Paste in a black foreground and fill the middle ground with smoke.
Which takes us back to the photo under title.
I knew it was fake because it doesn't have the feel of a real photo from that period.
This was in the 1940s, not that long ago, but the photo looks like something from the 19th century.
Notice how the photo is way too contrasty, with the water going to white and the buildings going to black.
Again, the foreground buildings are solid black, indicating the photo has been tampered with.
These contrast errors are very common in fakes, and we even saw a similar thing with faked photos of Sharon Tate, where her blonde hair suddenly became black.
Wikipedia almost admits the London bombing fake on its pages, telling us Based on experience with German strategic bombing during World War I against the United Kingdom, the British government estimated after the First World War that 50 casualties—with about one third killed—would result for every ton of bombs dropped on London.
British wartime studies concluded that cities generally took 10 to 15 days to recover when hit severely but exceptions like Birmingham took three months. [11]
Hmmm.
Ten days to recover from a severe bombing?
Our recent ancestors were apparently magicians of total reconstruction.
The German air offensive failed because the Luftwaffe High Command (Oberkommando der Luftwaffe, OKL) did not develop a methodical strategy for destroying British war industry.
"The munitions industry cannot be interfered with effectively by air raids... usually the prescribed targets are not hit."
Convenient for London, but unfortunately that is not the story we are told in other places, like, say, Dresden or Warsaw.
Apparently, bombers from both sides could hit targets when that was part of the story.
While the war was being planned, Hitler never insisted upon the Luftwaffe planning a strategic bombing campaign and did not even give ample warning to the air staff, that war with Britain or even Russia was a possibility.
The amount of firm operational and tactical preparation for a bombing campaign was minimal, largely because of the failure by Hitler as supreme commander to insist upon such a commitment.
And you believe that?
That this important series of airstrikes was never planned:
it just sort of happened.
Some German pilots decided one afternoon it might be fun and took off, I guess.
The Luftwaffe's decision in the interwar period to concentrate on medium bombers can be attributed to several reasons:
Hitler did not intend or foresee a war with Britain in 1939; OKL believed a medium bomber could carry out strategic missions just as well as a heavy bomber force; and Germany did not possess the resources or technical ability to produce four-engined bombers before the war.
I reprint that to show you how little these historians respect your intelligence.
The unexpected delay to civilian bombing during the Phony War meant that the shelter program finished in June 1940, before the Blitz. [55]
Again, so kind that the Germans waited to start bombing until Britain was fully prepared, giving them eight months to build shelters.
It's continuously curious how well planned-out the bombing was from the British side, although they were the ones being bombed:
Based in part on the experience of German bombing in the First World War, politicians feared mass psychological trauma from aerial attack and the collapse of civil society.
In 1938, a committee of psychiatrists predicted there would be three times as many mental as physical casualties from aerial bombing, implying three to four million psychiatric patients. [51]
"We must expect that, under the pressure of continuous attack upon London, at least three or four million people would be driven out into the open country around the metropolis."
image.png
12.2 MB
View full-sizeDownload Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill (30 November 1874 – 24 January 1965) was a British statesman, soldier, and writer who twice served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, from 1940 to 1945 during the Second World War, and again from 1951 to 1955. Apart from two years between 1922 and 1924, he was a Member of Parliament (MP) from 1900 to 1964 and represented a total of five constituencies. Ideologically an adherent to economic liberalism and imperialism, he was for most of his career a member of the Conservative Party, which he led from 1940 to 1955. He was a member of the Liberal Party from 1904 to 1924.
As usual, the highest officials seemed to know what was going to happen long before it did.
We can suppose that their planning included investing in psychiatric hospitals.
Also, convenient that the main shelters in London were the Underground stations.
Down there the Londoners could be “protected” from seeing what was really going on outside above them.
These sheltered people could be told what to believe the next morning by the media.
