The age of deception is here and thanks to digital technology is now even easier to fool people in mass numbers. A photograph, a video, and a any sound can be digitally manipulated to show something that is not really there.
This leads us to the topic of why( in part) the US will be switching all broadcasts from analog to digital. This teaching overviews a secret Pentagon psychotronics technology known as Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS) that has been fully operational since the early 1990s.
The physical, emotional, and psychological effects of this technology were so severe that 200,000 Iraqi troops surrended en masse without firing even a single shot against US led coalition forces.
Why would eight year veterans of Middle Eastern warfare (with Iran 1980-1988) behave this way? Simple.
They were subjected to a technology that was so extreme and incomprehensible that they were suddenly reduced to the level of compliant children and felt grateful to still be alive in the wake of their mind-wrenching experience.
This technology is (most likely) about to be used, albeit in a more subtle fashion, against American citizens in a highly classified and covert operation to mind control and manipulate the entire population into 'compliance' with our New World Order overlords.
The technology will utilize a combination of HAARP transmitters, GWEN towers, microwave cell phone towers, and the soon-to-be-mandatory High Definition Digital TV that will enter your home via:
cable
satellite
HD TVs
"digital converter boxes"
...that the government is so anxious to help you obtain and underwrite most of the cost on your behalf.
This is an extremely timely and important essay. It overviews a secret Pentagon psychotronics technology known as Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS) that has been fully operational since the early 1990s.
I first found out about the use of this technology from Al Bielek in a 1992 video he made with Vladimir Terziski. This technology was used against battle-hardened Iraqi troops fortified in deep underground bunkers in Kuwait and Iraq in the first Gulf War in January of 1991.
The physical, emotional, and psychological effects of this technology were so severe that hundreds of thousands of Iraqi troops surrended en masse without firing even a single shot against US led coalition forces. The numbers reported in the news were staggering: 75,000 and then another 125,000 (or more) Iraqi troops would come out of their deep desert bunkers waving white flags and falling to their knees before approaching US troops and literally kiss their captor's boots or hands if given the opportunity.
Why would eight year veterans of Middle Eastern warfare (with Iran 1980-1988) behave this way?
Simple. They were subjected to a technology that was so extreme and incomprehensible that they were suddenly reduced to the level of compliant children and felt grateful to still be alive in the wake of their mind-wrenching experience.
This technology is about to be used, albeit in a more subtle fashion, against American citizens in a highly classified and covert operation to mind control and manipulate the entire population into 'compliance' with our New World order overlords.
The technology will utilize a combination of HAARP transmitters, GWEN towers, microwave cell phone towers, and the soon-to-be-mandatory High Definition Digital TV (HD) that will enter your home via:
cable
satellite
HD TVs
those oh-so-easy-to-obtain "digital converter boxes" that the government is so anxious to help you obtain and underwrite most of the cost on your behalf
But why is the government so anxious to help American citizens experience a clearer and more highly defined television picture?
Does that make sense to you?
Since when is the government so concerned about the visual quality of our televised entertainment that congress would pass an undebated statutory proclamation which mandated that the HD conversion take place on Feb. 17, 2009 and and then subsidize about 90% of the associated cost?
I'm only guessing, but if there are 200 million "regular" televisions in America to be converted into HD, then that $40 in government subsidy per TV × 200,000,000 = $8 billion.
Why is the government so anxious to spend 8 billion dollars on her citizens to improve the clarity of a TV picture?
Or is the recently touted "additional bandwidth" cover story that supposedly is to be gained with the HD technology the only and genuine reason for spending so much taxpayer dollars on HD conversion?
The second service that this author performs is to "out" two of our more deceptive CIA/Pentagon 'assets' masquerading under the rubric of natural health advocates.
Their names are Rima Laibow and her husband, "former" Major General Albert Stubblebine.
If your e-mail Inbox has been filling with warnings and articles in recent months about the coming Codex regulations and the "wonderful" job that Rima and her retired Army husband have been doing to try and stem the tide, then you know who I'm talking about.
Folks, is it time to wake up yet? Or should we just resume our slumber and wait for them to take us away in those spiffy Gunderson cattle cars that Phil Schneider warned us about in 1995 (you know, the ones with the built in shackles and manacles)?
