How I Know the Hanging of John Brown was Fake
First published August 12, 2019, by Miles Mathis
Great head of hair for an old man.
We have to give him that.
But start by noticing the nose.
John Brown was the famous abolitionist allegedly hanged in Charlestown, West Virginia, on December 2, 1859.
John Brown (May 9, 1800 – December 2, 1859) was an American evangelist who was a prominent leader in the American abolitionist movement in the decades preceding the Civil War. First reaching national prominence in the 1850s for his radical abolitionism and fighting in Bleeding Kansas, Brown was captured, tried, and executed by the Commonwealth of Virginia for a raid and incitement of a slave rebellion at Harpers Ferry in 1859.
If you don't remember the particulars of the story, look it up:
I am not going to repeat it all here.
John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry - Wikipedia
It is a famous event of US history, and you should already know it.
Anyway, I know it was fake by closely reading one document:
Henry Steele Olcott's “How We Hung John Brown”.
Colonel Henry Steel Olcott (2 August 1832 – 17 February 1907) was an American military officer, journalist, lawyer, Freemason (member of Huguenot Lodge #448, now #46) and the co-founder and first president of the Theosophical Society.
No that is not a typo:
the title is “Hung”, not “Hanged”.
The story is in 1875's Lotus Leaves, but you can access it for free online in several places.
Our first and perhaps greatest clue is Olcott himself, since we have already seen in several previous papers that he was a top spook of the day.
From Theosophy to the Beat Generation or How even the Occult was Disguised – Library of Rickandria
At the time of the hanging, he was working as an editor for the New York Tribune, which was the Washington Post of its time:
a newspaper created directly by Intelligence and staffed completely by them.
Later he was on the 3-man investigating committee for the fake Lincoln assassination—the Warren Commission of its time.
Lincoln’s Assassination was a Manufactured Event: Meaning it NEVER Happened – Library of Rickandria
And a decade later he was one of the two founders of the Theosophy project, along with Madame Blavatsky.
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky[a] (née Hahn von Rottenstern; 12 August [O.S. 31 July] 1831 – 8 May 1891), often known as Madame Blavatsky, was a Russian and American mystic and author who co-founded the Theosophical Society in 1875. She gained an international following as the leading theoretician of Theosophy.
So, at this distance in time, his cover pretty much blows itself.
Olcott's story of the hanging is transparently false—outrageously so.
So outrageously it is difficult to believe it was ever written down and published.
But we have to remember that Olcott's audience was naive beyond any reckoning. . . sort of like now.
The American public has always been fantastically gullible, unable to spot a lie from a foot away at top volume.
The Trump Shooting was of course Staged – Library of Rickandria
So Olcott didn't have to take any reasonable care with his lies.
He figured he could say anything, no matter how absurd, and it would be believed.
Olcott begins by trying to convince us he was an agricultural editor at the Tribune, which is a laugh.
He probably didn't know an ewe from a kid or a wheatgerm from a corncob.
He also wants us to believe he was a Whig, and therefore totally uninterested in the slavery question.
An innocent bystander at the paper who only got involved for the thrill (or to help out his buddy Horace Greeley).
Horace Greeley (February 3, 1811 – November 29, 1872) was an American newspaper editor and publisher who was the founder and editor of the New-York Tribune. Long active in politics, he served briefly as a congressman from New York and was the unsuccessful candidate of the new Liberal Republican Party in the 1872 presidential election against incumbent President Ulysses S. Grant, who won by a landslide.
Right.
He actually tells us he had,
“as little to do with politics as any man in the city”
Yeah.
That's why just five years later he was on the investigating committee for the Lincoln Assassination.
They needed disinterested aggies for that, I guess.
Next, we are told the locals in Virginia were incensed that the abolitionist Tribune had sent spies south to report events on the ground and were combing their ranks for these spies.
Although Olcott says these spies were in fear for their lives from local mobs, he admits three suspects had been caught and driven out of Charlestown.
That is “driven out”, not lynched.
So Olcott wishes us to believe he was risking his own life to get this story.
He wasn't, as is clear if you read his own words closely.
Olcott began y taking a steamer to Petersburg, where he was housed by “a dear old friend”.
Even Petersburg is a clue, since—among other things—it was an early hub of Intelligence.
