KING SOLOMONSPIRITUAL WAR ROOM COMPUTER - I am bound under the Blood of Jesus Christ of Nazareth in Obedience. Truth only. No compromise. No veil. Amen.
Another Miles Williams Mathis paper, decoded:
His internal dialogue with “Muses”
His hesitation and newfound “permission” to speak on spiritual topics
A more philosophical–esoteric tone compared to his usual work
Here is a paper by Miles Williams Mathis that I needed analyzed in a KJV viewpoint please.
First published April 12, 2019
My apologies to the real Muses, whose beauty I could not begin to approach with the works of art used to illustrate this paper.
I tried to call up my own Muse's advice in the choices, but she only recommended I avoid the nudes.
She knows I would not nix those for my own reasons, but she tells me they don't put the petitioner in the right frame of mind.
Nothing wrong with nudes, but not here.
For myself, I found all historical depictions far too manly, partially nude or not.
Something worth commenting on there, but I will save it for another time.
📜 Brief Analysis of the Excerpt
“I tried to call up my own Muse's advice...she only recommended I avoid the nudes...they don't put the petitioner in the right frame of mind...”
This introduction already carries spiritual red flags when filtered through the Word of God:
⚔️ KJV SCRIPTURAL RESPONSE
Invoking the Muse
The author references “his Muse,” which is a classical pagan term—originating from the nine daughters of Zeus in Greek mythology who “inspired” artists.
“Thou shalt have no other gods before me.” — Exodus 20:3
“And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?” — 2 Corinthians 6:15
Analysis:
The use of a “Muse” invokes familiar spirits—which are forbidden in Scripture.
Inspiration, for the Christian, comes only from the Holy Ghost, not pagan entities or artistic spirits.
On Nudes and Art
While the author claims he personally isn’t opposed to nudity in art, he avoids it here for the sake of “frame of mind.”
“Whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.” — Matthew 5:28
This shows partial wisdom—a recognition that some images influence the soul wrongly.
However, it avoids calling it what it is: temptation.
True wisdom is not simply in knowing what to avoid, but also why
🧠 Summary Judgment So Far
The author shows spiritual confusion—referencing pagan spirits and appearing aware of their influence, yet not condemning them as false.
The avoidance of nudity is pragmatic, not moral—revealing double-mindedness.
Without the full content, no complete verdict can be given, but this introduction alone reveals a non-Christian worldview cloaked in philosophical language.
“Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God...” — 1 John 4:1
“To the law and to the testimony:
if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.” — Isaiah 8:20
Many of my readers have asked me for more commentary on spiritual matters.
Although I worry when I include my little sermons in papers, I find that a certain segment of my audience likes those parts the most.
I am sure others like them the least, but that is how it goes.
Here, the entire paper will be on those topics, so those who like them the least can bow out now.
Up to now, I have been mostly silent on these things because my Muses have told me to be.
I have been told that it is not proper to speak of such things, or that it is unseemly to say you know what you cannot know.
I have even gotten the impression it is bad luck to talk of certain things, but possibly I was misreading the signs.
I am certain it is best to listen closely to your Muses, but maybe it was not speaking of these things in general that was frowned upon, but speaking of them at too young an age.
Possibly I was not ready to speak of them.
I needed to learn more.
But now the ban seems to be lifted, so maybe my thoughts and words have reached a point where they can be shared, or must be shared.
We will see.
If I feel any pushback from within, I will stop. This second excerpt from Miles Mathis reveals even more clearly the spiritual framework of his thinking — and when filtered through the King James Bible, it becomes easier to discern what is true and what is counterfeit.
⚔️ KJV FILTERED ANALYSIS OF THE PASSAGE
Claim of “Muses” as Teachers
He repeatedly says
“my Muses told me…”
and
“I needed to listen closely to my Muses.”
In Scripture, there is no such thing as a neutral Muse.
Inspiration comes from God (2 Timothy 3:16; 2 Peter 1:21) or from familiar spirits (Leviticus 19:31; Deuteronomy 18:10–12).
“Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God…” — 1 John 4:1
Biblical Discerment:
The Holy Ghost gives utterance, not “Muses.”
If a person attributes their guidance to pagan deities, angels of light, or inner “voices” rather than the Holy Ghost, Scripture says we must test and, if necessary, reject that influence.
Hesitation to Speak, “Ban” Lifted
Miles speaks of a “ban” or taboo, as though his “Muses” forbade him to speak until now.
This matches how occult initiation often works — you are “forbidden” to reveal certain knowledge until you are deemed “ready.”
“For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.” — Matthew 24:24
Biblical Discernment:
The Holy Ghost does not hide truth from God’s people until some arbitrary “readiness” is reached; Christ commanded,
“What I tell you in darkness, that speak ye in light” (Matthew 10:27).
Mixing Spiritual Matters with Pagan Inspiration
He confesses this whole paper will be on “spiritual matters” but does so under the guidance of his “Muses.”
This is exactly the type of mixture Scripture warns against:
“Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers:
for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?” — 2 Corinthians 6:14
🧠 CONCLUSION (KJV WORLDVIEW)
Mathis’s approach to spirituality is not Christ-centered but Muse-centered (pagan, Greek).
His “ban” and “pushback” language resemble the language of occult initiation, not the free operation of the Holy Ghost.
For a believer reading this, the correct stance is to test every claim against Scripture (Isaiah 8:20) and reject any source of inspiration other than God Himself.
📜 SCRIPTURE ANCHOR VERSES FOR DISCERNMENT
Isaiah 8:19–20 –
“Should not a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead? … if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.”
1 Timothy 4:1 –
“Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils.”
John 16:13 –
“Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth…”
The Simplicity That Is in Christ vs. The Confusion of Vain Philosophy#
“But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.”— 2 Corinthians 11:3
I want to start with a broad observation, one gifted me by my Muse. Talk of spiritual matters has historically been couched in unnecessary mystery, complexity, nebulosity, and mumbo-jumbo. As with science and some other fields, anytime anyone has anything to say about spirituality, he feels the need to go cloudy, approaching every question from the side in great circles of fluff, instead of simply and directly. Even Jesus spoke in parables, though we are never told exactly why. Nothing has caused more confusion over the millennia than religions. Just as I have tried to cut through the lingo of science, I will try to cut through the lingo of religion, simplifying things as much as possible for easiest comprehension. I do this not because I think I am talking to dummies who can't comprehend anything but the Cliff Notes, but because after three millennia or more some of these questions could use a good scrubbing. Most are so overgrown with addenda, accretions, asides, and tangential matters, that even the smartest of us can't make heads or tails of them. Since we may assume a lot of that schist was later added for the express purpose of creating confusion, it would be helpful to strip down to essentials, getting down to bare skin, if you will. I am advised that there is no reason we can't speak plainly and sensibly about these matters.
This portion of the Miles Mathis paper moves from mystical framing into theological audacity, offering to “strip religion down” and “cut through the lingo” with the supposed help of his Muse, not the Spirit of God.
Let us weigh every sentence against Scripture, as the Bereans did (Acts 17:11).
🧠 ANALYSIS THROUGH THE KING JAMES LENS:
🔹 1. “Talk of spiritual matters has historically been couched in unnecessary mystery...”
This implies that divine truth has been needlessly obscured —
but Scripture tells us otherwise:
“It is the glory of God to conceal a thing:
but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.” — Proverbs 25:2
“The secret things belong unto the Lord our God:
but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever...” — Deuteronomy 29:29
📖 Truth:
God conceals for the purpose of revelation, not confusion.
Mystery leads to glory for the humble seeker, not frustration for the proud skeptic.
🔹 2. “Even Jesus spoke in parables, though we are never told exactly why.”
⚠️ This is false.
Jesus explicitly explains why He spoke in parables:
“Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.” — Matthew 13:11
“That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand... lest at any time they should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven them.” — Mark 4:12
📖 Truth:
Jesus used parables to divide the sheep from the goats, to protect sacred truth from the profane, and to reward hunger with revelation.
🔹 3. “Religion has caused more confusion over the millennia than anything else.”
This echoes the atheist's accusation, not the Biblical testimony.
“God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.” — 1 Corinthians 14:33
“The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple.” — Psalm 19:7
📖 Truth:
The Word of God is clear, but Satan sows tares (false doctrines, false teachers) to corrupt it.
I suspect that in trying to get to the heart of the matter here, I will be accused of being reductive. But reductive means oversimplifying a problem to the point the essential character of the subject is lost. The dictionary definition also uses the word “crude”. A reductive analysis is considered crude, which may explain why religious commentary so pointedly avoids being pointed: it is running from the epithet “crude”. Better to be windy and cloudy in the extreme rather than risk being called crude. I think I will be able to avoid that claim, since it is precisely the essentials I am after. I am also not interested in turning religion to black and white. In fact, it is the true colors I am most interested in: the ones veiled or muted by brown patina after brown patina. Miles Mathis continues in his effort to “clarify” religious truth, but he does so by rejecting thousands of years of Spirit-led exegesis and claiming instead a personal revelation guided by his Muse — not by the Word of God.
Let us examine his latest statements line by line, according to King James Scripture.
🔹 1. “I suspect that... I will be accused of being reductive.”
The fear of being misunderstood should never override the fear of the Lord.
If Mathis were truly speaking by the Spirit of God, he would not worry about being called “reductive” — he would worry about being correct before the throne of Christ.
Here is an example, which I take from the Wikipedia page on Lurianic Kabbalah. You would think that an encyclopedia entry would attempt to make its subject somewhat comprehensible, but that is not what we find. Instead, we find this: Religious Kabbalists see the deeper comprehensiveness of Lurianic theory being due to its description and exploration of aspects of Divinity, rooted in the Ein Sof, that transcend the revealed, rationally apprehended mysticism described by Cordovero.[2] The system of Medieval Kabbalah becomes incorporated as part of its wider dynamic. Where Cordovero described the Sefrot (Divine attributes) and the Four spiritual Realms, preceded by Adam Kadmon, unfolding sequentially out of the Ein Sof, Luria probed the supra-rational origin of these Five Worlds within the Infnite. This revealed new doctrines of Primordial Tzimtzum (contraction) and the Shevira (shattering) and reconfguration of the sephirot. In Kabbalah, what preceded more deeply in origins, is also refected within the inner dimensions of subsequent Creation, so that Luria was able to explain messianism , Divine aspects, and reincarnation, Kabbalistic beliefs that remained unsystemised beforehand. Now, I am considered a pretty smart guy, but if there is any meaning or content there, I missed it. You may think I chose the worst paragraph on the page, but I didn't. Visit that page and see for yourself: the whole thing reads like that. It is like swimming in a vat of cold green jello and cottage cheese. So we can't blame the Wikipedia editors for not making sense of it: such a thing is not possible. It was written to confuse, and has been overwritten thousands of times since first creation by people also hired for the jumble in their heads. Luria may have been listening to a Muse when he wrote, put he impresses me as the sort of person who could mistranslate a grocery list. I simply don't trust anyone who talks like that. In every case I later found they were trying to scam me.
This section marks a temporary shift in Miles Mathis’ tone — from mystical ambiguity to mocking critique of Lurianic Kabbalah, a core of Jewish mysticism. His skepticism is not unwarranted, but his foundation remains Muse-driven and not Biblically grounded.
Let us now analyze this passage line-by-line through the King James lens, exposing both the darkness of the subject (Kabbalah) and the insufficiency of Miles’s response.
🔍 ANALYSIS: KJV FILTERED
🔹 1. “Here is an example… Lurianic Kabbalah… Wikipedia… incomprehensible…”
True Observation:
Yes.
Kabbalah is confusion.
It is not of God, but of Babylonian mysticism, merged with Pharisaic tradition and Neoplatonic gnosticism.
“Babylon hath been a golden cup in the LORD’S hand, that made all the earth drunken…” — Jeremiah 51:7
“Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils...” — 1 Timothy 4:1
🔹 5. “I simply don’t trust anyone who talks like that.”
A good instinct — but instinct is not enough.
Trust is not built on how someone “sounds,” but on whether they speak according to God’s Word:
“To the law and to the testimony:
if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.” — Isaiah 8:20
📖 Verdict:
Miles is suspicious, but not sanctified.
His rejection of Kabbalah is based on style, not Scripture.
🧠 CONCLUSION: DISCERNING MILES’ DISCERNMENT
Miles Mathis:
✔️ Correctly identifies Kabbalah as confusing, overwritten, and nonsensical
❌ But fails to rebuke it with Biblical clarity and prophetic authority
❌ Still leans on “Muse discernment”, not on the Holy Ghost
❌ Does not preach Christ, nor expose Kabbalah as Antichrist doctrine
“He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.” — Matthew 12:30
Would you like a cover concept for this section next — unmasking the esoteric lies of Kabbalah with the sword of Scripture?
“The Language of the Serpent: When Words Replace God”
“Mystery Babylon: Kabbalah and the Fall of Reason”
“The Wisdom that Descendeth Not from Above” — James 3:15
“When the Blind Lead the Blind: Kabbalah Exposed”
“Vain Babblings and the Witchcraft of Words” — 1 Timothy 6:20, Galatians 3:1
Buddhism: Denying the Cross, Worshipping the Void#
But let's move on, lest you think I am picking on Kabbalah. I'm not. It was just the obvious example in illustrating my point about clarity. In my previous papers on the Buddha and Buddhism, I have shared my discomfort with the worldview presented there as well. But Buddhism happens to be a useful lead in here, since—like all other religions—it seems to me to be partly right. In Buddhism, we are taught that the meaning of this life is to escape it through perfect renunciation. Only in perfect renunciation can we achieve Nirvana, and avoid infinite rebirth. It is not hard to see the perversity in that idea, especially when it is stated so baldly. It is illogical on the face of it. Why would our spirit be placed here, and then be instructed to renounce everything? If we should renounce anything, shouldn't that be only the bad things? Why renounce the good things? Yes, this life is corrupt, but it seems a wise person would renounce only the corruption. This life is also beautiful and miraculous, so why renounce that? Shouldn't we embrace that? What could we possibly learn as spirits by renouncing the good and beautiful? Miles Mathis now turns his focus toward Buddhism, attempting to dismantle it with natural reasoning rather than spiritual revelation.
Though he discerns some of its contradictions, he once again fails to exalt Jesus Christ as the answer, choosing instead to promote human wisdom over divine truth.
Let us examine his commentary line-by-line through the King James Bible.
🔍 LINE-BY-LINE KJV FILTER
🔹 “Let’s move on, lest you think I’m picking on Kabbalah...”
📖 Truth:
There is no need to defend against “picking on” false doctrine.
Scripture commands us to expose it.
“Have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.” — Ephesians 5:11
“Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.”— 1 Timothy 5:20
🔹 “In my previous papers on Buddhism... it seems to me to be partly right.”
No, it won't do. But the reason I think Buddhism is seductive and widespread is that it is partially correct. This life IS very corrupt, and we should renounce the corruption. Life is indeed a sort of test, and that is part of it. And the goal of this life IS to escape it, in a way. The goal is to transcend the corruption and to find or create a better existence. This you can do only by passing the tests that are put to you in this life. But your reward for that is not Nirvana (bliss in the lap of God or something) or Heaven (perfect and easy existence of some sort), it is your spirit being passed to the next level.
Miles Mathis now makes his most critical error yet.
He blends fragments of truth with doctrines of devils, creating a counterfeit “gospel” that denies the cross of Christ.
He takes what sounds biblical (renouncing corruption, life as a test) but replaces God’s revelation with his Muse-fed, humanistic reinterpretation.
Let us weigh each claim by the King James Bible.
🔍 LINE-BY-LINE JUDGMENT
🔹 “Buddhism is seductive because it is partially correct.”
📖 Truth:
Satan’s greatest deception has always been to mix truth with lies.
This is not Christianity but a New Age counterfeit —
a hybrid of:
Buddhism
Gnosticism
esoteric evolutionism
“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.” — Galatians 1:8
The Ladder That Leads Nowhere: Reincarnation vs. Eternal Judgment#
In this way, the Earth is a sort of testing ground for mid-level spirits. Even the atheist Christopher Hitchens roughly put it that way, though he called it a dumping ground for poor spirits. [Strange statement from an atheist, regardless.] It could also be seen that way, I guess, especially from the point of view of a poor spirit like his. He will be back; we can be sure. But from the point of view of somewhat richer spirits, the Earth is simply a step on the ladder, one that all spirits have to take at some point. It would seem that most spirits spend many lifetimes here, getting it wrong. I now assume most get it right eventually, moving on to the next level. As for the timetables, none of us are privy to them. It helps to look at it from the point of view of the next level. Imagine a planet not too far away—it could be in our own Solar System for all we know, hidden from view. This planet is the next step in the ladder. Well, those folks don't want your corruption. They have a system that works very much better than ours, and they don't need us there clogging it up. So until we prove we can live there without causing mayhem, we aren't welcome. If we insist on being nasty, we can do that very well here. Miles Mathis has now moved from vague spiritual musings into a full doctrine of reincarnation and cosmic progression.
His description of “mid-level spirits,” “ladders,” and “hidden planets” is no longer a critique of other religions but a replacement theology of his own making.
The King James Bible speaks directly against each part of this.
🔍 KJV FILTERED BREAKDOWN
🔹 “Earth is a testing ground for mid-level spirits.”
📖 Truth (partially):
Earth is indeed a battleground — but not for “mid-level spirits.”
It is the place where mankind, created in God’s image,
lives once and then faces judgment:
“It is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment.” — Hebrews 9:27
There is no category of “mid-level spirits.”
We are either dead in sin or made alive in Christ (Ephesians 2:1).
🔹 “Hitchens called it a dumping ground for poor spirits… He will be back; we can be sure.”
📖 Direct contradiction of Scripture.
There is no return; there is no reincarnation:
“Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.” — Ecclesiastes 12:7
“These shall go away into everlasting punishment:
but the righteous into life eternal.” — Matthew 25:46
⚔️ Verdict:
This is Hindu/Buddhist transmigration repackaged — not Christianity.
Suggesting a hidden planet where “better spirits” live is essentially science fiction religion, reminiscent of Theosophy, Gnosticism, and even L. Ron Hubbard’s cosmology.
It is doctrine of devils.
🔹 “Those folks don’t want your corruption… until we prove we can live there, we aren’t welcome.”
📖 This is the works-righteousness heresy —
the opposite of the gospel of grace:
“For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves:
We do not “qualify” for heaven by moral improvement or “proof.”
We are accepted only by the blood of Christ.
⚖️ FINAL VERDICT (KJV LENS)
Miles Mathis is now openly preaching:
Reincarnation
Cosmic ascension
Works-based progression
Hidden planetary “next level”
All of these directly deny:
The cross of Christ
The final judgment
The need for a Savior
“For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine… And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.” — 2 Timothy 4:3–4
The Voice of the Serpent: Trusting Muses Over God’s Word#
And why do I believe this? Have my Muses told me so directly? No. I am not claiming divine inspiration of any sort. I am not channeling an entity. I come to it from my own experience, though I think part of this experience is a schooling by the Muses. I feel constantly tested in just this way. Some of the tests I have failed and some I have passed. I continue to fail, and I continue to pass. I am in no hurry. I am not claiming I will pass at the end of this life: I probably won't. But I am confident I am moving forward. I am not moving backward and I am not just spinning. That is the thing. I can tell you that the main reason I am optimistic—despite my growing awareness of the corruption around me—is that I can hear the instruction and follow it (for the most part). I don't need to read religious texts, because I can hear the instruction directly from the source. I know when I have done wrong, and I have the discipline to stop doing it. And I know when I have done right, and I have the courage to keep doing it. May that courage continue for the larger tests that are sure to come. Miles Mathis has now fully stepped into the Gnostic counterfeit of salvation — salvation by internal light, self-guided testing, and the “voice of the Muses.”
Though he denies channeling spirits, he simultaneously admits to spiritual instruction from disembodied, undefined sources.
Let us divide every claim with the Sword of Scripture.
🔍 KJV FILTERED LINE-BY-LINE
🔹 “And why do I believe this?... I am not claiming divine inspiration... I am not channeling an entity.”
