Armstrong before the 2009 Tour Down Under
1.71 MB
View full-sizeDownload Lance Edward Armstrong (néGunderson; born September 18, 1971) is an American former professional road racing cyclist. He achieved international fame for winning the Tour de France a record seven consecutive times from 1999 to 2005, but was stripped of his titles in 2012 after an investigation into doping allegations found that Armstrong used performance-enhancing drugs over his career. As a result, Armstrong is currently banned for life from all sanctioned bicycling events. Lance has been scrubbed more heavily than the others, which is perhaps understandable.
We are told his stepfather is Terry Keith Lov Armstrong, with his father being a Gunderson and his mother being a Mooneyham.
What no one has seen is that we already have possible links to the King Ranch there.
The Armstrongs have long been prominent at the King Ranch.
See for example John Barclay Armstrong, who died in 2003.
He had been chief executive of the King Ranch.
These Armstrongs were related to the Kennedys, who lived nearby.
Remember that name for later.
Won't be hard, will it?
But the Mooneys and Mooneyhams are also tied to the King Ranch.
See Linda Ballard Mooney, who has supplied photos of King Ranch to Pinterest and other sites.
Also, writer Michael Mooney, who did a piece on King Ranch for Texas Monthly.
But perhaps the most curious hit is on Lillian Mooneyham, a famous witness of the John Kennedy assassination.
She and two other women (Rose Clark and Jeanette Hooker) testified that they watched the motorcade from the courthouse, specifically the courtroom of. . . Judge Henry King.
Just a coincidence, right?
Probably not, one because the testimony of these women has been thoroughly discredited.
It doesn't match the rest of the story.
Two because no one asks how these women got permission to watch from the courtroom.
Courtrooms aren't normally open for gawkers.
So, it already looks like they were planted there to be fake witnesses to this fake assassination.
Part of the story we are supposed to believe is that in WWI Milch commanded a fighter wing, although he didn't know how to fly.
Between the wars he was head of Lufthansa.
He joined the Nazi Party in 1929, but we are told Hitler kept his membership secret until 1933.
Most likely because:
He was Jewish.
It wouldn't look good to have the head of Lufthansa a Nazi in 1929.
When Milch was captured by the Allies in 1945, we are supposed to believe Brigadier Derek Mills-Roberts beat Milch over the head with his own Marshal's baton, because he was so disgusted by the atrocities he witnessed at Bergen-Belsen.
Right.
I'm sure that happened.
Since Milch was supposed to be head of the Jagerstab (Fighter Staff), not of camps, I'm not sure what that story is supposed to prove.
Maybe it is supposed to prove that those reading this fake history will believe anything.
You might also ask yourself if Jewish Field Marshal Milch here is related to Jewish Harvey Milk of that fake event?
It's the same name, different spelling.
Harvey Milk's people were originally Milchs.
But can we link Judge Henry King of Dallas, d. 1990, to King Ranch?
Not easily, because no information is available on this Judge King online.
So, we have to look for other links between Mooneyhams and King Ranch.
We find it without much trouble, with Mooneyhams in the Coryell County Tax Assessor files, in Comer, Gatesville, etc.
Also confirming these links to King Ranch is that Terry Lov Armstrong is listed as living in Frisco, near Denton.
That area also has ties to King Ranch.
See King Ranch Drive in Denton as just one example.
This is because Frisco/Denton was on a “longhorn trail” from south Texas to Oklahoma.
So, the King Ranch people also owned places along those routes.
For more proof of that, we find a Mooneyham Elementary School in Frisco.
One other thing I found with Lance.
On his pages at Geneanet, site manager Tim Dowling admits he is related to Lance's stepfather, Terry Armstrong.
“Spouse of 14th cousin, once removed”.
You may think that is a distant relationship, but it isn't.
I think of anything up to 10th cousin as close, so this is semi close.
But it tells us what we need to know:
these Armstrongs are the same as the Armstrongs of the British peerage.
Remember, Tim Dowling is closely related to the Arundels, Stuarts/Stewarts and many kings of England and Scotland.
So, if Tim Dowling is closely related to this Terry Armstrong, then Terry Armstrong is closely related to the kings of England.
That, by itself, is enough to prove that Lance Armstrong isn't from some family of nobody hick Armstrongs and Mooneyhams in Texas.