Ken Adachi
Educate Yourself.org
THE SOUND OF SILENCE
The Antithesis of Freedom
The year was 1961, and John Kennedy was soon to become the 35th President.
Shortly before Kennedy's inauguration, President Dwight D. Eisenhower shocked the nation and the world with his televised farewell speech. The speech's content was shocking because General Eisenhower was a very popular war hero, and American military might was second to none.
Eisenhower, a highly decorated five-star general, was the Supreme Commander of all allied forces during World War II. It was Eisenhower's leadership during the Normandy invasion that ultimately freed Europe from the Nazi scourge.
Incredibly, in his farewell address, this great American hero did not warn the nation of the budding communist threat or the horrors of nuclear proliferation. No, not at all!
Instead, this career military genius poignantly and soberly declared to this great nation:
"… We have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.
"This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence - economic, political, even spiritual - is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to recognize its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or our democratic processes."
Here we have a career military officer, and sitting US President warning the nation in his final farewell speech, that something called "unwarranted influence by the military-industrial complex" poses an extremely dangerous threat to our Free Republic society.
According to Eisenhower, this threat "exists and will persist."
To President Eisenhower, in January of 1961, this evil was a much greater threat to America than Castro's Cuba or Kruschev's Soviet Union. What exactly could have happened in the "military-industrialist" establishment that would have caused Eisenhower to issue such a strongly worded warning?
Improved machine gun production? Nope. Battleship production? Nope. Nuclear submarines? Nope. Proliferation of nuclear warheads? A concern of course, but a concern that most Americans were fully aware of.
No, obviously what caused Eisenhower such deep concern had to be something much more pervasively shadowy, dark and secret. Some new, covert, technology had clearly emerged that had the very real potential to provide certain individuals with the "acquisition of unwarranted influence" that in turn would "endanger our liberties or our democratic processes" (i.e., our free and fair election process). In other words, it had the clear potential to circumvent the voice of the people and completely empower un-elected power mongers.
Eisenhower, I would submit, was warning America about something called the "Sound of Silence".
Eisenhower was an honest and patriotic American. Like Marine Corp General Smedley Butler, who decades earlier declared to Congress that "War is a Racket," Ike knew that such absolute power and total covert control over the minds and hearts of individual citizens would corrupt society absolutely.
He also knew and understood, as did the German philosopher Goethe:
"No man is more hopelessly enslaved, than he who falsely believes that he is free."
Therefore, he issued his strong, concluding warning to America. Today, this author must do no less.
The Sound of Silence is a military-intelligence code word for certain psychotronic weapons of mass mind-control tested in the mid-1950s, perfected during the 70s, and used extensively by the "modern" US military in the early 90s, despite the opposition and warnings issued by men such as Dwight David Eisenhower.
This mind-altering covert weapon is based on something called subliminal carrier technology, or the Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS) (also nicknamed S-Quad or "Squad" in military jargon).
It was developed for military use by Dr. Oliver Lowery of Norcross, Georgia, and is described in US Patent #5,159,703 - "Silent Subliminal Presentation System" for commercial use in 1992.
The patent abstract reads:
"A silent communications system in which non-aural carriers, in the very low (ELF) or very high audio-frequency (VHF) range or in the adjacent ultrasonic frequency spectrum, are amplitude- or frequency-modulated with the desired intelligence and propagated acoustically or vibrationally, for inducement into the brain, typically through the use of loudspeakers, earphones, or piezoelectric transducers.
The modulated carriers may be transmitted directly in real time or may be conveniently recorded and stored on mechanical, magnetic, or optical media for delayed or repeated transmission to the listener."
In layman's terms, this device, this "Sound of Silence" simply allows for the unwarranted implantation of specific thoughts, emotions, and even prescribed physical actions into unsuspecting human beings.
In short, it has the very real ability to turn human beings into mere puppets in the hands of certain "controllers," or puppet-masters.
Eisenhower knew full well what such a "weapon" could do in the hands of greedy, conspiring men and women scheming to control the planet. It could easily result in the takeover of American society without a single bullet being fired.
This is what he was warning America about, this is the "combination" he feared above all others.
Have the leaders of America ignored Ike's warning?
Have conspiring and evil men and women utilized this diabolical technology on unsuspecting Americans and others outside of our borders?
If so, will they continue to utilize the technology through the medium of television and radio?