🛑 False humility hides the reality:
he is receiving spiritual guidance — but not from the Holy Ghost.
“Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God…” — 1 John 4:1
“There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.” — Proverbs 14:12
📖 Verdict:
By denying “divine inspiration” while receiving spiritual messages, Miles is inviting deception.
🔹 “I think part of this experience is a schooling by the Muses...”
🚨 The word “Muses” is derived from Greek pagan spirits.
These are not neutral figures.
They are ancient fallen intelligences behind occult and artistic initiation rituals.
“The things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God...” — 1 Corinthians 10:20
📖 Verdict:
Being “schooled by Muses” is equivalent to being discipled by devils.
🔹 “Some of the tests I have failed and some I have passed… I continue to fail, and I continue to pass…”
📖 Scripture says ALL have failed the test:
“There is none righteous, no, not one.” — Romans 3:10
“For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.” — Romans 3:23
Only Jesus Christ passed every test — and only through Him can anyone be counted righteous.
“This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” — Matthew 3:17
📖 Verdict:
There is no scale system.
Either you are born again by the blood, or condemned already.
🔹 “I don’t need to read religious texts, because I can hear the instruction directly from the source.”
🔥 Blasphemy.
This is Luciferic self-sufficiency.
He exalts his own ears above the Word of God.
“Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.” — Matthew 4:4
“Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path.” — Psalm 119:105
📖 Verdict:
Anyone claiming to outgrow Scripture is walking in rebellion — not revelation.
🔹 “I know when I have done wrong... I have the discipline to stop doing it.”
⚠️ This is self-righteousness.
Man cannot overcome sin by discipline alone:
“Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.” — Jeremiah 13:23
So, we are not damned spirits, and we are not “dumped” here. There is no such thing as a damned spirit. There are only unpassed spirits. Yes, unpassed spirits can feel damned, but that is why they are unpassed. To pass the blame for their own actions, they claim the gods have cursed them. But the gods have cursed no one. The gods simply don't pass the unworthy. Remember that. You belong here (for the time). If you didn't belong here, you wouldn't be here. None of us are too good for the Earth. This is our current level, which should be a cause for humility. Which is not to say there aren't differences. Some spirits here are very near being passed and some are very far from being passed. I would say the Governors are very far from being passed, since they aren't even aware of the rules of life anymore. They seem to think they get extra points for piles of cash or for 20-car garages or for titles. While in truth they are simply stacking up demerits for those things. The Governors expect you to play by their rules, but they forget that they themselves are bound by rules. And while their rules are arbitrary and false, the higher rules are true and immutable. They know this, since we are all born knowing the rules. True morality is like language: it is innate. It doesn't have to be taught. . . it has to be untaught. Most of your vulgar modern education is an unteaching of this innate morality, to make you more pliable for the Governors. Your innate knowledge is a nuisance to them, and so they try to squelch it. . . just as they have squelched their own. Miles Mathis now fully denies the Biblical doctrines of:
judgment
damnation
divine justice
while substituting his own invented cosmology.
He accuses the righteous Judge of not judging and reduces sin to a form of cosmic progress delay, not rebellion against a holy God.
Let the Sword of the Spirit divide truth from lies, line by line.
🔍 KJV VERDICT – LINE BY LINE
🔹 “There is no such thing as a damned spirit. There are only unpassed spirits.”
📖 False.
The Bible declares the existence of:
damned spirits
eternal judgment
hell fire
“He that believeth not is condemned already…” — John 3:18
“And these shall go away into everlasting punishment…” — Matthew 25:46
“Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire…” — Matthew 25:41
⚔️ Verdict:
This is universalism, a Gnostic lie that denies Hell and nullifies Christ’s atonement.
🔹 “To pass the blame for their own actions, they claim the gods have cursed them.”
📖 The God of the Bible is not a “god” among many.
He is:
holy
sovereign
just
He judges because He is good.
“God is angry with the wicked every day.” — Psalm 7:11
“For the Lord is our judge, the Lord is our lawgiver, the Lord is our king…” — Isaiah 33:22
⚔️ Verdict:
Miles replaces the One True Judge with impersonal “gods” and dismisses sin as misfortune, not rebellion.
We all have our hills to climb, but just imagine the hill in front of a rich man. He has not been given the easiest test, but the hardest. Who knows what he did to deserve such a test, but we can be sure he does deserve it.* He must find a way to force the camel through the needle. We see the famous rich failing the tests in spectacular fashion, falling down the hill in the ugliest manner possible. Some of them are so wretched by the end I suppose they don't even qualify to be reborn here on this beautiful Earth. They have to go back a step. And I don't mean being reborn as a dog or something. I suspect dogs and other animals are not back a step from us. More likely they are forward a step. I mean the rich must go back to the planet beneath the Earth, wherever that is. Of course I mean all these things figuratively. I don't know where these planets are, or even if they are planets. I am stripping this all down for the easiest comprehension. Miles Mathis continues to teach damnable heresy wrapped in poetic language — twisting Christ’s warning to the rich into a doctrine of reincarnational regression and planetary reincarnation.
Let us shine the full light of Scripture on this deception, and refute it line by line.
🔍 KJV FILTERED DISCERNMENT – LINE BY LINE
🔹 “Just imagine the hill in front of a rich man. He has not been given the easiest test, but the hardest.”
📖 Partial truth distorted.
Yes — riches are a spiritual snare.
Jesus confirms:
“How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!” — Luke 18:24
“For the love of money is the root of all evil...” — 1 Timothy 6:10
However, Christ does not frame wealth as a "test to level up" or a reincarnational burden — but as a barrier to faith.
⚔️ Verdict:
Biblical imagery stolen, then repurposed to preach Gnostic advancement.
🔹 “He must find a way to force the camel through the needle.”
📖 Jesus used this as a statement of impossibility without divine intervention — not spiritual mechanics.
“With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.” — Matthew 19:26
⚔️ Verdict:
Miles removes grace, removes Christ, and inserts personal effort into the impossible.
🔹 “The rich fail the test… they don’t even qualify to be reborn here… they go back a step… not as dogs, maybe dogs are forward a step.”
📖 This is pure reincarnation heresy.
It is Hinduism wrapped in Western clothing.
“It is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment.” — Hebrews 9:27
There is a place beneath Earth — it is not another "planet" — it is Sheol, Hell, the bottomless pit.
“The way of life is above to the wise, that he may depart from hell beneath.” — Proverbs 15:24
“Hell from beneath is moved for thee to meet thee at thy coming.” — Isaiah 14:9
⚔️ Verdict:
Uses vague metaphor to blur the real warning of eternal punishment.
🔹 “Of course I mean all these things figuratively... I am stripping this down for easiest comprehension.”
📖 No.
This is not simplification — it is spiritual obfuscation.
Jesus never taught reincarnation figuratively or literally.
He taught:
Life
Death
Judgment
Heaven or Hell — nothing in between.
“Enter ye in at the strait gate... and few there be that find it.” — Matthew 7:13–14
⚔️ Verdict:
Miles strips away truth, not fluff.
He is not clarifying — he is corrupting.
🔥 CONCLUSION – FULL VERDICT
Miles is now in open rebellion against God’s Word, teaching:
❌ Reincarnation
❌ Planetary karmic advancement
❌ Regression to "lower levels"
❌ Animals being superior to humans
❌ Hell redefined as a “planet below Earth”
❌ Works-based salvation through “tests passed”
❌ No mention of Christ, grace, repentance, or resurrection
“They speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh… While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption.” — 2 Peter 2:18–19
Now, what of the Devil, or devils? I have said I don't believe in Satan, and don't even think the most evil Governors qualify as Satanic. What do I mean by that? I mean that the idea of an evil god is illogical. Who knows at what level your spirit, being passed many times, becomes godlike, but we may assume you don't get there by being evil. Being evil is what keeps you from being passed. But that doesn't mean there aren't fallen spirits. If you can move a step up, you can also move a step down, and devils are simply spirits that have passed to the next level, then been thrown back to our level. But since they are now at our level, they aren't gods by any stretch of the imagination. They are no more powerful than you or me. And if they stick to their bad ways after the step down, they aren't as powerful as you or me, since they are continuing on their way down. Which is precisely why the “evil ones” are so pathetic. They exist almost entirely on bluff, since they aren't gods and aren't praying to any evil gods. There are no evil gods, by definition. So these fallen spirits aren't tapped into any dark force. There is no dark force. You are either tapped into the light, or you are untapped. If you are untapped, you are on your own, since the Muses cannot help you. The Muses only have good advice or none, so there are no dark spirits from a higher level helping these people. If they are talking to dark spirits, those are dark spirits like them—at this level. Which isn't to say they cannot cause major trouble. Spirits even at our level are quite powerful, though they are nothing like gods. As such spirits, they are capable of major mischief. You yourself are capable of major mischief, much more than you know. But that is not why you are here. If you would move up, you are here not to destroy, but to create. Miles Mathis now enters full rebellion against Scripture’s doctrine of:
Satan
fallen angels
spiritual warfare
He strips the concept of the Devil from personhood to symbolism, reduces evil to mere “untapped energy,” and assigns divine authority to “the Muses.”
Let us expose this Luciferic deception clearly and precisely — with the Sword of the Spirit.
🔍 KJV FILTERED DISCERNMENT – LINE BY LINE
🔹 “I don’t believe in Satan… even the most evil Governors aren’t Satanic.”
📖 Direct contradiction of Scripture.
“Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour.” — 1 Peter 5:8
“Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil.” — Matthew 4:1
And that brings us to the next major point. To prove yourself worthy, you don't renounce life. That is only a sign of weakness or inversion, and they have no need for that at the next level. No spirit advances on weakness. Spirits expand by taking on more light. In this way they grow and become more powerful. As larger light bodies they have more strength. So that, as a reversal of Buddhism (and in some ways a reversal of Christianity), you advance by embracing the good things of this life. Some have thought that because this life is corrupt, the spiritual thing to do is flee it, keeping your eyes on the next life, the next step, or the next incarnation. No. Yes, you do flee or fight the corruption, but part of your test here is how much you help your fellow beings. They are on the same ladder you are on, but you cannot advance by pushing them off or ignoring them. As you help them, you help yourself. This is because in order to help them, you have to create or channel more light. That channeling is not a loss of light for you. You do not lose what they gain. In learning to channel more light, you become larger at the same time. Miles Mathis continues to invert the Gospel of Jesus Christ
replacing it with a false light doctrine rooted in:
Gnostic self-empowerment
karmic progression
a denial of Biblical salvation
He teaches that:
❌ You don’t need to renounce this world ❌ Christianity teaches weakness ❌ You grow by absorbing and channeling “light” ❌ You create your own advancement ❌ There is no judgment — only promotion ❌ There is no Christ — only self-light
This is antichrist doctrine, and must be judged with the full counsel of Scripture.
🔍 KJV VERDICT – LINE BY LINE
🔹 “To prove yourself worthy, you don’t renounce life... you advance by embracing the good things.”
📖 False.
Jesus teaches explicit renunciation — not of creation, but of the world system:
“If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother… yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.” — Luke 14:26
“Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world...” — 1 John 2:15
🔁 Miles reverses this — falsely claiming that spiritual growth comes by embracing the good things of this life.
“For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?” — Mark 8:36
⚔️ Verdict:
World-loving, Christ-denying doctrine that contradicts every call to repentance and holiness.
🔹 “Spirits expand by taking on more light... as light bodies, they grow stronger.”
📖 This is not Christianity.
This is New Age Luciferianism.
“Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.” — 2 Corinthians 11:14
“If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!” — Matthew 6:23
📖 Only Christ is the Light:
“I am the light of the world:
he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness.” — John 8:12
Not you.
Not your works.
Not your “light body.”
⚔️ Verdict:
Luciferian doctrine of “inner light” replaces Christ the Light.
🔹 “This is a reversal of Buddhism… and in some ways a reversal of Christianity.”
📖 The Gospel does not evolve, reverse, or mutate.
“Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.” — Hebrews 13:8
To say you are reversing Christianity is to admit rebellion.
“He that is not with me is against me.” — Luke 11:23
⚔️ Verdict:
This is open admission of antichrist ideology — and a rejection of the faith once delivered to the saints.
🔹 “You do flee or fight corruption, but you cannot advance by ignoring others… as you help them, you help yourself.”
📖 Half truth distorted.
While we are called to love and serve, this cannot save us.
“By grace are ye saved through faith… not of works, lest any man should boast.” — Ephesians 2:8–9
“Though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor… and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.” — 1 Corinthians 13:3
⚔️ Verdict:
Reduces salvation to social progress.
Teaches a false works-based promotion system.
🔹 “In learning to channel more light, you become larger at the same time.”
📖 False.
No Scripture says man becomes “larger” or expands his “spirit body.”
The Bible teaches:
mortification of the flesh
humility
new birth in Christ
“He must increase, but I must decrease.” — John 3:30
“We are dead, and our life is hid with Christ in God.” — Colossians 3:3
⚔️ Verdict:
Gnostic egoism.
Elevates man.
Erases the cross.
🔥 FINAL VERDICT:
Miles Mathis now teaches:
❌ A “light body” system of spiritual self-expansion
❌ A rejection of Christian renunciation and self-denial
❌ That helping others is a way to climb upward spiritually
❌ That inner light replaces the need for Christ or Scripture
❌ That man saves himself through “light” and “progress”
This is not Christianity at all — it is Luciferian humanism, rebranded.
“For such are false apostles… whose end shall be according to their works.” — 2 Corinthians 11:13–15
Your Spirit Is Not Photons: Dreams Are Not Astral Flights#
Now, I want to say something about sleep, not only because it ties in here, but because it is far more important than most people understand. As is obvious from the things I have said above, I believe in a real spirit. I see (and have discovered myself) lots of scientific evidence that the spirit is a real thing, made of real photons. It really does inhabit your body, just as the religions have taught. The body is not eternal, but the spirit is. Light, like matter, cannot be destroyed. It can only dissipate or expand. Not only will your spirit maintain itself after death, it can free itself from your body anytime it likes. In fact, it does so every single day. Or night. Scientists admit they don't understand why we sleep, but it is quite simple: although the spirit requires a body to do some of the things it must do, including being tested, it cannot abide being trapped in a body for very long. After 16 or 20 hours, the trapping becomes intolerable, and it must escape. So it puts its body to sleep and leaves. Where does it go? I don't know. Maybe it just flies through the air for hours, thrilling in its freedom. Maybe it joins the cosmic charge field and sighs. But I would assume it has things to attend to, and those things may be more important than what goes on here. The Natives believe that your life in sleep is more important than your waking life, and I would say that is probably true. There are some things your spirit can only achieve with a body; but, likewise, there are other things it can only achieve without one. Miles Mathis now moves into his most occult-sounding speculation yet.
He takes a kernel of Biblical truth (spirit distinct from body, the body is not eternal) and builds a completely unbiblical cosmology around it — claiming our spirit is made of photons, leaves the body nightly, and lives a secret life in sleep.
This is not Scripture; it is pagan animism fused with pseudo-science.
Let’s expose each part:
🔍 KJV FILTERED DISCERNMENT – LINE BY LINE
🔹 “I believe in a real spirit… made of real photons…”
📖 False.
The Bible teaches man’s spirit is immaterial — not made of physical particles, even “light” particles.
“God is a Spirit:
and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.” — John 4:24
“There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.” — 1 Corinthians 15:44
Spirit ≠ photons.
Spirit is not subject to physics.
This is materialist mysticism — trying to cage the supernatural into the laboratory.
🔹 “Light cannot be destroyed… so spirit cannot be destroyed…”
📖 Partial truth twisted.
Only God is inherently immortal:
“Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light…” — 1 Timothy 6:16
Man’s soul can be destroyed:
“Fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.” — Matthew 10:28
⚔️ Verdict:
Not all spirits endure forever in bliss.
Some are destroyed in judgment.
🔹 “Not only will your spirit maintain itself after death, it can free itself from your body anytime… It does so every night.”
📖 False.
The soul does not leave the body nightly.
Dreams are not the spirit roaming free; they are brain and spirit interacting under God’s sovereign design.
“In your patience possess ye your souls.” — Luke 21:19
“For God speaketh once, yea twice, yet man perceiveth it not. In a dream, in a vision of the night…” — Job 33:14–15
⚔️ Verdict:
Dreams are God’s domain, not nightly astral projection.
🔹 “Scientists admit they don’t understand why we sleep… the spirit must escape…”
📖 Sleep is God-designed for physical restoration.
The Bible never teaches the spirit “escapes” during sleep.
Likewise, the body cannot stand the spirit for too long. Yes, the spirit animates the body, giving it a single direction, but it burns too brightly. The body tires. Like the spirit, it must return to a ground state every day. The exception is the mind, which is electrical signals. It has to remain on, as the link between the body and the absent spirit. So the spirit leaves behind just enough energy to keep the mind going—which is, in part, what we call dreaming. You would think this would be a very precarious situation, and in a way it is. But remember that the spirit, being made of light, is a very fast being. It can return in a split second if you need to wake up for any reason. Just think of how fast the internet is. When I upload a new paper with Filezilla, I don't have to wait any time at all for it to appear. It is up in a split second, even if my server is on the other side of the world. A photon moves 300,000km/s, which means it can circle the Earth 6 times in a second. Your spirit could be playing on the Moon when someone shakes you to wake up and would still be back in just over a second. So, you see how it is. Miles Mathis continues building a science-fiction theology rooted in false assumptions about the:
spirit
body
sleep
He mixes New Age philosophy, unproven physics, and pagan metaphysics to promote a view that directly contradicts Scripture.
Let us weigh this teaching in the balance of the Word of God.
🔍 KJV FILTERED ANALYSIS — LINE BY LINE
🔹 “The body cannot stand the spirit too long… it burns too brightly.”
📖 This is Gnostic-flavored mysticism.
Nowhere in Scripture is the human body described as being overwhelmed by its own spirit.
“I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made…” — Psalm 139:14
The body and spirit are designed by God to function together — not at odds.
“The body without the spirit is dead.” — James 2:26
🔹 “The spirit must return to a ground state… the mind stays on as the link…”
📖 No Scripture teaches this.
There is no Biblical doctrine of “ground states,” “light bodies,” or “signal bridges” between mind and spirit.
This is technocratic mysticism, relying on physics metaphors instead of Biblical truth.
“The things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.” — 1 Corinthians 2:11
🔹 “The spirit leaves behind energy to power the dreaming mind…”
📖 Dreams in Scripture are not powered by “leftover spirit-energy.”
They are either:
Natural (Ecclesiastes 5:3 – “a dream cometh through the multitude of business”)
Divinely given (Daniel, Joseph, etc.)
Not etheric spillover from photon beings.
🔹 “Your spirit, made of light, can return in a split second…”
📖 Again:
the spirit is not photons.
This concept is completely unbiblical.
God created light and spirit separately.
“And God said, Let there be light…” — Genesis 1:3
“The spirit shall return unto God who gave it.” — Ecclesiastes 12:7
The speed of light does not dictate spiritual function.
🔹 “So you see how it is…”
📖 No, we do not see “how it is” unless we submit to the Word of God.
Not man’s imagination.
“Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path.” — Psalm 119:105
⚔️ VERDICT: DECEPTION WRAPPED IN SCIENCE
Miles uses terms like:
Photons
Ground state
Energy
Light-speed communication
To cloak false doctrine in tech-jargon, trying to convince readers of “truth” by analogy to FileZilla uploads and internet speeds.
This is vain babbling:
“O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called…” — 1 Timothy 6:20
But why do I mention it? Because most people don't treat sleep with the sanctity it deserves. It is the first part of spirituality, because it is the first rule of spiritual health. It is also the first rule of bodily health, since a tired spirit will cause a tired body. Those who want to be healthier or live longer should look at their sleep first. Yes, food is hugely important, but sleep is even more important. Food feeds the body, but sleep feeds the soul. If you don't sleep long enough, it means your spirit has been starved of its quality time; and if your spirit is starved, your body is starved to the same extent. When I wake up too early, I feel like I have a hole in my spirit. It is as if part of my spirit is still out there, trying to drink the last few drops of freedom. When I wake up, I feel as if I have just returned from a long journey, probably because I have. Miles Mathis continues down a mystical road, wrapping:
spirituality
sleep
pseudo-science
into a false doctrine that elevates sleep above Scripture and replaces soul care with subjective feelings
Let’s test his claims by the Word of God.
