As usual, this is just my personal opinion, based on private research.

There is always a point in my research when I stop and start writing.

It usually comes surprisingly early—well before anyone else would start writing.

It happens when I find a clue so formidable, so unanswerable, I know I won't be wasting my time writing.

It is that point when I am so certain I am on the right track, there is no chance I will discover I was wrong.

So, I simply start writing—before having done most of the research I will end up doing—knowing it will turn out.

In other words, I don't do the research first, and then write it up.

I do maybe thirty minutes of fishing on the web, find that indice formidable, and immediately start writing.

I then research as I write, looking for what I need to continue.

I always find it.

SHERLOCK HOLMES – Library of Rickandria

In this mystery, that clue was the discovery that Nigel Newton's mother was allegedly named Anne St. Aubyn.

Nigel Newton CBE (born 16 June 1955) is an American-born British publisher. He is the founder and chief executive (CEO) of Bloomsbury Publishing.

No doubt you will say,

Who is Nigel Newton?

He is the founder of Bloomsbury Publishing, the publisher of J. K. Rowling.

Joanne Rowling CH OBE FRSL (/ˈroʊlɪŋ/ ROH-ling; born 31 July 1965), known by her pen name J. K. Rowling, is a British author and philanthropist. She is the author of Harry Potter, a seven-volume fantasy series published from 1997 to 2007. The series has sold over 600 million copies, been translated into 84 languages, and spawned a global media franchise including films and video games. The Casual Vacancy (2012) was her first novel for adults. She writes Cormoran Strike, an ongoing crime fiction series, under the alias Robert Galbraith.

Curiously, although he has several online bios, including one at Wikipedia, his mother is not given.

He has no genealogy listings.

But his father, Peter, does have a New York Times obituary, and there his first wife is given as Anne St. Aubyn.

Peter Newton, Napa Vintner, Dies at 81 - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

She is stated to be the mother of Nigel.

Now, that is curious for several reasons.

One, no Anne St. Aubyn, wife of Peter Newton, comes up in any search.

Two—and this is the clincher—I happen to know that Anne St. Aubyn is a famous person from history.

She is also known as Anne Arundell, granddaughter of William Arundell of Menadarvy.

Anne Calvert, Baroness Baltimore (née Hon. Anne Arundell; c. 1615/1616[1] – 23 July 1649) was an English noblewoman, the daughter of Thomas Arundell, 1st Baron Arundell of Wardour by his second wife Anne Philipson, and wife of Lord Baltimore, who founded the Province of Maryland in 1632 // 1634, (third English / British colony of the Thirteen Colonies of the British Empire), namesake of Anne Arundel County in the U.S. state of Maryland. In addition, a United States Navy transport ship USS Anne Arundel (AP-76), an Elizabeth C. Stanton-class transport was in turn named after the Maryland county, serving three decades in the American Navy, from 1940 to 1970.

This Arundell family was closely related to the King (Henry VIII, for example), and Anne St. Aubyn was of the Trerice clan of Arundells, seated in Newlyn.

Henry VIII was Gay & an even bigger surprise revelation – Library of Rickandria

So the Arundell family is very famous—which is why we have complete genealogies going back centuries.

Moreover, according to thepeerage.com, there is no Anne St. Aubyn since about 1800.

There have been several, but none in the past two centuries.

The family is still prominent, with the writer Edward currently making headlines.

But he has no living or recently dead relatives named Anne or Ann.

Therefore, we may deduce that the writers of Intelligence are playing games with us once again.

If Anne St. Aubyn is a manufactured person, it is likely her son Nigel Newton is manufactured as well.

He probably exists, but only as a front for MI6 or the CIA.

The links of this family Arundell to the Newtons are buried but discoverable.

The Arundell line ended in the middle 1700s, and Trerice was taken over by Baronet Acland.

His mother was the daughter of Henry Hoare, of the banking company C. Hoare & Co.

It is still around today, being the oldest bank in the UK and the fourth oldest in the world.

One of its famous clients in the 18th century was Beau Nash.

Note the last name, which we have seen several times recently.

A Beautiful Mind? No, another ugly project – Library of Rickandria

Around 1920, the Hoares and Newtons intermarried, with Thomas Hoare marrying Daphne Newton.

Their son was Alfred Newton Hoare.

So, it looks like the spooks are giving us clues, knowing we can't read them.

In this case, they went to Nigel Newton's real genealogy and pulled up a name, assigning it to his mother.

But she wasn't his mother, she was something like his g-g-g-g-g-great aunt.

If you are wondering who the St. Aubyns are, they were created baronets in 1671, being descended from Arundels and Stewards/Stewarts.

After marrying the Knollys (previously Riches), they became barons in 1887, at which point they continued to marry up, to the Marquesses Townshend, who were Stuarts (Marquesses of Bute).

The second Baron then continued the rise by marrying into the Hamiltons, Dukes of Abercorn in 1892.

His second wife was a Child-Villiers, of the Earls of Jersey.

At that point the rise ended, since he had no sons.

His daughter is now married to the Earl of Morley.

A younger brother married a Phillips and continued to be Baron St. Leven.

They are still barons and have recently married into the Kennedys.

THE HIDDEN KING(S): Camelot Ruled from the Cave of Merlin – Library of Rickandria

If you think that is a stretch, we find confirming clues without much effort.

Bloomsbury Publishing has a relatively small author list, but we find a George Hoare on it.

An Introduction to Antonio Gramsci: His Life, Thought and Legacy: George Hoare: Bloomsbury Academic

He allegedly wrote a 2015 book on Antonio Gramsci.