This exposé will attempt to answer these questions, and give the reader a clear picture of exactly who made the decisions to use the "Sound of Silence" in both war and peace.
On March 23, 1991, a news brief was released in the form of an ITV News Bureau Ltd (London) wire service bulletin entitled "High-Tech Psychological Warfare Arrives in the Middle East." This was during the administration of George Bush Sr., during "Operation Desert Storm," and describes in remarkable detail a US Psychological Operations (psy-ops) covert operation successfully deployed against Iraqi troops in Kuwait.
Saddam Hussein's vaunted "Republican Guard" crack troops were promising Bush "the mother of all battles" with many thousands of dead coalition troops. On paper, it looked convincing. Hussein's Republican Guard troops were battle-hardened veterans of the 10 year war with Iran, while coalition troops were unblooded. The Iraqis had modern weaponry and were well trained in how to use it.
Something very strange happened, however. The "mother of all battles" ended before it began, as literally hundreds of thousands of Iraqi soldiers surrendered en masse without even firing a shot!
Here is what the British press reported on the incident (while the American press was censored):
"… an unbelievable and highly classified psy-ops program utilizing 'Silent Sound' techniques was successfully deployed. The opportunity to use this method occurred when Saddam Hussein's military command-and-control system was destroyed. The Iraqi troops were then forced to use commercial FM radio stations to carry encoded commands, which were broadcast on the 100 MHz frequency.
The US psy-ops team set up its own portable FM transmitter, utilizing the same frequency, in the deserted city of Al Khafji. This US transmitter overpowered the local Iraqi station. Along with patriotic and religious music, psy-ops transmitted 'vague, confusing and contradictory military orders and information.
"Subliminally, a much more powerful technology was at work, however. A sophisticated electronic system designed to 'speak' directly to the mind of the listener; to alter and entrain his brainwaves, to manipulate his brain's electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns and thus artificially implant negative emotional states - feelings of intense fear, anxiety, despair and hopelessness were created in the Iraqi troops.
This incredibly effective subliminal system doesn't just tell a person to feel an emotion, it makes them feel it; it implants that emotion in their minds."
While utilizing such a "non-lethal" covert psy-ops weapon resulted in many lives being saved, both American, Coalition, as well as Iraqi, the question begs to be asked:
How can Americans be assured that such a weapon is not being used on them by "Big Brother" on a daily basis?
Moreover, why was the real story behind the mass Iraqi surrenders censored so completely from the American people?
Typically, secrecy of this nature is only employed when the subject is morally offensive, or when the powers that be wish to continue to deploy the subject without public scrutiny or oversight, or both.
Clearly, if such a device employed covertly on Americans could result in "unwarranted influence" over a society, as Eisenhower warned, I submit the majority of Americans would be completely outraged and incensed, and rightfully so. Therefore, of course the technology would need to remain hidden away.
Officially, the Sound of Silence (S-quad) technology does not exist, just as the US Government officially denies the existence of UFOs and Area 51 (Groom Lake) in the Nevada desert. However, the physical realities cannot be ignored by the rational and logical mind.
For instance, during the first Gulf war, the man who most likely ordered the deployment of the Sound of Silence was Major General Albert (Bert) Stubblebine, who was the Commanding General of the US Army's Intelligence School and Center, as well as the Army's Electronic Research and Development Command (ERADCOM) as well as the Army's Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM).
In short, Albert Stubblebine was the Army's liaison with the CIA and Naval Intelligence operatives (ONI), and as head of ERADCOM, he would of necessity have had complete working knowledge of the Sound of Silence weaponry, if indeed it truly exists.
He was the US Army's top spy-boss, and of course, was privy to all its secrets.
Now retired from active duty following a 32 year career, General Stubblebine has combined with his wife, Rima Laibow to form something called the Natural Solutions Foundation, supposedly dedicated to fighting all health freedom threats to individuals including Codex Alimentarius, vaccinations, and of course the FDA Gestapo.
On their website, one can read this about Albert N. Stubblebine:
"Many of the innovations he developed helped the US to conduct the First Gulf War effectively and swiftly with a very low casualty rate."
But of course, such "innovations" are never fully disclosed to Americans and are officially non-existent.