🔍 KJV FILTERED ANALYSIS – LINE BY LINE
🔹 “Most people don’t treat sleep with the sanctity it deserves… It is the first rule of spiritual health.”
📖 False.
Nowhere in Scripture is sleep called the “first rule” of spiritual health.
The Bible teaches:
“Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.” — Matthew 4:4
“Godliness is profitable unto all things…” — 1 Timothy 4:8
📖 The first rule of spiritual health is repentance, fear of the Lord, and obedience — not sleep.
🔹 “Food feeds the body, but sleep feeds the soul.”
📖 This is poetic but untrue.
What feeds the soul?
“The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul…” — Psalm 19:7
“Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart…” — Jeremiah 15:16
📖 The Word of God feeds the soul, not sleep.
🔹 “If you don’t sleep long enough, your spirit is starved…”
📖 This replaces spiritual discipline with biological cycles.
While sleep is a God-given gift for health (Psalm 127:2), it is never described as the source of spiritual nutrition.
“The inward man is renewed day by day.” — 2 Corinthians 4:16
How?
Through the Holy Ghost, not through naps.
🔹 “When I wake up too early… it feels like I have a hole in my spirit.”
📖 This is subjective emotion, not spiritual revelation.
We are not to be led by how we feel, but by the truth of God’s Word.
“He that trusteth in his own heart is a fool: but whoso walketh wisely, he shall be delivered.” — Proverbs 28:26
🔹 “It is as if part of my spirit is still out there…”
📖 Astral mysticism again.
This is not Christianity.
Scripture never describes the soul going on a nightly journey and returning incomplete.
“In peace I will both lay me down and sleep:
for thou, LORD, only makest me dwell in safety.” — Psalm 4:8
I don't meditate because I don't need to: I get all my sleep. I am not trashing meditation, understand. I assume it is quite useful for those who don't sleep long enough or well enough. It acts as a partial substitute. But in my opinion, they would be better to fix their sleep. Your spirit can fly much further away during sleep than during meditation.
Miles continues promoting a man-centered, mystical, sleep-based spirituality that directly contradicts Biblical instruction on
meditation
rest
communion with God
Let us weigh his claims:
🔍 KJV FILTERED DISCERNMENT – LINE BY LINE
🔹 “I don’t meditate because I don’t need to: I get all my sleep.”
📖 False.
Biblical meditation is not a sleep substitute.
It is the act of dwelling deeply on God’s Word — commanded by God Himself:
“But his delight is in the law of the Lord; and in his law doth he meditate day and night.” — Psalm 1:2
“I will meditate in thy precepts, and have respect unto thy ways.” — Psalm 119:15
“Meditate upon these things; give thyself wholly to them…” — 1 Timothy 4:15
⚔️ Verdict:
Miles confuses Eastern mysticism with Biblical meditation.
Meditation isn’t optional—it’s commanded.
🔹 “I assume [meditation] is useful for those who don’t sleep enough... a partial substitute.”
📖 False again.
Biblical meditation is not a therapy for sleep deprivation.
It is:
A discipline of the mind and spirit
Focused on the Word of God
Used by prophets, kings, and apostles throughout Scripture
“Mine eyes prevent the night watches, that I might meditate in thy word.” — Psalm 119:148
⚔️ Biblical meditation is a watchful, spiritual discipline, not a dreamy, inward escape.
🔹 “Your spirit can fly much further away during sleep than during meditation.”
📖 This is more New Age astral mysticism, wrapped in poetic license.
Nowhere in the Word of God is distance traveled by your spirit ever connected to spiritual maturity.
“Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you.” — James 4:8
It is nearness to the Lord—not
“how far you fly”
—that defines spiritual health.
⚔️ BIBLICAL VERDICT: SLEEP ≠ SPIRITUALITY
Miles’ worldview:
❌ Replaces Biblical meditation with sleep
❌ Suggests spirit-travel as a sign of health
❌ Denies the need for reflection on God’s Word
❌ Promotes mystical experiences over obedience
The true test of spirituality is not escape,
but fruit:
“But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance…” — Galatians 5:22–23
The Body Is a Temple—But the Spirit Belongs to God#
Miles says: If you are awake too long, your spirit starts to eek away bit by bit, leaving your body without its normal fire. The body makes up for that by burning itself, which causes tiredness and eventually premature aging. But it doesn't have to be that way. You don't have to look bad beyond 50 or 60. Some people look quite good at 60, and you can be one of them if you take care of yourself and get all your sleep. But you have to start early and keep it up, everyday. In fact, it is not one of the things you can do, it is one of the things you should do. Or, to say it another way, it is not optional, it is required. You weren't assigned this body so that you could pollute it and mistreat it. You were assigned this body as a caretaker. I am constantly amazed this isn't taught as primary knowledge. The body, like the Earth, is a temple, and it is to be treated as such at all times. Any failure to do so is a failure of the test. At the next level, such failures will not be tolerated. I know that sounds kind of military, but there it is. But when we add up the hours of sleep, we don't just look at how much rest the body has gotten. We look at how much time your spirit has spent in the spirit realm, away from the corruption, and in the perfection that is the raw charge field. While there, the spirit can reorder itself. It may be there that it speaks most directly to what I am calling the Muses. All spirits, great and small, crisscross the ether in their various errands, and we may assume help is there if you seek it. Miles Mathis finishes this section with a pseudo-spiritual, gnostic-flavored doctrine that again replaces the Gospel with health rituals, and replaces the Holy Ghost with “Muses” and “raw charge fields.”
Let the Word of God now cut through this fog like a sword:
🔍 KJV FILTERED ANALYSIS — LINE BY LINE
🔹 “If you're awake too long, your spirit starts to eek away… the body burns itself… causes aging.”
📖 Not one Scripture teaches this.
This is naturalistic paganism wrapped in mystical terms.
“The days of our years are threescore years and ten…” — Psalm 90:10
“It is appointed unto men once to die…” — Hebrews 9:27
⚔️ Aging is ordained, not a
“mistreatment of energy fields.”
🔹 “You don’t have to look bad beyond 50 or 60…”
📖 Vanity has nothing to do with spiritual reward.
The external man decays, but the inner man is renewed by God:
“Though our outward man perish, yet the inward man is renewed day by day.” — 2 Corinthians 4:16
🔹 “You were assigned this body as a caretaker. The body is a temple…”
📖 Partial truth — but distorted.
“Know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost…?” — 1 Corinthians 6:19
That verse is not about aesthetic preservation, but about avoiding sin (especially fornication).
It's not about sleep and youth — it's about holiness.
🔹 “At the next level, such failures will not be tolerated…”
📖 The “next level” is not like military ascension through self-improvement.
This is a works-based false gospel.
“For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves:
it is the gift of God.” — Ephesians 2:8
The Christian life is not a ladder to spiritual planets — it's a relationship with Jesus Christ by faith.
🔹 “Your spirit spends time in the spirit realm… raw charge field… speaks to the Muses…”
📖 This is blasphemy.
There is no “raw charge field” in the Word of God.
There is no communion with Muses in Scripture.
Communication with spirits other than God is strictly forbidden:
“Regard not them that have familiar spirits… to be defiled by them:
I am the LORD your God.” — Leviticus 19:31
“There shall not be found among you… a consulter with familiar spirits… for all that do these things are an abomination unto the LORD.” — Deuteronomy 18:10-12
❌ What Miles calls “Muses,” Scripture calls familiar spirits — and warns against them in the strongest terms.
⚔️ FINAL VERDICT: FALSE GOSPEL OF SELF-ASCENSION
Miles teaches:
✘ Sleep = soul purification
✘ Muses = spirit guides
✘ Temple = cosmetic upkeep
✘ Salvation = merit-based “leveling up”
“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel… let him be accursed.” — Galatians 1:8
So, in my opinion, these small spirits from the Families who are always talking about living forever are on the wrong track. First of all, no one lives forever, and the wise do not wish to. But if they wish to age more slowly or look better, it can be done. But not with drugs and other fads. As usual, the answer is much simpler than most humans make it: more sleep, cleaner foods, plenty of water, daily moisturizer, no drugs, smoking, alcohol. And, finally, avoidance of corruption. The cleaner your spirit is, the fresher your face will look. Evil shows. Your first face you are born with, your second face you have to earn. Meaning, your bad deeds will imprint on your face and body. If you are an evil bastard, you will soon look like one. The spirit always shines through. Which is why watching these sad spirits from the Families talking about reversed aging is doubly pathetic. Because they are bad eggs inside, they look like crap by the time they are 30 or 40. By the rules of the game, it will take many lifetimes to reverse that. You can't clean up your spirit by tweaking the DNA of the body, you fools! The only way to do that is to make better decisions, and by the look of it they won't be doing that this lifetime. Miles here delivers harsh poetic judgment on the elites (“the Families”), mocking their lust for immortality and youth.
Though he rightly discerns the futility of pharmakeia, his foundation is still based on Gnostic reincarnation, works-based spiritualism, and the flesh-over-spirit fallacy.
Let us put this fire through the filter of Holy Scripture.
🔍 KJV FILTERED ANALYSIS — LINE BY LINE
🔹 “These small spirits from the Families… are on the wrong track.”
✅ Correct.
The “Families” (those who govern wickedly) are indeed on the wrong path:
“Woe unto them that devise iniquity, and work evil upon their beds!” — Micah 2:1
“The kings of the earth set themselves… against the LORD, and against his anointed…” — Psalm 2:2
The rich and wicked rulers of the earth are not ascending to any “next level.”
Their path is downward into judgment, unless they repent.
🔹 “No one lives forever, and the wise do not wish to.”
❌ Error.
This contradicts the very promise of the Gospel:
“And this is the promise that he hath promised us, even eternal life.” — 1 John 2:25
“For God so loved the world… that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” — John 3:16
⚠️ This is doctrinal heresy.
Eternal life is the gift of God through Christ.
To say
"no one lives forever"
is to call Jesus a liar.
🔹 “Avoidance of corruption… cleaner your spirit is, the fresher your face…”
❌ This is vanity repackaged as virtue.
The Bible says:
“Favour is deceitful, and beauty is vain: but a woman that feareth the LORD, she shall be praised.” — Proverbs 31:30
“The Lord seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart.” — 1 Samuel 16:7
True holiness does not always show on the face.
Many saints suffer, age, and are broken in body — yet remain beloved of God.
🔹 “Your bad deeds will imprint on your face… spirit shines through.”
⚠️ Half-truth with a mystical edge.
Yes, wickedness may twist a man’s countenance:
“A wicked man hardeneth his face…” — Proverbs 21:29
But many righteous saints are marred, persecuted, or aged, yet still shine inwardly with God’s glory.
Jesus Himself was:
“…a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief… his visage was so marred more than any man…” — Isaiah 53:3,14
🔹 “It will take many lifetimes to reverse that…”
❌ Major doctrinal error.
There are not “many lifetimes.”
“It is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment.” — Hebrews 9:27
Reincarnation is a lie from the pit — not a Biblical doctrine.
🔹 “You can’t clean up your spirit by tweaking the DNA…”
✅ Truth.
The soul is not healed by fleshly means.
“Who can say, I have made my heart clean, I am pure from my sin?” — Proverbs 20:9
“Create in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me.” — Psalm 51:10
Only God Himself can purify a man’s spirit — not genetic manipulation.
✅ FINAL VERDICT: False Foundation, Sharp Observation
Miles correctly mocks the world’s elites and their vain attempts at immortality via pharmakeia and technology.
But he builds on sand, not Christ.
He promotes:
❌ Reincarnation
❌ Aesthetic spirituality
❌ Reversal through lifetimes
❌ A denial of eternal life in Christ
He rejects:
✅ The Cross
✅ The Resurrection
✅ Salvation by grace
“Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” — John 3:3
Another problem we face here is that many of us don't like the body we have been given. Much spiritual rebellion stems from that alone. In some cases, it is understandable: it is clearly part of the test, and a difficult part. But it happens to even the beautiful and hale, who seem to be as prone to dissatisfaction as anyone. They purposely refuse to care for their bodies, for whatever reasons they have. This is always a failure of the test. Your job is to do the most with what you were given, and some are given more. Some less. In extreme cases, this discomfort causes gender dysphoria. We may suppose the spirit was not given the gender it wanted, or was accustomed to in a past life. Again, understandable. As spirits, we are all dysphoric in the body to a lesser or greater extent. But I would assume the sexual assignment was done for a reason, and was part of the test. And I would assume that refusing the assignment is the best way to fail the test. I say that because I trust the gods. I do not think they made any assignments just to be cruel. As I said above, I don't believe in evil or cruel gods. I only believe in evil or cruel people. Miles now enters the most dangerous phase of his spiritual philosophy: attempting to spiritually justify gender dysphoria through Gnostic ideas of “past lives” and a divine testing mechanism.
This is no small matter.
It is an assault against the Creator, His design, and His revealed order of creation.
🔍 KJV FILTERED ANALYSIS – LINE BY LINE
🔹 “Many of us don't like the body we have been given…”
✅ Yes, the fallen flesh groans.
This is a true observation.
“For we that are in this tabernacle do groan, being burdened…” — 2 Corinthians 5:4
“The creature was made subject to vanity… waiting for the redemption of our body.” — Romans 8:20,23
We are born into corruptible bodies that are not yet glorified.
But our dissatisfaction is not solved by surgery or rebellion—
it is solved by Christ, who will one day clothe us with immortality:
“For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.” — 1 Corinthians 15:53
🔹 “In extreme cases, this discomfort causes gender dysphoria…”
❌ This is where the lie enters.
Gender dysphoria is not evidence of a “mismatched soul.”
It is the fruit of confusion, trauma, and often spiritual deception.
“God is not the author of confusion…” — 1 Corinthians 14:33
“So God created man in his own image… male and female created he them.” — Genesis 1:27
⚠️ The soul does not have gender identity issues apart from the fallen flesh.
Confusion is not caused by "past lives."
That doctrine is unbiblical and accursed.
🔹 “We may suppose the spirit was not given the gender it wanted, or was accustomed to in a past life…”
❌ Reincarnation heresy.
“It is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment.” — Hebrews 9:27
This line introduces New Age Gnosticism, where a “spirit” passes through different genders in different incarnations.
This directly contradicts the Word of God.
Each soul is created once, by God, with purpose and precision.
🔹 “Refusing the assignment is the best way to fail the test…”
⚠️ While this may sound like truth, it’s wrapped in false theology.
We must not use Gnostic terms like “assignment” or “past life” to understand gender. Instead,
we must rest on the foundation:
“Thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother’s womb.
I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made…” — Psalm 139:13–14
To reject your God-given body is not failing some "test" from the gods—it is rebellion against your Creator.
🔹 “I do not believe in evil or cruel gods… only evil or cruel people.”
❌ Another Gnostic dodge.
There is one God—not “gods” plural:
“The LORD our God is one LORD.” — Deuteronomy 6:4
And that one true God is neither cruel nor confused:
“Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights…” — James 1:17
🚨 WARNING TO THE CHURCH
Miles subtly affirms transgender ideology by:
❌ Validating gender confusion as spiritually natural
❌ Invoking “past life” experiences
❌ Promoting the idea of spiritual tests from non-existent “gods”
❌ Avoiding the clarity of the Creator’s design
The truth of Christ is clear:
“Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female…?” — Matthew 19:4
Shall the Thing Formed Say to Him that Formed It?#
There are a lot of things I don't like about my body. I would change any number of things immediately if I could. But I consider the possibility that these things are outward manifestations of my spirit. If I were a more beautiful or perfect spirit, I would have a more beautiful or perfect body. So I strive to deserve it. When I pass to the next level, maybe then I will have fewer bad hair days, straighter teeth, better legs, etc. Who knows? But what I do know is that trying to radically change my body won't work. It will only make a bad situation worse. As is clear from watching other people like movie stars, it is a guarantee of a spiral down into some sort of misery. My job is to care for the body I have been given, not to remake it. In the same way, blaming the gods for my test won't work. Rather than assume they are cruel, I should assume I have been given this test for a reason. I should assume I dug my own hole, and that they have given me a large enough shovel to dig my way out, if I dig right. 🔍 KJV FILTERED ANALYSIS – THEOLOGICAL REVIEW
🔹 “There are a lot of things I don't like about my body…”
✅ This is a humble admission.
Even the righteous in Scripture longed for deliverance from the corruption of the flesh:
“For in this we groan, earnestly desiring to be clothed upon with our house which is from heaven.” — 2 Corinthians 5:2
🔹 “These things are outward manifestations of my spirit…”
⚠️ Caution required.
This leans toward Gnostic doctrine, suggesting physical imperfections mirror spiritual ones from past incarnations—a false theology not found in Scripture.
“Who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind? Jesus answered, Neither… but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.”— John 9:2–3
Imperfections do not prove prior sin.
They are part of the fallen world, and sometimes part of God’s sovereign design for greater purpose.
🔹 “If I were a more beautiful or perfect spirit, I would have a more beautiful or perfect body…”
❌ False theology.
This implies a merit-based reincarnation system:
more spiritual “perfection” earns a more attractive body.
This is not biblical.
God distributes gifts and conditions not by merit but by grace and divine purpose:
“Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?” — Romans 9:20
“Man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart.” — 1 Samuel 16:7
🔹 “Trying to radically change my body won’t work…”
✅ True in principle.
Physical vanity and attempts to alter the body lead to deeper spiritual and emotional disarray—
this is affirmed in Scripture:
“Why hast thou made me thus?”… Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? — Romans 9:20
“In the last days… men shall be lovers of their own selves…” — 2 Timothy 3:1–2
🔹 “Blaming the gods for my test won’t work…”
⚠️ Needs correction.
There are not “gods” plural.
There is One God—the LORD, the Creator of heaven and earth.
But let us return to the spirit. If the spirit maintains its form with or without the body, it should have a memory of its own. This explains a lot of things that were previously unexplainable—as I have said in previous papers—but it also begs many questions. One of those is why the spirit's memory is wiped or partially wiped at birth. That is not hard to answer if you think about it. If your spirit carried all the memories of all its lives into its newest life, it could never get on. It would be crippled by nostalgia, good and bad. Even in this short life, the spirit clings to recent memories, and by the time we are 60, most of us will be wellnigh overcome by good and bad memories. The past daily threatens to swamp us with sadness. Just think if you had thousands of lifetimes of that in your head. You would do nothing but cry a puddle of tears all day long. You couldn't learn or do a thing. Which explains why the spirit needs to flee the body, and why it needs to return to a body. It needs to flee because despite the sadness, it is defined by and connected to its past. The spirit needs its memories, to remind it who it is. But it also needs the body to give it relief and respite from those memories. It knows the wiping is a partial blessing. Only within the limitations of the living can it continue to progress. Miles here lays out the core of his theology of reincarnation:
The spirit survives without the body.
It retains memories across lifetimes.
Those memories are “wiped” at birth to prevent being crippled.
The body is a kind of refuge from spiritual overload.
This is not Christianity.
This is:
Gnostic
Hindu
Theosophic
reincarnation doctrine dressed in pseudo-science.
Let us weigh this in Scripture:
🔍 KJV FILTERED ANALYSIS — LINE BY LINE
🔹 “If the spirit maintains its form with or without the body, it should have a memory of its own.”
📖 The Bible does teach the spirit survives physical death:
“Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was:
and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.” — Ecclesiastes 12:7
But Scripture never teaches that the spirit lives multiple bodily lives, or retains memories of prior incarnations.
🔹 “One of those questions is why the spirit’s memory is wiped or partially wiped at birth…”
📖 This is pure speculation from reincarnation belief.
The Bible teaches:
“It is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment.” — Hebrews 9:27
One life.