It had connections to a host of peerage families and Jewish merchants, far more than its population would lead you to suspect.
But Olcott quickly tries to cover those tracks by telling us his dear old friend was a fire-eating defender of slavery, one who wanted to hang John Brown with his own hands.
We will pause here to ask if that makes any sense.
If Olcott's dear old friend was such a person, why was his house chosen as the “base of operations for Olcott”?
As a dear old friend, this person would surely know Olcott not only had sailed from New York but was working as an editor for the Tribune.
I guess this dear old friend was either the most unsuspicious person ever born or was as dumb as a bag of rocks.
Olcott is also trying to sell us the idea that Northerners didn't really care if Virginia hanged John Brown.
Which means it isn't true.
Although the hanging was faked, a majority of Northerners were against it.
They believed it was real and were genuinely upset by it.
For many of them John Brown was a hero.
See Thoreau, as just one example.
Henry David Thoreau (July 12, 1817 – May 6, 1862) was an American naturalist, essayist, poet, and philosopher. A leading transcendentalist, he is best known for his book Walden, a reflection upon simple living in natural surroundings, and his essay "Civil Disobedience" (originally published as "Resistance to Civil Government"), an argument in favor of citizen disobedience against an unjust state.
As now, Brown was a manufactured hero, but he was a hero, nonetheless.
So, as usual, we see the layering of lies here, and the multiple levels of manipulation of the American people by their governors.
Was Thoreau another dupe, or was he part of the con?
A question for another paper.
The next day, Olcott joined a group of recruits for the Petersburg Grays (Virginia Militia) doing duty in Charlestown to maintain order.
Olcott tells us he was ready to fight with them and for them, should the need arise.
This is what I mean by an outrageous lie.
Who believes that these Grays would allow a Yankee to join them last minute?
We have already been told they were on the lookout for spies, but no one suspected Olcott?
What did he have to do to tip them off, wear a New York Tribune gimme cap, carry an Underground Railroad coffee mug, or wear an I ♥ John Brown t-shirt?
The very next day this new recruit to the Grays was taken charge of by General Taliaferro's Chief Surgeon, who Olcott admits just happened to be a fellow Freemason.
Decoding Rosicrucianism & Freemasonry Using the Unified Field – Library of Rickandria
Olcott, the Surgeon, and the other Grays boarded a train for Charlestown, and the train was later stopped by the provost-guard, which was looking for spies.
“Every passenger was subjected to a rigid examination.”
Despite that, Olcott was let off on the vouching of his fellow Grays—who, remember, had known him for all of one day.
Besides, it can't be both ways.
If he was let off on the vouching of the Grays, he wasn't subjected to a rigorous examination, was he?
Next, we learn that although Olcott was ready to fight for and with his fellow Grays, he was not in uniform.
He and the surgeon were in street clothes.
This also makes no sense.
Getting off the train, Olcott was almost recognized by
“a Washington acquaintance, Colonel Blank”
but dodged that bullet by screwing up his face.
No, really, that is what it says.
Rather than bunk down with his militia mates, Olcott then went with his surgeon friend to General Taliaferro's own headquarters, which happened to be in a 5-star hotel downtown.
Strange that this known Yankee was led directly into the enemy's camp, eh?
There, he ran into South Carolina Senator Ruffin, who also knew him, but again avoided recognition by turning his head away.
Edmund Ruffin III (January 5, 1794 – June 17, 1865) was a wealthy Virginia planter who served in the Virginia Senate from 1823 to 1827. In the last three decades before the American Civil War, his pro-slavery writings received more attention than his agricultural work. Ruffin, a slaveholder, staunchly advocated states' rights and slavery, arguing for secession years before the Civil War, and became a political activist with the so-called Fire-Eaters. Ruffin is given credit for "firing the first shot of the war" at the Battle of Fort Sumter in April 1861 and fought as a Confederate soldier despite his advanced age. When the war ended in Southern defeat in 1865, he committed suicide rather than submit to "Yankee rule." Ruffin is also known for his pioneering work in methods to preserve and improve soil productivity. He recommended crop rotation and amendments to restore soils exhausted from tobacco monoculture. Early in his career, he studied bogs and swamps to learn how to correct soil acidity. He published essays and, in 1832, a book on his findings for improving soils. He has since become known as "the father of soil science" in the United States.
No really.
