I have noticed Venus seems abnormally large and bright, but I assumed it was because I was getting older, and my eyes couldn't focus it like they used to.
So, I clicked.
I was taken to a cache of videos by Steiger and Olson at GNN, and was immediately suspicious, of course.
The production stunk of spin, so I called up a list of all their videos, looking for Flat Earth promotion.
I didn't find that, but I found a video on Bezos and Elon Musk.
Bezos in 2017
1.83 MB
View full-sizeDownload Jeffrey Preston Bezos (/ˈbeɪzoʊs/ BAY-zohss; né Jorgensen; born January 12, 1964) is an American business magnate best known as the founder, executive chairman, and former president and CEO of Amazon, the world's largest e-commerce and cloud computing company. He is the second wealthiest person in the world, with a net worth of US$ 211 billion as of July 16, 2024, according to Forbes. He was the wealthiest person from 2017 to 2021, according to both the Bloomberg Billionaires Index and Forbes.
Steiger/Olson are doing a straight promotion of both guys, saying “isn't it great” to see competition in the space race.
That's all I needed to know.
Since I have shown you, Elon Musk is probably a total fraud and that SpaceX is a definite fraud, I have a lot of evidence Steiger/Olson are pushing another Intel project here. . . perhaps from the halls of Langley itself.
image.png
9.41 MB
View full-sizeDownload Walter Seff Isaacson (born May 20, 1952) is an American author, journalist, and professor. He has been the president and CEO of the Aspen Institute, a nonpartisan policy studies organization based in Washington, D.C., the chair and CEO of CNN, and the editor of Time.
I wanted to watch an interview with Bezos, so I went to youtube, where the first thing that was listed is a Vanity Fair interview with Walter Isaacson.
I couldn't watch more than a few moments, one because the interview was so boring, and two because these two people made me immediately nauseous.
I don't understand how other people fall for this stuff, but maybe they don't.
I'm sure the numbers at YouTube are manufactured, so maybe no one else is clicking on this, and if they are, maybe like me they are running screaming after a few seconds.
Anyway, I wanted to remind you who this Walter Isaacson is.
He is one of the Jewish bigwigs who runs everything, especially in the media.
He pushes forward these projects like Jobs and Bezos, acting as a handler to these people sort of like George Martin did with the Beatles.
image.png
409 KB
View full-sizeDownload Sir George Henry Martin CBE (3 January 1926 – 8 March 2016) was an English record producer, arranger, composer, conductor, and musician. He was commonly referred to as the "fifth Beatle" because of his extensive involvement in each of the Beatles' original albums.
For, while Isaacson seems spooky, he doesn't seem stupid.
He keeps his charges on track.
This indicates to me that being CEO of Aspen and on the board of Bloomberg Philanthropies and so on doesn't take more than a few minutes a month.
That really isn't surprising, is it, considering that philanthropy is just a pose to start with.
These people steal a million dollars and give back a penny, and giving back the penny probably doesn't take long.
Isaacson and the wider media are trying to convince us these people like Bezos are fascinating, but are they?
Even if Bezos had done what they say he did, I don't think I could care less.
He founded Amazon and has billions of dollars.
So what?
Is Amazon.com fascinating as a subject?
Am I missing something?
I find it about as fascinating and intellectually stimulating as Walmart.
It is a big online store.
I don't see the genius involved.
Why is this guy being interviewed?
Why was he TIME's Man of the Year?
You might as well interview the guy who runs the dime store.
And since the first interview with Bezos years ago was a big yawn, why keep going back?
Does everyone think he is eventually going to get around to saying something poignant?
He isn't.
We have seen millions of businessmen interviewed over the years, and not one has ever said anything that would break a snooze.
Anyway, it looks to me like Bezos is just another rich boy from the families, chosen as the face for the Amazon project.
Just as Zuckerberg is the face for the Facebook project, and Musk is the face for the Tesla/SpaceX projects, and Jobs was the face of the Apple project, and Gates is the face of the Microsoft project, Bezos is the face of the Amazon project.
So, to understand my argument here, you should have read my papers on Jobs and Zuckerberg, as well as my paper on Musk.