He is from THE Armstrongs.
So why does any of this matter, you may ask.
It matters because it not only ties us to the people below, but it also goes some way to explaining the whole Lance Armstrong story.
No one has really explained why Lance was so sure from the very beginning that he deserved to win, whether or not he was the best athlete in the group or not.
Beyond the drug stories—which finally became mainstream news and brought him down—there are stories of paying off other riders even before his Tour de France days and even stories of hidden motors inside the bicycle frames.
The cons were so brazen and numerous they were beyond comprehension. . . until now.
Now that we can link him to the Families, we see that Lance's cons were actually small potatoes.
This is what these people do and always have done.
It is how they think.
They think that all:
money
property
position
and awards are their birthright.
If they enter a contest, they expect to win it, the rules be damned.
Truth
honesty
integrity
and fairplay mean absolutely nothing to these people.
Even more mysteriously, they do not seem to see that the awards and positions are worth nothing if they were not earned.
I personally don't see the point in buying off my competition, since that immediately negates the whole competition.
Winning is only useful in that it makes you feel good about yourself.
You feel pride in your accomplishment.
How can you feel pride in buying off your competition?
Buying a trophy or other award is pathetic.
It is beneath contempt.
And yet it now appears most awards in all fields out there are decided on this basis.
Highest bidder or biggest cheater.
It also explains why the Justice Department never filed charges against Lance.
Last year, Lance had to pay about five million to avoid a lawsuit, but that was a whistleblower lawsuit that Justice decided to join.
What?
Why would Justice join a whistleblower lawsuit and then let Lance off with such a low fine?
He has made 50-100 times that from his career.
The original suit was for 100 million, so they settled for 5%?
So, just as we have seen in the banking scandals, the criminal pays a small percentage of his theft and walks.
Lance is still chuckling to himself, since he remains a rich man.
Not as rich as he was ten years ago, but far richer than he was 25 years ago.
So, looking at it long term, we could say his gamble paid off.
I am sure he sees it that way.
Justice didn't pursue Lance because justice never bothers these people.
They don't know what it means.
It doesn't concern them.
They own the government and the courts, so they can pass the losses on.
Lance probably has uncles or cousins in the Justice Department.
I have a problem with that photo of Neil Armstrong as an ensign in 1952.
Don't they teach these kids to sit up straight?
No, seriously.
It doesn't look like a real military photo, because the photographer would have told him to sit up straight before taking the picture.
Real military photos never look like that.
Which reminds us that although we are told Neil went to Purdue on a Holloway scholarship, he didn't take any courses in Naval Science and didn't join the NROTC.
That makes no sense, because the Holloway scholarship was specifically for naval officers.
Part of his scholarship requirement would be enrolling in NROTC.
So, the historians are giving you a clue there, same clue as the photo above.
Armstrong's call-up by the Navy also makes no sense, since he was pulled out of college after just a year and half in January 1949.
The Korean War was still a year and a half in the future, so why was he called up halfway through college?
If they are training officers on scholarship, they would wait and call him up after graduation, so that he could enter the Navy as an ensign or lieutenant.
Instead, he had to start as a midshipman, which basically wasted all his scholarship money and the year and half in college.
Neil allegedly flew in the Korean War, although the stories again make no sense.
He was promoted to ensign in 1951.
He was promoted to Lieutenant Junior Grade in 1953.
So, it took him two years to become an ensign, despite having been chosen for the Holloway Plan?
In 1952 he returned to Purdue, where he pledged Phi Delta Theta and co-directed two musicals for the all-student revue.
What?
Looks like we have found another drama club/glee club boy.
Like Lindbergh, Neil liked to crash planes.
He totaled at least one during the war, and he wrecked another one at Purdue.
He finally graduated in 1955 at age 25.
He didn't get his MS until 1970, after the faked Moon landing.
You might ask yourself when he had time to work on that.
According to his bio, he was pretty busy up until 1969.
Neil married Janet Shearon.
“According to the couple, there was no real courtship, and neither could remember the exact circumstances of their engagement.”
What?
Who can say that about their marriage?
Coupled with the drama club stuff, it indicates the usual thing.
They didn't live together after marriage, since Neil was in bachelors' quarters at Edwards AFB while she was in Westwood.
Neil applied to NACA in 1955 and was almost immediately accepted.