Later that evening he slept in the house of “one of the principal functionaries of the court” (as in “judge”), along with the entire General Staff.
Great way to fly under the radar, right?
Added July 22, 2020:
But let's pause on General Taliaferro for a moment.
William Booth Taliaferro (/ˈtɒlɪvər/ TOL-iv-ər; December 28, 1822 – February 27, 1898) was a United States Army officer, a lawyer, legislator, Confederate general in the American Civil War, and Grand Master of Masons in Virginia.
His full name was William Booth Taliaferro.
Yes, as in John Wilkes Booth, a cousin.
John Wilkes Booth (May 10, 1838 – April 26, 1865) was an American stage actor who assassinated United States President Abraham Lincoln at Ford's Theatre in Washington, D.C., on April 14, 1865. A member of the prominent 19th-century Booth theatrical family from Maryland, he was a noted actor who was also a Confederate sympathizer; denouncing President Lincoln, he lamented the then-recent abolition of slavery in the United States.
Lincoln’s Assassination was a Manufactured Event: Meaning it NEVER Happened – Library of Rickandria
Here is what William looked like:
Are you seeing the usual pattern in this story?
He was the Grand Master of Masons in Virginia.
He was the nephew of James Seddon, Confederate Secretary of War.
James Alexander Seddon (July 13, 1815 – August 19, 1880) was an American lawyer and politician who served two terms as a Representative in the United States Congress, as a member of the Democratic Party. Seddon was appointed Confederate States Secretary of War by Jefferson Davis during the American Civil War.
And I wonder what Seddon looked like:
You have to laugh.
It reminds me of this:
Or maybe this one:
Did you know they have now named the train station at the Western Wall in Jerusalem Trump Station?
Looks Like Donald Trump is Jewish – Library of Rickandria
Anyway, notice how on Seddon's Wiki page they skip over his parents completely.
James Seddon - Wikipedia
That's because on his mother's side he is an:
- Alexander
- Casson
- Bruce
making him not only Jewish but descended from Kings of Scotland.
When Scotland Was Jewish - Anna’s Archive (annas-archive.org)
He married his cousin Sarah Bruce.
General Taliaferro's mother was Frances Todd Booth, not only linking us to John Wilkes Booth but also Mary Todd Lincoln.
Mary Ann Todd Lincoln (December 13, 1818 – July 16, 1882[1]) served as the First Lady of the United States from 1861 until the assassination of her husband, President Abraham Lincoln, in 1865.
And it reminds us that Abe Lincoln was related to his alleged assassin through his wife.
Abraham Lincoln (/ˈlɪŋkən/ LINK-ən; February 12, 1809 – April 15, 1865) was an American lawyer, politician, and statesman who served as the 16th president of the United States from 1861 until his assassination in 1865. He led the United States through the American Civil War, defending the nation as a constitutional union, defeating the insurgent Confederacy, playing a major role in the abolition of slavery, expanding the power of the federal government, and modernizing the U.S. economy.
They never tell you that.
But back to Olcott.
He actually brags that he had “a full-blooded blackie” to polish his shoes in Charlestown.
Charming.
He also:
- drank whiskey
- smoked pipes
- sang comic songs
with his new pals in Southern Intelligence.
There he learned more about Brown, including that he had,
“With a force of fifteen men taken Virginia with his right hand and Maryland with his left hand and shaken them, until every corner of the Union had resounded with their shriekings.”
If this is the first time you are hearing of the doings of John Brown, that should be enough to peg it as a fake.
Fifteen men (with swords again I guess—see below) don't cause such a ruckus, unless they have military intelligence faking and inflating their deeds.
I am just surprised the number was fifteen.
Given later—and earlier —events, we would have expected nineteen.
See:
- the 19 hijackers
- 19 guerrillas with Castro
- 19 witches hanged in Salem
et cetera.
As we will see below, it was 19, not 15.
Olcott and his quoted author get the number wrong, probably on purpose.
Next, General Taliaferro himself proclaimed that all strangers should report themselves to the provost for full examination.
Again, Olcott was not included in that number.
But if he was not a stranger, then they must have known who he was.
And if they knew who he was, why did they not arrest him as a spy?
Next, Olcott admits his trunk had been left at the station upon his arrival.
Since it had his name on it and his place of departure, it should have given him away.