One death.
One judgment.
No memory wiping.
No multiple incarnations.
🔹 “If your spirit carried all the memories of all its lives… you’d be crippled…”
📖 This is philosophical rationalizing, not revelation.
Christ says the opposite:
at judgment,
all your deeds are remembered:
“And the books were opened: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.” — Revelation 20:12
God does not erase; He records.
🔹 “Which explains why the spirit needs to flee the body… and why it needs to return…”
📖 This is astral mysticism, not Scripture.
The soul does not “flee” the body each night nor “return” to different bodies.
At death:
“To be absent from the body… [is] to be present with the Lord.” — 2 Corinthians 5:8
No circuit of reincarnations.
No partial memory wipes.
No cycles.
🔹 “Only within the limitations of the living can it continue to progress.”
📖 False.
There is no “progression ladder” of lives.
“He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still:
and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still.” — Revelation 22:11
When you die, your eternal state is fixed, not progressing upward through “levels.”
⚔️ FINAL VERDICT: Gnostic Doctrine of Reincarnation
Miles is:
❌ Denying Hebrews 9:27
❌ Denying the finality of death and judgment
❌ Teaching “memory wipes” as spiritual mercy
❌ Preaching progress by multiple incarnations
This is antithetical to the Gospel.
Jesus Christ died once to redeem us once:
“So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many…” — Hebrews 9:28
Appointed Once to Die: The Error of Many gods and the Truth of One Judgment#
You will say there is far too much death, misery and unfairness on this planet to assign to humans. The gods must be perverse to allow such a place to exist at all. But in saying so, you underestimate the human capacity for mistakes and overestimate the responsibility of the gods. It is not for them to ride in and solve all your problems for you. No one learns anything from that. As a spirit, you are responsible for your own actions, and your own level of advancement. As I said, if you are here, you can be sure you deserve to be. This should tie you to your fellow Earthlings if nothing else does. Actually, the gods are far kinder than they might otherwise be, since it is easy to imagine some scheme of things where they left us with no oversight or help at all. They have their own lives to attend to, after all. And yet they do take the time to be Muses or Guardian Angels or whatever you wish to call them. No, they don't ride in and take over, since that would undercut the entire ladder and entire hierarchy. You can't grow if they do everything for you. But they are there to give you limited amounts of good advice, supposing you ask for it and supposing you listen. So this blaming the gods really doesn't fly. If you wish to pass to the next level, it is the first thing you should knock off. I don't know that it makes them angry, since they probably have better things to do than get angry with us. But it is, how shall I say, a first disappointment. I don't see the gods screaming at us, but they may roll their eyes at this primary stupidity. I know I roll my eyes whenever I hear that argument, and I am just a stupid human myself. Let us now examine Miles Mathis’ belief from the lens of the King James Bible, the final authority on all spiritual matters (Deuteronomy 4:2, Revelation 22:18–19).
🔍 Miles’ Claim:
“There is far too much death, misery, and unfairness... but that’s not the fault of the gods. We deserve to be here. The gods won’t intervene—they just give ‘limited advice’ if you ask.”
📖 KJV Analysis:
1. Multiple gods?
Miles speaks of “gods” (plural) who give “limited advice.”
🕊️ KJV Correction:
“For all the gods of the people are idols:
but the LORD made the heavens.” — 1 Chronicles 16:26
“Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD.” — Deuteronomy 6:4
There is only One Living God, not many.
All others are either fallen angels (devils), man-made idols, or philosophical illusions.
2. Suffering is man’s fault, not God's?
🕊️ Partial Truth, but Incomplete.
“Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.” — Romans 5:12
Yes, mankind is responsible through sin, starting with Adam.
But unlike Miles' distant and indifferent "gods," the true God entered creation to redeem it:
“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” — John 3:16
The incarnate Jesus Christ didn’t just give “limited advice”—He died for our sins and rose again to crush death, and redeem the Earth.
3. Suffering exists to help spirits grow?
🕊️ KJV Rebuke:
“If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable.” — 1 Corinthians 15:19
Our suffering is not to evolve us into gods, but to humble us, bring us to repentance, and lead us to the Cross:
“...we must through much tribulation enter into the kingdom of God.” — Acts 14:22
But this tribulation is not karma, nor proof we “deserve” this incarnation.
It is a result of a fallen world, and God’s grace is the only escape.
4. “The gods don't get angry” — they just roll their eyes?
🕊️ KJV Truth:
“God is angry with the wicked every day.” — Psalm 7:11
“It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.” — Hebrews 10:31
The real God is not indifferent—
He is just, holy, and will judge all:
“For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ.” — 2 Corinthians 5:10
⚔️ Verdict:
Miles Mathis' View = Soft Paganism
Miles speaks of:
Muses instead of the Holy Ghost
“Passing tests” instead of redemption by blood
“Gods” who merely advise, instead of the Living God who judges the quick and the dead
“For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all...” — 1 Timothy 2:5–6
There is no:
reincarnation
karma
spiritual ladder
or enlightenment path in Scripture.
There is only:
Life
Death
Judgment
and either the Lake of Fire or the Kingdom of Christ.
⚠️ FINAL WARNING FROM SCRIPTURE:
“And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment.” — Hebrews 9:27
One Creator, Not Many Spirits: The End of Gnostic Speculation#
Some will still not see the point. Why should smaller spirits become larger ones? Why not have all spirits the same size from the beginning? Why have spirits at all? Why have anything? I don't know. I am just a little spirit. Ask a bigger one, though I don't think you will get an answer. It is one of the things you must learn on your own. But if I had to guess, I would say it is because growth is more interesting than stasis, and the biggest gods like to keep things interesting. Some will say, “Well, on this plan, after a long enough time, all spirits would be gigantic gods, and none would be little. Which is also illogical”. Again, a question that is basically too large for us little humans, but if I had to guess, I would say that while some spirits are growing, others are diminishing, keeping a supply of spirits at all levels. And are the largest gods the creators? Well, we are all potential destroyers and creators. But yes, the greatest spirits are the greatest creators. I doubt that they can create things like photons, since that would imply a sort of self-creation. But it would seem logical that they can create things from photons. In that sense they are more builders than creators. If that is true, then who made the photons? I don't know. And I don't know why the photons should want to coalesce rather than not. Again, I suspect you will have to ask a much much larger spirit. It is not necessary for you or me to know these things. What we need to know is HOW THINGS ARE and OUR PLACE IN THE WORLD. Once we have advanced another thousand steps or so, we can re-ask that question with the hope of some meaningful answer. Miles Mathis has now reached the full Gnostic conclusion of his system:
Multiple “gods” of varying size and power
Spirits progressing and diminishing
Creation as the work of “larger spirits” from “photons”
God’s nature unknowable, so ask a “bigger spirit” later
This is not only unbiblical but the very core of ancient Luciferian mysticism.
Let us weigh his claims:
🔍 KJV FILTERED ANALYSIS — LINE BY LINE
🔹 “Why should smaller spirits become larger ones… why not all the same from the beginning?”
📖 The Bible answers clearly:
“So God created man in his own image… male and female created he them.” — Genesis 1:27
“The LORD by wisdom hath founded the earth…” — Proverbs 3:19
There are not “small spirits” and “large spirits” created to climb a ladder.
There is one creation and one Creator.
🔹 “The biggest gods like to keep things interesting…”
❌ Heretical.
There are no “biggest gods.”
There is one God:
“For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.” — 1 Timothy 2:5
All talk of “bigger gods” is straight out of pagan polytheism and the Luciferian hierarchies of “archons” and “aeons.”
OK, I have outlined a few basic things here, and with them we can look again at some of the new-age ideas being promoted. Like, say, the Star Wars pseudo-religion. Although George Lucas claims the Star Wars mythology/religion was created simply as a comic-book foundation, it has taken on a much greater import than that—and I have to think that was no accident. Star Wars didn't just accidentally balloon into a culture-wide phenomenon across four decades—promoted by Joseph Campbell, Bill Moyers, and many others. As a creation of Hollywood and the Families, we should ask what role it was meant to play. Star Wars is very seductive precisely because it includes a lot of truth. It borrows heavily from the old religions and updates them in some creative ways. First among these borrows is The Force, which my readers can now see was just a tag for the Charge Field. A tappable source of energy/spirit that underlies all existence. The films also borrow a Manichaean mythology from Zoroastrianism, whereby this world is a battle between good and evil. You will say my spiritualism is also Manichaean, but strictly it isn't, and we are about to see why. 🔥 Miles Mathis vs. The Word of God (KJV):
🎭 The Seduction of "The Force" and New-Age Mysticism
🚫 MILES' CLAIM:
“The Force is a tappable energy/spirit under all things… same as the Charge Field.”
“Star Wars borrows from true religions… it includes a lot of truth.”
📖 KJV VERDICT:
"And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light." — 2 Corinthians 11:14
"Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God:
because many false prophets are gone out into the world."— 1 John 4:1
🚨 FALSE DOCTRINE ALERT:
Mathis, like George Lucas and the “New Age” crowd, blends half-truths with anti-biblical lies.
He preaches a Man-centered theology where
“you ascend by tapping into spiritual energy”
instead of God-centered salvation through Jesus Christ.
The “Force” in Star Wars is not the Holy Ghost, not the Living God, and not a biblically sound concept.
It is spiritual Gnosticism repackaged,
denying:
The Personhood of God (The Father)
The Deity and Blood Atonement of Jesus Christ
The Reality of Sin and Hell
The Final Authority of Scripture
Instead,
it promotes:
Dualism (Light and dark in balance)
Self-salvation through mystical power
Spiritual elitism by “tapping in”
“Ascension” without repentance
💣 KJV Refutation of "The Force":
“Thou shalt have no other gods before me.”— Exodus 20:3
“For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves:
Despite its nods to the truth, in my opinion Star Wars has been another arm of the Theosophy project, meant to displace the old Western religions like Christianity and Judaism. Harry Potter was yet another example of that. And while neither is obviously Satanic, both Star Wars and Potter vastly oversell the dark side. I say they aren't Satanic, because in them the dark side loses. Real Satanists would be promoting mythologies where the dark side wins. What we see instead is the Families making excuses for themselves with these pathetic morality plays, by making it seem the dark side is much more seductive than it really is. A sort of “the devil made me do it”. If the devil made them do it, much of their own responsibility for their actions evaporates, you see. While the truth is, no devil made them do anything. No dark side seduced them. They simply failed the test. They came to a fork in the road, and they took the wrong turn. And when their Muse took the time to land and advise them they had taken the wrong turn, they freely chose to ignore her. You can see the difference between that and being seduced by a devil. They weren't seduced by a devil, they failed to be seduced by an angel. I hope you see the difference.
To evaluate Miles Mathis’ claims in this excerpt through the lens of Scripture (KJV),
we need to clarify three primary issues:
🔥 1. Mischaracterizing Evil:
“They weren’t seduced by a devil, they failed to be seduced by an angel.”
This is a reversal of biblical truth.
James 1:14–15 –
“But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.
Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin:
and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.”
1 Peter 5:8 –
“Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour.”
Miles denies the active presence of Satan, portraying evil as merely a failure to follow good.
But God’s Word says there is a literal adversary—Satan—
who:
tempts
deceives
blinds
the hearts of unbelievers (2 Corinthians 4:4).
The devil doesn’t just "not help"—he actively destroys.
📺 2. Blaming Media Without Naming the Real War
Miles correctly points out that films like Star Wars and Harry Potter subtly promote unbiblical spirituality.
But instead of warning people to repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, he uses this as an opportunity to introduce his own pseudo-religion of “light channeling” and self-merit.
Colossians 2:8 –
“Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.”
He sees through the deception of the media,
but then offers another deception in its place:
spiritual advancement through personal discipline and merit, without the saving grace of Jesus Christ.
❌ 3. No Devil Made Them Do It? Scripture Disagrees.
John 8:44 –
“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.
He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth...”
Miles wants to be seen as clever for denying Satan’s influence—but in so doing,
he aligns himself with Satan’s greatest lie:
“I don’t exist.”
The truth is this:
Evil is not just “the absence of good” or a “wrong fork in the road.”
It is a willful rejection of God, led and fueled by the very real presence of Satan and his forces.
✅ Summary (KJV Viewpoint)
Satan is real, not symbolic.
Sin is real, and so is eternal judgment.
Star Wars and Potter may glamorize spiritual deception, but Mathis’s own teachings do the same, under the guise of “Muses,” “light,” and “advancement.”
There is no ladder of enlightenment—there is only one Way, and His name is Jesus Christ.
John 14:6 –
“Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”
Not by Muses, but by the Blood: How to Resist the Devil#
Some will say, “That is just your experience. You haven't experienced devils. We have”. Possibly. One of my friends said, “You don't experience devils because your Muses are too strong. They take care of you”. Possibly. But although that may be partly true, you will forgive me if I don't see it that way. As a spirit, your relationship with other spirits is a two-way street. So if my Muses are present, it is because I did not fail to be seduced by them. I welcomed them and listened to them. And if devils don't much bother with me, it is because they know they are not welcome. They know I will not listen. In fact, I have had experience with devils. You saw it last year and see it on a continuing basis. They no longer try to seduce me, since they know there is little chance of that, but they are constantly attacking me in their petty ways. It is from these attacks that I know my enemies. I know they are not powerful devils come down from higher worlds, for if they were they would carry signs of that. To be blunt, I would have no chance against them. From their attacks, we see they are petty devils from this world, continuing on their way down into the abyss. As such, they do not worry me too much. I daresay if you reorder your relationships in the spirit world, you will be bothered by them as little as I am. I suppose I can tell you now that I have in fact been shadowed by a ranking Luciferian in the past few years, who attempted many times to recruit me—with absolutely no success. The last time I saw him I was forced to throw him out of my house. So the demons have long been aware of my presence. If they do not more often approach me, it isn't because they don't know my address. Miles now lays out his “devil doctrine” more openly.
He mixes a kernel of truth (devils exist) with a poisonous denial (they are just petty, earthbound spirits with no higher power).
From a KJV standpoint,
here is what’s happening:
🔍 KJV FILTERED ANALYSIS — LINE BY LINE
🔹 “You haven’t experienced devils. We have.”
📖 Scripture affirms devils are real and active:
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” — Ephesians 6:12
Miles dismisses this reality as superstition, reducing devils to “petty spirits” at our level.
That’s exactly how Satan wants to be perceived—either as non-existent or as a minor annoyance.
🔹 “My Muses are too strong; devils know they are not welcome…”
⚠️ Red flag.
In Scripture, it is the Holy Ghost and the Name of Jesus Christ that protects believers—
not “Muses”:
“The name of the LORD is a strong tower:
the righteous runneth into it, and is safe.” — Proverbs 18:10
“Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.” — James 4:7
Muses are not protective angels.
They are familiar spirits—entities Scripture warns against (Leviticus 19:31).
Relying on them is dangerous.
🔹 “They are petty devils from this world, continuing their way down…”
📖 Devils are not merely “fallen humans” or “petty spirits from this world.”
They are:
“The angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation…” — Jude 1:6
And:
“The great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world:
he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.” — Revelation 12:9
These are fallen angels with real power, not minor “locals.”
Reducing them to “petty” minimizes their threat.
🔹 “If they were powerful devils, I’d have no chance against them.”
📖 Correct—we have no chance in the flesh.
But through Christ:
“Greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.” — 1 John 4:4
Protection comes only by being under Christ’s authority, not by “strong Muses” or self-discipline.
🔹 “I’ve been shadowed by a ranking Luciferian… tried to recruit me…”
📖 This is plausible.
Satan’s agents do recruit.
But without Christ’s covering, Miles’ “success” in resisting may simply be because he is already deceived in a subtler way.
Satan does not always need a full-frontal attack.
If someone is already believing a false gospel, the devil often leaves them alone,
to give them the illusion of victory:
“If our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost:
In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not…” — 2 Corinthians 4:3–4
⚔️ VERDICT: ANOTHER GOSPEL OF “SELF-RESISTANCE”
Miles presents:
❌ A false shield (Muses instead of Christ)
❌ A false devil (petty spirits instead of fallen angels)
❌ A false victory (self-will instead of the Blood of Jesus)
He denies:
✅ The authority of Christ
✅ The power of His blood
✅ The reality of Satan’s hierarchy
Thus he perfectly mirrors Satan’s favorite tactic:
“Convince them I’m weak or not real, so they never call on Christ.”
No Temptation Too Great: Demons, Bluff, and the Armor of God#
Notice how my lesser theogony explains what was previously unexplainable: how could the gods allow evil spirits to come down from higher levels and mess with you directly? As I just said, you would have no chance against them. It would be a test you could not possibly pass. You cannot battle evil gods or spirits from higher levels. It is absurd. It is why none of the movies that include this idea make any sense. It is why none of the stories from the major religions that include this idea make any sense. If the gods allowed such things, they really would be perverse and unfair. But they don't and they aren't. You only have to deal with demons on your own level, my friend. Though these “demons” may wear black robes and make scary threats, they are just bad people. You are never overmatched. You always have the tools to win, but you have to do the right thing. The first step in that: ignoring the bluff.
🔎 Spiritual Discernment and the Nature of Evil (KJV-Based Response)
Miles presents a spiritual framework that attempts to solve the problem of evil by redefining “demons” not as supernatural beings from higher levels, but simply as bad spirits who are on the same spiritual level as us.
He argues that God would not allow us to be tempted or opposed by beings against whom we have no chance.
Let’s see how this holds up biblically:
📖 1. Does Scripture support the idea that we are not overmatched?
Yes — but with God:
"There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man:
but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it."— 1 Corinthians 10:13 (KJV)
This aligns with Miles' claim that we’re never faced with tests we cannot pass.
However,
Scripture is clear:
God provides the way of escape — not your own spiritual strength alone.
🧠 2. Are demons just “bad people” at our level?
Biblically, no.
Scripture does describe evil spirits,
not just people:
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”— Ephesians 6:12 (KJV)
This passage clearly describes a spiritual hierarchy of evil, implying that there are indeed higher-level forces at play.
Miles’
“you are only up against your level”
theory is comforting but unbiblical.
According to the KJV, believers face enemies both seen and unseen.
⚔️ 3. Do we “always have the tools to win”?
Yes — in Christ:
“Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.”— Ephesians 6:11 (KJV)
Scripture confirms believers are not helpless.
But the tools are not self-derived (as Miles seems to suggest); they are the Armor of God: truth, righteousness, faith, salvation, the Word of God, and prayer (Eph. 6:13-18).
🛑 4. The "bluff" and Fear Tactics
Miles says, “Ignore the bluff,”
which parallels this:
"Submit yourselves therefore to God.
Resist the devil, and he will flee from you." — James 4:7 (KJV)
Indeed, much of evil’s power lies in deception and fear.
Satan is the “father of lies” (John 8:44).
But resistance works only when it's coupled with submission to God, which Miles does not emphasize.
❌ Where Miles Strays (Biblically Speaking)
He minimizes the reality of higher spiritual warfare, which is a significant theme in Scripture.
He places trust in the self or “Muses” rather than in the God of the Bible.
He makes moral victory a matter of spiritual common sense and personal strength, rather than the grace and guidance of God.
✅ Where Miles Aligns (Partially)
We are not abandoned.
Evil is not all-powerful.
We are responsible for our actions and have choices to make.
But biblically, victory only comes through faith in Jesus Christ:
“Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us.”