Like art and physics, large parts of big business have been taken over by these cardboards cut-out geeks who register zero on the charisma scale, zero on the intelligence scale, and zero on the reality scale.
They just aren't convincing in their roles.
About all they seem capable of is getting their picture taken and reading from the Teleprompter, and most of them can't even do that convincingly.
I don't know about you, but I am past believing in any of them.
What it looks like to me is that they are just talentless rich kids who asked Daddy to set them up on camera.
They want to be famous, but they can't actually do anything, so Daddy has to use them in some ongoing project.
The CIA has lots of projects that need human fronts, and so these rich kids are chosen for the part.
Compare these kids to George Bush, Jr., who—if the world worked on merit—would have been cleaning pools somewhere.
image.png
8.97 MB
View full-sizeDownload George Walker Bush (born July 6, 1946) is an American politician and businessman who served as the 43rd president of the United States from 2001 to 2009. A member of the Republican Party, he previously served as the 46th governor of Texas from 1995 to 2000.
Instead, they set him up as President.
That tells you how much value they put on the role of President.
You don't have to believe anything that isn't believable.
Remember that.
Just five or six years ago, they were telling us Bezos was worth only about 18 billion.
Now he is worth 71 billion?
So, he quadrupled his wealth in five years?
Really?
In a down market?
While everyone else was going broke, he quadrupled his wealth?
I think it is false, but if true you still shouldn't “love this guy”.
He is either A) a total fraud, or B) a towering crook.
Take your pick.
I choose A.
I broke the numbers down for you in my papers on:
Jobs
Zuckerberg
Musk
showing you why the given levels of wealth don't add up.
So, I am not going to do it again here.
Just be advised that Bezos' entire bio is again a thing of smoke and mirrors.
For instance?
For instance, his name has changed.
His birth name is Jeff Jorgensen.
Why can't any of these people exist under their real names?
I will be told his stepfather adopted him at age 10, but that seems to happen an awful lot with these people I research.
A person doing research on famous people would come to the conclusion that about 3/4's of all people are adopted by their stepfathers at some point.
Statistically, that is way off, of course.
Probably less than 1% of people are adopted by stepfathers.
Which means that these biographies appear to me to be made up as misdirection.
I have shown much evidence of that with many previous people I have researched, so it is a good assumption.
They need to confuse your mind, so they start by mixing in a bunch of adoptions and stepparents.
They then have:
parents dying
name changes
truncated genealogies
Most people see the mess and give up, just accepting what they are told because it is easier than unwinding the tangle.
At Wikipedia, we are told that Jeff's maternal ancestors owned very large acreages around Cotulla, Texas, but we aren't told who they were.
We are told his maternal grandfather was a director of the US Atomic Energy Commission, but once again aren't given a name.
Since it is scrubbed at Geni as well, more research is required.
We find with some digging this grandfather was Lawrence Preston Gise, husband of Mattie Strait and son of Lloyd Preston Gise and Rebecca Hall.
The Gises were uranium billionaires from their Texas King Ranch holdings, and Preston Gise was Deputy Director of the AEC Albuquerque, government employee for 33 years, retiring in 1997.
Since AEC oversees ARPA and ARPAnet, and Amazon is a large cloud provider, I guess you can see the links.
Bezos' rise was not an accident and was not due to some idea he had about selling books online.
This is because.
Preston Gise was headquartered in Albuquerque, just up the road from me, which could be why I get so much flak from there.
They must not have liked this paper.
Plus, I trust you are paying attention, because we already have possible links there to famous Texans Preston Smith, George Strait and Jerry Hall—who just came up in my last addendum. Ethnicelebs now admits he is a second cousin of George Strait—who also comes from Cotulla. Rebecca Hall's mother is Henrietta Trammell, which may link us to Trammell Crow.
Rebecca's father is Thomas Hall, who is the grandson of Col. John Gladden King of Gonzales, TX.
Which takes us just where I figured we were going when I saw the name Cotulla.
I am from Texas, so when I see mentioned “large landholders in south Texas”, I automatically think of the King Ranch.
Turns out, Jeff may come from these Kings.
We are told Bezos owns a huge ranch in West Texas, but Cotulla isn't in West Texas.
Although we aren't told where the name Rede came from, this family is related to the Rosenberg banking family, as well as the von Kaullas—also ennobled Jews of Austria.