With all due respect to General Stubblebine and shadowy power-brokers such as Frank Carlucci and Donald Rumsfeld, this author concurs whole-heartedly with General Eisenhower, and I declare that such posturing and secrecy with weapons of mind-control constitutes indeed an "acquisition of unwarranted power and influence" and has absolutely no place in a free and open society - no matter how many soldier's lives it may save on the battlefield.
The potential for massive misuse and abuse of such immense controlling power is simply too great.
Furthermore, with all due respect Mr. Stubblebine, is he and Rima Laibow using the cover of Natural Health activistism to hide their true agenda? Could this hidden agenda be the covert promotion and testing of Sound of Silence equipment and technology commercially throughout the world?
… Immediately after "retiring" from the army, General Stubblebine took a position as the "VP for Intelligence Systems" with Braddock, Dunn, and McDonald (BDM), a major defense contractor owned by the shadowy Carlyle Group and ex-Defense Secretary Frank Carlucci of Iran-Contra infamy…
Since the Sound of Silence machine technology was patented for "privatization" commercial applications by Dr. Lowery on October 27, 1992 , it clearly opened the door to private defense contractors such as BDM to develop their own "intelligence systems". It would then make sense to employ General Stubblebine as a consultant.
Of course, what would then stop BDM from quietly marketing and selling the Sound of Silence to large corporations tied to Wall Street?
For example, imagine utilizing the Sound of Silence in a large Wal-Mart store, mixing the ELF waves with background music to subliminally brainwash dishonest shoppers not to engage in shoplifting? Such a device would save Sam Walton many millions of dollars in lost revenue every year.
Suppose also that a young, black man from Illinois was given access to, and was able to utilize the S-quad Sound of Silence technology in his public speeches, radio and 30-minute television "infomercials" - all programmed and designed by "handlers" to illicit strong emotional responses from audience members who then are merely "hearing without listening."
Moreover, what if televisions across the US and Canada all went 100% digital [to be mandatory in Feb. 2009] in their signals (in order to successfully link to GWEN towers) which would allow the unrestricted use of the Sound of Silence frequencies in a complete and massive control of the nation's mind and consciousness?
I am telling you that is exactly what is happening. President Eisenhower was absolutely correct, and his worst fears were indeed well founded!
The military-industrialist complex has quietly completed the takeover of the nation's consciousness, and thus its very soul.
… Keep in mind that taking complete fascist control of America is just one step of the Zionist elites ultimate agenda, of which Stubblebine and Laibow have very likely pledged their true loyalty.
The elitist Zionists overall objective is indeed absolute world control, something they refer to as a "New World Order" with them as dictators and overlords.
Again, the absolute secrecy surrounding the development and deployment of the electromagnetic mind-altering technology of the Sound of Silence in a very real way reflects the tremendous power that is inherent in it.
This is why Eisenhower knew that he had to warn the nation about it back in 1961. To put it bluntly, whoever controls this technology literally has the power to control the minds of men - all men and women everywhere.
Of course, whoever controls the minds of all humans, controls the wealth and destiny of planet Earth.
Furthermore, Stubblebine, as commander of Army Intelligence would likely follow the prescribed manual of all covert ops, such as is found in a declassified US manual for the planned subversion and coup of the government of Nicaragua. The manual instructs the CIA "guerilla forces" to engage in different "false front" organizations designed to win the respect, trust, and influence of the enemy.
Once complete trust and confidence is achieved by means of the activities of the "false front," then the destruction of the enemy by means of misdirection and disinformation tactics can more easily be executed.
I would submit there is no better "false front" to infiltrate in America than Natural Health proponents, for they are typically healthier, better informed, and more dedicated to preserving individual freedoms and fighting tyranny than other Americans.
Thus, there could be no better "false front" to establish, and there is clearly no more potentially vicious wolf hiding in sheep's clothing than the man who knows more about the Sound of Silence secret deployment than any other human…
There is ample evidence that certain elitists in America and Israel plan to definitely extend the capacity of this technology to encompass all people on every continent.
A key to this is the HAARP project where ELF and VHF frequencies can indeed be beamed off of the Earth's ionosphere to various GWEN towers world-wide.
Of course, the US Government officially denies all of this, telling the talking heads of the controlled news media that the GWEN towers are merely private cell-phone towers with no ulterior agenda, and therefore anybody who thinks otherwise is a lunatic-fringe conspiracy nut.