Antonio Francesco Gramsci (UK: /ˈɡræmʃi/ GRAM-shee,[2] US: /ˈɡrɑːmʃi/ GRAHM-shee, Italian: [anˈtɔːnjo franˈtʃesko ˈɡramʃi] ⓘ; 22 January 1891 – 27 April 1937) was an Italian Marxist philosopher, linguist, journalist, writer, and politician. He wrote on philosophy, political theory, sociology, history, and linguistics. He was a founding member and one-time leader of the Italian Communist Party. A vocal critic of Benito Mussolini and fascism, he was imprisoned in 1926, where he remained until his death in 1937.

Who is Gramsci?

He was the leader of the Communist Party in Italy in the 1920s, allegedly jailed by Mussolini in 1926.

Benito Mussolini – Library of Rickandria

He allegedly died in custody in 1937 at age 46.

In other words, he was another agent.

Communism itself is a creation of Intelligence back to the 1840s.

Reading the Signs – Today’s Lesson: Karl Marx – Library of Rickandria

And of course, that is just the sort of book you would expect agents to be writing in 2015.

Marx’s Wife & other things – Library of Rickandria

Before we move on, notice that if either Nigel Newton's mother or distant ancestor is a St. Aubyn, that makes him related to former kings of England and several current peers.

You aren't ever told that.

Also, note that his last name is Newton.

Might he be related to Sir Isaac Newton?

Someone else can research that.

There was also a Thomas Newton acting as prosecutor in the Salem Witch Trial hoax.

There is something else you should know about Bloomsbury Publishing.

Its Chairman is Anthony Salz.

Salz was the Chairman of the BBC in 2006, having been for several years on the Board of Governors.

He is also a trustee of the trust which owns The Guardian newspaper, one of the largest in London.

he is Executive Director of N. M. Rothschild and Sons Limited.

Who are the Rothschilds? – Library of Rickandria

This bank was founded in 1811 and serves the Queen, among other extremely prominent clients.

Curious to find Bloomsbury Publishing connected in this way, isn't it?

Rothschild and Salz are of course Jewish.

Exposing the Jews – Library of Rickandria

Also curious is that Bloomsbury Publishing was so new when it began working with Rowling.

It became publicly registered in the UK in 1994, and in 1998 Bloomsbury USA was established.

The Nineties – Library of Rickandria

The first Harry Potter came out in 1997.

Strange to find a new publishing house taking on an unknown writer and immediately making her book the biggest thing ever.

The first book is said to have sold over 100 million copies worldwide, and the series has sold almost half a billion units.

Rowling's bio is also full of red flags.

We don't even know her real name.

According to the mainstream bio, she has no middle name.

The K. is made up.

It stands for Kathleen, but she simply adopted it for the books.

No one else in her family only has two names.

Both her parents are military, with her father being an aircraft engineer for Rolls Royce and her mother also being a technician.

That is the only published picture of them together I could find.

it is fake.

It is a paste up.

Both figures were pasted onto that background.

All the edges are unnatural.

Also compare their chins.

His chin and the area under his chin on his neck are black.

Hers are not.

Impossible.

His head is also squashed horizontally, making him look thinner than he was.

This paste-up was very poorly done.

For another clue, we can study this 2012 article from the Daily Mail.

Reunited: JK Rowling and the father who sold rare Harry Potter books to pay £100,000 debts | Daily Mail Online

In it, Rowling is supposedly reconciling with her father.

47.

Numerology all the time with these people.

We are told she refused to loan him money 9 years earlier when his burger van business hit hard times.

Right.

Who believes this stuff?

The article also admits the father is a retired engineer.

England is a cradle-to-grave socialist country, with full retirement packages.

Old guys who worked for Rolls Royce aren't left on the streets, begging from their children or running burger vans.

He looks pretty dapper for the manager of a burger van, doesn't he?

That is the picture published with the 2012 article.

But it is from 2000.

They had both people there for the interview in 2012, so why use a picture from 2000?

All their cameras were broken?

But there are bigger problems than that.

Study the photo closely.

Does that look like a woman with her father?

I would say no.

He is supposed to be 55 and she is supposed to be 35.

He might possibly be a well-preserved 55, but she looks awful for 35.

Without knowing anything about them, I would guess him at 50 and her at 45.

They look like a married couple, not like a father and daughter.

As a girl, Rowling lived in Winterbourne, a suburb of Bristol.

Bristol is of course a huge defense hub, now housing the Defence Procurement Agency.

It is also the home of Bristol Aero Engines, where Rowling's father was said to have worked (now Rolls Royce).

Another red flag comes when Rowling moved to Wales at age 9.

The family lived near Chepstow.

That is suspicious because the Mabey Group was also there, building “major engineering structures”.

The Mabey Group, like Rolls Royce, is closely tied to the British military, and has been back to 1923, when it bought up spare Bailey bridges from the British Army.

 

Destroying Our Past – Library of Rickandria

Best guess is Rowling's first ties to British Intelligence were made through Mabey.

The next red flag is Rowling's time at university.

Although many mainstream sources now say she graduated from Exeter in 1986, a few years ago the same sources were hedging by only claiming she studied there.

I know, because in 2010 I researched Rowling for a paper I was writing on women with degrees.

The end of sense by Miles Mathis (mileswmathis.com)

Based on that research of online mainstream sources, I came to the conclusion Rowling did not graduate from Exeter.

For instance, you may check the Wayback Machine for snapshots of her Wikipedia page at the time.

J. K. Rowling - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (archive.org)

The bio is careful to say she “read” there, but it does not say she graduated. 

So, what gives? 

It looks to me like Intelligence is so confident and so in-control of all sources, it decided to just go ahead and claim she graduated. 

For myself, I am going to need to see some verification from Exeter before I believe anything. 

And given the reach of Intelligence, I may not believe it even then.

Also curious is the number of snapshots of that page the Wayback Machine was taking in 2015. 

