Some of that evidence is covert and some is overt.
Meaning, some is right out in the open while some is hiding under a shallow frosting of lies but isn't hard to find once you pull the blinders off and start looking.
What started me writing was news today that Walgreens and CVS have agreed to pay $10.7 billion to settle lawsuits against them for cooperating in and profiting from the opioid crisis.
I still don't really understand how these places could be involved, because I had always assumed this was a street drug thing, with users being sold the drugs by illegal pushers.
Hence the big drug busts, where we see ICE or Interpol bagging ten tons of Meth or Fentanyl pills or something.
I assumed they weren't finding those in the backrooms at CVS.
So, I looked it up.
The first thing that came up on a general search was this story from CBS in 2020 from San Francisco, where a Walgreen's pharmacist had been arrested for impersonating a pharmacist and illegally filling 745,000 prescriptions over eleven years.
We are told the pharmacist pled not guilty and has not yet been convicted, so why did Walgreens agree to settle?
You would expect them to wait for a verdict.
Also, how do you impersonate a pharmacist?
According to the story, she was previously a licensed pharmacy tech, but her license expired in 2008.
This lady then used the license number of someone else with the same name to keep working.
That sounds very unlikely.
It sounds like cover for something else to me.
And, even if true, that doesn't make the prescriptions illegal.
As long as a doctor prescribed them, they are legal.
You could not promote an opioid crisis with such a paper technicality, and I fail to see how Walgreens could have caught the fraud or be liable for it:
which is exactly the point of this article.
That is what they want you to think.
The whole story is being spun to make Walgreens and the doctors involved look innocent, putting all the blame on this rogue pharmacist.
But with or without a license, all this pharmacist did was fill a legal prescription—at least according to the story.
So, why would government entities later prosecute these companies for fraud?
I can only guess:
one party decided after the fact to turn on the other parties and shake them down for part of their share.
Like bank robbers after a job.
In return for keeping the sums low and spinning the blame onto minor players, as we saw in San Francisco, those parties agree play ball.
And the public is given the impression something is being done, while almost nothing is.
Is paying a fine really the correct remedy to this?
Hundreds of thousands of people have been murdered for profit or worse things than profit, and that is supposed to be remedied by fining these companies a few billions?
No, when someone kills another person with a gun or knife, we don't fine him a few thousand and tell him to go home, do we?
So, why are the directors of these companies still on the streets?
Why are their chief medical officers still on the streets?
I also rewatched Tucker Carlson's interview with Dr. Malhotra today, and there we are reminded that Vioxx killed 60,000 Americans, more than Vietnam.
It later came out that Merck knew the lethal side effects of Vioxx, and that data had been fabricated, but went ahead with its sales anyway.
The Malhotra interview is very damning for Pharma and the medical profession, but he actually spends a lot of the interview defusing this bomb (of the vaccines as well as Vioxx).
Although he allegedly lost his father to the vaccine, he doesn't seem very angry about it.
I find his sangfroid maddening, and also suspicious.
As usual, he is sure to tell us he took the vaccine, and we see he isn't sick or dead, so that is a defusing right there.
I am not sure I believe it.
I would assume he didn't take it.
He then tells us that pre-Covid vaccines are one of the safest things ever, so he is again generally pro-vax: highly suspicious since it isn't true.
These mRNA “vaccines” are the worst, but many (perhaps all) previous vaccines have been oversold or dangerous, and not just for their mercury or other adjuvants.
But his comment that really jumped out at me came later in the interview at min. 38:30, where he says the problem is a,
“Pandemic of misinformed doctors and misinformed and unwittingly harmed patients.”
Really?
Unwittingly?
So, it was all just another honest mistake, eh, Dr. Malhotra?
These doctors didn't know any better?
It wasn't outrageous and malevolent fraud, promulgated at best for profit and at worst as an abetting of mass murder?
But Malhotra had already said that this huge vaccine crisis had come down from some great “psychopathic entity”, which he had implied was at the corporate level if not higher.