The evidence to the contrary, however is clear and unequivocal. Dr Michael Persinger is a professor of psychology and neuroscience at Laurentian University, Ontario, Canada.
Concerning this subject, Dr Persinger writes:
"Temporal lobe stimulation can evoke the feeling of a presence, disorientation, and perceptual irregularities.
It can activate images stored in the subject's memory, including nightmares and monsters that are normally suppressed. Contemporary neuroscience suggests the existence of fundamental algorithms by which all sensory transduction is translated into an intrinsic, brain-specific code.
Direct stimulation of these codes within the human temporal or limbic cortices by applied electromagnetic patterns may require energy levels which are within the range of both geomagnetic activity and contemporary communication networks.
A process which is coupled to the narrow band of brain temperature could allow all normal human brains to be affected by a sub-harmonic whose frequency range at about 10 Hz would only vary by 0.1 Hz."
Dr Persinger concludes the article by writing:
"Within the last two decades a potential has emerged which was improbable, but which is now feasible.
This potential is the technical capability to influence directly the major portion of the approximately 6.5 billion brains of the human species, without mediation through classical sensory modalities, by generating neural information within a physical medium within which all members of the species are immersed.
"The historical emergence of such possibilities, which have ranged from gunpowder to atomic fission, have resulted in major changes in the social evolution that occurred inordinately quickly after the implementation.
Reduction of the risk of the inappropriate application of these technologies requires the continued and open discussion of their realistic feasibility and implications within the scientific and public domain."
How can one have an "open discussion" on the subject when government circles continually deny the existence of such technology?
Lyrics to the pop song 'The Sound of Silence' by Paul Kane (aka Paul Simon)
1963
Hello, darkness, my old friend I've come to talk with you again Because a vision softly creeping Left its seeds while I was sleeping And the vision that was planted in my brain Still remains within the Sound of Silence.
In restless dreams I walked alone Narrow streets of cobblestone Beneath the halo of a street lamp I turned my collar to the cold and damp When my eyes were stabbed by the flash of a neon light That split the night and touched the Sound of Silence.
And in the naked light I saw Ten thousand people, maybe more People talking without speaking People hearing without listening People writing songs that voices never share… And no one dare disturb the Sound of Silence.
"Fools," said I, "you do not know Silence like a cancer grows." "Hear my words that I might teach you, Take my arms that I might reach you." But my words like silent raindrops fell, And echoed in the wells of silence.
And the people bowed and prayed To the neon god they made. And the sign flashed out its warning In the words that it was forming.
And the signs said: "The words of the prophets Are written on the subway walls And tenement halls, And whisper'd in the Sound of Silence."
Paul Simon/Paul Kane's musical work in the early 1960's was primarily as a contracted songwriter in the famed "Brill Building machine."
He would write songs for other artists to record. He did try his hand at performing, however. He wrote many ballads and rockabilly tunes which were recorded, both by Paul and his mildly-successful Tico and the Triumphs.
Paul also had a famous collaborator, Carole Kane (who changed her name to Carol King).
Paul Simon, whose family was part of the military-industrialist complex, was very likely a product of the early 1960s military experimentation in Silent Sound mind control, which is clearly what the lyrics of "The Sound of Silence" convey to those "in the know".
by Linda Carroll msnbc.com contributor on March 5, 2010, from MSNBC Website
You’ve accepted the idea that TV makes you dumber. You know there are lots of more edifying things you could be doing with your time than cheering on the contestants on "Survivor."
And unless you’re working out to an exercise video, you know those hours sprawled out in front of the screen are going to make you fatter - not to mention the impact of all that junk food you’ve been tempted to scarf down during the commercial breaks.
Recent research reveals the weirder ways television is ruining your life.
131 KB
View full-sizeDownload
But you’ll be surprised to learn the host of other bad things TV can do to you.
TV makes you deader
TV-viewing is a pretty deadly pastime, research suggests. No matter how much time you spend in the gym, every hour you spend in front of the TV increases your risk of dying from heart disease, according to a recent report in Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association.
Australian researchers studied 8,800 adult men and women for an average of six years and found that every hour spent in front of the TV translated into an 11 percent increase in the risk of death from any cause, a 9 percent increase in the risk of death from cancer and an 18 percent increase in the risk of death from cardiovascular disease.