On August 26, it took 52 snapshots in one day.

From June 10-13, it took 195.

Why?

The next red flag is Amnesty International, where Rowling worked after leaving university.

in general.
 
AI Confesses to Lying! – Library of Rickandria

Which leads us to check Rowling's genealogy.

The first thing we find at Geni is that her sister married a Moore, and her maternal aunt married a Fox.

Since those names are from the families and the peerage, we have red flags already.

Fox is Jewish, from the name Fuchs, and links us to the Quakers.

The SOCIETY of FRIENDS Looks Like Another JEWISH FRONT – Library of Rickandria

Her grandmother was a Watts-Smith, and her grandfather was a Campbell.

For some reason her mother's maiden name is given as Watts-Smith rather than Campbell.

The Watts Smiths are scrubbed.

Her 2g-grandmother was a Warner.

Her great-aunt was a Robinson.

Her great grandfather was Rev. Colin Fisher Campbell.

Rev Colin Fisher Campbell (1803-1882) - Find a Grave Memorial

Note the name Fisher, which is Jewish. 

Her grandfather Volant was adopted, but his biological father is not given.

But his mother's name is given as Salome Schuch, which also looks Jewish.

and Schneiders.

This may link us to Goldie Hawn, who is really a Hahn.

Goldie Jeanne Hawn (born November 21, 1945) is an American actress. She rose to fame on the NBC sketch comedy program Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In (1968–1970), before going on to receive the Academy Award and Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress for her performance in Cactus Flower (1969).

On her father's side, Rowling is a Holland, but that line is immediately scrubbed.

So is the Andrews line.

But her 3g-grandmother is given as Sarah Abraham, which is a Jewish name.

She is of course immediately scrubbed.

However, we do find Rowlands at this point, indicating Rowling was originally Rowlands.

Edward Eastwell Rowling (c.1830 - d.) - Genealogy (geni.com)

This is interesting, since we have seen them before.

See the Rowlands in the peerage of this time (1800s), who were closely related to the Morris Baronets.

This Morrises were related to the Byngs and Musgraves.

The Rowlands of the peerage were related to the Warrens, which links us Rowling's genealogy, as we just saw.

We also find an Eleanor Rowland marrying Sir Henry Aaron Isaacs in 1848.

Sir Henry Aaron Isaacs (15 August 1830–2 August 1909) was an Alderman, Sheriff of the City of London and Lord Mayor of London in 1889.

He is Jewish, also being a Levy and a Judah.

These Isaacs had been in the peerage for centuries, although we aren't told why; and in 1860 they became the Marquesses of Reading.

The 1st married a Cohen, becoming Lord Chief Justice in 1913 and later Viceroy to India.

The 2nd married a Goetze and was Treasurer of the Middle Temple.

We just saw the name Goetz in Rowling's genealogy, pretty much proving the link.

The name Rowland was originally Rowlands, and they came from Wales, and specifically, Anglesey.

But get ready for the clincher, since if we click on John Rowlands from the peerage, we are taken to Sir Henry Morton Stanley.

Sir Henry Morton Stanley GCB (born John Rowlands; 28 January 1841 – 10 May 1904) was a Welsh American explorer, journalist, soldier, colonial administrator, author and politician who was famous for his exploration of Central Africa and his search for missionary and explorer David Livingstone. Besides his discovery of Livingstone, he is mainly known for his search for the sources of the Nile and Congo rivers, the work he undertook as an agent of King Leopold II of the Belgians which enabled the occupation of the Congo Basin region, and his command of the Emin Pasha Relief Expedition. He was knighted in 1897, and served in Parliament as a Liberal Unionist member for Lambeth North from 1895 to 1900.

Why?

Because his birthname is given as John Rowlands, remember?

We've seen him before, haven't we?

Do you remember where?

It was in my paper on Obama's genealogy.

Obama’s Genealogy & so much more – Library of Rickandria

He is the one who found Livingstone in Africa, saying,

He is given no parents in the peerage and is supposed to have been illegitimate—taking his name from Henry Hope Stanley.

However, we have seen what bollocks that is, and since the Rowlands came from Anglesey— ancient stronghold of the Stanleys, Kings of Mann—we can be sure Rowlands really was a Stanley from that set.

He probably took the name from his mother.

This means that we have linked J. K. Rowling to the Stanleys, Earls of Derby.

That pretty much explains everything, doesn't it?

Still don't believe me?

Well, Sir Henry Stanley's grandson married Dorothy Abel Smith, granddaughter of Maj. Edward Pelham Smith, b. 1869. Rowling was also a Smith, remember?

Lizzie Volant's brother was Henry Edward Smith, b 1870.

And this means that J. K. Rowling is also related to the Queen.

House of Windsor – Library of Rickandria

Dorothy Smith's great-uncle married Elizabeth Brownlow, whose father was the Baron Lurgen.

And his mother-in-law was Elizabeth Lyon, who married John Cavendish Browne, Baron Kilmaine.

The Queen-Mother was a Bowes-Lyon.

Which means we can also figure out who the Hollands are in Rowling's genealogy.

They are the Hollands, Viscounts Knutsford and Baronets Holland.

The 1st Baronet was the Chairman of the Central Mining and Investment Corporation in the late 1920s.

The 2nd was director of Price and Pierce, a global trading house specializing in paper products.

Let's see, what was Harry Potter printed on?

Oh, that's right, paper.

These Baronets Holland were the second iteration, the 1st iteration being in the 1700s, where we find the 1st Baronet Holland, whose mother was a Gould.

Although thepeerage gives no parents for her, you know what that means.

A bit later, we find a Holland, Baron Rotherham, b. 1849.

His mother was a Robinson.

We already saw the Robinsons in Rowling's genealogy, providing yet another link.