The von Kaulla family owned the Bank of Wurttemberg.
This reminds us that von Roede is probably a variant of Rhodes, which already came up in this paper.
See above, where the Kings in Massachusetts in the 1700s married with the Rhodes.
Now we find the Kings in Texas marrying with the von Roedes.
Coincidence?
I doubt it.
You are free to come to your own conclusions, but to me it looks like Richard King was a son or nephew of Col. King, and that they both come from the Kings of Massachusetts.
We weren't able to link them through South Carolina, but we finally linked them through Rhodes/von Roede.
And for those saying the Kings of King Ranch couldn't have been Jewish, note not only the genealogical evidence I have shown you going way back, also remember the more recent evidence with Bezos.
Bezos is a Pollack and a Gise, and he now owns part of what used to be the extended King Ranch.
His ancestors ARE Kings, and they admit that.
So, he probably didn't buy these fragments or extensions of the old King Ranch, it looks like he inherited them.
More evidence comes from the scrubbed bio of Richard King, which still has residue on it I can read.
We are told he was a jeweler's apprentice in New York City at a young age.
They should have scrubbed that and now probably will, since it tells us he was very likely Jewish.
Most jewelers in NYC were Jewish.
Like textiles and banking, it is a famous Jewish trade.
Addendum March 12, 2017:
My reader and guest author Kevin did some more research on the Kings and sent it in.
Max and Crystal Eastman descend from the Kings of Massachusetts and Southern England.
{This links us to many prominent Eastmans such as George Eastman of Eastman/Kodak and Linda Eastman (wife of Paul McCartney).
Also, Linda's father Lee Eastman, born Leopold Epstein, lawyer not only for McCartney, but also for modern artist Willem de Kooning.
image.png
1.13 MB
View full-sizeDownload Willem de Kooning (/də ˈkuːnɪŋ/; Dutch: [ˈʋɪləm də ˈkoːnɪŋ]; April 24, 1904 – March 19, 1997) was a Dutch American abstract expressionist artist. Born in Rotterdam, in the Netherlands, he moved to the United States in 1926, becoming an American citizen in 1962. In 1943, he married painter Elaine Fried.
It also links us to Joseph Bartlett Eastman, son of Lucy King.
And he links us to current artist Bo Bartlett, who I have been trying to figure out for years.
image.png
603 KB
View full-sizeDownload Olivia Langdon Clemens (November 27, 1845 – June 5, 1904) was the wife of the American author Samuel Langhorne Clemens, better known under his pen name Mark Twain.
Through his parents, Max also became acquainted in his youth with Twain.
image.png
281 KB
View full-sizeDownload Max Forrester Eastman (January 4, 1883 – March 25, 1969) was an American writer on literature, philosophy and society, a poet and a prominent political activist. Moving to New York City for graduate school, Eastman became involved with radical circles in Greenwich Village. He supported socialism and became a leading patron of the Harlem Renaissance and an activist for a number of liberal and radical causes. For several years, he edited The Masses. With his sister Crystal Eastman, he co-founded in 1917 The Liberator, a radical magazine of politics and the arts.
image.png
4.55 MB
View full-sizeDownload Crystal Catherine Eastman (June 25, 1881 – July 28, 1928) was an American lawyer, antimilitarist, feminist, socialist, and journalist.
Social work pioneer and journal editor Paul Kellogg offered Crystal Eastman her first job.
Crystal's son Jeffrey Eastman Fuller was an OSS field operative, serving in the Research and Analysis Branch of the U.S.S.R. Division in Washington, Berlin, and Central Europe.
Fuller was discharged from the Army in June 1946 with the rank of Major but continued to serve as a Major in the reserve, where he specialized in psychological warfare.
{This links us not only to the CIA, but to the Fullers like Margaret and Buckminster.} But back to Bezos.
His stepfather is also a pile of red flags.
This Miguel Bezos is supposed to be a Cuban immigrant who became an engineer at Exxon.
That links us to Standard Oil, of course.
I don't think I have ever done research on famous people that didn't lead to Standard Oil.
A person researching famous people would come to the conclusion that about 3/4's of all people ever born work at some point for Standard Oil.