He admits it would have been searched, leading to his arrest.
So, what does he do?
He finds another Mason on the staff and sends him to retrieve the trunk.
Communism & Masonry: Two Fronts of the Jew World Order – Library of Rickandria
This Southerner, being a fellow Mason, asks no questions, develops no suspicions, and does not report it to his superior.
Convenient.
Now we get to the greatest clue the hanging was faked.
The entire city was shut down, and the citizens were told to keep away, under threat of martial law and being shot on sight.
No one but military were allowed within telescope distance of the hanging, so no one but military “witnessed” it.
There was a military force of between two and three thousand troops. . . the whole country for fifteen miles around was guarded by mounted and foot soldiers; all intercourse between town and country was stopped. . . the most stringent precautions had been made to prevent the townspeople from approaching the outermost line of patrolling sentries. . .
We are told this was because the State of Virginia was “badly scared” of Brown being rescued by Pennsylvanians, or to prevent him from making any seditious speeches, but that is ridiculous. If you want to prevent a speech, you gag him.
If you want to prevent a rescue, you have a guard, but you don't have to keep out the public.
The only reason to keep out the public would be to prevent it from seeing the whole thing was a fake.
Since military can be ordered to keep quiet and to see what they are told to see, we have no reliable witnesses to anything.
We have a totally controlled event, with no civilian participation.
Since the newspapers both North and South were also owned by those who owned the military, they could be ordered to report anything desired.
Global Media Control – Library of Rickandria
In this sense, the media was also not “civilian”, so any reporters onhand—like Olcott—should also be considered military.
Their reportage means nothing.
It is not trustworthy.
As we have seen over and over, if the mainstream media tells you that it is day, assume it is night.
But we get even more clues.
Olcott tells us when Brown was driven up, he was wearing a black suit and black slouch hat.
Why would he be allowed to wear a black slouch hat?
Not only would a hat interfere with the hanging, but it would prevent recognition.
Did they also allow him to wear sunglasses, a full beard, and makeup?
As soon as he took off his hat, they quickly placed a white hood over his head.
To round out the fake story, our Mason Olcott is sure to include a bit of numerology at the end, for no apparent reason other than to wave at his pals in lodge.
We are told they waited eight minutes to hang Brown, while troops marched about.
Then the signal was given by Colonel Scott, and Sheriff Campbell cut the rope holding the trapdoor.
Good to see those familiar names.
Other than maybe:
- Stuart
- Murray
- Stanley
those are the names we would most expect.
And then another clue:
Olcott says,
“After the thing had dangled in mid-air for twenty minutes. . .”
Not “Brown” but “the thing”.
The thing being a dummy, you see.
The surgeons took a pulse, of course found none, but then allowed the thing to hang for eighteen more minutes.
18.
Aces and eights.
Dead Man’s Hand - Aces & Eights Meaning & Story Explained (techopedia.com)
Just to be sure they got Chai in there, you know.
Can't tell a fake story without including Chai.
It is in the Mason handbook, I assume.
But even that one mention of eighteen wasn't enough, since four sentences later we get it again.
The drop of the body in a hanging is eighteen inches, we are told.
What we discovered there is already decisive, I would say, but in the name of thoroughness I went to John Brown's Wikipedia page, which is another nest of red flags.
Brown was the son of Owen Brown and Ruth Mills.
So, we have Jewish markers already.
Owen was the founder of Western Reserve College, so Brown didn't come from nowhere, or out of the middle or lower classes as you are led to believe by the glosses you get in school.
That later became Case Western Reserve, and Case = Chase.
Ulysses Grant's father had apprenticed with Owen Brown.
Jesse Root Grant (January 23, 1794 – June 29, 1873) was an American farmer, tanner and successful leather merchant who owned tanneries and leather goods shops in several different states throughout his adult life. He is best known as the father of Ulysses S. Grant and the one who introduced Ulysses to military life at West Point. Jesse was born in Greensburg, Pennsylvania, and was one of seven children. He was a self-made man who rose from poverty to become a wealthy merchant.
Jesse Root Grant - Wikipedia
Owen was also a primary supporter of Oberlin College, which was founded by Philo Stewart.
Philo Stewart (July 6, 1798 — February 13, 1868), American inventor, Missionary | World Biographical Encyclopedia (prabook.com)
Oberlin was named for J. F. Oberlin of Germany.