So, compared to people who watched less than two hours of TV a day, those who watched four or more hours a day had a 46 percent higher risk of death from any cause and an 80 percent higher risk of death due to cardiovascular disease.
And that was true even among people who didn’t smoke, were thin, ate healthy diets and had low blood pressure and cholesterol.
TV makes you drunker
TV may make you drink more. When it comes to drinking, we’re apparently very susceptible to what we see on TV, according to a report published in Alcohol and Alcoholism.
To discover whether what we view actually affects drinking habits, researchers rounded up 80 male university students between the ages of 18 and 29 and plunked them down in a bar-like setting where the students were allowed to watch movies and commercials on TV.
The researchers found that men who watched films and commercials in which alcohol was prominently featured immediately reached for a glass of beer or wine and drank an average of 1.5 glasses more than those who watched films and commercials in which alcohol played a less prominent role.
TV can make your kid pregnant
Teens who watched a lot of TV that included sexual content were twice as likely to get pregnant, according to a study published in Pediatrics. Once a year for three years, Rand Corporation researchers surveyed 1,461 youngsters - ages 12 to 17 at the beginning of the study - about TV-viewing habits and sexual behavior.
Boys were asked if they had ever gotten a girl pregnant and girls were asked if they had ever been pregnant.
To get a handle on how much sexually charged TV kids were watching, the researchers asked teens if and how often they viewed 23 specific programs.
Another study showed that kids who watch two or more hours of TV a day start having sex earlier, according to a report in the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine.
Researchers followed 4,808 students for a year. The kids - all ages 15 or younger - had never had sex at the beginning of the study. Among kids with parents who disapproved of teen sex, those who watched two or more hours of TV per day were 72 percent more likely to start having sex by the end of the study.
The researchers said they weren’t surprised to find no TV effect among kids with parents who didn’t care about teen sex since those kids were at high risk of early sex anyway.
TV weakens your bones
Hours spent watching TV can set a kid up for later problems with brittle bones, according to a study published in the Journal of Pediatrics. Until we hit 25 or so, we accumulate bone in a kind of savings account. The more bone we build when we’re younger, the less likely we are to develop the brittle-bone disease osteoporosis.
To see whether TV watching might impact kids’ bone growth, researchers followed 214 3-year-olds for four years. The children’s height and weight were checked every four months, along with their activity levels. At each checkup, parents were asked about their kids’ TV-viewing habits.
The more TV kids watched, the less bone they grew, regardless of how active they were at other times.
TV makes you less engaging
A recent study found that when the TV is on - even if it’s just in the background - parents interact less with their kids.
To learn more about TV’s effects, researchers brought 51 infants and toddlers, each accompanied by a parent, to a university child study center, according to the report published Child Development. Parents and kids were observed for half an hour in a playroom without a TV and then for a half hour with the TV tuned to an adult program such as "Jeopardy!" When the TV was on, parents spent about 20 percent less time talking to their children.
And when parents did pay attention to their kids, the quality of the interactions was lower: With a program on in the background, parents were less active, attentive and responsive to their youngsters.
Have you ever overheard an intense or heart-wrenching discussion only to find out the talkers were actually hashing out the lives of fictional TV characters?
Do you ever wonder why people are so easily beguiled into trusting the talking heads?
It might not be such a mystery when you find out how easy it is for TV programming - the waves it emits, the storytelling - to override basic brain function and even damage your body.
Back in 1969, a man named Herbert Krugman conducted a series of experiments regarding the effect of television on a person's brainwaves.
What he found was pretty startling:
"Krugman monitored a person through many trials and found that in less than one minute of television viewing, the person's brainwaves switched from Beta waves - brainwaves associated with active, logical thought - to primarily Alpha waves.
When the subject stopped watching television and began reading a magazine, the brainwaves reverted to Beta waves."
'Beta' is considered a normal, awake state, while 'Alpha' waves are experienced in a deep relaxation or 'daydreaming' state.
When in the Alpha state, a person is subjected to a passive learning experience with the right side of the brain at the wheel, leaving critical thinking skills behind.
When scientists study these effects, we often find out later that they were only trying to help corporate advertisersbetter influence you.
They have even found that the brains of people watching movies together are snyced up! Is that a "syn" against individuality?
One of his reasons was the "death culture" - all the story lines, especially in the news were heading toward death obsession.
Think about how that has changed in 40 years and what that does to already hopeless people? Is that entertainment?