And if we look at the Hollands, Viscounts Knutsford, we find the daughter of the 2nd marrying a Graham, of the Dukes of Montrose.

The 5th Duke married a cousin, Violet Hermione Graham, showing us one place Rowling went to get her names for Potter.

As is usual with these writers from the families, she took the names from her own lines in the peerage.

We can also search on the name Watts from Rowling's genealogy, using the same method.

We find Kay Devereux Watts in the peerage, who married Hugh Fox in 1988.

So, the Watts and Foxes of Rowling's lines are still marrying.

Of course, the Watts in the peerage are also related to the Blairs, linking Rowling to Tony Blair—Prime Minister when Potter was released.

These Watts are also related to the Cave-Brownes, and we just saw the Brownes above.

Both come from the Brownes of Derbyshire who married the Greys, Earls of Kent, in the 1600s. 

Tates
Jones
Turners

and Forbes.

in 1787, Eleanor Watts married 1st Baronet Wigram, and their 10th child was William Pitt Wigram.

He married Sophia Smith.

Their son Clive Wigram married the daughter of Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain.

And their grandson, the 3rd Baron Wigram, married Gabriela Diana Moore in 1974.

Could she be the sister or aunt of the Moore who married J. K. Rowling's sister?

All links are scrubbed at Geni and thepeerage, but my guess is yes.

Also curious is that Rowling's daughter Jessica is admitted having been named after Jessica Mitford.

Jessica Lucy "Decca" Treuhaft (née Freeman-Mitford, later Romilly; 11 September 1917 – 23 July 1996) was an English author, one of the six aristocratic Mitford sisters noted for their sharply conflicting politics.

That is a huge red flag, since not only was Mitford the daughter of the 2nd Baron Redesdale, but the Baron's also real name was Freeman-Mitford.

Freeman is a Jewish name, originally Friedmann.

The 1st Baron took the name Freeman from his cousin the 1st Earl Redesdale, from whom he inherited his estates.

and Molyneux.

Jessica Mitford was a huge spook, and she worked on many projects in her long life.

During WWII she hung out with the Durrs in DC, and we have already outed them as spooks many times.

After that she became a Communist, so we have her pegged already as an agent.

Reading the Signs – Today’s Lesson: Karl Marx – Library of Rickandria

Communism was one of their oldest and most successful projects, but it was always no more than a grand hoax.

Marx’s Wife & other things – Library of Rickandria

We can also tell where Rowling got the name “Potter”, since Mitford's publications in the 1950s were influenced by Stephen Potter.

Stephen Meredith Potter (1 February 1900 – 2 December 1969) was a British writer best known for his parodies of self-help books, and their film and television derivatives.

In the 60s, Mitford got involved with the MLK project, which I have unwound elsewhere.

Martin Luther King – Library of Rickandria

Jessica's sisters ran different projects, Diana and Unity Mitford being devotees of Hitler.

Hitler’s Genealogy – Library of Rickandria

But get ready for this. . . Jessica's great-grandmother was Henrietta Stanley, daughter of the 2nd Baron Stanley of Alderley.

His mother-in-law was Henrietta Browne, who we have already seen.

Her grandmother was Dorcas Moore.

So, I think you can see why Rowling named her daughter after Jessica Mitford.

They are closely related.

More indication along these lines is Rowling's current husband, given as Neil Murray.

I could find no information on him, but there are several Neil Murrays in the peerage.

Murray is one of the most common names in the peerage.

they were married in 2001 in Killiechassie House in Scotland, which we are told Rowling had bought recently.

Killiechassie - Wikipedia

So, we should ask, why Killiechassie House?

Well, remember that Rowling is a Campbell.

Killiechassie was owned by the Douglases (Marquesses of Queensbury) in the 19th century, and the Douglases and Campbells are closely related at the top of the Scottish peerage.

More importantly, Killiechassie was owned before that by the. . . Murrays, Dukes of Atholl.

If you think that is a coincidence, I don't know what to tell you.

However, you may want to look up the Dukes of Atholl, who were related to the Percys and Drummonds, just like the Mitfords.

The 6th Duke was the son of a Percy and the husband of a Home-Drummond.

The 4th Duke married a Forbes.

The 8th Duke married a Fanning Stewart.

The 11th Duke died in 2012, and his mother was an Eastwood.

He married a Leach, daughter of a Kleinenberg.

The 12th Duke married Elizabeth Andrew.

We saw that surname in the genealogy of Rowling, scrubbed.

What all this means is that Rowling is another hidden peer, and her fame is due to all her connections— which go straight to the top, including the Queen.

All that rubbish in her common bio about being a commoner, being on welfare and depressed, is just the standard sob story, told by these families to gain your sympathy.

---

I just discovered something that ties in strongly here.

The Isle of Man passed from the Stanleys, Earls of Derby, to the Murrays, Dukes of Atholl, in 1736, when the Earl died without issue.

His cousin James Murray (whose grandmother was a Stanley) inherited the Lordship of the Isle.

Since this Murray's mother was a Hamilton, this also brings the Dukes of Hamilton into it.

Anyway, this indicates that Rowling's husband Neil Murray is probably a cousin, and that her ties to Killiechassie Castle may be as strong as his through her connection to the Dukes of Atholl.

Also interesting is that the Isle of Man is independent to this day, being neither a part of Great Britain nor of the United Kingdom. †

That tends to confirm my analysis in many papers, where I suggest the Stanleys have hidden powers to this day.

---

All this is highly suspicious and leads me to believe Rowling was simply hired to front this project.

I would say it is very doubtful she wrote any of it, a better guess being it was written by a committee in Vauxhall, Langley, or elsewhere.

In support of that, we find the Harry Potter books selling many of the same points of other Intelligence projects, including the destruction of the family.