Although the intensity of the bombing was not as great as prewar expectations so an equal comparison is impossible, no psychiatric crisis occurred because of the Blitz even during the period of greatest bombing of September 1940.
An American witness wrote:
"By every test and measure I am able to apply, these people are staunch to the bone and won't quit ... the British are stronger and in a better position than they were at its beginning."
image.png
1.36 MB
View full-sizeDownload Anna Freud CBE (3 December 1895 – 9 October 1982) was a British psychoanalyst of Austrian–Jewish descent. She was born in Vienna, the sixth and youngest child of Sigmund Freud and Martha Bernays. She followed the path of her father and contributed to the field of psychoanalysis. Alongside Hermine Hug-Hellmuth and Melanie Klein, she may be considered the founder of psychoanalytic child psychology.
The psychoanalysts were correct, and the special network of psychiatric clinics opened to receive mental casualties of the attacks closed due to lack of need.
That is supposed to be a German plane flying over London on Sept. 7, 1940, the first day of the raids. Strange that the photo is from an Australian government collection, and that only the lo-res image is available.
The only reason it would be casting a shadow like that is if it was bent.
The right main wing also looks bent on the end.
But that indicates we are looking at a junked 111 pasted in or a model.
The Germans wouldn't have been flying a 111 with bent wings on an important mission like this.
Another thing that looks odd is the apparent stripe on that tail wing.
The 111 didn't have such a stripe.
There should only be a single line, which indicates the line of the flap.
But here we see another line above that.
The fuselage also doesn't look right, since we should see a cross painted on the side.
We wouldn't be able to see it on the shadow side, but we should be able to see the top of it on the light side.
The other thing I noticed immediately is the propellers.
They are way too sharp.
They are moving so fast that cameras can't stop them completely, and they should appear blurry to some degree. See other photos of propeller planes in flight online, in which we see either a big round blur—indicating a slow shutter speed—or smaller blurs, indicating a faster shutter speed.
But we never see propellers stopped cold like this, again indicating a model pasted in.
You will tell me we do have convincing photos of bombed out areas in various cities, and I agree.
But I think it is possible certain slums were targeted for demolition.
The governors used the war as an excuse to remove blighted areas, which they could then rebuild at a profit, also accelerating gentrification.
They are still doing it now in peacetime, as we have seen in various more recent false flags and fake events, including the 9/11 event.
Being in a high-rent district in Kensington, the owners of the land likely figured they could make a better profit by getting rid of it.
By the way, the building burned for 60 hours on almost all floors without collapsing, putting the lie to the claims during 911. * The leaders of various countries may have hired foreign air forces to take out their undesired regions, or they may have simply ordered their own air forces to do the job.
After 911 (and the evidence I have uncovered in this paper), I don't believe it is off-the-table to propose the RAF may have bombed Britain themselves.
The British press now admits that as much as half the damage in Britain was caused by their own antiaircraft shells, rather than German bombs.
I would assume some collateral damage, including casualties, occurred, but it wasn't intentional.
The numbers were then inflated to better match the phony war being sold.
The higher the numbers, the more you would hate the Germans.
In previous papers, I have shown much evidence the war was largely managed and at least partially faked including many fake photos from the Dresden event.
I hope you can see why that hit me like a ton of bricks.
Although it is quite easy to identify Hitler and Neville Chamberlain there, it is also easy to tell the photo is a fake.
image.png
505 KB
View full-sizeDownload Arthur Neville Chamberlain FRS (/ˈtʃeɪmbərlɪn/; 18 March 1869 – 9 November 1940) was a British politician who served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from May 1937 to May 1940 and Leader of the Conservative Party from May 1937 to October 1940.
It is one of the worst fakes I have ever seen, in fact.
Although Chamberlain's head is the worst, the whole thing is a tragedy, and I can't believe they still post it.
Perhaps the most obvious clue is the line where Chamberlain's forehead meets the background.
See the black line there?