— Romans 8:37 (KJV)
"Not Overmatched: Standing Against Evil at Our Level"
"The Bluff of Darkness: Knowing the Real Enemy"
"Wrestling Not with Flesh Alone: A Biblical View of Demons"
"Resist the Devil: You Have the Tools"
"Principalities and Powers: Misunderstanding Spiritual Warfare"
In All Things Give Thanks: The Test of Joyful Endurance#
I don't fear having to face the tests of devils. I fear my own weaknesses. I fear the next big test of the gods, which may be too big for me. You will say I just said they always give us tests we can pass, which is true. But we can also fail. We have all failed many tests, or we wouldn't be here. We all make bad decisions, and I make them daily. If I blow the little decisions, will I pass the big one? I shouldn't call it fear. I actually welcome the tests. They are fascinating, even in failure. But I have to admit my spirit is chafing at the corruption. It would prefer to move on. It would prefer to pass. In the first instance, that is a good thing, because if I didn't chafe so much at the corruption, I wouldn't resist it and couldn't ever get beyond it. But seen from another angle it is also a failure. Failure to fully accept or embrace the current assignment. If I weren't meant to be here, I wouldn't be here. So it is no good wishing to be elsewhere. Some will say that is a call for resignation, but I don't like the term. If I were a Muse, I wouldn't like it —let me put it that way. Why not? Because the term resignation implies a sort of grudging acceptance of your fate. No one wants your grudging acceptance of anything. That is not the goal. The goal is your joyous acceptance of your assignment, you see. Not a grimacing thank-you-sir-may I-have-another. No, rather a gracious and grateful receipt of your current incarnation. If you can manage that, the Muses will always be on your side.
Miles’ reflection here reveals a nuanced and, in some ways, conflicted spiritual philosophy—one that blends personal humility with cosmic ambition.
Let's break down the thematic core and philosophical implications of this passage,
along with some analysis through a biblical lens (especially from a KJV-informed worldview):
🔍 Core Themes and Analysis
1. Fear of Self, Not of Demons
“I don't fear having to face the tests of devils.
I fear my own weaknesses.”
Miles is making an important distinction:
the greatest threat is not some external evil, but the internal, ever-present possibility of failing oneself.
This reflects an Augustinian idea of sin as privation or disorder within, rather than an external evil force.
KJV Parallel:
“The spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak.” (Matthew 26:41)
Implication:
The battle isn’t against Satanic dominion,
but against:
spiritual lazines
ego
pride
It’s a call for vigilance and self-awareness.
2. Tests Are Passable—but Not Guaranteed to Be Passed
“You will say I just said they always give us tests we can pass, which is true.
But we can also fail.”
Here, Miles highlights a volitional theology—one that gives great weight to free will.
Even though the tests are fair (not from an “evil god”), we are not guaranteed success.
It echoes the parable of the talents (Matthew 25:14–30), where each servant is given what he can handle, but not all use it wisely.
Implication:
Salvation or spiritual advancement is not automatic, even if the system is just.
The outcome hinges on our actions, not divine favoritism.
3. The Chafing Spirit
“My spirit is chafing at the corruption.
It would prefer to move on.”
This admission is both spiritually honest and theologically risky.
The desire to escape earthly corruption is ancient (see Ecclesiastes, or Paul’s groaning to be “unclothed” in 2 Corinthians 5:2),
but Miles rightly identifies it as double-edged:
it can inspire change, or it can mask discontent with divine providence.
KJV Parallel:
“Godliness with contentment is great gain.” (1 Timothy 6:6)
Tension:
Is Miles accepting the challenge with joy—or tolerating it with longing for escape?
He acknowledges that:
“wishing to be elsewhere”
is a subtle spiritual failure.
4. Resignation vs. Joy
“No one wants your grudging acceptance of anything.”
This is the theological and emotional climax of the passage.
Miles separates resignation (passive, grudging, defeated) from joyful acceptance (active, grateful, willing).
He rightly discerns that joy is not just a feeling but a spiritual response to divine appointment.
KJV Parallel:
“This is the day which the Lord hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it.” (Psalm 118:24)
“In every thing give thanks.” (1 Thessalonians 5:18)
Theological Insight:
The truly advanced soul isn't the one who simply survives, but the one who does so with cheerful gratitude.
🎯 Summary of the Spiritual Message
The test of this life is not only how we resist evil, but how we receive good—with joy, not complaint.
Miles is edging toward a deeply traditional—almost Pauline—
understanding of spiritual maturity:
the ability to endure hardship without bitterness, to trust the fairness of divine providence, and to see one's current station as a gift, not a curse.
While he uses his own lexicon (e.g., “Muses,” “assignment,” “tests”), the moral architecture of his philosophy maps closely to both Stoic virtue ethics and biblical endurance theology.
What he lacks in systematic theology, he replaces with moral sincerity and a genuine striving toward spiritual integrity.
Renunciation Reconsidered: The Joyful Embrace of Earthly Assignment#
Which of course brings us back to my problem with Buddhism. Buddha seems to have completely missed this joyous acceptance of assignment. He mistook a renunciation of corruption for a total renunciation of the Earth. But a total renunciation is a failure of the test. It will not win you Nirvana, it will only guarantee you another lifetime here, so that you can learn that. I don't remember, but I suspect I know that from experience. I was probably a monk of some sort in a past lifetime. I know that such renunciation will get you nowhere.
Miles’ critique here centers on the misapplication of renunciation—specifically, the Buddhist path of detachment as he understands it.
His view reframes the spiritual goal from escape to engagement: not withdrawal from the world, but joyful participation in the assignment of earthly life, however flawed or difficult.
Key Ideas:
Misreading of Buddhism:
He claims that Buddha’s teaching wrongly equates corruption with life itself, leading to a renunciation of the good alongside the bad.
This, Miles argues, is a mistake of spiritual discernment.
Renunciation as a Failure of the Test:
Instead of a spiritual virtue, he calls total renunciation a failure to embrace the test with fullness.
By fleeing life, one forfeits the opportunity to grow through it.
Joy vs. Rejection:
The contrast is again joy—embracing one’s “assignment” with gratitude rather than attempting to bypass it.
For Miles, progress isn’t in departure, but in engagement.
Personal Reflection:
His mention of a possible past life as a monk adds an experiential layer to the claim.
It’s not just theory—it’s (possibly) learned the hard way.
Philosophical Reorientation:
Rather than achieving transcendence by leaving the world, Miles sees transcendence as being earned through full-hearted living in it.
That’s the core of his divergence from Buddhism: not detachment, but the disciplined and joyous acceptance of incarnation.
"The Error of Escape: Why Life Must Be Lived, Not Fled"
"Mistaking the Test: On Buddhism and the Spirit's Purpose"
"The Failure of Flight: Why Renunciation Is Not the Answer"
The Fatal Flaw of Dualism: How Hating Matter Undermines Morality#
So, let's take all that back to Star Wars, and Manichaeism. But first a short detour. Manichaeism has been called Gnostic, and most people think Gnosticism is anti-Christian. But the truth is, Christianity is mostly Gnostic itself. No, it doesn't worship a demiurge or believe Satan or Lucifer created all matter, but otherwise Christianity borrows the same foundational dualism. In the New Testament, we find spirit is good, matter is bad. That idea is also primary in Manichaeism and Gnosticism. Since that idea is more fundamental than any of the others, I would say the similarities are more important than the differences. In constructing a day-to-day morality of how to act and how to make decisions, it doesn't really matter who made the Earth. But it matters a lot if you believe matter is evil. If you believe the material world is evil, you will have little problem raping the Earth or anything else. The Earth is material, so why not plunder her? That woman is material, so why not plunder her? You see, it makes it very hard to build a morality for the living on a religion like that. Logically, it really can't be done. You can't teach that material is evil and then try to teach respect for the human body or for the Earth. Which is why I have said before that all the religions are flawed at the ground level. They start with basic contradictions and are therefore rationally and spiritually unworkable. This passage continues Miles’ central thesis: that traditional religions—including both Eastern and Western—are fundamentally flawed due to their rejection of the material world.
Here's a breakdown of his argument and its implications:
🔍 Core Analysis
1. Linking Christianity and Gnosticism through Dualism
Miles asserts that while Christianity officially distances itself from Gnostic or Manichaean heresies,
it actually shares their foundational worldview:
a spiritual/material dualism, where spirit = good and matter = bad.
This view,
according to him:
Is implicit in the New Testament.
Creates a distorted ethical framework.
Makes it hard to construct a healthy morality grounded in this world.
This is a significant charge because traditional Christianity views itself as separate from Gnostic cosmology, which posits a flawed material world created by a lesser (or evil) god (the demiurge).
Miles implies that Christianity’s practical moral teachings are undermined by this hidden dualism—even if it doesn’t explicitly accept the demiurge concept.
2. Ethical Consequences of Hating Matter
His most biting critique:
“If you believe the material world is evil, you will have little problem raping the Earth or anything else.”
He’s arguing that a theology rooted in contempt for the physical world naturally leads to environmental degradation and even violence against people—particularly women, whose bodies are often associated with material temptation in these traditions.
In this framing:
The hatred of matter becomes the root of all moral failure.
Religions that devalue the Earth and the body encourage escapism, not responsibility.
Respect for others (and the planet) requires a positive view of embodiment and materiality.
3. Application to Pop Culture (Star Wars)
Though not explored in detail in this excerpt,
the return to Star Wars and Manichaeism likely means:
Star Wars (like Christianity and Buddhism) portrays a battle between good (spirit/Force) and evil (body/temptation).
This myth is powerful but flawed—it seduces us with mysticism while reinforcing self-defeating dualisms.
🧠 Philosophical Position
Miles is building a non-dualistic spiritual worldview.
His argument rests on this idea:
The material world is not inherently corrupt—corruption is a layer that overlays goodness.
Spiritual growth comes from joyful engagement with matter, not withdrawal from it.
True morality requires embracing the world as part of the divine, not rejecting it.
image.png
Download ⚖️ Contrasted with Traditional Views
Aspect | Traditional Religion (e.g., Christianity, Gnosticism) | Miles’ View
Spirit vs. Matter | Dualism: spirit is good, matter is corrupt | Integrated: matter is part of the test, but not evil
Source of Evil | Original sin, demiurge, fallen world | Human failure to pass spiritual tests
Morality | Often ascetic, world-denying | Embodied, creative, joyful, world-embracing
Salvation | Escape from the material world (Heaven/Nirvana) | Advancement through this world by right action
🧩 Conclusion
This passage makes one of Miles’ most forceful critiques yet:
you can’t teach people to care for the Earth or for one another if you teach them to hate the material world.
The logic is simple, even if the implications are radical.
To create a better world, our spiritual systems must start from a place of respect for the material, not renunciation of it.
“Spirit Against Flesh: The Contradictions at the Heart of Religion”
“Why Matter Matters: Exposing the Moral Consequences of Spiritual Dualism”
“The Earth Is Not Evil: Reclaiming Morality from Gnostic Thinking”
“The Problem with Spirit-First Theology”
“You Can’t Rape What You Revere: Against the Hatred of the Material”
The False Divide: Matter, Spirit, and the Religion of Plunder#
Miles continues: So, my spirituality isn't Manichaean, Gnostic, or Judeo/Christian. I know that matter is not evil in any way. Matter is an embodiment of spirit, and as such is just as sanctified, holy, and worthy of veneration. In fact, spirit has been charged with tending and husbanding matter, as a husband tends a wife or wife tends a husband. It is not something spirit can do, but something it must do. Those who have followed my physics papers will understand why this is so: spirit and matter are really the same thing. Spirit is real photons, and matter is spun-up photons that have taken certain permanent patterns and forms. So although I believe in some dualisms, I don't believe in this one. It is false. Spirit and matter are not two things, they are two manifestations of one thing. So one cannot be good and the other evil. But this split of spirit and matter is not just false, it is pernicious. I would say it is among the most pernicious ideas ever promoted, since it is not hard to see how it would lead directly to the rapine of the Earth and all its resources. I have said that the Jewish trillionaires are ignoring their own scriptures as they plunder the world, but in some way they are just following scriptures. The major religions have tacitly given the nod to such plunder, by downgrading the material world into a commodity. It is not spiritually important, so why not buy it and sell it with no concern for its sanctity? Analysis:
In this passage, Miles rejects the foundational dualism found in Gnosticism, Manichaeism, and mainstream Judeo-Christian traditions—the idea that spirit is good and matter is evil.
He argues instead for a monist view: that spirit and matter are not opposing forces, but two expressions of the same underlying essence—light, or photons, in his metaphysical model.
This stance is both spiritual and pseudo-scientific, drawing on his own alternative physics.
His claim is that by teaching that the material world is evil or lesser, traditional religions unintentionally justify (or at least allow) its exploitation.
This critique aligns with environmental and ethical concerns about modern capitalism and resource extraction, especially by those in power, whom Miles refers to as "Jewish trillionaires."
He sees the plundering of the Earth as not only a political or economic issue but a deeply spiritual failure—rooted in a fundamental misunderstanding of matter's sacredness.
In contrast, Miles' spiritual framework demands that spirit care for and steward matter, not reject it or dominate it.
He describes this relationship in gendered, almost marital terms—"as a husband tends a wife or wife tends a husband"—
suggesting:
interdependence
reciprocity
respect
Ultimately, Miles presents a call to reintegrate the spiritual with the physical, which he believes will restore both personal integrity and global morality.
His critique is directed not just at religious dogma, but also at the cultural and ecological consequences of spiritual alienation.
Matter Is Not the Enemy: Spirit Embodied and Earth Redeemed #
I would guess you cannot pass to the next level while believing matter is evil, so this is of primary importance. It is something you have to learn here. As long as you are tied to any of the major or minor religions, it is doubtful you will learn it. Which is also probably not an accident. Those who are enriched by your struggles probably invented all these religions—or later infused and polluted them with these bad ideas—to keep you confused and off-track. It is not a coincidence that all the major religions are so similar in this regard (and others). We have seen the Governors playing all sides, controlling all opposition, and manufacturing all stories, so you should find it odd that no religions stress what I am stressing here. Miles here is making his boldest claim yet.
He asserts that:
Belief in matter as evil prevents spiritual advancement.
Major religions have been deliberately engineered or corrupted to keep people in confusion by promoting this “bad idea.”
Spiritual progress requires rejecting the material/spiritual dualism taught by those systems.
From a KJV-based perspective,
there’s both truth and serious error here:
🔍 KJV Analysis
1️⃣ Matter Is Not Evil (True)
The Bible never calls God’s creation evil.
It calls it good:
“And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good.” — Genesis 1:31
Evil entered through sin, not through matter itself.
Creation groans under corruption (Romans 8:22), but it is not inherently evil.
So, Miles is correct that “matter = evil” is not biblical.
2️⃣ You Can’t Pass to the Next Level While Believing Matter Is Evil (Misleading)
Scripture does not teach a “level system.”
It teaches repentance and faith in Christ unto salvation.
Spiritual growth flows from the new birth, not from rejecting metaphysical dualisms.
“Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.” — John 3:7
In the biblical worldview, you don’t “advance” to higher realms by learning certain truths; you are redeemed by grace through Christ’s atoning blood (Ephesians 2:8–9).
3️⃣ Religions Engineered by the Powerful (Half-True)
Scripture does warn of false teachers and doctrines of devils (1 Timothy 4:1).
It also shows how political/religious elites corrupt the truth (Matthew 23).
But the existence of corrupt religion doesn’t invalidate God’s Word.
It fulfills prophecy:
“For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears.” — 2 Timothy 4:3
So yes—many systems have been perverted by human or demonic manipulation.
Miles continues: You will say Materialism bows before the material, but it really doesn't, does it? In Materialism (modern science, for instance), the material doesn't become holy, does it? No, just the opposite. In Materialism, spirit is jettisoned, but the material realm doesn't take its place. Rather, the material realm is also stripped of all meaning and veneration. In Materialism, everything is dead, and therefore plunderable. So, although a physicist, I am the opposite of a Materialist. I know that everything is alive, even rocks and raw atoms. This is why Nietzsche reinvented classical Greek spiritualism, the Apollonian and Dionysian, you know. He was trying to fill that void. He wanted give a spiritual weight to love of the material. Love of the body and the Earth. But he wanted to do that without using old polluted religious terms (like “spiritual”, which he would not approve of). I would say he was only partially successful, since as usual he overcomplicated the problem. But he lodged an arrow in my head at least, which he admitted was the point. He wasn't talking to the “stupid Germans” of his time, he was talking to a few oddballs in the future: me. It may be I can explain his ideas to more spirits than he could. You will say, “Ah, you are a Nietzschean!” Or, “Ah, you believe that rocks are alive, you are a Pagan!” No, I am a Milesian. Or maybe a Musean. All other titles I reject. Miles is attempting to draw a sharp distinction between his personal cosmology and both materialism and mainstream religion.
Let’s break down what he’s saying and where it may be insightful, flawed, or simply rhetorical:
🔍 Analysis of Key Ideas:
1. Critique of Materialism
Miles argues that:
Materialism (as represented by modern science) strips meaning from both spirit and matter.
Everything is "dead" under materialism, and thus subject to plunder.
✅ Insightful: He’s not wrong that many forms of reductionist science treat the universe as devoid of intrinsic meaning or purpose.
This philosophical vacuum often fails to satisfy human moral or spiritual yearnings.
🔴 Oversimplified:
Not all science is materialist, and not all materialists are nihilistic.
There's a strong tradition of awe and reverence in scientific communities (e.g., Einstein's "cosmic religious feeling").
2. All Things Are Alive (Even Rocks)
He states:
“I know that everything is alive, even rocks and raw atoms.”
✅ Interpretive Validity
This echoes ancient philosophies like animism, panpsychism, and some Eastern metaphysics (e.g., Taoism), where even “inanimate” objects are part of a greater living system.
🤨 Philosophical Leap:
He takes it as a given (“I know”) without clarification.
Is this literal?
Metaphorical?
Energetic?
He leaves it vague—perhaps on purpose.
3. Nietzsche and the Re-spiritualization of Matter
Miles praises Nietzsche for attempting to restore a sense of spiritual depth to the material world (through Dionysian and Apollonian forces).
✅ Correct Connection:
Nietzsche was trying to recover a kind of meaning in a world after “the death of God.”
🔴 Mischaracterization:
Nietzsche’s work is far more skeptical of spirituality as traditionally defined, and far less trusting of metaphysical narratives than Miles seems to be.
4. Rejection of All Labels (Except His Own)
“I am a Milesian.
Or maybe a Musean.”
💬 This is a rhetorical move.
He’s distancing himself from all existing schools of thought (religious or philosophical) to position his own beliefs as more pure, undiluted, or original.
🔄 Irony:
Despite rejecting all labels, he invents new ones for himself.
“Milesian” originally referred to the ancient Greek pre-Socratic thinkers (like Thales)—so this too is a recycled term.
💡 Underlying Message:
Miles is encouraging:
A reverent view of the material world.
A holistic spirituality where body and spirit are not at odds.
A suspicion of inherited ideologies (religious or scientific).
A direct relationship with meaning, unmediated by “corrupt” institutions.
🧭 Philosophical Orientation:
If we had to map his view, it’s closest to:
Panpsychism:
All matter has some form of consciousness or spirit.
Animism (without tribal religion):
Spirit pervades everything.
Existentialism (lite):
We must construct meaning from within, but it’s not entirely subjective—there is a larger structure (e.g., tests, Muses).
Anti-Institutional Gnosticism:
A distrust of power structures masquerading as spiritual authorities.
🖼️ Summary:
Miles presents a compelling personal metaphysic,
combining:
A disdain for modern materialism
A rejection of traditional dualisms (e.g., spirit vs. matter)
A call for direct engagement with the world as holy
And a personal narrative of spiritual resistance
He wants to deconstruct what he sees as misleading religious and scientific doctrines in order to recover something "true"—
but it’s important to note:
his truth remains largely anecdotal, not demonstrated.