Harry has no family, being adopted by “muggle” relatives who don't like him and whom he finds both ridiculous and contemptible.

He is glad to leave them and go off to a boarding school where he never sees them.

So, the books are selling an updated version of Plato's The Republic, where children are taken from their parents by the State, divided into classes, and raised to serve the interests of the Elders.

Children today are being taught to look upon their own parents as contemptible muggles and upon themselves as a superior class of magicians, who can potentially get whatever they wish with the proper spell.

They will be happy to be taken from their witless parents and placed in fortified castles, as long as they are issued fake wands and are presided over by people in black robes.

If you think that is a recipe for a healthy society or homelife, you need to cut your fluoride dosage.

Harry Potter is often compared to The Lord of the Rings, but the comparison could not be less apt.

Potter is actually an inversion of LOTR.

In LOTR, the heroes are hobbits—short and unattractive common folk living on the land.

They are the muggles of their time and place.

But Potter reverses this, making common folk less than useless.

Without a few high-born wizards like Harry to fight for them, the muggles would soon be wiped out.

But in Potter, it is hard to understand why this wouldn't be good riddance.

Tolkien made the hobbits ignorant and provincial, but through the actions and explanations of both Gandalf and Frodo, we understand why they are worth saving from the Dark Lord.

In Potter, we have none of that, the muggles as described being completely expendable.

This is no accident, since it is exactly how the current Elders see it.

If, by unfortunate means, non-magical people do happen to observe the working of magic, the Ministry of Magic sends Obliviators to cast Memory Charms upon them causing them to forget the event.

Ministry of Magic - Wikipedia

From the Wiki page on muggles.

Just substitute “agent” for “Obliviator”, “non-agent” for “non-magical person”, “Intel hoax” for “magical event”, CIA for “Ministry of Magic”, and “propaganda blitz” for Memory Charm.

If, by unfortunate means, non-agents do happen to see through obvious hoaxes, the CIA sends agents to confuse and misdirect them, causing them to forget the event.

As you see, the Harry Potter project is stupidly transparent in a thousand places, and only readers that had been sucking on blue pills their whole lives could fail to see through it.

The REAL Pill to Swallow – Library of Rickandria

Once again, we have Intelligence writing about itself, and pretty much telling you what is going on straight to your face, even as they do it to you.

They know that, as a muggle, you won't figure out you are being fucked with, even as you are being fucked with, and as they tell you that you are being fucked with.

The standard muggle response in such a situation is,

Throughout the entire seven books in the series, “magic” is always just a pointer to Intel.

Magic or Magick? – Library of Rickandria

They are the magicians.

The agents are wizards in training, and the muggles are civilians.

Everything in all the plots has a pretty transparent analogy to something in Intelligence, with Hogwarts being the Intel Academy, and so on.

You will say I could make analogies like that to Intel with any book.

OK, so try it with The Lord of the Rings.

What is the analogy to Intel there?

Where is the academy, who are the agents, where are the competing cadres, etc.?

Although Tolkien assured us the book was not an allegory, I agree you can find allegorical elements if you try.

But unlike Harry Potter, LOTR is not just a thin palimpsest through which you can see Intel at every point.

LOTR is a full-fledged work of fiction, not just an amateurish roman à clef.

and so on.

As another example, we can look at King's Cross Station, used in Potter for the locus of platform 9 and 3/4's.

Why King's Cross?

Probably because it is the station used by the writers.

And guess what, it takes very little research to find the Guardian Media Group offices right next door.

This is the publisher of The Guardian and The Observer.

We already saw The Guardian linked to Harry Potter above, didn't we?

Anthony Salz is involved in both, as a trustee for The Guardian and as Chairman of Bloomsbury.

If we keep studying a map, we find NMR Consulting is also right next door.

Google Maps

NMR works with ITV, which I connected to British Intelligence in my paper on John Lennon.

Proof that John Lennon Faked his Death – Library of Rickandria

The head of ITV Eric Maschwitz was also an employee of BSC, the American arm of MI6.

ACEVO is also there, which is a red flag.

I assume large parts of the third sector in England are Intel fronts or fronts for the major corporations.

As in the US, the whole “voluntary”, not-for-profit, or non-governmental sector is just a smokescreen.

NCVO and Euclid are right next door to ACEVO in the King's Cross Complex.

and barter.

It operates in 80 countries but is headquartered in New York.

Come to your own conclusions.

Nathaniel Lichfield is also there, another red flag.

The son of Jewish immigrants from Poland, Lichfield became the Minister of Housing in the late 1940s and 1950s.

After that he was heavily involved in all major urban planning in the UK.

He later served on the board at Tavistock.

And of course, Tavistock itself is also located just south of these other companies.

The University of London is about six blocks [2000 ft.] south of King's Cross and Regent's Wharf, and that is where Tavistock Place is.

Tavistock Institute was founded in 1947 and funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.

It is and was a center for psychiatric research.

It is now said to be a charity, but that of course is a smokescreen.

Tavistock is at the center of the well-known Aquarian conspiracy theory of John Coleman.

Theodor W. Adorno (/əˈdɔːrnoʊ/ ə-DOR-noh, German: [ˈteːodoːɐ̯ ʔaˈdɔʁno] ⓘ;[9][10] born Theodor Ludwig Wiesengrund; 11 September 1903 – 6 August 1969) was a German philosopher, musicologist, and social theorist.

there was and is a project to destroy the family, and popular music has been a part of that project.*

I came to that conclusion independently—as you can see from my paper on Lennon—and have to admit that today was the first time I read Coleman's article, or even heard of it.

I knew about Tavistock, and knew something of the theory through Larouche, but hadn't heard of Coleman.

I know my readers will find that incredible, but that is the case.