So, again, do you stop a huge psychopathic entity by slapping it on the wrist?
That can only encourage further psychopathy and murder, which is exactly
what we have seen: accelerating levels of raw criminality.
At this point, not convicting these mass murderers is the same as abetting them.
When Malhotra starts backpedaling and soft selling this as due to bias and conflicts of interest, he seems to me to be framing this as far less than it is, for the benefit of his promoters.
He was paid to defuse this bomb by admitting what we already know but trying to talk us down from the obvious solution.
We see it again later when Tucker points out that the US seemed to encourage obesity during the pandemic rather than discourage it, by closing gyms, etc., despite it being known obesity was the leading co-morbidity.
He says he doesn't believe this was part of a planned population reduction but asks Malhotra to explain it.
Malhotra says it is due to,
“The corporate capture of public health”
and again, tries to pass it off as conflicts of interest.
Conflicts of interest?
He says Gates was also invested in McDonalds and Coke, so that somehow explains it.
These people wanted to make money from vaccines and junk food at the same time:
Malhotra literally says that and then drops it, as if he has answered Tucker's question, and they move on.
But Tucker somehow fails to notice that doesn't refute the genocide theory, it confirms it.
These people were invested in junk food because they knew that promoting it was a plank of the genocide:
keep everyone at home living on Domino's pizza and Coke.
Mandate all the upper-end restaurants to close so that people would be forced to drive thru Wendys or Taco Bell.
Close all the Mom & Pop stores so people would be forced to shop at Walmart:
then you only have to poison Walmart.
From there the interview sort of unwinds, as both Malhotra and Tucker play dumb, pretending they don't understand how this worked, how it happened, or what can be done.
Tucker continues to say that people are basically good, which isn't to the point, obviously.
This isn't about people in general, it is about the psychopaths, so I don't know why he and Malhotra can't stay on target.
Or, actually, I am pretty sure I do know, it is more misdirection.
In the closing minutes, Malhotra actually says that if Trump knew what he knew, he would flip his position on vaccines.
Except that we are almost three years out on Covid, so it is kind of late for Trump or anyone else to be claiming ignorance.
If Trump doesn't already know what Malhotra knows, we can only call him grossly incompetent or senile.
Nothing Malhotra is saying is new:
it has been up at places like Infowars and Zero hedge for a year and a half and could have been intuited by anyone with a brain long before that.
Nothing Malhotra is saying is new to me, though he passes it off as fresh off the medical presses.
Plus, this interview is a couple of weeks old, and we know Trump watches Tucker.
There is no way he isn't aware of it.
Has Trump rushed to Twitter or Social to admit his mistake?
No, and he won't, because he has been in on this genocide from the start.
But back to the opioid crisis.
It is prong two of this attack on worldwide populations, dwarfed somewhat by the vaccines, but still incredibly potent.
The setting in San Francisco of the pharmacist story reminded me of my research on Haight-Ashbury for my Manson/Tate paper, where I found government agents had been planted there to disseminate many dangerous drugs through whatever means possible: fake prescriptions, passing them out at parties, introducing them through Esalen and other CIA fronts, the works.
And not just LSD, but also PCP, STP, and everything else.
It later came out in leaks and department declassifications that this was a targeted attack, planned for years by a consortium of government agencies, at the behest of. . . some great hidden psychopathic entity that was at the reins of the:
CIA
FBI
DIA
Justice
and even local police.
So, this goes back many decades, and San Francisco was an early hub.
CIA has grown exponentially since the 1960s, and it has now taken over everything.
It can place people anywhere it likes. . . and that anywhere of course includes pharmacies.
So, I think what we are seeing here is evidence government drug pushers have actually inserted themselves into major pharmacy chains.
What better way to achieve their goals directly?
If doctors refuse to prescribe these deadly drugs, or aren't keeping up with orders in any way, the drugs can be dispensed with forged signatures and any other fraudulent paperwork required.
At that point the street pushers of the 1960s have moved indoors, with a Walgreens or CVS pharmacy sign over their heads to lend the legitimacy.