See his picture on his Wiki page and note the endless nose.
J. F. Oberlin (31 August 1740 – 1 June 1826) was an Alsatian pastor and a philanthropist. He has been known as John Frederic(k) Oberlin in English, Jean-Frédéric Oberlin in French, and Johann Friedrich Oberlin in German.
He's also wearing his Jewish hat for us, making this even easier.
His mother was a Feltz.
Indicating again they were Jewish.
Oberlin is called there,
“The true precursor of Social Christianity in France.”
Anything to do with:
is and always was a project of Jewish merchants, who were trying to undercut both Christianity and Republicanism by misdirection and corruption.
Reading the Signs – Today’s Lesson: Karl Marx – Library of Rickandria
You may have been taught that John Brown was a poor tanner, but the mainstream bios now admit he was a wool merchant.
We are told that Brown,
“Learned much about the Massachusetts' mercantile elite”
but aren't told he didn't learn it from books.
He learned it by being one of them.
We are told he battled the Massachusetts wool cartel, trying to import wool from Europe to contest their local markets.
But they ended up allegedly bankrupting him.
Immediately after that Brown founded his first militant group, the League of Gileadites.
If you aren't smelling the usual smoke by now, you may need to take a decongestant or an antihistamine.
This should clear your head:
Wikipedia next admits Brown was financed and supported by New England's top merchants and richest men.
Power of the Purse: The Origin of Money – Library of Rickandria
They were known as the Secret Six, though there were more than six.
The so-called Secret Six, or the Secret Committee of Six, were a group of men who secretly funded the 1859 raid on Harper's Ferry by abolitionist John Brown. Sometimes described as "wealthy," this was true of only two. The other four were in positions of influence, and could, therefore, encourage others to contribute to "the cause." The name "Secret Six" was invented by writers long after Brown's death. The term never appears in the testimony at Brown's trial, in James Redpath's The Public Life of Capt. John Brown (1859), or in the Memoirs of John Brown of Franklin Benjamin Sanborn (1878). The men involved helped Brown as individuals and did not work together or correspond with each other. They were never in the same room at the same time, and in some cases barely knew each other.
One of these was industrialist George Walker.
Think George Herbert Walker Bush, a descendant.
LOOKS LIKE the Bushes are Jewish – Library of Rickandria
Walker was the brother-in-law of Franklin Sanborn, another of the Six, famous for writing about the Transcendentalists, including Thoreau.
Franklin Benjamin Sanborn (December 15, 1831 – February 24, 1917) was an American journalist, teacher, author, reformer, and abolitionist. Sanborn was a social scientist and memorialist of American transcendentalism who wrote early biographies of many of the movement's key figures. He founded the American Social Science Association in 1865 "to treat wisely the great social problems of the day." He was a member of the so-called Secret Six, or "Committee of Six", which funded or helped obtain funding for John Brown's Raid on Harpers Ferry; in fact, he introduced Brown to the others.: 105 A recent scholar describes him as "humorless."
Sanborn was a wealthy spook whose mother was a Leavitt.
So, another Jew.
Another of the Secret Six was Amos Adams Lawrence.
Amos Adams Lawrence (July 31, 1814 – August 22, 1886) was an American businessman, philanthropist, and social activist. He was a key figure in the United States abolitionist movement in the years leading up to the Civil War and the growth of the Episcopal Church in Massachusetts. He was instrumental in the establishment of the University of Kansas and Lawrence University in Appleton, Wisconsin.
He owned Ipswich Mills, the largest producer of knit goods in the US.
His wife was Sarah Appleton, also Jewish.
Another of the Six was Gerrit Smith, whose wife was Ann Carroll FitzHugh.
Gerrit Smith (March 6, 1797 – December 28, 1874), also spelled Gerritt Smith, was an American social reformer, abolitionist, businessman, public intellectual, and philanthropist. Married to Ann Carroll Fitzhugh, Smith was a candidate for President of the United States in 1848, 1856, and 1860. He served a single term in the House of Representatives from 1853 to 1854.
His daughter was the suffragist Elizabeth Cady Stanton, telling us what to think of her as well.
This links us to the peerage several more times, since these were the Smiths of Wales and Nottingham.
Smith's mother was a Livingston, as in Levinson.