I will have to study his article more closely and report back to you. *

I remind you that Lyndon Larouche has a similar theory of the Beatles, but both Larouche and Coleman may be controlling the opposition.

Another possibility is that they may be mostly telling you the truth, but offering it to you in an unpalatable form, to make sure you refuse it.

create a crazy person to tell you the truth, so that you will dismiss it as crazy.

See Ezra Pound, for instance.

I have called such a person an Anti, and there are all levels of Anti, from the obviously crazy to the marginally crazy.

We will see. **

Bloomsbury Publishing is also nearby, just past University of London, about a mile south of Regent's Wharf.

Even closer to Regent's Wharf than Tavistock is IBS Intelligence.

IBSi FinTech News Analysis - Global FinTech News - IBS Intelligence

Established in 1991, IBS Intelligence is the definitive source of independent news and analysis relating to global financial technology markets.

Flanking that is Digital Catapult Center,

Next door is Startup Funding Club, specializing in

It is flanked by Financial Services Forum.

The Financial Services Forum is a non-partisan financial and economic policy organization comprising the CEOs of 18 of the largest and most diversified financial services institutions doing business in the United States. [1]

and Allstate.

FSF is located about 800 feet south of Regent's Wharf.

Strange to find all this right by King's Cross Station, right?

You would look for that down in The City.

I suggest the Financial Services Forum is The City's liaison with Intelligence, and it is located where it is for a reason.

And those are just the companies listed on the Google map.

I assume others are unlisted.

In this line, it is interesting to discover all these buildings have access to Regent's Canal.

They are all right on one of the most prominent wharfs in London not located on the Thames. 

Few people even know London has a canal, but it does.

It goes north from the Thames at the Narrow, passing through Limehouse Basin.

It goes through the Islington Canal Tunnel, where it passes beneath the Royal Bank of Scotland and the Islington Police Station.

Note all the containers parked in the dock and along the canal.

This all leads me to believe Harry Potter was written from offices in this area by a government writing team.

---

In a YouTube video called Lost World of the Seventies, (a BBC production), the opening sequence takes us to a vault,

It houses a treasure trove of old films, but we aren't told what else it houses.

150 feet is something like 15 stories underground, so there is room for far more than just some old stacks of film cannisters.

Anyway, the location of these hidden vaults tends to confirm my analysis here, doesn't it?

This whole area now looks like spook-central in London.

---

For more evidence in this line, we found The Guardian and The Observer leading the cheerleading for the first book in 1998.

Of course, the Sunday Times and the Mail on Sunday concurred, as did most of the Intel-owned outlets in the Western World.

Harry Potter benefitted from an unprecedented and Tiger Woods' level of promotion—not coincidentally at the same time he was enjoying his.

Is Tiger Woods a PSYOP? – Library of Rickandria

Not only had no children's book ever been promoted on these levels, but no book also ever written had been promoted on these levels.

soon followed.

We may assume Oprah's Book Club came from the same place.

When I say Potter was one of the first, I do not mean it was the first book promoted by Intelligence, of course.

Intel has been successfully promoting its books from the beginning, and it had already hit early peaks with Bulwer-Lytton, H. Rider Haggard, and many others in the 19th century.

The Stolen Century – Library of Rickandria

media arm of Intelligence.

In the decades leading up to the 1990s, Intelligence had finally realized its centuries-long dream of absolute control of all media.

Global Media Control – Library of Rickandria

Even after gaining control of “The Mighty Wurlitzer” in the 1960s and 70s, it took a couple of decades for Intelligence and its masters to decide what they wished to do with it.

They needed some time to compose their “great songs”.

But by the 1990s, they had completed not only the apparatus, but a playlist.

The Nineties – Library of Rickandria

Over the past 20 years this playlist has been put into heavy rotation, at first slowly but with accelerating speed.

Not only was a vastly enlarged repertoire of faked events made possible, but a vastly enlarged library of manufactured artifacts was as well.

Intelligence has dumped an impressive load of pseudo-science, pseudo-literature and pseudo-art on the shores of the world in the past score of years, all of it composed by ghost committees in the bowels and dungeons of the various linked agencies.

Jewish Pseudoscience & Materialism – Library of Rickandria

to advance some nasty and shallow agenda.

That is your New World Order in a nutshell.

The Truth About the “New World Order” – Library of Rickandria

Interestingly, we do see a continued turf war within Intelligence, despite its monopoly on the world.

That is, although outsiders no longer have a say about anything, we do find agents sometimes attacking each other, for whatever reasons.

We have seen many examples of that in my previous papers, and we find it again here.

The only truth that still gets told is told when one agent attacks another.

Dame Antonia Susan Duffy DBE HonFBA (née Drabble; 24 August 1936 – 16 November 2023), known professionally by her former married name, A. S. Byatt (/ˈbaɪ.ət/ BY-ət),[1] was an English critic, novelist, poet and short story writer. Her books have been translated into more than thirty languages.

she wrote an op-ed article calling Rowling's universe a,

To me, that points at Intelligence and a committee in multiple ways.

Byatt most obviously drops the clue when she says “intelligently”.

She might as well have said Intelligence-ly.

She clearly doesn't think the books are intelligent, so the word choice is otherwise inapt and inexplicable.

Beyond that, Potter is “patchworked” because it is composed by multiple authors at a large table.

It is “derivative” because anything written by such a committee is going to be derivative.

Committees do not create real art, have deep or new ideas, or show any independence of thought. . . because they are not paid to do so.

They are paid to cobble together semi-convincing propaganda.

it was meant to.

In this way, Byatt's critique absolutely fails to land, because the committee she is critiquing wasn't trying to do anything other than what it did.

By both her standards and their own, they were completely successful.