Why?
I always thought they wanted top people for the astronaut program, but we have seen that Neil was not exceptional in any way.
The stories at Edwards AFB also don't make sense, because suddenly Neil is supposed to be some sort of genius.
We are told he had a mind like a sponge.
No, he had a personality like a sponge.
His mind was more like an empty cardboard box.
Watch any of his interviews, where you will see his intelligence seems sub-normal.
Or just look at his photos on the internet.
Look into his eyes.
Do you see any signs of brilliance there?
I don't.
Look at him above.
He looks like a big dope.
In 1962 Neil was selected for the astronaut program.
He was already 31, so he would be 39 for the Moon landing.
Something about that doesn't seem right to me.
It seems they would want younger men for the Apollo flights, to withstand the pressures of space.
We also find a curious story here.
Neil's application for the program arrived a week late, so it should have been thrown out.
We are told Dick Day secretly inserted it into the stack.
Again, this makes no sense.
If you have a deadline like that, you catalog all the entries the day after the deadline.
You don't let them sit there a week unopened.
This is just another clue that the whole story is a fake.
Neil made the final nine, and we are told:
NASA announced the selection of the second group at a press conference on September 17, 1962.
Compared with the Mercury Seven astronauts, they were younger, [57] and had more impressive academic credentials. [61]
So, Neil's academic credentials were impressive?
Did I miss something?
Also, the Mercury Seven were all military test pilots.
That was one of the requirements.
Armstrong wasn't a military test pilot.
He was a civilian test pilot, the first one to make the astronaut program.
So, let's compare Armstrong's academic credentials against someone like, say, Gus Grissom.
Shepard in 1971
1.35 MB
View full-sizeDownload Alan Bartlett Shepard Jr. (November 18, 1923 – July 21, 1998) was an American astronaut. In 1961, he became the second person and the first American to travel into space and, in 1971, he became the fifth and oldest person to walk on the Moon, at age 47.
Born November 18.
Aces and eights.
Shepard skipped two grades and graduated high school at age 16.
His IQ was tested at 145, way above Mensa's minimum of 130.
He graduated Annapolis in three years and was commissioned an ensign.
By 1950 (age 26) he was a military test pilot.
By 1971 and the time of his Apollo landing he was a Rear Admiral.
So, no comparison there.
You get my point and there is no reason to even do the rest of the Mercury Seven.
But it is worth pointing out that when Shepard allegedly walked on the Moon in 1971, he was 47.
Again, that makes no sense.
NASA would want much younger men for such a rigorous trip.
Think about it.
I was in very good shape in my 20s and also at age 47.
But I was definitely stronger overall when I was younger.
Just think of your eyes, which should be important to an astronaut.
A person's eyes change in their mid-40s, and most of us have to use reading glasses after about 45.
So, I personally don't find it credible that NASA was sending 47-year-old guys to the Moon.
I couldn't find a picture of Shepard tagged as age 47, so let's use this one of Lance Armstrong.
Did you know that Neil Armstrong's middle name is Alden?
If you are thinking that links us to John Alden, you are thinking what I am thinking.
A conjectural image of John and Priscilla Alden by George Henry Boughton, 1884
1.32 MB
View full-sizeDownload John Alden (c. 1598 – September 12, 1687) was an English politician, settler, and cooper, best known for being a crew member on the historic 1620 voyage of the Mayflower which brought the English settlers commonly known as Pilgrims to Plymouth Colony in Massachusetts. He was hired in Southampton, England as the ship's cooper, responsible for maintaining the ship's barrels. He was a member of the ship's crew and not initially a settler, yet he decided to remain in Plymouth Colony when the Mayflower returned to England. He was a signatory to the Mayflower Compact. Neil's Engels came over from Germany in about 1890 and settled in Ohio.
That's pretty recent, since Neil was born in 1930.
In Ohio his ancestor Martin August Engel married a Jacobs.
