and, later, submit to a series of experimental but involuntary gene-altering bioweapons to acquire a 'vaccine passport', among other measures.
Particularly importantly, these restrictions effectively shut down the mainstream economy with vast sectors of industry either closed outright or unable to function in the absence of locked-down or, later, bioweapon-injured or bioweapon-killed staff.
For just one discussion of the vast evidence available of Covid-19 'vaccine' injuries and deaths, watch '3.5 BILLION could be injured or killed by the jab. Are YOU ready?' which is briefly discussed here:
This inevitably adversely impacted the entire supply chain:
That is, the process that connects the production of raw materials, such as food grown on farms and minerals mined from the Earth, to factories that produce everything from canned food to computers, and then to outlets that sell these products to the public.
All components of this chain were either shut down completely at one or more times, as part of the imposed restrictions or other policy measures - watch, for example, 'Biden pays farms to STOP - EU out of Feed - Meat taxes & Chicken permits - Up to you to GROW FOOD!' - or just substantially curtailed by the unavailability of essential inputs, ranging from replacement parts to competent labor.
To exacerbate matters, the transport industry (trucking, railroads, shipping, airlines) was also effectively shut down, containers became unavailable (because they were in the wrong places) and logistics corporations (that organize the movement of trade goods) were disabled, including by cyber-attacks.
The airline and tourist industries were just two industries that were profoundly disrupted. But so was much of small business, with many businesses destroyed.
As a result, hundreds of millions of people lost employment, many permanently, throughout the industrial economies and millions more were starved to death in:
Africa
Asia
Central/South America
because the day-to-day economy, by which many survive, was shuttered and any ameliorative measures by governments and international organizations were, deliberately, woefully inadequate (or were siphoned into elite wallets).
But 'behind the (obvious) scenes' outlined above, there has been a great deal more going on that has been deliberately concealed from public view, and this has been considered and discussed by some fine analysts.
According to Catherine Austin Fitts, using 'national security' as the justification, the U.S. National Security Act 1947 and the CIA Act 1949 were the basis of a series of Acts and Executive Orders that 'created a secrecy machinery' which essentially meant that 'the most powerful financial interests in the world can keep a whole bunch of money secret', thus creating a secret black budget.
image.png
188 KB
View full-sizeDownload Catherine Austin Fitts (born December 24, 1950) is an American investment banker and former public official who served as managing director of Dillon, Read & Co. and, during the Presidency of George H.W. Bush, as United States Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Housing. She has widely written and commented on the subject of public spending and has alleged several large-scale instances of government fraud.
And, starting in 1998, according to US federal government documentation, huge sums of money were not accounted for while private equity firms began exploding and, despite having no capacity to raise such amounts, were suddenly investing huge sums of money in emerging markets.
According to Fitts,
'We are now missing over $US21 trillion', which she calls a 'financial coup d'etat' that is clearly in 'massive violation' of the US constitution.
The financial value of what has transpired under the Covid-19 narrative is that the 'magic virus' can be used to explain, for example, why there is no money for healthcare or pension funds cannot pay on retirement those who paid into them throughout their lives.
But if $US21 trillion missing already sounds like a lot, it doesn't end there, as Fitt's recent discussion with Professor Mark Skidmore makes perfectly clear in 'The Financial Coup: More Missing Money & FASAB Standard 56'.
We are now over $US100 trillion of undocumentable adjustments if we use their most recent figures and so I would say we are describing a financial system which is completely and utterly out of control...
If any of the allegations about financial fraud in the 2020 [US Presidential] election are true, and I believe that many of them are, we've now delinked both the election system and the finances [from] the constitution and the law so we are now operating both in terms of who governs and how they spend the money completely outside of the law and completely outside of any democratic process.
So, this is a coup.
To which Professor Skidmore responds:
The reason that I really struggled... watching what was going on during the last financial crisis, [was that] I thought 'Wow we don't have the rule of law'.
It was so obvious that we didn't ten years ago and it's like it's devolving even more and so I am not sure how much further we can go before we are just completely devoid of the rule of law at least for a subset of the very powerful.
As an aside, while genuinely appreciative of the research of Fitts and Skidmore, as outlined earlier in this article and previously demonstrated, democracy has always been a sham and the Elite has always operated beyond the rule of law, routinely corrupting national political processes in pursuit of Elite ends.
All we are seeing in the current context is Elite corruption being flaunted in a way that reflects the sure knowledge that it can act corruptly on a global scale, with impunity.
But to return to the subject at hand: In 2019, the central bankers of the G7 countries met for their regular conference at Jackson Hole, Wyoming and agreed to the 'Going Direct Reset', a plan devised (and later orchestrated) by BlackRock - see 'Dealing with the next downturn' - and, as explained by John Titus, the fundamental purpose of this 'Reset' was to orchestrate the largest asset transfer in history under cover of the forthcoming Covid-19 'pandemic'.
'In a nutshell, the arrival of the 2020 pandemic was about as accidental as an assassination.
The pandemic narrative is nothing but a cover story to conceal from the public what in reality is the biggest asset transfer ever.'
While you can learn the mechanics of how this was conducted in the excellent documents and videos immediately above, as Fitts points out in relation to the central banks:
'Controlling and having access to data on fiscal and monetary policy is the basis of huge fortunes.'