Do the users care one way or the other?
No.
Once they have been hooked, they no longer care about legal or illegal, street or pharmacy.
All they care about is their fix.
But for those just getting snared, the apparent legitimacy of the pharmacy is a great convenience.
For the levels of genocide envisioned by the Great Psychopath, street pushing was not enough.
It requires the cooperation and infiltration of all non-governmental institutions, from schools and universities to:
hospitals
pharmacies
groceries
malls
and cinemas.
It requires a full-spectrum implementation.
This is what is happening, and you would have to already be zonked on some drug cocktail not to see it.
And there is only one solution: prosecute these maniacs to the fullest extent of the law, either locking them in some deep dark dungeon filled with rats or throwing them from the nearest cliffs in a vast civic ceremony of cleansing.
Anything short of that will just send the signal to the next round of psychopaths to murder even more of us in the next wave.
The plans are already in place for that, so you better decide quickly.
Watching Tucker Carlson tonight I learned you can kill yourself with opioids over the counter now, buying them at the grocery store or minimart under the name Za-Za or Tianaa, aka gas station heroin.
It is a 46-billion-dollar industry killing people right and left, but our vaunted FDA is doing. . . nothing, of course.
There are existing laws against this, but no one at any level—
Justice
FBI
attorneys general
or DAs—are doing anything about it.
Why?
I just told you: they want you dead.
Added December 15:
In continuing to study this, I discovered something else shocking:
at the very same time Johnson & Johnson was pushing its Covid vaccine as safe and effective, it was part of a $26 billion dollar fraud settlement nationwide, brought by state Attorneys General for its part in the opioid crisis.
McKinsey & Co, a management/consulting firm I have mentioned many times in these papers, was also involved in this settlement, agreeing to pay over half a billion.
McKinsey is one of those huge firms like Burson Marsteller that comes up like clockwork in my research, since it is a Phoenician Navy hub of skullduggery.
The Enron scandal came out of McKinsey, and so did the 2007 financial crisis, as even Wikipedia admits.
Also involved in this opioid settlement are drug distributors:
McKesson
Cardinal
AmerisourceBergen
But my point is, it was always amazing to me that average people were trusting these vaccine makers and Big Pharma in general, given their horrendous track record.
But it was even worse than we knew in the case of Johnson & Johnson, as you see.
Somehow, they managed to push this vaccine genocide right on the heels of the Oxycontin/Fentanyl genocide, murdering you WHILE they were being tried for murder and admitting guilt.
It isn't that these stories were completely suppressed or censored, because they weren't.
You could find this information online if you wanted to.
But the mainstream wasn't reporting it, so most people missed it.
When the mainstream mentioned it, it was only as a passing story.
They never gave it any context, warning you—as they should have—that the same companies pushing the vaccines were—at that very moment—losing huge government lawsuits for fraud.
What is even more uncanny is that people weren't listening as I was trying to educate them on these things back in 2020.
I wasn't aware of the J&J Oxycontin settlement, since I think it was still in the future, but I was telling those around me not to trust:
Pfizer
Moderna
J&J
since they had previously been fined billions for massive fraud.
Although that information was easily available from places like Wikipedia, most people brushed me off as a conspiracy theorist.
They simply didn't want to hear it, seeming to be in some hurry to kill themselves with a dangerous faux vaccine.
I can't think of one person locally who listened to me or followed my advice, much less thanked me for saving their lives.
But I do know many who ignored me and are now regretting it.
The only way I can explain that is prestige: in their eyes those on TV had some unnamed prestige, just by being on TV or being promoted, while I had none.
And, perhaps even more importantly, they trusted “medical professionals” and their own doctors, which we now know was a huge mistake.
I wish I could say all that is over, and people will never trust doctors or the government again. . . but I can't say that.
The government and medical profession have been lying to us all our lives and getting caught at it, but no one ever seems to catch on.
No doubt your average citizen will find some way to bury all this as well and go on as before, acting the gull to every passing fraudster.