So, while her statements are true, they are actually more misdirection.

They lead a reader to mistakenly think Potter is a failure, when in fact it is a smashing success.

Judged as literature, it is garbage; judged as propaganda, it is brilliant.

So why didn't Byatt state it in the terms I have stated it?

Because if she had, her critique would have never been published.

Her faux-earnest critique fools its audience into thinking the media is still multi-lateral, while doing Potter no real harm.

While at the same time Byatt is allowed to present her (losing) case to Intel that her own books will still be promotable in the near future.

Sorry, Antonia, they won't be.

While Possession is superior in every conceivable way to Potter, such books will have no possible life in the Future World now being put into place.

We are only surprised Intel found a use for it as late as 1990.

Finally, the religious debates have created the same sort of false dichotomy Byatt creates, though with different manufactured opponents.

The witchcraft in Potter has been attacked by Christians as Satanic, but in my opinion that misses the point—probably on purpose.

WITCHCRAFT – Library of Rickandria

not through Satan but through Intelligence.

As I have shown in previous papers, Wicca was manufactured by Gerald Gardner in the 1950s, and Gardner was an MI6 protege of Aleister Crowley.

Gerald Gardner: Witch, Amateur Archaeologist & Intelligence Asset? – Library of Rickandria

Intelligence has been hiding behind the Occult for centuries, as we saw very clearly with the fake Salem Witch Trials.

Kabbalah, Hermeticism & the Occult – Library of Rickandria

The Christian critique of Potter mostly doesn't fly, because, like Christianity itself, the books create a battle of good and evil, and Harry isn't on the side of evil.

Christian Program & Purpose – Library of Rickandria

Voldemort is the Satan substitute in this story, and he is Harry's opposition.

The Identity of Satan – Library of Rickandria

It has been argued that Potter blurs those good/evil lines, which is true, but Christianity itself is blurry on most of those same issues and always has been.

Exposing Christianity – Library of Rickandria

If you want clear answers on any questions of morality, I don't recommend Christianity (or any other major religion).

The Horrible Truth About Religion – Library of Rickandria

That won't win me any friends and will only score me a mailbox full of attacks, but I call it like I see it.

I don't see Potter promoting Satanism or even Gnosticism, since either one would imply a depth, it doesn't have.

Ancient & Modern Gnosticism – Library of Rickandria

What Potter is promoting is a shallow fascism, one where all real religions and moralities are eventually jettisoned as getting in the way of business and total control.

Gods & Religions on Planet Earth – Library of Rickandria

those moralities help them sell products and move people around in the short term.

both might require study, discipline, and a belief in something beyond immediate gratification.

Dabbling in Satanism – Library of Rickandria

I have to think that even Satan would require something from his followers.

The Philosophy Behind Satan/Lucifer – Library of Rickandria

But the new masters don't want any of that: there will be no text for you to memorize, not even any real bows to make.

They don't need worshippers or devotees, only buyers.

and bios.

What I Finally Understood – Library of Rickandria

Beyond that, they just don't care.

In this way, Satanism would actually be preferable to the Future World.

The Truth About Satanism – Library of Rickandria

I have no interest in the dark side and never have, but I have to think Satan would be able to create a more interesting world than the one upon us.

Being a fallen angel, he would be bored stiff by the flabby life most people now lead.

I don't see people rushing out to become Satanists.

The Satanic Revelation – Library of Rickandria

That isn't the trend.

The trend is people becoming slugs.

The government is not promoting Satanism, nor does it fear a rise in Satanism.

According to Crowley, the first tenet of his fake Satanism was “do what thou wilt”.

But that requires courage and decision, something most people no longer have.

The government is not promoting that: it is promoting the opposite.

It is making sure you have neither courage nor decisiveness.

That is what all the propaganda is about, including Harry Potter.

It is not about making you a Satanist who will do what he wishes.

It is about making you a slug who will do nothing important.

It is about making you too scared to question anything you are told, so that if you have any residual courage or decisiveness, you will waste it getting a tattoo or piercing your belly button instead of resisting the world in meaningful ways.

I live in a very “liberal” town with lots of “progressive” people, but none of them want to hear about anything I have discovered.

Those Damn Liberals – Library of Rickandria

They simply don't want to know and say so.

They prefer the blue pill.

The REAL Pill to Swallow – Library of Rickandria

People like that don't become Satanists.

They don't “do what they wilt”, because beyond a few immediate appetites, they have no idea what they wilt.

Since all they wish to do is pay the bills, watch movies, and order pizza, the government is not getting in the way of their grandest desires.

I Would Like to File a Suspicious Transactions Report on the entire 20th century – Library of Rickandria

Those aren't on their lists of things to do, so what's the difference?

Besides, unless what you wish to do is murder people and feast on their blood, Do What Thou Wilt isn't Satanic anyway.

Serial Killers Are Fake – Library of Rickandria

If you are evil, Do What Thou Wilt is evil; if not, not.

An angel who does as he wishes will do angelic things, by definition.

So even that morality is blurred.

maybe Crowley set up that tenet and labeled it Satanic just so that it would be shot down.

He didn't want you to do as you wish, and neither does Intelligence.

They want the opposite.

They don't want you to do what you wish; they want you to do what you are told.

Therefore, they teach you doing what you wish is Satanic and doing what you are told is Godlike.

Reaching the Godhead – Library of Rickandria

That isn't the opposite of Christianity, is it?

The Real Tetragrammaton: Further Exposing Christianity – Library of Rickandria

No, it is pretty much the same thing.

Yes, Christ himself was a rebel, but mainstream Christianity hasn't encouraged rebels throughout history.

Breaking Free of Christianity – Library of Rickandria

It has encouraged obeying God's laws—which are of course the governors' laws put into the mouth of God.