That is a cutting error.
Heads don't have outlines like that in real life.
They are outlined like that only in cartoons.
Same for the back of his head, which is obviously cut and pasted.
Before I move ahead, I want to pause on Sporcle.
Sporcle is actually pushing a lot of propaganda, so this is not a one-time thing.
[These are pre-existing photos, you know, and I am not accusing the authors at Sporcle of faking them themselves.]
True, but Sporcle is especially bad, since it is heavy with newer propaganda.
It is hard to find quizzes there on “schoolboy” topics, the site leading with Harry Potter trivia, Game of Thrones trivia, and things of that nature.
By “schoolboy” topics, I mean traditional trivia of the old Jeopardy type, or even of the old College Bowl or University Challenge type.
As in “what every schoolboy knows”, from the old days.
You will tell me that is also full of faked events and propaganda, which is true, but propaganda pre1980 had a whole different feel than the newer stuff.
The same goes for science, where if you get a science question it tends to be about Stephen Hawking or something, and you are expected to regurgitate the latest bullshit story from the headlines.
Which all goes to say I suspect the big trivia sites of also being Intel fronts.
They are pushing the sort of general “knowledge” that turns your mind to mush, making sure all your braincells are wasted memorizing the minutiae of their latest gambits.
I have to think that if they had trivia contests a century ago, the trivia would be comprised of minor facts in all categories, not the mind-garbage that is now passed off as trivia.
For instance, although it might not be necessary to your understanding of Van Gogh and his art to remember that he roomed with Gauguin, spent time in London, or lived with coal miners teaching them the Bible, these were things that might stick in your mind nonetheless.
To take another example, geography is full of trivial facts.
image.png
24.2 MB
View full-sizeDownload Sir Edmund Percival Hillary KG ONZ KBE (20 July 1919 – 11 January 2008) was a New Zealand mountaineer, explorer, and philanthropist. On 29 May 1953, Hillary and Sherpa mountaineer Tenzing Norgay became the first climbers confirmed to have reached the summit of Mount Everest. They were part of the ninth British expedition to Everest, led by John Hunt. From 1985 to 1988 he served as New Zealand's High Commissioner to India and Bangladesh and concurrently as Ambassador to Nepal.
While knowing Everest is the highest mountain isn't trivial, knowing Sir Edmund Hillary was the first to climb it is.
image.png
802 KB
View full-sizeDownload Tenzing Norgay GM OSN (/ˈtɛnzɪŋ ˈnɔːrɡeɪ/; Sherpa: བསྟན་འཛིན་ནོར་རྒྱས tendzin norgyé; May 1914 – 9 May 1986), born Namgyal Wangdi, and also referred to as Sherpa Tenzing, was a Nepalese Indian Sherpa mountaineer. He was one of the first two people known to certainly reach the summit of Mount Everest, which he accomplished with Edmund Hillary on 29 May 1953. Time named Norgay one of the 100 most influential people of the 20th century.
Norgay would be hard trivia; Hillary is pretty easy trivia.
Ok, got that off my chest.
Back to the fake photos.
You may be wondering why they would need to fake photos of Hitler with Chamberlain.
The obvious answer:
they didn't have any real ones, since the two men were never together.
Hitler was an actor meant to fool the German people, and to fool the worldwide press.
To achieve that, it wasn't necessary to have him travel to meet real heads of state in other countries.
He could have done so, but I guess that wasn't cost effective.
They figured it was easier and cheaper to just paste up some photos.
Audiences were even easier to fool back then, and we may assume they didn't study these photos in the papers closely for anomalies.
Almost no one reads a newspaper or magazine that way.
Here's another one, but this time only Hitler has been pasted in.
After being deflated, he is now several inches shorter than he was moments before. His head has also deflated by about four hat sizes. You have to laugh.