Speaking of which, here is a video that shows how television affects your brain chemistry for the worst. Yes, the waves entrain your brain for the greatest suggestibility - but it gets worse. Your mind gets confused and derailed by the condensed and unrealistic story lines.
The imagery creates plenty of stress hormones - like the constant release of adrenaline - but with no outlet because we consciously try to tell ourselves that it's just a show.
A while back I wrote 'Part 1' (above) and someone asked,
"Don't you mean for the worse?"
No… the worst.
I don't mind getting called a Luddite or skittish about technology because I know TV's effects in my own life, large parts of which that were evaporated by a flickering, vampiric screen.
Such a blind trust in this "gift" to humanity really should have been questioned and cautioned early on.
He knew the magical, forceful will of manipulative imagery from the other side since he used those tricks as a top PR executive.
Last time, I touched on stress hormones. Volumes have been researched and written about hormones - the damaging effects of chronic streaming hormone release; but very rarely does anyone think to analyze that watching television might make up a good bulk of that stress.
So it would appear that chronic stress happens throughout the day while trying to work or survive, and then continues with entertainment - more like en-train-ment.
Maybe television should be considered in a dietary sense - something that is ingested and can be overdone.
Cortisol is necessary for good health but the amounts released in the Western world are brinking on PTSD levels and can lead to impaired brain function, damaged thyroid, obesity, blood sugar problems, chronic fatigue, immune dysfunction, impaired healing, insomnia and weakness.
Trauma can lead to brain fog and shrinking of the hippocampus - the brain center responsible for creating new, time-sequenced memories. Adrenal fatigue is the disorder du jour - could television play a role?
The body must not agree with the brain that the imagery is fake, because fight-or-flight is triggered just the same. Another aspect that people rarely mention is that storylines will trigger fight-or-flight adrenaline reaction based on events that happened in your own life.
Another word about adrenaline and nature. When rabbits are caught, either by traps or cornered by predators, naturally this activates their fight-or-flight. So, what happens when they are finally safe? They look cuckoo as they zip around in lightning fast circles in order to burn off the adrenaline rush.
What do humans do as their bodies flood with adrenaline? Nothing. Remain sedentary. Not even deep breaths.
Whose idea was it to change and speed up children's television to the point of causing erratic brain graphs?
I've only ever heard one doctor talk about it, and the only reason he thought to study the effect was because he stayed home with his child and noticed the sensory-overload and zipping nature of children's programming.
Last time, my article showcased a video clip about how television affects brain chemistry. The full video (below) discusses ways to break propaganda spells - aside from full abstinence, of course.
One of those ways is pointing out hidden placements and propaganda, such as overt product placements by companies who may have sponsored the show.
Side fact
Did you know that it's been admitted that "green" and globalist messages are worked into TV show scripts in order to hypnotize viewers into "going green" and saving the earth?
The WSJ article I just linked to may have gotten their information from an entire book on the subject, called Green Culture: An A-Z Guide - it's a textbook on sustainability and green society. In fact, this practice was rampant in the early 1990s.
Are we really such brain-dead children that we need "morals" worked into our entertainment? Just whose morals are we downloading, anyway? Laughter through entertainment is a wonderful way to prompt a healing process, but it's also dreadfully used to gain acceptance of the unacceptable.
Scientists study YOU, not so that you can have better entertainment or health - but so that the companies that hire them can manipulate and sell to you better. What's the best way to break your will, they wonder.
But you are not a child and you don't need "story time" or the allowance of corporations to take rent-free space in your life.
Is it any surprise that Mexico's government is making sure that all the poor have digital TVs? That's well over a billion spent where I'm sure there's a more common sense and helpful use for those funds in Mexico.
I think one of the greatest tragedies in human history is how the globe got sucked into the videodrome.
Is there anything good about TV or movies? Absolutely - there's a reason we use them in analogies all the time.
That's precisely the language of the subconscious - through metaphor and imagery! For instance, the movie Invasion of the Body Snatchers could serve as a metaphor for so much social commentary - television is a body snatcher.
You may have used the movies Idiocracy and They Live to reach your friends in a conversation. On the other hand, violent or horror-inducing concepts can stick with us like an unwelcome house guest.
But it's a powerful language that bypasses conscious cognition. Which is all the more reason to guard your mind and heart.