She was also a Ten Broeck, of Dutch nobility.
The FitzHughs were also nobility.
Smith ran for US President in:
- 1848
- 1856
- 1860
Another of the Six was Thomas Higginson, of the Boston Brahmins.
Thomas Wentworth Higginson (December 22, 1823 – May 9, 1911), who went by the name Wentworth,: 52 was an American Unitarian minister, author, abolitionist, politician, and soldier. He was active in abolitionism in the United States during the 1840s and 1850s, identifying himself with disunion and militant abolitionism. He was a member of the Secret Six who supported John Brown. During the Civil War, he served as colonel of the 1st South Carolina Volunteers, the first federally authorized black regiment, from 1862 to 1864. Following the war, he wrote about his experiences with African-American soldiers and devoted much of the rest of his life to fighting for the rights of freed people, women, and other disfranchised peoples. He is also remembered as a mentor to poet Emily Dickinson.
Not only was he a billionaire, but he was also Steward of Harvard College.
His grandfather had been in the Continental Congress.
His wife Channing was a close relative of the Fullers, linking us again to Intelligence.
Another of the Six was George Luther Stearns, a descendant of Isaac Sterne of Salem.
George Luther Stearns (January 8, 1809 – April 9, 1867) was an American industrialist and merchant in Medford, Massachusetts, as well as an abolitionist and a noted recruiter of black soldiers for the Union Army during the American Civil War.
So, again, Jewish.
The Salem Witch Trials WERE FAKED – Library of Rickandria
Stearns was born 1/8/1809.
Chai.
William Lloyd Garrison (December 10, 1805 – May 24, 1879) was an American abolitionist, journalist, and social reformer. He is best known for his widely read anti-slavery newspaper The Liberator, which Garrison founded in 1831 and published in Boston until slavery in the United States was abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment in 1865.
Another of the Six was William Lloyd Garrison, who founded the newspaper The Liberator with Isaac Knapp.
Isaac Knapp (January 11, 1804 – September 14, 1843) was an American abolitionist printer, publisher, and bookseller in Boston, Massachusetts. He is remembered primarily for his collaboration with William Lloyd Garrison in printing and publishing The Liberator newspaper.
Jewish.
Isaac Kappy Faked his Death – Library of Rickandria
So, you may want to ask yourself why these wealthy Jewish merchants of Boston and Springfield were funding John Brown.
And why they weren't charged for conspiracy along with him.
Also why, with all this money and power behind him, Brown was only able to gather 15 or 20 men for his militia, and why he couldn't avoid trial.
Keep those questions in mind as we proceed.
Brown's career as a vigilante or guerrilla started in 1856 at the Pottawatomie Massacre, where he and his band attacked a group of slave hunters.
Armed only with swords, they killed five of them.
Right, and you believe that?
Slave hunters wouldn't carry guns?
They would get ambushed by a few guys with swords?
C'mon!
In the next paragraph we are told that prior to these murders, only eight killings in Kansas were attributable to slave politics.
There is your clue that Pottawatomie was faked.
The name itself is another sign, since the writers wished to give this ridiculous story a ridiculous name.
They kept up that drollery with the Osawatomie Siege, where, despite being outnumbered 7 to 1, Brown and three of his sons allegedly escaped after being surrounded.
No chance that happened.
The genius historians who wrote all this weren't mathematicians as usual, and hired no continuity editor, also as usual, since they tell us 29 people died in the Bleeding Kansas period of three months.
But 23 were killed at Osawatomie alone, which leaves only six for the rest.
So, although Bleeding Kansas is sold as a major preview of the Civil War, the amount of blood was actually minuscule, even according to the mainstream fake story.
I don't believe Brown's battle ever happened, which takes us down to six.
And the odds are those six were faked as well, taking us to. . . zero.
Next, we learn that Brown hired as his drillmaster and military consultant Hugh Forbes.
Random Thoughts on History: John Brown's Hired Martial Help: Hugh Forbes
Forbes was allegedly a mercenary who had taken part in battles in Italy with Garibaldi, but that is doubtful.
More likely he was a banker's son on holiday.
His name alone is a towering red flag.