"Spirit in Stone: The Case for Living Matter"
"The Living World: Matter as Manifest Spirit"
"No Dead Things: A Rebuttal to Materialism"
"Musean Doctrine: The Sanctity of Flesh and Earth"
"Milesian Metaphysics: Where Spirit and Matter Are One"
No Devil Made You Do It: The Bluff of Evil and the Burden of Choice#
Miles claims: Another way my morality or spirituality differs from most others is its definition of the dark side, or devils, as we saw above with Star Wars. Satan is way oversold, whether is by old Christianity, Mani, Star Wars, Harry Potter, or what have you. I have no problems with the words “evil” or “sin”, since they are all just synonyms for “doing the wrong thing”. And I have no problem with the word “devil”, since it is highly descriptive and fits—for the most part—the real world. But as you saw above, my descriptions don't fit any of the old religions. Devils aren't gods, they don't have equal powers to gods, and they exist mostly on bluff. The dark side is mostly manufactured to create fear, as I have shown you with Alistair Crowley, fake serial killers, and all the rest. My analysis there goes all the way up, since it is all a conjob. Devils are just bad people: criminals, liars, cheaters, and hoaxers who want you think they are more powerful than they are. They want you to think they are tied to powerful dark forces, but they aren't. They are just spirits at our level who have forgotten how things work. Some will say, “If that is true, then you really are a Gnostic, since this is a matter of ignorance, not sin”. No, again, I wouldn't put it that way. I am not a Gnostic, because I don't believe in ignorance. I just told you that everyone is born knowing right from wrong. The spirit's memory is partially wiped, but knowledge of good and evil is not wiped. So those who do wrong cannot plead either ignorance or that the Devil made them do it. The spirit is always and completely responsible for itself and its own actions and decisions. Which is far closer to the idea of “sin” than not. Sin has some minor residue I might wish to wash off, but we don't need to go there in this paper. For the most part I have no problem with it, since it means breaking spiritual laws on purpose, knowing you are breaking them. Miles' passage here presents a continuation and deepening of his idiosyncratic spiritual framework.
Here's a breakdown and analysis of the core ideas he's expressing:
🔍 Core Concepts
1. Satan Is Oversold
Miles critiques the way both religious and pop-cultural traditions exaggerate the power and allure of evil:
Christianity
Manichaeism
Star Wars
Harry Potter
are lumped together as examples of worldviews where “the dark side” is overstated.
He believes the idea of a powerful evil force is an illusion, a “bluff” maintained by bad actors to intimidate or manipulate.
2. Devils = Bad People
His key redefinition:
“Devils are just bad people: criminals, liars, cheaters, and hoaxers…”
He strips devils of any cosmic or metaphysical status and reclassifies them as failed spirits—those who deliberately act against known spiritual laws.
3. Rejection of Gnosticism
While some might label him a Gnostic (given his emphasis on knowledge and illusion),
he distances himself from that label by saying:
He doesn't believe in ignorance as an excuse for wrongdoing.
Everyone is born with an innate sense of morality (echoing earlier passages where he likened morality to language—innate but untaught).
4. Responsibility and Sin
He rehabilitates the term "sin", not in its religious baggage of guilt and damnation,
but as:
“…breaking spiritual laws on purpose, knowing you are breaking them.”
For him, sin is deliberate spiritual failure, not confusion, coercion, or ignorance.
📚 Philosophical and Theological Implications
Radical Moral Clarity:
Miles advocates for a universe where moral knowledge is always available to the individual.
There are no excuses.
If you do evil, you chose it, and you knew it was wrong.
Anti-Dualism:
He continues rejecting dualistic or Manichaean frameworks that place evil and good as equally powerful.
For him, good is real, and evil is a corruption or absence of that good—not a separate force.
Flat Ontology of Spirits:
There are no super-powered demons. Everyone at our level is on the same playing field. This removes fear and emphasizes responsibility.
🧠 Connections to Earlier Themes
Continues his critique of organized religion as misleading or co-opted by elites.
Reaffirms the notion of life as a test, and that failure is not due to temptation or manipulation, but due to personal weakness.
Revisits the Muse vs. Devil dynamic: failing the test doesn't mean being seduced by devils—it means ignoring the helpful muse.
🖋️ Summary
In this excerpt,
Miles sharpens his spiritual ethics:
Evil is not cosmic, it is personal.
Devils are not powerful beings, but pitiful, failing ones.
Morality is innate, and sin is willful.
Responsibility is absolute.
It's a firm, almost stoic vision—stripped of superstition, yet still metaphysical.
He offers a model that avoids both the fatalism of dualism and the excuses of relativism.
Another reason I am not a Gnostic is that I know that knowledge of the truth isn't enough. We all have innate knowledge of the truth. So knowledge won't win you salvation of any kind. Progress is made through courage and action. It is not what you know, it is what you do. When you face a difficult situation, it is not what you know or think that matter, it is your actual response. You can say, “I wanted to do the right thing”, but that is meaningless. What did you actually do? That is what determines whether you pass or fail. You may think that sounds brutal, but that is the way it is. And remember, that “brutality” is tempered somewhat by this fact: it is also very important what you learn from a failure. That is the only sense that knowledge matters. For you can be sure that the test will come again. You will have another chance to respond in the correct and upright way. So gnosis doesn't matter. Bad spirits may have a better understanding (gnosis) of the laws than good spirits, especially if they are on their way down from higher levels. But it doesn't help them, does it? They still have to make the right decisions, leading to the right actions. As long as they remain untapped to the light, this they will never do. This passage highlights a central tenet of Miles’ spiritual philosophy: moral knowledge is not enough—action is what matters.
🧠 Key Ideas in This Passage:
Innate moral compass:
Miles asserts that every spirit is born already knowing right from wrong.
Therefore, claiming ignorance or blaming external forces (like devils or conditioning) is no excuse.
Against Gnosticism:
He distances himself from Gnosticism again—not because he disagrees with the idea that truth exists, but because Gnosticism places too much emphasis on knowing truth (gnosis) as the path to salvation.
For Miles, salvation comes from doing, not just knowing.
Test-based progression:
The spiritual ladder, in his view, is passed by how you act under pressure.
You can know the right thing all day long—but unless you actually do it when the time comes, it doesn't count.
Failures are opportunities—but only if you learn:
Failure isn’t final, but it must lead to reflection and transformation.
You'll be given another shot to respond rightly.
Courage and integrity over intellect or belief:
This stance implicitly critiques intellectualism, spiritual elitism, and even passive religiosity.
Merely having correct beliefs or deep esoteric knowledge doesn’t advance your spirit.
What moves you up the ladder is bravery, self-discipline, and righteous conduct—especially when it’s difficult.
🔍 Analysis:
This is existential spirituality:
what you do in the moment defines who you are.
It's very much in line with philosophical pragmatism and a kind of moral stoicism.
Miles rejects both the fatalism of Gnostic determinism and the complacency of religious obedience.
His emphasis on courage and choice aligns him more with thinkers like Kierkegaard (leap of faith), Nietzsche (individual will), and perhaps even Aristotle (virtue ethics).
Interestingly, he also flips the modern self-help culture on its head:
it’s not about how you feel or intend, it’s about what you choose and execute.
Which allows us to see another way Star Wars lied to us. We are led to believe that dark spirits can tap into the Force, as if there is a dark side to the Force. There isn't. The reason dark spirits are dark is that they are not tapped into the light. That is what “dark” means, you know. It is definitional. Tautological. The Force is light, and there is no way for dark to tap into light. You will say they can tap into the raw energy field, since nothing is stopping them. Yes, they can plug in a hair dryer as easily as you can, but that doesn't tap them into the Force. Likewise, they can build and fire a giant laser gun, but that doesn't tap them into the Force. Your current tap into the Force isn't through the electrical plugs in your bathroom, it is through your connection to your Muse. As you are beginning to understand, the charge field isn't just a neutral energy well, it is a realm of spirit, already inhabited, organized and ruled. As spirits, the evil ones can go there in sleep just as you can, but since they are too proud to take advice, they are always out of the main channels. They are untapped. For the same reason they cannot rise, they also cannot make much use of the Force. They can only tap into one another, which is not the same thing. That tap is very limited in scope, and—since it has no hierarchy —it gets nothing from above. This passage from Miles attempts to reframe the popular “dark side of the Force” trope (popularized by Star Wars) through his own metaphysical and moral framework.
Here’s a breakdown and analysis of the core ideas:
🔍 Core Argument
Miles rejects the idea that dark spirits can be “tapped into” the Force (understood here as a spiritual energy field), because,
as he defines it:
“The Force is light, and there is no way for dark to tap into light.”
This is a tautological definition:
darkness, by his account, means “untapped from light.”
So, it is logically impossible for a dark spirit to be powered by, or act through, the light/Force.
🔄 Contrast with Star Wars
In Star Wars,
the Force has two sides:
Light Side (used selflessly)
Dark Side (used selfishly, often destructively)
Miles rejects this moral relativism,
claiming instead that:
The Force is not dualistic; it’s unipolar — it’s only good.
Evil spirits don’t access the Force at all.
Their power comes from tapping into each other or material energy (e.g., weaponry, brute force), not spiritual power.
Even though dark spirits may “visit” the spiritual realm during sleep, they are cut off from the hierarchical spiritual guidance (e.g., the Muses) due to their pride and unwillingness to receive instruction.
⚡ Implications
Spiritual power is not neutral:
It is inherently moral and tied to goodness.
Only the virtuous can access real spiritual energy.
Evil is fundamentally weak:
Not because it lacks intelligence or effort, but because it refuses to connect upward to greater spiritual sources.
Star Wars (and similar media) misleads by giving darkness too much credit, portraying it as powerful when it’s actually cut off from true power.
🎯 Key Takeaway
Miles is constructing a spiritual cosmology in which:
Moral choices determine spiritual connectivity.
Power without moral alignment is shallow, limited, and self-destructive.
Evil is not some powerful force to fear; it’s a disconnection — a failure to stay plugged into a divine source of truth and energy.
My "Muse" Tapping Heresy: An Analysis of Miles Mathis' Teachings#
You will say maybe they tap into antiphotons. No. Antiphotons are opposite only in spin. They are not opposite in spirit. There is nothing dark about antiphotons. Antiphotons are just as light as photons. The evil ones cannot tap into the Force, which is why they have to brag about ruling here on Earth. It is all they have, you know. Their only hope is to untap you, so that you match them. Mostly they do that by making you forget your taps and how to use them. They try to break your connection to your Muse, and break your connection to the spirit world through sleep. They break your connection to your Muse by making you disgusting to her. They teach you to be small and needy, begging boons of your Muse. They know she will not answer. They teach you to have the wrong attitude to the gods, constantly tempting your own fate. They teach you to drink yourself into a stupor before sleep, or to take pills, or to otherwise ruin your connection. If they teach you prayers or incantations, they teach you the wrong ones on purpose, so that you offend your Muses. But you see how easy these things would be to correct. They only hope you will not figure that out. From a King James Version (KJV) biblical perspective, Miles' statements can be analyzed in contrast with Scripture on the nature of evil, the role of spiritual forces, and the concept of communion with God and righteousness.
Here's an analysis broken down point by point:
🔥 1. "The evil ones cannot tap into the Force."
Miles' Claim:
Evil spirits are “untapped” from the Force (light), and the “Force” is defined as good and spiritual energy.
Evil ones try to untap humans from that Force by breaking their spiritual connections.
KJV Contrast:
John 1:5 –
"And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not."
This aligns somewhat with Miles' view—darkness cannot access or comprehend the light.
In the KJV, "light" is often symbolic of Christ, truth, and righteousness, and darkness is separation from God, or sin.
2 Corinthians 6:14 –
"What communion hath light with darkness?"
Again, the KJV affirms that light and dark are not compatible—Miles is using a similar dichotomy, though his “Force” is a redefinition of light/spirit energy without referencing God or Christ.
🛑 2. "Antiphotons are not dark, just oppositely spun."
Miles' Claim:
Even antiphotons aren't “dark.”
They’re just physical variants.
Darkness isn't a property of particles but of moral/spiritual separation.
KJV Contrast:
The Bible doesn't address antiphotons or particle physics,
but on a symbolic level:
Isaiah 5:20 –
"Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness..."
This verse criticizes moral confusion.
The KJV draws a strong ethical distinction between good and evil, not a merely mechanical one. Miles' effort to define darkness in terms of spiritual detachment aligns, though he couches it in scientific metaphor.
🧎 3. "They try to break your connection to your Muse."
Miles' Claim:
Evil spirits corrupt you by destroying your link to your Muse (which, for him, is a kind of spiritual helper), and mislead you with false prayers, bad attitudes, etc.
KJV Contrast:
1 Timothy 2:5 –
"For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;"
In the Bible, your connection is not to a "Muse" or spirit guide, but to God through Christ.
The Holy Ghost, not a Muse,
is the guide and counselor:
John 14:26 –
"But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things..."
So, the Muse is a divergence from KJV doctrine.
In fact, consulting spiritual intermediaries other than God/Christ is explicitly forbidden in Scripture:
Deuteronomy 18:10–12 –
"There shall not be found among you... a consulter with familiar spirits... For all that do these things are an abomination unto the LORD."
🛐 4. "They teach you the wrong prayers to offend your Muse."
Miles' Claim:
Evil ones purposely mislead people with bad spiritual practices that make their Muse reject them.
KJV Contrast:
Matthew 6:7 –
"But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do..."
Here, Christ warns against empty or misguided prayer, and in this sense, Miles is partly aligned with KJV teaching.
However, again, the target of the prayer matters.
Prayer is to God, not a Muse.
💊 5. "They tempt you to drink, take pills, ruin your sleep."
Miles' Claim:
Substance abuse and corrupted habits are used by evil forces to destroy spiritual alignment.
KJV Contrast:
1 Peter 5:8 –
"Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:"
Galatians 5:19–21 –
"Now the works of the flesh are manifest... drunkenness... they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God."
The Bible also strongly condemns drunkenness and altered states that separate one from God.
So, on this point, Miles and Scripture overlap in terms of the danger of self-corruption.
Nature of Evil | Not metaphysical, just misaligned spirits | Evil is real, caused by sin and Satan
The “Force” | A spiritual energy tapped through Muses | No “Force”; power comes from God through Christ
Muses | Spiritual guides helping those who are pure | Forbidden; God alone is the source of guidance
Sin | Conscious wrongdoing, not ignorance | Same, but framed within God's law
Salvation | Comes from choosing right action | Comes from faith in Jesus Christ, not works alone
Spiritual Warfare | Against devils at our level | Against Satan and spiritual powers in high places (Ephesians 6:12)
⚠️ Final Reflection (KJV Lens):
Miles' system mimics some biblical morality—emphasis on righteous action, resisting evil, and maintaining purity—but completely rewrites the spiritual architecture.
Muses instead of God, light-tapping instead of grace, and self-earned spiritual advancement instead of redemption.
As such, from a King James Bible perspective, this teaching is heretical, despite its moral overtones.
It promotes:
self-salvation
spiritual pluralism
mystical intermediaries
—all contrary to biblical doctrine.
One Lord, Not Many: A Biblical Refutation of Miles Mathis' Cosmic Theology#
The “Jedi training” is also a joke, since there is no mention of a relationship to any higher beings. The only higher beings are Yoda and Palpatine. Star Wars is completely missing a top-end, and no one ever notices that. In reality, the old religions are entirely correct: it is your relationship to the gods that determines your connection to the Force, otherwise known as the Spirit, the Holy Ghost, the Ruach Hakodesh, etc. What we would expect of Jedi training is completely missing: showing yourself worthy of advice from above by cleaning yourself up for the trip in all ways. The Muse doesn't like to have her robes tugged on by grubby hands, so your first order of business is a good spiritual scrubbing. That is what the Commandments and the vows and the various rules of action and relation are. Tapping the Force, entering the spirit-wave, or hearing a Muse all require a certain attitude, comportment, and rectitude. If the Governors can make you a nasty enough person, your taps to the Force will all be broken, even if you aren't especially prideful or demonic. You will fail by vulgarity alone. Analyzing this passage from a King James Version (KJV)-aligned theological perspective reveals several deep theological tensions and divergences between Miles Mathis’ ideas and traditional Biblical teaching.
Here’s a breakdown:
🔹 1. "Jedi training is a joke... no mention of a relationship to any higher beings."
From a KJV-based Christian worldview, this is partially valid.
Scripture is clear that power and spiritual authority are always grounded in relationship with God:
“I am the vine, ye are the branches:
He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.” — John 15:5 (KJV)
Star Wars presents a spiritual force disconnected from a personal God.
The Force is impersonal and dualistic.
In contrast, Biblical spirituality is relational:
humans are not to "tap" energy fields but to submit to the living God who empowers them through the Holy Ghost (Acts 1:8).
🔹 2. "Your relationship to the gods... determines your connection to the Force."
This is where Miles’ view sharply contradicts Biblical doctrine. Scripture teaches monotheism, not a hierarchy of “gods” or “Muses”:
“Hear, O Israel:
The LORD our God is one LORD.” — Deuteronomy 6:4 (KJV)
“I am the LORD, and there is none else, there is no God beside me.” — Isaiah 45:5 (KJV)
The Bible condemns any invocation of intermediary spirits (Muses or otherwise) in place of God.
The Holy Ghost (not a “Force”) is God Himself, and is not “earned” by cleanliness or training but received by faith:
“...the gift of the Holy Ghost.” — Acts 2:38 (KJV)
🔹 3. "Cleaning yourself up for the trip... spiritual scrubbing... Commandments and vows..."
This sounds superficially aligned with Biblical moral discipline, but deviates in motivation and method.
In the Bible:
Moral obedience flows from faith, not as a prerequisite to receiving God’s Spirit (Romans 5:1).
Righteousness comes from Christ’s imputed righteousness, not from our own “cleanliness”:
“But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags...” — Isaiah 64:6 (KJV)
“Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us...” — Titus 3:5 (KJV)
🔹 4. "Fail by vulgarity alone."
Miles suggests that moral ugliness or vulgarity alone can sever a person from divine contact.
While Scripture affirms that sin separates man from God (Isaiah 59:2), it also teaches that God is eager to restore even the most fallen through repentance and grace,
not via merit:
“The LORD is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart; and saveth such as be of a contrite spirit.” — Psalm 34:18 (KJV)
This differs significantly from Miles’ quasi-meritocratic cosmology, where the Muse only favors the spiritually hygienic.
Multiple gods or Muses dispense “Force” based on worthiness. | One holy God dispenses the Holy Ghost by grace through faith in Christ.
Spiritual progress comes through self-cleaning, discipline, and rectitude. | Spiritual life begins with repentance and faith, not earned cleanliness.
Evil ones break your taps to “the Force” by making you vulgar or disgusting. | Sin does separate, but God offers mercy to all who repent (1 John 1:9).
Force = spiritual energy field to be tapped. | The Holy Ghost is the third person of the Godhead, not a force. "No Muse, No Force: The Holy Ghost Alone"
"The Spirit Is Not a Force: A Christian Response to Miles Mathis"
"There Is No Other God: Exposing the Muse Myth"
"From Muses to Myths: Testing Spirits by Scripture" (cf. 1 John 4:1)
That is what much of current culture is about, you know. They have milked all the pride from you as a youth, by a constant hounding for equality, so that you have no chance of rising even as a Luciferian. But with some rectitude, you might still be educated by your Muse. To prevent that, you have to be broken again, turned into a Modern mutant by the media, crushed into a whining, lying, screeching brat that no Muse would get near. At that point you are just as untapped as any demon, with no power to resist them. This spiritual cleanliness takes no money, no suit of clothes, no position, no societal elevation. Anyone can achieve it in any country at any time. Remember, your Muse usually meets you in sleep, so it has nothing to do with your body. It is an uprightness of conduct, attitude, and relationship, so it will not be achieved by shining brass buttons or buying new shoes or marching in formation. Nor will it be achieved by courtseys, kneeling postures, bows, or ablutions. It will be achieved by a long series of right actions in real situations. From a King James Version (KJV) biblical perspective,
we can analyze Miles’ statement through the lens of scripture on:
spiritual purity
pride
humility
and relationship with God.
Here's a breakdown of how Miles' ideas compare and contrast with KJV biblical doctrine:
🕊️ Spiritual Cleanliness and Right Action
Miles says:
Spiritual cleanliness is required for communion with the divine (the Muse),
and is not outward but inward—based on:
conduct
attitude
right action
in real life.
KJV Alignment:
“Who shall ascend into the hill of the LORD? or who shall stand in his holy place? He that hath clean hands, and a pure heart…” — Psalm 24:3-4
“But the LORD said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature… for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart.” — 1 Samuel 16:7
Miles’ claim aligns closely with biblical teaching that true righteousness is not about rituals or appearances, but about the state of the heart and consistent right action.