In this one it is Chamberlain who has been in the dryer too long:
image.png
325 KB
View full-sizeDownload The six foot two inch Chamberlain is now only about 5'8”, the shortest man in the picture.
We can also compare Hitler and Mussolini directly:
Of course, Churchill wasn't in the trenches in WWI.
He was Lord of the Admiralty at the outbreak of the War, and the Lord of the Admiralty wouldn't have been caught dead in that Royal Scots Fusiliers uniform.
Born in 1874, Churchill was 41 in 1916.
As a younger man, he was allegedly a lieutenant with the Fourth Hussars.
Thepeerage tells us he fought in:
Cuba
India
Africa
in the 1890s, but Wikipedia admits he was at most a journalist there.
He was First Lord of the Admiralty until 1915 and was later Minister for Munitions.
We are told that WWI photo is from 1916, and he is supposed to be a Lieutenant Colonel commanding the 6th battalion in Belgium.
What a joke.
The only believable part is the Lt. Col. title, which we have seen was a common one for Intel officers.
It is a marker, that is, but it wasn't his rank.
Lords of the Admiralty don't take demotions to Lt. Col.
They sort of admit the whole thing was theater, since his battalion took part in zero battles, though they were in Belgium in the middle of the war.
To make up for that, we are told Churchill personally made 36 forays into no man's-land, in order:
“To expose himself to danger.”
Right.
That just means he stepped outside the pub in Ploegsteert 36 times to piss on a tree.
This might be the time to insert a few genealogical tidbits of Churchill you probably weren't aware of.
His mother was American, from great wealth as well.
image.png
3.97 MB
View full-sizeDownload Jeanette Spencer-Churchill CI RRC DStJ (née Jerome; 9 January 1854 – 29 June 1921), known as Lady Randolph Spencer-Churchill, was an American-born British socialite, the wife of Lord Randolph Churchill, and the mother of British prime minister Winston Churchill.
image.png
612 KB
View full-sizeDownload Leonard Walter Jerome (November 3, 1817 – March 3, 1891) was an American financier in Brooklyn, New York, and the maternal grandfather of Winston Churchill.
image.png
5.67 MB
View full-sizeDownload Cornelius Vanderbilt (May 27, 1794 – January 4, 1877), nicknamed "the Commodore", was an American business magnate who built his wealth in railroads and shipping. After working with his father's business, Vanderbilt worked his way into leadership positions in the inland water trade and invested in the rapidly growing railroad industry, effectively transforming the geography of the United States.
The Jerome Mansion was in New York on the corner of Madison Avenue and 26th Street, and that is only the corner of it.
It had a 600-seat theater, a breakfast room which seated 70 people, a ballroom of white and gold with a champagne-spouting fountain, and a view of Madison Square Park.
Jerome also owned the huge Bathgate Mansion in the Bronx.
image.png
1.21 MB
View full-sizeDownload Prince Arthur, Duke of Connaught and Strathearn (Arthur William Patrick Albert; 1 May 1850 – 16 January 1942) was the seventh child and third son of Queen Victoria of the United Kingdom and Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. He served as Governor General of Canada, the tenth since Canadian Confederation and the only British prince to do so.
Before that we can trace them back to Gloucestershire, and Richard Rich, Lord Chancellor of England in 1547, in the rule of Edward VI.
image.png
7.28 MB
View full-sizeDownload Edward VI (12 October 1537 – 6 July 1553) was King of England and Ireland from 28 January 1547 until his death in 1553. He was crowned on 20 February 1547 at the age of nine.
He is a primary villain in the film A Man for All Seasons.
We have seen him in several previous papers, most prominently destroying the monasteries and stealing Church wealth for himself and Henry VIII.
The Owens were related to the Tripps—think Linda Tripp of the Lewinsky hoax.
Also related to the Perrots, as in Ross Perot.
Although Churchill hadn't done anything of import by the time he was 25 except play polo and hobnob with his wealthy relations, in 1900 he won a seat in Parliament and immediately went on a speaking tour of England and the US, making about two million dollars.