James IV, copy by Daniël Mijtens of a lost contemporary portrait
2.2 MB
View full-sizeDownload James IV (17 March 1473 – 9 September 1513) was King of Scotland from 11 June 1488 until his death at the Battle of Flodden in 1513. He inherited the throne at the age of fifteen on the death of his father, James III, at the Battle of Sauchieburn, following a rebellion in which the younger James was the figurehead of the rebels. James IV is generally regarded as the most successful of the Stewart monarchs of Scotland. He was responsible for a major expansion of the Scottish royal navy, which included the founding of two royal dockyards and the acquisition or construction of 38 ships, including the Great Michael, the largest warship of its time. So, Neil is also closely related to:
Berkeley
Douglas
Seymour
Somerset
Welles
Stafford
Herbert
Devereux
FitzGerald
Bonnville
Dorsey
Willoughby
Leigh
Warner
Todd
Hammond
Baldwin
FitzJames
Lowe
Ely
Worthington
and so on.
But it isn't just via these two lines (Arundel and Howard) that Neil is related to kings.
He is also related to them through the Griffith and Willoughby lines.
In that direction we also hit:
the Molyneux
the Cheneys
the FitzHerberts
the Stanleys
the Gorsuchs
the Lindsays
the Warfields
the Pitts
the Plummers
the McFarlands
the Houghtons (hello Erica!)
and so on.
We also find the Griffiths marrying the Jacobs back in 1782 in Maryland.
She is immediately scrubbed.
But remember, we already saw Neil's maternal grandmother as a Jacobs.
So, we have Jacobs on both sides.
What about the Sarah Todd in Neil's ancestry?
Does that link us to Abe Lincoln through his wife Mary Todd?
You betcha.
Sarah's father was Lancelot Todd, son of Capt. Thomas Todd.
Lancelot's sister Isabella married a Madison, linking us to that President, and her children married a Penn and a Taylor.
Taylor c. 1843–1845
1.08 MB
View full-sizeDownload Zachary Taylor (November 24, 1784 – July 9, 1850) was an American military officer and politician who was the 12th president of the United States, serving from 1849 until his death in 1850. Taylor was a career officer in the United States Army, rising to the rank of major general and becoming a national hero for his victories in the Mexican–American War. As a result, he won election to the White House despite his vague political beliefs. His top priority as president was to preserve the Union. He died 16 months into his term from a stomach disease. Taylor had the third-shortest presidential term in U.S. history and was the third president whose death has been traced to poor sanitation in Washington DC. This links us to Zachary Taylor and singer James Taylor, among other people.
The Purdums in Neil's ancestry link us to the Pierces, and to that President, as well as to Barbara Bush.
It's funny, the closer to the present we get, the better Neil's ancestry is scrubbed.
They don't care you know he is related closely to kings of:
England
France
Scotland
but they don't want you to know he is related to Custer or Lance Armstrong.
Or maybe they just figure you won't have the stamina to go back several centuries.
I was going to tear apart last year's film First Man, but after watching the previews and reading reviews, I figured why bother.
They could bring David Bowie out of retirement to sing Starman, and Prince out of retirement to sing Little Red Corvette, as Neil drove around on the Moon in a red Tesla speedster.
I mean, c'mon, these guys have no imagination anymore.
After Game of Thrones, do you really think people go to the cinema for factual documentaries?
Especially when they know there are no facts there to start with?
We saw pictures of him there posing as an equal with Grand Duke Alexei, son of Alexander II.
So, it looks like one of those ties to Russian royalty was through the Zborowskis.
At Wikipedia, we find Zborowski is also Zabriskie.
In 1873, just before Little Big Horn, William Zborowski's daughter married Count de Montalban, Baron de Fontenoy.
That links Custer to Spanish nobility as well.
Wiktor Zborowski showing a young golfer the gopher pose from Caddy Shack
530 KB
View full-sizeDownload
But you won't believe what other link I was able to find with the Zborowskis.
A search on “Zborowski Romanov” takes us to the Wiki page for Sigismund III Vasa, King of Poland and Sweden in around 1600.
You may remember him from previous papers, where we linked him through his mother Catherine Jagiellon to many other monarchs, including the current Queen of England.
Anyway, we find that Sigismund was supported as king by the noble Zborowski family, so we take that link, which curiously didn't come up for me on a Google search for Zborowski.
On that page, we are told the Zborowskis were one party in the War of Polish Succession, and that due to a loss in that war, the main line died out in 1621.
However, the Counts continue to the present day.
There are three in the British peerage, including Wlodzimierz Jan Zborowski, who in 1944 married the granddaughter of the 1st Baron Tollemache and Eliza Duff.