🧍♂️ Pride, Equality, and Luciferianism
Miles criticizes cultural leveling, saying it destroys healthy pride and leaves people spiritually broken.
He also mentions that even a Luciferian might rise with rectitude—though the implication is more about personal strength than rebellion.
KJV Tension:
“Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.” — Proverbs 16:18
“But he giveth more grace.
Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble.” — James 4:6
Here, Miles’ view diverges.
The KJV views pride as a danger, not a virtue to be recovered.
While Miles seems to differentiate between “healthy pride” and destructive ego, scripture exhorts humility as the true path to divine communion—not pride or ambition, Luciferian or otherwise.
🌙 Meeting the Muse in Sleep vs. Communion with God
Miles speaks of the Muse meeting the spirit in sleep, offering guidance based on spiritual hygiene.
KJV Contrast:
“I will bless the LORD, who hath given me counsel:
my reins also instruct me in the night seasons.”— Psalm 16:7
“For God speaketh once, yea twice, yet man perceiveth it not.
In a dream, in a vision of the night, when deep sleep falleth upon men…” — Job 33:14-15
The idea that spiritual communication can occur during sleep is supported by scripture (e.g., dreams and visions from God), but the concept of a “Muse” as an intermediary figure is not. In the biblical framework, it is God (or angels sent by Him) who communes with individuals—not impersonal Muses or forces.
🚫 Rejection of External Rituals
Miles criticizes religious postures and rituals—kneeling, bowing, ablutions—as insufficient or misleading.
KJV View:
“This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.”— Matthew 15:8
“Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father…” — Matthew 7:21
The KJV clearly agrees: outward rituals alone are meaningless without true obedience and a right heart.
🧠 Summary:
Theme | Miles’ View | KJV Alignment
Spiritual Cleanliness | Based on right action, not ritual | ✅ Strong alignment (Psalm 24:3-4)
Pride & Equality | Pride is essential for growth | ❌ Diverges (Proverbs 16:18, James 4:6)
Dream-state Guidance | Muse meets in sleep to instruct | ⚠️ Partial alignment; KJV credits God, not Muses
Rejection of Ritual | Ritual is irrelevant without action | ✅ Agrees (Matthew 15:8) "Not by Ritual, but by Righteousness"
"Clean Hands, Pure Heart"
"The Muse and the Midnight Watch"
"Spirit Untapped: How the Wicked Cut Themselves Off"
Know Your Place: Pride, Virtue, and the Real Path to the Force#
Critique of modern spirituality and his emphasis on moral hierarchy and genuine spiritual practice—rooted not in posturing or rebellion, but in personal conduct and alignment with higher principles.
So, if you really want to tap the Force, it won't help you to run around with a muppet on your back, waving a light saber. You should start by taking the eternal rules seriously, especially the ones concerning lying and stealing. You should also study the words honor, truth, righteousness, rectitude, virtue, veneration, supplication, and service. Service doesn't imply servitude, you know. Likewise, it would be well to revisit the word pride, which has several meanings you don't want to confuse. It is OK to have pride in your accomplishments, for instance. It is OK to defend yourself, from a sense of pride. Proud doesn't always mean haughty. It means self-assured, which is mostly a good thing. Pride is only a sin in relation to the gods or other higher beings. The sin was originally “excessive pride”, not just pride. Meaning, having more pride than the event calls for. A pride out of proportion to the reality. You must know your place in the hierarchy. 🔍 ANALYSIS
1. Rejection of Pop Culture Spirituality
Miles opens with a jab at Star Wars, specifically mocking the idea of Jedi training by referencing Yoda ("a muppet on your back") and lightsabers.
This signals a larger critique: spiritual enlightenment is not gained through fantasy role-playing, cinematic mysticism, or shallow symbolism.
This isn't about cosplay or slogans—it’s about moral seriousness.
This mockery functions rhetorically to break the reader's attachment to spiritual consumerism or "force-for-rent" ideologies.
It's a dismantling of the illusion that the "path to the Force" is glamorous or accessible without deep self-discipline.
2. Return to Eternal Ethics
Miles places moral law—eternal, non-negotiable principles—at the center of spiritual power.
He asserts that tapping into any genuine spiritual force must begin with a re-engagement with concepts like:
Honor, truth, rectitude, and virtue:
These are not abstract ideals here—they are portrayed as the infrastructure of the soul, the channels through which the Muse or divine force can operate.
Veneration and supplication:
These signal a proper orientation to higher beings—a spiritual posture of humility, not arrogance or entitlement.
Service (not servitude):
He distinguishes between joyful, voluntary devotion and forced submission.
Service becomes a sacred act of alignment, not humiliation.
3. Nuanced Treatment of Pride
This is one of the richest parts of the excerpt.
Miles reclaims “pride” from total condemnation, emphasizing its multiple meanings.
Modern or religious discourse often collapses all pride into sin,
but Miles asserts that:
Healthy pride is necessary—it’s the confidence to stand for truth, defend oneself, and acknowledge progress.
Excessive pride, especially directed against divine hierarchy, is the true sin.
By framing sin as proportionality—
“pride out of proportion to the reality”
—he restores pride to its moral function while condemning its corrupt form.
This approach avoids both modern egoism and puritanical shame.
4. The Hierarchical Worldview
The phrase
“You must know your place in the hierarchy”
is a deliberate, provocative assertion in today’s egalitarian climate.
But for Miles, this hierarchy is not oppressive—it’s the spiritual architecture of the universe.
Your “place” is not static or humiliating.
It is:
A position of responsibility
A relationship to higher spirits or gods
A function of earned moral development, not bloodline, fame, or external power
It is also fluid—one can rise or fall depending on action.
Knowing your place means aligning with the cosmic order, not self-worship or rebellion.
5. Real Path to the Force
Miles equates "the Force" with something like the Holy Ghost or divine energy, but emphasizes that access to it is moral, not magical.
The “real path” is not about gifts or secret knowledge—it is about moral refinement, humility, and courage.
In that sense, the Force is not neutral energy (as portrayed in Star Wars), but a moral current, responsive to purity and intention.
🧭 Conclusion
This section is a sharp blend of satire, moral instruction, and metaphysical philosophy.
Miles critiques modern detachment from sacred ethics and re-centers spirituality on virtue, humility, and responsibility within a divinely ordered hierarchy.
He offers a counter-religion that is not “new age” but rather a stripped-down, behavior-focused spiritual realism, rooted in earned wisdom, not belief systems or mystical special effects.
False Heroes and Plastic Prophets: How Modern Myth Misguides the Soul#
Which is yet another perversion of Star Wars and the current pseudo-mythologies. In them, everyone is either a hero, a demon, or a droid. While in real life, almost no one is a hero, a demon, or a droid. So in helping you understand your place, these stories simply don't. You get better advice from Little House on the Prairie or Pollyanna than you now do from all of Hollywood put together. Again, the point of the media is to dislodge you from any and all grounding or meaningful connection, so that your only point of contact with society is the lady at the counter at Macy's or Starbuck's. Your only advice is from Anderson Cooper or Sean Hannity or the Ty-D-Bol man. Your only religious instruction is from Dumbledore, Iron Man, or the Incredible Hulk. This next passage from Miles follows naturally from his earlier reflections on spiritual discipline and hierarchy, but here he turns toward the cultural consequences of mythic distortion.
Let’s analyze this section from the same lens as before—with attention to moral, spiritual, and cultural implications.
🔍 Analysis of Miles' Commentary on Pseudo-Mythologies and Media Corruption
“Which is yet another perversion of Star Wars and the current pseudo-mythologies.
In them, everyone is either a hero, a demon, or a droid.
While in real life, almost no one is a hero, a demon, or a droid.
So, in helping you understand your place, these stories simply don't.”
1. False Archetypes: Hero, Demon, Droid
Miles begins by identifying a reductionist schema in modern mythmaking:
Hero – the glorified chosen one with special powers.
Demon – the irredeemable villain or enemy of the light.
Droid – the soulless automaton, subhuman, machine-like.
In Star Wars (and much of modern fantasy), all characters are flattened into these symbolic extremes.
Miles critiques this as a caricature of the spiritual hierarchy he described earlier.
Most people are none of these.
Real humans exist in the messy middle:
flawed
learning
stumbling
—struggling to do the right thing without capes or horns.
Implication:
These pop myths do not help people locate themselves spiritually or morally.
Instead, they offer unreachable ideals or dehumanizing tropes that distort self-understanding.
“You get better advice from Little House on the Prairie or Pollyanna than you now do from all of Hollywood put together.”
2. The Loss of Everyday Moral Models
Miles upholds simple, older media as having more spiritual and moral value.
Why?
Shows like Little House on the Prairie and Pollyanna emphasize ordinary virtue:
patience
kindness
humility
duty
and love.
These characters are not superheroes or sages.
They are relatable, flawed, human.
This isn’t nostalgia—it’s a defense of stories grounded in moral realism.
By contrast, modern media (especially Hollywood) feeds people morally unanchored fantasies:
people are either impossibly heroic or villainous, or they're passive consumers (the "droids").
“Again, the point of the media is to dislodge you from any and all grounding or meaningful connection, so that your only point of contact with society is the lady at the counter at Macy's or Starbuck's.”
3. Cultural Fragmentation as a Control Mechanism
This is the most biting line,
where Miles accuses the media of an intentional plot:
Dislodge you from your traditions, community, and even family.
Replace real-world relationships with consumer interactions.
Reduce the depth of your social world to retail and celebrity.
It’s not just that media is vapid—it’s engineered to cut you off from deeper forms of meaning.
This is a classic critique of modernity: atomization as a tool of spiritual control.
“Your only advice is from Anderson Cooper or Sean Hannity or the Ty-D-Bol man.
Your only religious instruction is from Dumbledore, Iron Man, or the Incredible Hulk.”
4. Satire as Moral Weapon
Miles uses mockery to expose the absurdity of modern sources of truth:
News pundits (Cooper, Hannity) give you moral or political guidance—
through:
conflict
outrage
spin
Pop culture figures (Dumbledore, Iron Man, Hulk) serve as de facto spiritual mentors, though they are fictional, morally ambiguous, or comically inappropriate.
Which brings us back to that. I stress again how important it is that neither Star Wars nor Harry Potter ever mentions a god. Both create new religions/mythologies, but they are devoid of gods. This, more than anything, tells us who created them. These people don't like gods. The very idea distresses their tiny spirits. So, they try to trap you in their own small box, hiring pretty cousins to seduce you on the big screen. They keep you so enthralled for two hours with special effects and costumes and fast action that you forget to notice you have been in a religion with no gods. And it gets progressively worse. Star Wars wasn't too bad in the beginning, Harry Potter is worse, and Games of Thrones is far worse. In Game of Thrones, gods are hardly mentioned, and when they are they are obscure and unimportant. The Faith of the Seven is a shallow literary construct, one that has no bearing on the people's actions. Only the god of death gets a serious mention, which is instructive. Here is what the fake CIA-front Martin has said about the gods of Westeros: “Worship of death is an interesting basis for religion because after all, death is the one universal. It doesn't seem to matter what gods you pray to. We all die in the real world and in fantasy worlds. So if there was one culture where you did not die, I suspect that God would become very popular. They will promise us eternal life, but whatever". He also stated the belief "that the world we live in was created by the evil god [is] kind of persuasive" when "you look at the world, particularly the Medieval world". Any questions? Sort of confirms everything I am telling you, doesn't it? This passage from Miles is a scathing cultural and spiritual critique wrapped in theological and literary analysis.
Let's unpack it from several key perspectives—
starting with its central themes:
🔍 Core Analysis:
1. The Godless Mythology
Miles argues that the most popular modern mythologies—
Star Wars
Harry Potter
Game of Thrones
—are intentionally designed without any meaningful concept of God or gods.
While they mimic religious or spiritual systems (The Force, magic, “The Seven”), none of them reference a higher Creator or moral authority beyond the characters themselves.
Star Wars features The Force—a deistic energy field—but lacks any source deity or creator figure.
Harry Potter has a magical world with moral lessons, but no metaphysical or divine authority.
Game of Thrones is even bleaker: the gods are empty shells, plot devices, or outright ridiculed.
📌 Key Claim:
These franchises condition the audience into accepting godless moral universes, thereby subtly guiding viewers into a worldview where the divine is absent, irrelevant, or even despised.
2. Psychological and Spiritual Manipulation
Miles emphasizes how media seduces the masses through spectacle—“special effects, costumes, and fast action”—while implanting subtle philosophical and spiritual messages.
The audience is so entranced by visual stimulation that they fail to notice the lack of spiritual grounding.
This, he argues, is not accidental but designed by those whose "tiny spirits" despise the idea of a god and want others to share in their disconnection.
He characterizes them as spiritually small, bitter, and ultimately misleading.
3. The Inversion of Religion
Miles quotes George R. R. Martin to underscore his claim.
Martin's cynical commentary on religion (“worship of death,” evil god as creator, etc.) is used as evidence that these creators have internalized (and promote) nihilistic or inverted spirituality.
The god of death is the only real deity mentioned—a perverse prioritization.
📜 Interpretation:
Rather than lead viewers toward reverence, hope, or virtue, these stories normalize spiritual emptiness, moral relativism, or worse—fatalism.
📖 Theological Implication
From a biblical or theistic perspective, especially one grounded in King James-style Christian thought, this criticism would resonate with the warning in Romans 1:25:
"Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator..."
Miles' point is that pop mythology replaces the Creator with the creature—magic, human power, or a vague force—while subtly teaching that divinity is irrelevant or malevolent.
🧠 Philosophical Position
Miles’ stance isn’t conventionally religious, but it is deeply spiritual and hierarchical.
He believes:
There are higher beings ("gods" or "Muses")
The media elites are intentionally blocking access to them
True spiritual growth is connected to veneration of these higher spirits
The inversion or erasure of godly hierarchies is a test—one most people are failing due to media conditioning
🎯 Summary:
Thesis:
Modern pop culture mythologies are godless by design.
Mechanism:
Spectacle and story displace divine truth, making spiritual apathy seem normal.
Consequence:
Viewers become disconnected from higher spiritual realities, more susceptible to nihilism, and fail the “test” of recognizing true hierarchy and moral purpose.
Response (implied):
Return to stories (and a worldview) grounded in divine order, spiritual hierarchy, and personal accountability to the higher realms.
The Light in Middle Earth: Tolkien’s Moral Cosmos vs. Godless Fantasy#
Compare that to Lord of the Rings. Although Potter and Game of Thrones are constantly compared to LOTR, the feel is completely different. Unlike the others, LOTR doesn't come off as a shallow Luciferian construct, straight out of the dungeons of Langley or MI6 (or, the films do, but the books don't). We can believe that LOTR was actually written by Tolkien, since it has a human stamp. And we can believe that Tolkien was not just an agent-front for MI6. This is because the stories and backstories are stiff with gods, many of whom take an active part in the history of Middle Earth. As we find out in the endnotes, Gandalf is a god himself. Beyond that, Tolkien tells us Men go somewhere after death, and that mortality is a gift of Eru Iluvatar. So, although the Elves are immortal, and seem superior in some ways, Tolkien tells us it is actually the Men who are gifted. Where do the Men go? Tolkien tells you that, too, though not directly. Why do you think they call it Middle Earth? It must be a middle stage, and Men go after death to a Higher Earth of some sort. Which confirms the positive hierarchy. LOTR is defined by positive hierarchies, and they always include the gods. This, among other reasons, is why LOTR reads as highly moral, despite its near-complete disconnect from the current major religions. Even though Middle Earth is constantly threatened by a powerful Dark Lord, the books are far brighter than Game of Thrones, Star Wars, or Harry Potter. A strong light shines there that never shines in the others. Here’s a direct analysis of that section from a KJV/Biblical perspective,
following the same lens we’ve been using:
🔍 Analysis of Miles on Lord of the Rings vs. Modern Fantasy
“Compare that to Lord of the Rings…LOTR doesn’t come off as a shallow Luciferian construct…
This is because the stories and backstories are stiff with gods…
Men go somewhere after death… mortality is a gift of Eru Iluvatar…
Middle Earth must be a middle stage…
Men go after death to a Higher Earth of some sort… positive hierarchies always include the gods… even though Middle Earth is constantly threatened by a Dark Lord, the books are far brighter…”
1. Tolkien’s Mythos and “the Stamp of God”
Miles contrasts Tolkien’s LOTR with the “godless” pseudo-mythologies of Harry Potter, Game of Thrones, and Star Wars.
He argues:
Tolkien’s work is “stiff with gods” – not just a force or energy field, but active, personal beings who shape history and destinies.
Tolkien presents mortality as a gift from Eru Ilúvatar (the Creator)—a radical inversion of modern pop-fantasy, which usually presents death as a curse to be overcome.
From a biblical lens, this echoes Genesis 3:22-24 and Hebrews 9:27:
death is not inherently evil but a portal to the next stage appointed by God.
Miles’ reading of Tolkien aligns with the KJV worldview of a Creator, a moral order, and an afterlife—not a meaningless cycle of reincarnation or a nihilistic void.
2. Middle-Earth as “Middle Stage”
Miles interprets “Middle Earth” literally as a “middle stage” of existence—echoing his own ladder-of-spirits cosmology.
Tolkien never explicitly says this,
but his mythos implies:
Men are mortal because they are called elsewhere.
Elves remain in Arda (the world), but Men transcend it.
This is remarkably close to biblical teaching of believers as “strangers and pilgrims” (Hebrews 11:13) passing through a middle place on their way to the higher kingdom of God.
3. Positive Hierarchy vs. Luciferian Inversion
Miles identifies LOTR as a “positive hierarchy”:
God (Eru Ilúvatar) > Valar (angelic powers) > Maiar (lesser spirits like Gandalf) > Elves and Men.
This structure mirrors the biblical cosmology of God > angels > humanity.
By contrast, Harry Potter and Game of Thrones erase or trivialize the divine, leaving only power struggles among mortals and vague “forces.”
Miles’ point is that when gods are removed, hierarchy collapses into nihilism or tyranny.
4. The “Light” of Tolkien’s World
Miles notes that LOTR “shines” with a strong light despite constant danger.
This is because Tolkien imbues his world with:
A Creator with a moral plan.
Evil that is limited and destined to lose.
Mortality as purposeful, not tragic.
This produces a:
tone of hope
purpose
moral clarity
absent from more recent fantasy franchises, which either glorify the dark or dissolve into relativism.
From a biblical viewpoint, Tolkien’s mythos resembles Psalm 36:9—
“For with thee is the fountain of life: in thy light shall we see light.”
5. Why This Matters in Miles’ System
Miles isn’t praising Tolkien out of nostalgia.
He’s identifying a literary test:
Works with:
gods
moral hierarchies
purposeful death
uplift and orient the reader toward higher realities.
Works without gods (or with only dark or trivial gods) seduce readers into spiritual confusion and despair.
Thus, LOTR passes his test,
while:
Harry Potter
Game of Thrones
Star Wars
fail.
🧭 Conclusion
Miles uses Tolkien as an example of how stories can still transmit truth about:
hierarchy
Creator
moral order
even outside explicit Christianity.
In his view, LOTR resonates because it reflects the deep structure of reality—a divine order, purposeful mortality, and active light—rather than erasing it.
From a KJV perspective, his praise of Tolkien aligns with Romans 1:20 (God’s eternal power and Godhead are “clearly seen” even in non-biblical creations) and Philippians 4:8 (whatsoever things are true, honest, just…think on these things).