But of course, the statistics don't support that, either, making it a huge red flag.
Although Bezos' degree was allegedly in computer science, he went to work after graduation for Bankers Trust.
He then went to work for D. E. Shaw, a large hedge fund company.
That doesn't make much sense.
At age 30, while driving cross-country, he supposedly came up with the business model for Amazon.
In one way, that is believable, since it isn't like nobody had ever thought of a mail-order business before.
But in this case, it was web-order.
As with the founding of Facebook and the idea of social networking, it doesn't take a genius to come up with the idea for a web-order business.
In fact, in both cases many people beat them to the idea.
The section on the founding of Amazon is paper-thin on Bezos' Wiki page, so for more information we go to Amazon's own page.
Again, almost nothing.
So, we go to the “timeline of Amazon” page.
Again, almost no useful information on how or why Amazon flourished.
The one thing we do discover —that Amazon started out selling only books—is a head-scratcher.
Were book sales on the rise in 1994?
No, just the opposite.
Books sales have been in a steep decline for decades, and if it weren't for Harry Potter and Oprah books, new book sales would be near-zero now.
By 1990, Trivial Pursuit had removed its original brown Literature category, since it was considered defunct.
Their PR department likely reported to management it would be like having a category devoted to cobbling or leechcraft.
Besides, Abebooks and Alibris were going online in the same years as Amazon, so Amazon should have found stiff competition.
Since both Abebooks and Alibris outlasted Amazon as a bookseller, we may assume Amazon didn't win that war (or at least not until it bought out Abebooks years later in 2008).
Beyond that, they admit Amazon didn't make and
“didn't plan to make a profit for four to five years.”
Really?
That's a great way to pull in investors, right?
The old no-profit plan.
We are told Amazon turned its first profit in 2001.
So, yes, Bezos is looking like a real genius.
A 1994 online bookstore with a 7-year no-profit plan.
Why wouldn't that score big?
TIME named Bezos Person of the Year in 1999.
Wait, let me be sure I get this straight:
Bezos—a man whose company hadn't made a profit in five years and wouldn't for another two years—is named Person of the Year by TIME?
And you don't think these people are toying with your mind?
If you still think Bezos isn't Jewish, we now go to the Amazon board of directors.
Surnames:
Alberg
Gorelick
Rubinstein
and Gordon.
Gordon is a partner in:
Kleiner
Perkins
Caulfield
and Byer.
Do I need to draw you a picture?
So, I am not saying these guys like Bezos aren't rich.
Of course they are.
They are from the families, so they are very rich.
But their wealth doesn't arise the way we are told.
It probably isn't distributed the way we are told, either.
In other words, I assume these guys are worth a few tens or hundreds of millions.
They are set up in a big house and they have lots of vehicles.
They have to, to maintain the fiction.
But all the other billions are funneled elsewhere.
If they exist anywhere but on paper, they exist in the coffers of the top families who actually run these largest companies.
And I assume they are hidden.
They may be Rockefellers or Rothschilds (or not), but they almost certainly aren't these dweebs like Musk and Bezos.
And if, like me, you come knocking on doors nonetheless—having skirted the drugs and bad info—they then just lock the door and pretend no one is home.
Since they own all the markets, they know you can't advance in any major market without their permission.
Without market support, they figure you will die on the vine in short order.
This is the way they maintain hegemony.
Remember, it is all about money with these people.
They don't see the world like I see it.
When the Muses asked me early on if I would rather be a real artist, but poor, or a fake artist, but rich, I choose the former.
I wanted to become an artist in order to create beautiful works, not to get rich.
That's what being an artist meant to me, and it still does.
image.png
35.2 MB
View full-sizeDownload Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino[a] (Italian: [raffaˈɛllo ˈsantsjo da urˈbiːno]; March 28 or April 6, 1483 – April 6, 1520),[2][b] now generally known in English as Raphael (UK: /ˈræfeɪ.əl/ RAF-ay-əl, US: /ˈræfi.əl, ˈreɪfi-, ˌrɑːfaɪˈɛl/ RAF-ee-əl, RAY-fee-, RAH-fy-EL),[4] was an Italian painter and architect of the High Renaissance.