And in other news, I have to ask:
image.png
10.3 MB
View full-sizeDownload Ye[a] (/jeɪ/ YAY; born Kanye Omari West /ˈkɑːnjeɪ/ KAHN-yay; June 8, 1977) is an American rapper, singer, songwriter, record producer, and fashion designer. A subject of widespread controversy and public interest, West is a figure in contemporary pop culture.
image.png
314 KB
View full-sizeDownload Nicholas Joseph Fuentes (born August 18, 1998) is an American far-right political commentator and live streamer who is known for his white supremacist, misogynistic, homophobic, antisemitic, and Islamophobic views. A former YouTuber, his channel was permanently terminated in February 2020 for violating YouTube's hate speech policy. Fuentes has promoted conspiracy theories against Jewish people, has denied the Holocaust, and advocates for the genocide of Jews. Fuentes identifies as a member of the incel movement, as a supporter of authoritarian government, and as a Catholic integralist and Christian nationalist.
It seems to me he is self-destructing on purpose, since any sane man who wished to “restore his reputation” after the Sandy Hook thing would avoid those two guys above any others.
image.png
11.4 MB
View full-sizeDownload Matthew David McConaughey (/məˈkɒnəheɪ/ mə-KON-ə-hay; born November 4, 1969) is an American actor.
The Hennon's link us forward to Macks in about 1880, and you should also recognize that name.
It links us to the Mormon's founder Joseph Smith as well as the well-known bigwigs of Las Vegas, who are Jewish.
image.png
1.15 MB
View full-sizeDownload Joseph Smith Jr. (December 23, 1805 – June 27, 1844) was an American religious leader and the founder of Mormonism and the Latter-Day Saint movement. Publishing the Book of Mormon at the age of 24, Smith attracted tens of thousands of followers by the time of his death fourteen years later.
Geni scrubs that Martha Mack, refusing to tell us what Mack she married or where:
no locations.
But we can find the info at Findagrave, where they tell us he was Samuel Mack who died in PA in 1935.
This Martha Hennon yields more good info, since her mother was also a Philips and a Work.
Not only are these Philips white, but the surname also famously links us to the Windsor's.
And indeed, these Philips related to Kanye hail from Pembrokeshire, Wales, as in the Prince of Wales.
Through the Percys we link to those Dukes of Northumberland.
But if we stick to Kanye's published lineage, we find Daniel Eccles' mother being a Kerr, another big peerage name.
These Eccles were also Montgomerys.
So, although Geni is not providing short bios for these prominent people as it should, we know we are not looking at commoners.
These Eccles of Shannock and Kildonan were marrying people like Isaac Simon, obviously Jewish, who married Jean Black in 1741, daughter of Robert Gordon, 12th lord of Hallhead, son-in-law of Janet Middleton.
So, we have already found Kanye linked to peers in at least two lines.
And now for the cherry on top.
Kanye's maternal great-grandmother is conspicuously scrubbed almost everywhere, so I wondered why.
Finally, we find at Findagrave that her first name was Beulah, and if we search on Beulah Eckles married to Clarence Anthony, we find her as Beulah Mae Jones, b. 1899.
She was supposedly born on the Chickasaw Nation and her father is unknown, but her mother is Tilla Evertt of McKinney, TX.
image.png
16.3 MB
View full-sizeDownload Alexander Emerick Jones (born February 11, 1974) is an American far-right, alt-right radio show host and prominent conspiracy theorist.
Also notice the weird double consonant in Evertt:
we now know that is an earmark and signal of Intel, telling us that name is fake.
Also remember that Jones has admitted he has Native American ancestry.
That would explain why Alex Jones is interviewing Kanye West:
they are cousins.
It is what we have found every time we have dug into any of these questions.
There is a lot of misdirection around this Beulah Mae Jones, so I looked up other Beulah Mae Jones of that time and place, to see if I could clear up this fudge.
There happens to be a second Beulah Mae Jones of McKinney, b. 1892.