As is Brown's other supporter in this period:
Allan Pinkerton (August 21, 1819 – July 1, 1884) was a Scottish-American cooper, abolitionist, detective, and spy, best known for creating the Pinkerton National Detective Agency in the United States and his claim to have foiled a plot in 1861 to assassinate president-elect Abraham Lincoln. During the Civil War, he provided the Union Army – specifically General George B. McClellan of the Army of the Potomac – with military intelligence, including extremely inaccurate enemy troop strength numbers. After the war, his agents played a significant role as strikebreakers – in particular during the Great Railroad Strike of 1877 – a role that Pinkerton men would continue to play after the death of their founder.
Allan Pinkerton.
Pinkerton was head of the Pinkerton Agency, of course, precursor of both the secret service and the CIA.
CIA: Central Intelligence Agency – Library of Rickandria
So, I don't think we could pile any more red flags on the head of John Brown if we tried.
But let's try.
Although Brown's draft plan for attacking Harper's Ferry Armory called for 4,500 men, he attacked it with. . . 18.
Chai.
With Brown himself, that would 19, so we do have that number come up, linking us to 9/11, Salem, Cuba, etc.
We are told the Armory contained 100,000 rifles but was guarded by a single watchman.
Yeah.
Reminds us of the single drunken policeman (related to Mary Todd Lincoln) who was guarding Lincoln at the theater but went next door for a pint.
We aren't told how Brown and his merry band of 18 planned to carry off 100,000 rifles.
I guess they overlooked that little logistics problem.
Or maybe the Chinook they hired blew a fuse.
Local farmers pinned them down and they were captured on. . . October 18.
10/18.
Chai.
Since Harriet Tubman also worked with Brown, we can take her down with this as well.
Harriet Tubman (born Araminta Ross, c. March 1822 – March 10, 1913) was an American abolitionist and social activist. After escaping slavery, Tubman made some 13 missions to rescue approximately 70 enslaved people, including her family and friends, using the network of antislavery activists and safe houses known collectively as the Underground Railroad. During the American Civil War, she served as an armed scout and spy for the Union Army. In her later years, Tubman was an activist in the movement for women's suffrage.
Clearly, the whole John Brown saga was manufactured from the ground up by military intelligence, under orders from the wealthy merchants we saw above.
It was part of the wind-up to the Civil War, but not in the way we have been told.
The slavery question was used as cover for the real causes of the War, as it still is.
The War was not between the North and the South, but between the richest merchants in the North and the richest merchants in the South.
It was a battle for control of most of North America by a small number of trillionaire families, those families still living on both sides of the pond.
In that context, we can begin to understand that the Underground Railroad, as far as it actually existed, was not so much a road for freeing slaves, as it was a recruitment pipeline for the upcoming war.
The South was obviously seen as having a huge excess of black manpower, which could be used as a military weapon in the event of war.
Jews Have Cursed the Black Race – Library of Rickandria
So, the North naturally wished to siphon off as much of that power as they could.
One, by physically moving as many of those slaves north as they could, where they could be drafted into the Union Army.
Every man moved was a double or triple gain, since what the North gained the South lost.
And the lost slave was not only a lost soldier, but also a lost commodity and source of income.
Two, by making all slaves as discontented as possible by a constant line of propaganda.
Slaves who could be turned against their masters, even if just in word, would be useless in battle.
They would have no fighting spirit.
By constantly talking of freedom, the North would be creating enemies against the South in their own homes.
This is what the slavery question was really about, as we see anytime, we look closer at the people involved.
You can be sure these rich northern merchants didn't give a damn about black people.
Communist Infection of the Black Race – Library of Rickandria
Why?
Because they didn't give a damn about white people, either, unless those white people were others in their families.
These rich bastards were the same then as they are now, so we don't have to squint or use any imagination.
For them, most people—black and white—are just robot workers and consumers, who are allowed to exist only to be fleeced at every opportunity.
So, any time we hear them start talking about human rights or freedoms, we can be sure we are being snowed.
Such talk has always been used to herd us around at will.
They will say whatever is necessary to set us up for the next plunder.
There is much more to be said about the Civil War, but I can't say it all here.
As with the other major wars, I need more basic research to build upon.
All we can be sure of is that we will uncover more fakes everywhere we look.
But after collating all of them, who knows what we will find.
Is the mainstream story 50% false, 75% false, or 98% false?
We will see.
If it follows the lines of the Lincoln assassination or the John Brown story, it will be closer to 98% false.