And, combined with the secrecy that has protected their manipulations from public view,
'if you look at all the technology and assets that have been transferred, by questionable means, into private and corporate hands, the liability is over the top',
...it has engendered the view that their only way forward is,
'Complete, total central control'.
Central Bank Digital Currencies
How will this 'total control' be achieved? One key element will be the introduction of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs).
CBDCs allow the Central Bank to determine exactly what products and services your digital currency can be spent on, when it can spend and where it can be spent.
It also allows the issuing authority to freeze, reduce or empty your bank account, and to alter its functionality with the latest 'update', based on your 'social credit score', political allegiance or if you do not comply with certain directives.
But it goes beyond this.
According to the Bank for International Settlements:
The G20 has made enhancing cross-border payments a global priority and has identified CBDC as a potential way forward to improving such payments.
A "holy grail" solution for cross-border payments is one which allows such payments to be immediate, cheap, universally accessible and settled in a secure settlement medium.
For wholesale payments, central bank money is the preferred medium for financial market infrastructures.
A multi-CBDC platform upon which multiple central banks can issue and exchange their respective CBDCs is a particularly promising solution for achieving this vision, and mBridge is a wholesale multi-CBDC project that aims to advance towards this goal. It builds on previous work...
Project mBridge tests the hypothesis that an efficient, low-cost, real-time and scalable cross-border multi-CBDC arrangement can provide a network of direct central bank and commercial participant connectivity and greatly increase the potential for international trade flows and cross-border business at large...
All the while safeguarding currency sovereignty and monetary and financial stability by appropriately integrating policy, regulatory and legal compliance, and privacy considerations.
'Project mBridge: Connecting economies through CBDC'.
Apart from the fact that the G20 governments are distinctly unrepresentative of the world's people, these words are typical of the type usually chosen when the Elite is intent on sugarcoating their lies to conceal their true agenda.
image.png
296 KB
View full-sizeDownload Agustín Guillermo Carstens Carstens (born 9 June 1958 in Mexico City) is a Mexican economist who has served as the general manager of the Bank for International Settlements since 1 December 2017. He served as governor of the Bank of Mexico from 1 January 2010 to 30 November 2017. In 2011, Carstens, along with Christine Lagarde, was one of the two final candidates to become the managing director of the International Monetary Fund. He previously served as secretary of finance in the cabinet of Felipe Calderón (2006–09), as deputy managing director of the International Monetary Fund (2003–06) and as treasurer of the Bank of Mexico. In 2011 he was included in the 50 Most Influential ranking of Bloomberg Markets Magazine. Carstens took up his appointment as the general manager at the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, where he was appointed to a five-year term, starting on 1 December 2017.
Fortunately, Agustin Carstens of the Bank for International Settlements has been more forthcoming:
'We don't know, for example, who's using a $100 bill today, we don't know who is using a 1,000-peso bill today.
The key difference with the CBDC is the central bank will have absolute control on the rules and regulations that will determine the use of that expression of central bank liability, and also, we will have the technology to enforce that.'
Before proceeding, however, it is worthwhile noting the conflict that is going on between the central banks and the commercial banks (the traditional actors in the retail banking sector, that is, the part of banking where people interact directly with a bank), as well as that between the commercial banks and the big tech companies, such as:
PayPal
Alipay
Facebook
and Amazon that have developed or are developing their own digital currencies and/or payments systems outside the traditional financial system.
While non-bank financial institutions long-ago overtook commercial banks in lending, bank influence generally continues to decline and is accelerating in the face of the competition from the technology giants.
Why the conflict?
Because a CBDC risks collapsing the commercial banking sector completely by eliminating retail banking and thus destabilizing the long-standing financial system.
For some discussion of this, watch Alice Fulwood's presentation:
There is no doubt, of course, that this conflict will be resolved and that it will not be in our favor.
In any case, CBDCs are just one feature of their planned technocracy which includes digitizing your identity, issuing you a social credit score, geofencing you in one of the Elite's 'smart cities' and feeding you insects and processed trash, among many other elements.
And to elaborate the significance of imprisoning you in a 'smart' city, Patrick Wood points out the evidence both in the literature and in practice:
The intention is to force us off the land, as is already happening in China, and at gunpoint if necessary, so that 'vacated farm land' can be combined 'into giant factory farms to be operated by advanced technology such as agricultural robots and automated tractors'.
Once relocated into the 'smart' city of the government's choice, everyone will be subject to 24-hour surveillance using a plethora of 'smart' technologies such as biometric facial scanning, geospatial tracking and CBDCs, forced onto public transport which will not include the option of leaving the city, and confined to those work and other activities approved by the relevant technocrats.
The bottom line, in simple language however, is the same as it has always been:
Endlessly acting to consolidate their control over the rest of us, our money is being stolen by the Elite for their own ends and they are not required to report it and they cannot be held accountable, legally or otherwise.
The only difference to what has happened historically is that now even the pretense of some form of equity, the rule of law and even the notion of democracy are being abandoned in the final rush to techno-totalitarianism and wealth concentration.
Beyond this, however, other components of the elite program are designed to play a part in destroying human society and the global economy.