We aren't told why anyone paid to hear him speak or what he had to say.
No doubt he rattled on about escaping from a prison in Pretoria and other such nonsense.
He couldn't hold a seat in Parliament, being deselected from Oldham, turning from Conservative to Liberal to sit for Manchester, soon losing that as well, and then sitting for Dundee.
Since Dundee is in Scotland, we aren't sure how he managed that.
I guess after that he sat for Funzie, on the Shetlands.
Some of his great reforms at the time included trying to “sterilize the feebleminded” (exceptions for those sitting in Parliament) and lobbying against women's suffrage.
At age 35 he was promoted to Home Secretary, which as we have seen was basically an arm of Intelligence.
But this was appropriate, since Churchill had instructed the Army to attack striking coal miners in Rhondda.
As such a man, he was well qualified to be Home Secretary.
At this time Churchill was also involved in the suspicious Sidney Street Siege, which now looks like an early false flag of some kind.
All the usual numerology markers are present, including the fact that it took place at 111 Sidney Street.
If you read the Wiki page on the event, notice how much it looks like an earlier version of the manufactured Waco Siege.
Many were arrested but all were acquitted.
One of the most famous of those allegedly involved, Peter the Painter, is now admitted being a ghost.
There is no evidence he ever existed at all.
His photo, as posted by the mainstream sites, is an obvious fake.
They also appear to be blackwashing artists in this event, though I can't say why.
But remember this was during the steep rise of Modernism, so they may have been blackwashing traditional art, as they still are.
At any rate, Churchill was photographed right outside the building during the supposedly dangerous siege, which is indication enough he knew it was all theater.
His presence has been commented on in every possible way. . . except that one.
More indication of that is that everyone, including Churchill, admitted that when the building caught fire, he himself ordered it be let burn.
Could be because Churchill and his families were invested in oil.
During his tenure the government bought all the stock of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company (later British Petroleum), which had been founded in 1908 to import oil from Iran.
This company was headed by William Knox D'Arcy, but D'Arcy had been a partner of William Russell Hall and the Morgans.
Of course, William D'Arcy is also in the peerage, though he is mostly scrubbed.
What we do learn is that his son William, b. 1873 (about the same time as Churchill), married a Baring, daughter of the Barings of Barings Bank.
Her mother was a Schuster.
They were also closely related to the:
FitzMaurices
Earls of Orkney
Viscounts of Kirkwall
The D'Arcys were descended from Bartletts and Knoxes.
They are both scrubbed here, but the Bartletts are Baronets, related to the Robinsons.
[Charles Darwin married a Wedgwood, granddaughter of a Bartlett from Wales.]
The Bartletts ran Perry &Co, civil engineering contractors responsible for rebuilding Waterloo Station and many stations on the Underground.
The Knoxes were the Earls of Ranfurly, related to the Perys and Brownlows.
Also, to:
the Stuarts
Earls of Bute; the Wortley-Montagus
Earls of Sandwich; the Campbells
Dukes of Argyll
and the Pierreponts, Dukes of Kingston-upon-Hull.
Those last four names all link us to Churchill, as we have seen.
So, the best guess is all these top families, including the SpencerChurchills, were invested in D'Arcy's oil business in Iran, and profited enormously when the treasury decided to buy all stocks in the company.
After the war Churchill was appointed Secretary of State for War, where he got involved in the Russian Civil War.
No surprise there, since we have seen he was always an Intel officer, and the Russian Civil War was a staged event of European Intel from the beginning.
At about the same time, Churchill organized the Blacks and Tans to quash the Irish War of Independence.
This is why the old Irish hated Churchill.
The Blacks and Tans were a British gestapo infamous for their unprovoked attacks on civilians and civilian property, and the encyclopedias like Wiki admit that.
In other words, they were state-sponsored terrorists, the only real terrorists then and now.