I didn't admire Raphael or Van Dyck or whomever because they were rich.
image.png
4.76 MB
View full-sizeDownload Sir Anthony van Dyck (Dutch: Antoon van Dyck [ˈɑntoːɱ vɑn ˈdɛik]; 22 March 1599 – 9 December 1641) was a Flemish Baroque artist who became the leading court painter in England after success in the Spanish Netherlands and Italy.
I admired their paintings.
They aren't famous now because they were rich.
They are famous because they created real works of art.
And when I got involved in physics, it was the same.
I wanted to do real physics, not just collect a paycheck.
But these people in the families aren't like that.
They look at people like me as aliens, or as another species.
What I just said doesn't register with them.
I know, because I have worked with some of them (in the galleries).
I have seen them look at me in wonder.
They can't figure out what I am up to.
They think I am running some con on them, preparing to unleash some kind of financial reverse-whammy on them, picking their pockets while their guard is down.
It never occurs to them that I am serious.
This is why they have destroyed:
art
literature
science
and everything else.
Those things really don't mean anything to them, except as potential commodities.
I have never seen any real evidence they are Satanists, but I have seen lots of evidence with my own eyes that they are fatally shallow, unable to appreciate anything with depth.
Likewise in physics, where we have seen top physicists admitting that physics means nothing to them.
They are only interested in a shallow heuristics.
If that.
I suspect they too are only interested in money or appearing on camera.
More broadly, it has always looked to me like the governors want you think they are Satanists, because as Satanists they would actually be far more interesting than they really are.
But this is just a Halloween costume they like to dress up in, because it makes them look like they have a personality.
They are so devoid of all imagination; they can't think of anything but to scare you.
That is the extent of their creativity.
I leave open the possibility there may exist some interesting people hidden away somewhere on this planet, but I have yet to meet them or hear of them.
The rich and influential people I have met have not been the most interesting, but the least.
Hanging with them has always been like eating plastic fruit, and I would rather spend time with my cats.
Which is what I do.
This is because I have found by long experience that not only do these people have nothing interesting to say, but they will also allow nothing interesting to be said.
As a child, I remember being able to enthrall just about any audience with my observations, but that all ended at about age 12.
It wasn't that my stories became less interesting:
in fact, I believe they have become more and more interesting as time has passed.
What changed is my audience.
While children are pure enough to be enthralled by a true story, most adults are not.
Most adults don't want to hear anything they haven't already heard on TV.
Teenagers are heavily groomed by culture, and they are entertained only by those who can mimic the major entertainers and forms.
Although I could do that as a young man, I didn't find it entertaining for myself.
image.png
3.01 MB
View full-sizeDownload Stephen Glenn Martin (born August 14, 1945) is an American comedian, actor, writer, producer, and musician.
Beyond a certain age, I was no longer interested in aping Steve Martin or Robin Williams or whoever was in the news.
image.png
778 KB
View full-sizeDownload Robin McLaurin Williams (July 21, 1951 – August 11, 2014) was an American actor and comedian. Known for his improvisational skills and the wide variety of characters he created on the spur of the moment and portrayed on film, in dramas and comedies alike, he is regarded as one of the greatest comedians of all time.
In short, I grew up.
I needed more from my entertainment than a few shallow jokes.
I like comedy routines and sports, but only as a sidelight in my downtime.
For my main courses, I need to feed on something more substantial.
Most adults no longer grow up.
They are stuck at the level of comedy routines and sports.
They are groomed by long custom to remain at this level.
If you get beyond those categories, your audience is lost.
They look at you like time traveler from the 19th century.
You might as well be wearing a powdered wig and buckles on your shoes.
If you say anything interesting, they will ignore it as if it wasn't said.
This happens to me every time I go out (which isn't often anymore).
I still try to be interesting, but it doesn't fly.
So almost the only time I speak out now is in these papers. I have my say, entertain myself mightily, and possibly reach a few adults who retain that child inside.
I find the stories I have told you and myself over the past years far more interesting than any history or fiction, and not just because my stories are true.
My stories are more interesting because they contain a complexity that is unmanufactured.
While they have some similarities to Sherlock Holmes mysteries, they make Sherlock Holmes mysteries look like grocery lists.