Note the Maltese Cross or Hospitaller's Cross, which not only links us to the Phoenicians via one of their main ports, but which links us forward to the Nazis, who also used it (see the Iron Cross, etc.).
The Zborowskis aren't the only family who used this coat of arms.
It was used by many szlachta families, which now include 1738 surnames, including:
Chmielowski
Czerknicki
Niemirowicz
Peszkowski
Swiecicki
and Taczanowski.
Also, Sir Conrad Fisher Swan, who just died.
The historians don't admit it, though it is obvious:
these families are Jewish.
Our search on Zborowski also takes us to Marc Slonim, Jewish deputy of the Socialist Revolutionary Party in 1917.
He ended up as a professor at Sarah Lawrence College and lecturer at Phillips Academy. . . as you would expect.
Anyway, Mark Zborowski of NKVD is listed on his page as a close friend.
Figures.
But back to Custer.
Through the Livingstons, Custer links us to the Rev. John Livingston, the patriarch of US Livingstons.
Also, to his wife, Janet Fleming, whose mother was Marion Hamilton.
Marion Hamilton is scrubbed, but she links us to the Hamiltons, rulers of Scotland.
John Livingston's daughter-in-law was Alyda Schuyler, daughter of Philip Schuyler, one of the wealthiest men in the US in 1700.
The Schuylers were from Holland, where they are scrubbed.
But we have seen before they were actually Philips, related to:
This takes us to a Pletjes, which takes us to an Adelheid Goebles.
She is scrubbed to keep us from connecting this to Josef Goebbels, but we do find their granddaughter marrying Admiral William Penn, father of William Penn of Pennsylvania.
We also link to a Herman Isaacs Op den Graeff, obviously Jewish.
Kuster then becomes Kusters.
Through his wife Elizabeth Bacon, we can link Custer to the Pages.
Readers of my recent paper on Eric Clapton and Jimmy Page may get a kick out of that.
Anyway, David II married the daughter of Isabella of France, the She-Wolf.
She was like an earlier Catherine de Medici.
Her father was Philip the Fair, who we looked at briefly in a previous paper.
So, all these people were from old Phoenician lines.
That's John Heffernan as Edward II. I bet you thought it was Ryan Gosling again. Nope, though they do look a lot alike.
572 KB
View full-sizeDownload
Isabella's husband Edward II was notoriously gay, which no doubt turned her mean from an early age.
She soon got all three of her sisters-in-law jailed for life for adultery, though she herself was probably sleeping around—possibly with women.
After she helped her husband and the Despensers destroy their enemies, including Lancaster, she then went after the Despensers. . . and her own husband.
Edward probably knew she was plotting, since he tried to give her up to the Scottish Army.
She escaped and was then twice as mean.
Like JFK, Edward moved in with his boyfriend Hugh Despenser, and Isabella secretly targeted them.
When Despenser confiscated her lands, she went to her brother, Charles IV of France, and returned with an army.
Within weeks she had control of the country.
She executed both Despenser and Edward, the King, becoming regent for her son!
One ballsy babe.
Anyway, the Armstongs probably have a more direct link to the Vikings/Phoenicians, since the first Armstrong was a nephew of King Canute, the Danish King of England in early 1000s.
Canute's mother may have been Swietoslawa of Poland, daughter of Mieszko I (Piast dynasty).
The Piasts ruled Poland for over 400 years, until the time of Casimir III the Great.
You remember him, right?
His mother was Jadwiga of Kalisz, daughter of Yolanda of Hungary.
This links us through Maria Laskarina to Alexios III Angelos, Byzantine Emperor.
He was a. . . Komnene.
This is one of our links between the Komnenes and the Jagiellons/Vasas.
So that's where the Armstrongs come from.
We are told the Stuarts of Scotland feared the Armstrongs and wiped them out.
“There has been no trace of the Armstrong chiefs since the clan was dispersed in the 17th century.”
Not really true, as we are seeing.
What really happened is that the Armstrongs married into the bigger clans, through these marriages like we have seen to the Campbells.
The clans merged.
But the Armstrongs still exist, even under that name, and they still demand their due.
With Custer, we see one demanding his due despite being semi-retarded.
But that has never stopped these people, as we know.
The Families often lead with their stupidest people, to create the illusion of complete incompetence.
See for example the Presidents of the United States of America.