In 1920, the Blacks and Tans sacked Cork, destroying most of the central part of the city.
Many in England pretended to be shocked, including the King (George V), but of course no one did anything about it.
image.png
15 MB
View full-sizeDownload George V (George Frederick Ernest Albert; 3 June 1865 – 20 January 1936) was King of the United Kingdom and the British Dominions, and Emperor of India, from 6 May 1910 until his death in 1936.
Speaking of, here is a photo of George V with his cousin Nicholas II of Russia,
image.png
1.69 MB
View full-sizeDownload Nicholas II (Nikolai Alexandrovich Romanov; 18 May [O.S. 6 May] 1868 – 17 July 1918) or Nikolai II was the last reigning Emperor of Russia, King of Congress Poland and Grand Duke of Finland from 1 November 1894 until his abdication on 15 March 1917.
That may help you understand both WWI and the Russian “Revolution”.
George and Nicholas were actually first cousins.
Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany was also George's first cousin.
image.png
7.71 MB
View full-sizeDownload Wilhelm II (Friedrich Wilhelm Viktor Albert; 27 January 1859 – 4 June 1941) was the last German Emperor and King of Prussia from 1888 until his abdication in 1918, which marked the end of the German Empire and the House of Hohenzollern's 300-year reign in Prussia and 500-year reign in Brandenburg.
image.png
1.55 MB
View full-sizeDownload Alexandra of Denmark (Alexandra Caroline Marie Charlotte Louise Julia; 1 December 1844 – 20 November 1925) was Queen of the United Kingdom and the British Dominions, and Empress of India, from 22 January 1901 to 6 May 1910 as the wife of King-Emperor Edward VII.
Her sister Dagmar was Nicholas' mother.
Do you still want to tell me the War wasn't managed?
Are you going to continue to let the historians tell you the cause of the War was the assassination of an Archduke in Sarajevo?
We have traced these Royal lines back to the Crusades, in fact, discovering that they, the Popes, and the Byzantine Emperors all hailed from the same Armenian families (see the Komnenes).
Also ask yourself this: do you think a real war of 70 million people taking place over 4 years would be limited mostly (in the West) to a so-called Western Front along the border of a neutral country?
Ten million people allegedly died, but no major cities were attacked in the West?
Not Paris
not London
not Berlin
not Moscow
not Copenhagen
not Munich
not New York
not even Brussels.
The Germans didn't even go after the biggest ports in Europe, Rotterdam and Amsterdam.
On the page for Amsterdam, WWI isn't even mentioned.
Rotterdam is mentioned only as a locus of spies.
What sort of war is waged without the attempt to control major ports?
The older I get, the less sense these Wars make.
And I don't mean that as in,
“War is a senseless enterprise.”
I mean that the stories don't add up.
The faked photos are just one part of that.
I pause to re-affirm that I haven't got it all figured out yet.
I still don't comprehend how large the fake really was.
I don't know where to draw the line:
what to believe and what not to believe.
I still need to do a lot more research before I can come to any sweeping conclusions.
But the extent of the photographic fakery in both wars indicates a very broad hoax, which may include the faking of the death figures.
That is, as of now I still assume a lot of people died, but I think it is possible the numbers have been inflated by many orders of magnitude.
I know those glad tidings won't be met in the spirit they were intended, since most people don't like to have mainstream stories or numbers questioned.
But just remind yourself how nice it would be if the numbers were inflated.
It is not really a suggestion that should be met with anger or malice, is it?
Any rational person should meet it with open arms, as a welcome possibility.
This doesn't mean there weren't any crimes against humanity in the wars.
Even supposing the slums were cleared before they were obliterated by their own governors, I think we can all agree there is still a lot to answer for.
But I will have more to say on this question later, once I understand more about what really happened. * We are told there was no formal register of who was living in the Grenfell Tower, which is of course beyond belief.