It's time to start looking at television, not as some kind of reward, but with skepticism like a junk food or a pill. It's more powerful than the latter items because it doesn't just affect your health, but shapes who you are - it was designed that way.
It's been called the greatest mind control device known to humanity and amazingly it's the one addiction that when truly broken can most change your life forever.
Yes, that's how bad this problem of mind control has become.
You can cut the degree of mind control deception with a knife, it's so thick. Freeing oneself from such a deep level of deception is a mental freedom you can only truly understand if you have experienced it yourself.
Consider the prospects of going from a full state of being mesmerized in a controlled environment to one of freedom. Mental freedom and spiritual freedom that is. Perhaps these are the two most important freedoms.
Physical freedom on the other hand, is usually the first to go and the one we'd like to think we will fight for and defend. It (the physical freedom) is the one they always threaten to take away.
This physical freedom is the image of freedom we all dream about for what good is freedom of speech if it's at a prison or concentration camp?
No question the values and virtues of physical freedom speak for themselves, but,
When you are watching TV, especially every day, your ability to connect to your real life is fogged; the line between reality and fiction become blurred.
The young generation knows about this real well, they live in the matrix every day, subjected to the impulses that come with being young.
As they should enjoy their youth, I cast no stones at youth who won't consider the problems of the world. A part of me empathizes with a youth who would rather not know how bad the world really is.
Empathy only goes so far however.
Ultimately 'I understand' gives way to 'no I'm serious' and 'hey I really need you to understand this'. Realizing what is really happening should induce an 'oh my god' out of you, at the very least. If only you could connect with the reality of the suffering that humanity has endured throughout history.
That's right, if you could actually experience reality through the eyes of those who have had close family and friends murdered by war and propaganda, this would significantly impact your view about life.
So why are so many especially in America so disconnected from the reality of what I speak? Television.
How dangerous is TV?
Television and TV programming is singlehandedly the most powerful force of energy pointed directly at your physical brain.
It changes how you see the world and how you react to situations you encounter. Yes, even the physical electronic signals that come out of your TV have been shown to affect your brain. Studies have even connected television watching at early ages with bad grades, attention and concentration issues, bad behavior and communication problems among other things.
How then can anything so bad for you be so legal? Only after being mentally cleansed from the TV addiction can you truly appreciate this question.
Television is quietly the most important tool for the success of the globalist new world order plans. It's the direct channel of communication they have set up to push their messages across to the masses in order to see their agenda through.
This television 'power cable' which sends signals directly to your mind, is real and works similar to the cable lines that run all across America.
We see the lines all over the country. Cable, Wi-Fi, telephone and fiber-optic lines. It's a network of communication lines that coat the country. These lines deliver television and other signals directly into everyone's homes and now we are observing the multidimensional effect of this whole phenomenon.
How can so many electronic radio wave signals not affect the mind in a deleterious manner? And how about the degree of mind-control it has on those hard-wired to it?
Disconnecting your way to freedom
This is why disconnecting your television and throwing it away is one of the most powerful ways that you can change your life forever.
Yes forever and manually, no power needed. Right now every single person in America has the power to manually turn the TV off and find out or rediscover who you really are.
Turn off the electronic signal that has you fully mentally controlled. The TV has found a parking space in your mind. If the majority of Americans could find the courage to turn off that mental parking space and start their life anew, the global government minions and their politician mouthpieces would lose their audience instantaneously.
Imagine! With no audience, how can one complete a plan? Sounds crazy? Wait till enough people have had enough.
Though it may or may not ever happen it is factually true that if everyone right now turned off their TV we would have a world-wide revolution never before seen. Imagine humanity focused on fixing what is wrong. What if we could finally unseat the criminal politicians who are running the show? Actually it's been said that all that is needed to induce true change is for 1% of the people to wake up.
If this is true then think of how close this 'TV turning off' effect is to coming true.
Spread the word. Turn your TV off and do without it. It's easy and it's fun. It really is. After a few months you'll look back and you won't believe you watched TV in the past. It's an addiction you usually never go back to and when you are around someone who watches TV you may feel uncomfortable with the signal alone.
You'll understand the phenomenon a lot more once you cross that line.
Here's to being focused, being positive and believing this TV-turning-off phenomenon will happen and will bestow a blessing on humanity that we cannot understand.