Who Created God If God Created Everything? – Library of Rickandria

You may think I am blurring, but I am clarifying.

You will say,

And I answer,

As with language ability, morality is innate.

you have to be untaught morality.

Most people can tell a good law from a bad law, or a good government from a bad one, which means that neither the laws nor the government create morality.

Laws simply codify what people already know.

If people didn't have an innate sense of good and bad, you couldn't teach it to them.

You may think that God put that innate sense there, and maybe he did, but it doesn't really matter how you think it got there.

What matters is that you know it is there and can tap it.

Your entire ability to resist a bad government comes from that place.

If your entire understanding of good and evil came from laws—either civil or religious—you could never resist those laws.

You would be exactly as you were educated to be and could never question your education.

The Controlled Global Education – Library of Rickandria

The current governors aren't promoting Satanism, they are unteaching innate morality.

They are short circuiting your inborn abilities on purpose, because those abilities get in their way.

You may call that Satanism if you like, and maybe it is.

But in my mind, Satan would not unteach morality.

According to my understanding of the various scriptures, Satan preened on his ability to promote evil.

You cannot promote evil if it doesn't exist.

In other words, Satan and the various demons of other religions accepted the division into good and evil but chose and promoted evil.

Christian Demons: The Pagan Gods of Hell – Library of Rickandria

They didn't unteach morality, they flipped it.

The current propaganda isn't teaching you to choose evil.

It is teaching you to forget that there is any difference, or any division.

It is teaching you to not care one way or the other.

They are not teaching you to embrace evil, they are teaching you to do nothing as they do as they wilt. 

Aha, you will say.

If what they are doing is evil, yes.

But it isn't evil because they did as they willed, or because everything they do is evil.

It is evil because it goes against that innate morality, and they know that as much as you do.

But they have untaught themselves morality—or tried to—in the same way.

In most cases, they aren't embracing evil any more than you are.

They are telling themselves that evil doesn't exist.

In that way, they can do what they do without calling it evil.

And even as they are doing evil things, they are still not Satanists.

Again, there is a big difference.

A Satanist does evil things on purpose, and believes they are good.

A Satanist will have flipped morality, enjoying doing harm, causing pain, and destroying beautiful things.

But as little respect as I have for those running the world, I do not think that applies to them. 

They don't appear to me to have the character it would take to be Satanic.

Satanists don't push moral relativism, for one thing.

Moral relativism is for the weak of will, not the strong of will.

Satanists would embrace the negative consequences of their actions, but those running the world prefer to ignore the negative consequences.

They are constantly in denial, telling you and themselves those things aren't really happening. 

They are only a little less squishy than you are, the major difference being that their births have given them the power to do things, even while they are being indecisive and pusillanimous. 

I have no way of knowing.

But I see no evidence of it.

A world run by Satanists would be far less squishy at all levels.

It might be a horrible place, but at least it would be firm to the touch.

As I see it, the current Elders aren't Satanists.

They are just thieves.

They want to steal as much easy money as possible, as far as possible without you noticing.

Power of the Purse: The Origin of Money – Library of Rickandria

They then use Satanism as another scare tactic, in case you notice.

They want you to think they are powerfully evil people, so that you don't even think of taking them on.

In other words, it is all a bluff.

Yes, they currently control a lot of armed people and may rub you out if they feel they have to.

I am not saying they won't.

But as individuals, they are not powerful wizards.

They are just the opposite.

This is what Frank Baum was telling us in The Wizard of Oz, though few got the message.

Lyman Frank Baum (/bɔːm/;[1] May 15, 1856 – May 6, 1919) was an American author best known for his children's fantasy books, particularly The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, part of a series. In addition to the 14 Oz books, Baum penned 41 other novels (not including four lost, unpublished novels), 83 short stories, over 200 poems, and at least 42 scripts. He made numerous attempts to bring his works to the stage and screen; the 1939 adaptation of the first Oz book became a landmark of 20th-century cinema.

They are weak and shallow people in a precarious and vulnerable position, and they know that.

Their position will always be vulnerable because they are always fighting that innate sense of right and wrong inside everyone, even themselves.

You may think you cannot win, but it is they who cannot win.

Because they have set themselves against Nature herself, even as they win, they lose.

As they reach out to take in their hands all they have worked for centuries to achieve, it slips away like mist.

What they had thought would taste sweet tastes only bitter.

The REVOLUTION IS NOW – Library of Rickandria

---

*

Of course it didn't start with the Beatles.

It started in the mid 19th century or before, and was pushed hard by the Marxists, especially Engels.

Engels & Owen – Library of Rickandria

---

**

OK, I studied it.

Coleman couches some things in some terms I wouldn't use, but he is basically correct in all his major theses.

Unlike him, I think Intel hired some pretty talented songwriters to back these rock bands, and the performers are often quite talented as well.

If they hadn't been, none of this would ever have gotten off the ground.

He and Larouche dismissing it offhand as garbage doesn't help their arguments.

Some sub-genres like punk and rap have few redeeming qualities, and pop music has certainly degenerated since the 1970s.

But in the 1960s and 70s, at least, a large number of musically talented people were tapped to sell the project.

I don't think there is any denying that.

---

†

Actually, Wikipedia says it is not, The Guardian says it is.

I think Wikipedia is actually more believable on this point and may be giving away some information it shouldn't.

Jimmy Wales & the founding of Wikipedia: All the World’s a Stage – Library of Rickandria

There is also some confusion on the status of Anglesey as well.

Like the City of London and the Isle of Man, Anglesey is likely independent, being a special demesne of the hidden rulers.

potter.pdf (mileswmathis.com)

---

The Great Harry Potter Hoax (basecamp.com)

---

The Great Harry Potter Hoax – Library of Rickandria