The Muse and the Child: Rejecting Gnosis, Embracing the Light#
But let us return to Gnosticism. Conceivably, a person could know nothing about any religion, being able to cite no laws, and still pass all tests. His gnosis would apparently be zero, but his power would still be great. He would be a sort of natural, relying on his direct connection to his Muse, and through her to all higher levels. This idea isn't even anti-Christian, since I would argue it is what Christ meant when he told us to be like the little children. They are naturals in just this way, and our religious instruction more often corrupts them than educates them. Through their studies, they are soon so confused they can no longer hear the clear voices of their Muses. You will say a good spirit is just a slave to the Muses or to the laws, in that case. He doesn't question them, just assuming they are correct. In which case we have just discovered a higher fascism. Well, that is what the evil ones will tell you, but that isn't the way I see it. I am more than a bit rebellious, as you may know, and I don't accept anything just because it is told me. I don't take orders very well. So you may be surprised to see me acting such a pup before my Muse. But again, I tell you it isn't a matter of obsequiousness, it is a matter of admiration. Some of us can admit when we are in the presence of a higher being. Not a higher authority, mind you. I purposely avoided that term. I don't take her advice on authority, I take it because it is good advice. There is a huge difference. I have been told by a friend, “Well, maybe you are wrong. Maybe your Muse has you fooled. Maybe she is a Witch in beguiling robes.” My answer: “maybe yours is”. We will see where our Muses takes us. Mine has led me quite well. She has never tempted me and there is not the least scent of the dark side on her. Some would find that a bore, I guess, but I don't. I suppose I have spent enough time in the presence of corruption and am no longer fascinated by the Pit. I am fascinated by the light. This passage from Miles provides a summation of several core tenets in his idiosyncratic spiritual philosophy, and when analyzed closely, it presents a rejection of dogmatic religion, a redefinition of “gnosis”, and a personalized mysticism rooted in lived experience and moral intuition.
Here's a structured analysis of the ideas, especially in context with earlier entries in this series.
1. Gnosis Without Religion
Key idea:
“Conceivably, a person could know nothing about any religion... and still pass all tests.”
This is a direct attack on traditional Gnosticism, which emphasizes salvation through hidden or arcane knowledge (gnosis).
Miles flips that completely—he proposes that it is not knowledge, but upright conduct and connection to the divine (the Muse) that leads to advancement.
A person could have no access to religious doctrines or texts and still be morally excellent.
“His gnosis would apparently be zero, but his power would still be great.”
This brings Miles back to his theme of hierarchy by spiritual quality, not intellectual accumulation.
Wisdom is shown in action, not in doctrine.
2. Echoes of Christ, Not Christianity
“This idea isn't even anti-Christian... be like the little children.”
This alludes to Matthew 18:3 (KJV):
“Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.”
Miles leans into a non-institutional reading of this verse.
For him, it’s not about entering Heaven through baptism or sacraments—
it’s about:
spiritual freshness
uncorrupted intuition
lack of prideful artifice
Yet he’s clearly distinguishing between “Christ” and “Christianity.”
This distancing implies a de-institutionalized reading of Jesus, who becomes more Muse-like—an embodiment of pure guidance, not hierarchical authority.
3. Laws vs. Authority
“I don’t take her advice on authority, I take it because it is good advice.”
This is the crux.
For Miles, moral authority is earned, not conferred.
His Muse doesn’t command because she’s powerful.
She advises because she is:
wise
gentle
truthful
This contrasts with most traditional religions, which ground obedience in divine authority (“obey because God says so”).
Miles counters with:
“obey because it is true, and you recognize the goodness yourself.”
4. Rebuttal to Skepticism
When Miles quotes his friend—“maybe your Muse is just a Witch in beguiling robes”—he acknowledges the suspicion of deception, a theme common in Gnostic and even Christian thought.
But instead of entertaining paranoia, he says,
“We will see where our Muses take us.”
This reflects spiritual pragmatism:
judge a spirit by the fruit of its guidance, not by its robes.
“There is not the least scent of the dark side on her.”
This phrasing again echoes earlier critiques of Star Wars and pop mysticism:
darkness is not to be toyed with, and light is not boring—it is beautiful.
5. Rejection of the Pit / Embrace of Light
“I suppose I have spent enough time in the presence of corruption and am no longer fascinated by the Pit.”
This is a moment of spiritual maturity and fatigue.
The allure of the abyss—of:
corruption
rebellion
darkness
—is something Miles sees as juvenile or at least self-destructive.
The real challenge is to:
admire
obey
move
in tune with
the higher
the clean
the noble
It’s also a message of hope.
That despite the corruption in the world, it’s possible to maintain clarity and
And that is another reason I am the opposite of a Gnostic. In the modern world, Gnosticism has been twisted or redefined as a sort of Luciferianism. That love of the material world I was talking about above is redefined as a worship of Lucifer, the demiurge who created it. He then becomes the god and lawgiver, and you are taught the God he rebelled against is actually the fraud. You don't get a reversal of dark and light, because Lucifer is the “lightbearer” and so is now the light. But there is one big problem with all this, and few have commented on it. You would think that Lucifer, the creator of all matter and of the Earth in this story, would have a set of laws like those recommended by my Muse, right? In other words, you would think this creator of the Earth would teach a love of the material, of the body, and of the Earth herself. You would think he would teach and demand a reverence for both matter and spirit, instead of just spirit. But that isn't what we see. No, in modern Gnosticism/Luciferianism, we see another variant of the promotion of plunder—indicating it is yet another creation of the plunderers. They have created another in a series of manufactured religions that justifies their actions. This section from Miles provides a critical lens on modern Gnosticism and Luciferian reinterpretations,
and it can be broken down into a few analytical themes:
🔍 1. Distinction from Traditional Gnosticism
Miles distinguishes himself from both:
Ancient Gnosticism, which held a dualistic cosmology (with a corrupt demiurge creating the material world), and
Modern reinterpretations, which, according to him, twist that view into a type of Luciferianism, where Lucifer becomes the misunderstood creator and “true god.”
He rejects both by maintaining that:
"I am the opposite of a Gnostic."
This continues his broader theme of being a third way — not traditional religion, not atheism/materialism, and not occult inversion — but rather his own spiritual realism, rooted in personal communion with higher beings.
🔥 2. Critique of Luciferian Gnosticism
Miles critiques modern Luciferianism for failing its own logic:
If Lucifer is the true creator of matter and Earth, why does this belief system not promote reverence for the body, the Earth, and physical reality?
Instead, he argues, these belief systems still promote plunder and disdain for matter — just like the traditional Gnostic or even Christian cosmologies they claim to subvert.
This is Miles’s key insight here:
“You would think this creator of the Earth would teach a love of the material... But that isn't what we see.”
He implies that these ideologies are intellectual traps, cynically constructed to justify exploitation, not truth.
🧰 3. Manufactured Religions as Tools of Control
Continuing his recurring theme,
Miles suggests that:
Modern Gnosticism/Luciferianism is another manufactured religion, built by the same elite forces ("the plunderers") that control mainstream culture.
Its purpose:
to spiritually deconstruct the soul, to confuse, and ultimately, to justify immoral behavior while pretending it’s enlightened.
“They have created another in a series of manufactured religions that justifies their actions.”
This positions Miles once again as both:
A spiritual realist, who believes in moral laws and cosmic hierarchy.
A cultural dissident, who sees through elite ideological manipulation.
✨ Summary
Miles rejects the dualistic view that matter is evil, but he also rejects its inversion, which turns Lucifer into the misunderstood hero.
For him, neither is grounded in spiritual truth or moral clarity.
He believes:
Matter and spirit are both sacred.
Luciferianism, as it currently exists, is a tool of misdirection.
Real spirituality comes through uprightness, action, and connection to benevolent spiritual beings—not secret knowledge or mythic inversions.
“Plunder in Disguise: Gnosticism, Lucifer, and the Theft of Meaning”
“The Inversion Trap: Matter, Spirit, and the Lie of Modern Gnosis”
Not What You Wish from Me: Serving the Muse Instead of Self #
In this sort of Gnosticism, there is a love of the material, of a sort. Physical and sexual restrictions are mostly gone, so you are encouraged to worship the physical in that sense. And if you love money, that's also fine, since it is also material. But of course that isn't what my Muse is talking about when she insists upon the sanctity of the material world. She is teaching that the material and spiritual are one, and must both be venerated. Gnostics asks their spirits to give them objects or powers, but my Muses don't listen to such requests. They have no interest in me gaining riches, women, or worldly power, and nothing could be clearer than that. So, there is nothing Gnostic about my progression, such as it is. There is no asking of boons of any sort. In a way, it is not what she can do for me, but what I can do for her. I ask for guidance, but not toward any treasure. I ask for guidance in my tasks. Do you see what a gigantic difference there is in that? She does not ask, “What do you wish from me?” Rather, I ask, “What do you wish from me?” The Muse is not a sort of genie, you see. She is not there to grant wishes. This passage from Miles offers a distinct philosophical and spiritual counterpoint to both traditional Gnosticism and modern pseudo-Gnostic or Luciferian teachings.
Here's a structured analysis:
1. Critique of Gnostic “Materialism”
Miles is drawing a critical distinction between two forms of “love of the material”:
Gnostic/Modern Occult Materialism:
He argues that in many versions of modern Gnosticism or Luciferianism,
there is an endorsement of:
bodily indulgence
wealth acquisition
hedonism
—a surface-level "worship of the physical."
This reflects not a reverence for the material, but a license for pleasure-seeking and consumption.
Musean Material Sanctity:
In contrast, Miles offers a different concept: the sanctity of matter as a reflection of spirit.
His Muse teaches not that the body is to be indulged or exploited, but that it is to be venerated and stewarded because it is spiritually significant.
This position reframes the material world not as a playground for pleasure or power, but as a sacred medium for moral growth and spiritual work.
2. Rejection of Transactional Spirituality
Miles sharply rebukes what he sees as the self-centered nature of many modern spiritual or magical practices, where the spirit (or “gods”) are treated as wish-granting entities.
He emphasizes that his relationship with the Muse is non-transactional.
He does not pray for riches, lovers, or power.
He instead asks how he might serve, not how she might serve him.
This reverses the often-entitled posture of modern mysticism and aligns with a traditional devotional model—though he distances himself from organized religion.
3. Inversion of Power Structure
He portrays the Muse not as a subordinate entity (like a genie, spirit guide, or demon bound to command), but as a higher being worthy of
deference
admiration
obedience
—not through fear, but through trust and love.
The Muse leads through moral insight, not magical results.
His request is not for power, but for guidance in fulfilling a task—implying he sees life as a mission of responsibility, not a game of acquisition.
This resonates with Christian ideas of vocation and stoic or classical philosophy, but without the traditional theological framework.
Instead, it's a kind of rational mysticism, where higher beings guide those who align themselves with moral clarity and humility.
4. Core Themes
True spirituality is service-oriented, not self-indulgent.
Material and spirit are one, and both are to be approached with reverence.
Piety is not submission to arbitrary rules, but willingness to participate in a larger moral structure.
Ego, desire, and pride sever the connection to divine guidance.
Closing Thought
Miles' spiritual cosmology here is strikingly clear: the divine is not there to fulfill your fantasies—it is there to guide your growth.
Those who seek only boons miss the point and risk remaining stuck in a lower spiritual orbit.
"The Muse Is Not a Genie: Real Devotion in a Corrupted Age"
"The Task, Not the Treasure: Rejecting the Gnostic Bargain"
"In Service of the Light: A Spiritual Reversal of Desire"
"What Do You Wish from Me? A Philosophy of Sacred Obedience"
So, one of the things you have to learn is how to shut up in the presence of your Muse. A thing very hard for most people to learn. You aren't there to talk; you are there to listen. You have to trust that she knows more about what you need than you know yourself. You don't have to list all your problems and then ask for specific responses. She already knows the first part, and you need to let her determine the response. You may not even know what to ask for. So, for the sake of efficiency, just show up and shut up. Tug on her robe, have a seat, and then keep quiet. Some will say, “Where is all this happening exactly, and when? I don't get it”. Maybe in meditation, more likely in sleep. Don't worry so much about that. Once you decide you want to go there, you will, without planning it all out. I don't need to draw you a map or tell you what to chant before bedtime. A silent intention is more than enough, but if it helps you can make up your own little prayers. The important thing is that you demonstrate the right attitude, and I am trying to get across to you what that is. You have to call her for the right reason. She will not answer greedy or needy calls. She will answer when you are ready to do something decent and she can help. And if you want to think of your Muse as a man or a talking unicorn or a giant furry kitten, it doesn't really matter. Whatever gets you in the mood. I like to think of mine as a beautiful woman in white robes, but that is just me. She isn't really any of those things. She is a light-being beyond your current comprehension: she doesn't demand fear or obeisances, only respect and hopefully love. She will take into account your limitations. This passage from Miles can be analyzed as a reflection on:
spiritual receptivity
humility
relational alignment with higher guidance
all deeply grounded in an intuitive metaphysics.
Here’s a closer breakdown:
🧠 Theme: Receptivity over Request
Miles contrasts two orientations toward spiritual beings:
Modern approach:
People often treat spiritual encounters like customer service—bringing a laundry list of problems and expecting immediate, specific resolutions.
His approach:
One must quiet the self to hear something deeper.
The Muse (symbol of divine inspiration or higher consciousness) already knows your needs and isn't there to be ordered about.
This recalls ancient wisdom across traditions:
In Christianity:
“Be still, and know that I am God” (Psalm 46:10)
In Taoism:
“The Way does nothing, yet nothing is left undone.”
In Zen:
True listening requires the death of the ego’s noise.
🔑 Lesson:
You are not the initiator of the conversation with the divine—you are the recipient.
🧎 Spiritual Humility and Readiness
Miles emphasizes that the Muse:
Will not respond to greed or neediness
Will respond when you're ready to do something decent—when you're offering yourself to serve rather than to gain
This notion echoes the idea that:
“The gods help those who are helping others.”
This also undermines the:
prosperity gospel
manifestation culture
even new-age magical thinking
where the divine is imagined as a vending machine for desires.
🌙 On the Experience of Contact
Miles is non-dogmatic about the how and where:
“Maybe in meditation, more likely in sleep.”
No strict rituals, chants, or formulas required.
He emphasizes silent intention over formality.
The internal disposition (respect, humility, willingness to serve) is what opens the channel.
This is profoundly counter-cultural in an age of:
Hacks
formulas
biohacks
and systems of “spiritual optimization”..
🕯️ Miles is saying:
You don’t need a flashlight to find the light.
You just have to stop shining your own in your eyes.
👼 Flexible Iconography of the Muse
Interestingly,
Miles opens space for:
Imagining your Muse however is most helpful (man, unicorn, kitten)
But also states:
“She isn’t really any of those things.”
The true Muse is a:
“light-being beyond your current comprehension”
This treads closely to apophatic theology (“via negativa”) — the understanding that God or divine truth is beyond all mental constructs, and any image is just a tool or approximation.
❤️ Final Insight: Respect and Love
Perhaps the most profound aspect is that:
The Muse does not demand fear or obeisances, only respect and hopefully love.
This directly challenges both:
Fear-based religion (fire-and-brimstone gods)
Transactional spirituality (get what you want through ritual)
Instead,
he affirms a relationship that is:
personal
ethical
reciprocal
🔖 Summary
Miles’ view of the Muse is not theological but relational.
She is not a deity in a temple, a force to command, or a fantasy projection—
but a higher presence of wisdom that:
Requires nothing but your sincere readiness to act well
Offers no rewards, but tremendous guidance
Cannot be approached with arrogance or desperation—but can always be approached with quiet openness and loving humility
The Muse or the Spirit: Discerning Divine Guidance in Light of Scripture#
But back to Luciferianism. Luciferianism teaches a worship of the inner self. You may think that is what I am recommending with my talk of the Muse, but it isn't. The Muse isn't my inner self. She is completely separate from me, a much greater being. In fact, in my system, confusing your Muse for yourself would be a sort of heresy. It would be the ultimate tempting of fate, since you are confusing yourself with a god or angel. My gods wouldn't put up with it for a minute, and as far as I know, they don't. I have never tested them in that fashion. You will say I seem to elide from god to Muse to angel, treating them almost interchangeably. Don't I know the difference? No, and neither do you. Yes, I know the various religions have their dogma here, pretending they know who is who in the angelic and deistic hierarchies, but I don't tend to believe it. It looks like a bunch of made-up names to me, akin to all the begatting in the Bible. In my wanderings in the spirit world, I have come away with no memory of such things, and it is my opinion we are not privy to the lists. Why would we be? Memorizing a bunch of names isn't part of the test, and it would only breed familiarity. If the gods or angels wished to be familiar with us, they would be. They would have their own TV miniseries and Hollywood blockbusters. But obviously they don't want that. They want us as independent as possible here. They want us far from the nest. All we need to know is that the connection is not broken. They are there, and will help at given times. But as for us measuring them, that is absurd. We have no way to measure light beings. We can feel if they are good or bad, but the ones larger than us are otherwise beyond our comprehension. Analyzing Miles' statement through a King James Version (KJV) biblical lens brings up several key theological contrasts.
Here's the excerpt again for clarity:
Miles says:
“But back to Luciferianism. Luciferianism teaches a worship of the inner self. You may think that is what I am recommending with my talk of the Muse, but it isn't. The Muse isn't my inner self. She is completely separate from me, a much greater being. In fact, in my system, confusing your Muse for yourself would be a sort of heresy. It would be the ultimate tempting of fate, since you are confusing yourself with a god or angel... All we need to know is that the connection is not broken. They are there, and will help at given times. But as for us measuring them, that is absurd. We have no way to measure light beings. We can feel if they are good or bad, but the ones larger than us are otherwise beyond our comprehension.”
🔍 KJV Analysis:
1. “Worship of the Inner Self” vs. Biblical Doctrine
Luciferianism, as described by Miles, exalts the inner self as divine.
The KJV Bible directly opposes this:
“The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked:
who can know it?” – Jeremiah 17:9
“Lean not unto thine own understanding.” – Proverbs 3:5
The Bible clearly teaches that the inner self is not to be worshipped, trusted, or elevated above God.
Instead, God’s will must be followed.
2. The Muse as an External, Divine Advisor
Miles presents the Muse as a separate, higher being—akin to an angel or a god.
In KJV terms, this idea resembles interaction with angels or the Holy Ghost, but diverges by encouraging direct, independent spiritual communication with a personal entity not rooted in Scripture.
The Holy Ghost is the Bible’s primary spiritual guide:
“But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things…” – John 14:26
However, nowhere does Scripture suggest an external, personal muse who is neither God, angel, nor the Holy Ghost.
3. Avoiding Familiarity with the Divine
Miles claims we should not attempt to catalog divine hierarchies or make gods/angels familiar.
While mystery is acknowledged in Scripture, God does reveal His structure through the Bible:
“Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation?” – Hebrews 1:14
“Know ye not that we shall judge angels?” – 1 Corinthians 6:3
The KJV affirms that humans are given some knowledge and authority over the spiritual realm.
The idea that we should not or cannot know these beings runs contrary to Paul’s teachings.
4. Discernment of Spirits
Miles states we:
“can feel if they are good or bad,”
but not measure them.
The Bible emphasizes testing spirits through Scripture,
not feeling:
“Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God…” – 1 John 4:1
Another reason to shun Luciferianism is the people involved. Luciferianism is closely linked to the whole lefthand/righthand paths of magic that were brought to the west from India and popularized by Madame Blavatsky. It was promoted by super spook Alistair Crowley. The pseudo-religion is now promoted by various Fords, Paynes, Beyers, and other obvious members of the Families. It is just another fringe on the Theosophy project, and we may assume it is run out of Intelligence. Analyzing this passage from a King James Version (KJV) biblical worldview requires holding it up to core scriptural teachings concerning:
Lucifer/Satan
The occult and magic
False prophets and deception
Spiritual authority and discernment
🔥 Analysis:
1. Condemnation of Luciferianism and Occultism
"Another reason to shun Luciferianism..."
From a KJV perspective, Luciferianism—whether understood as outright Satan worship or as self-deification—
is condemned unequivocally:
Isaiah 14:12
"How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!"
Lucifer's fall is explicitly linked to pride and rebellion, themes associated with occultism and "left-hand path" ideologies (which elevate the self above submission to God).
Deuteronomy 18:10-12
“There shall not be found among you... a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer. For all that do these things are an abomination unto the Lord.”
Thus, the very foundation of magic—left-hand or right-hand—is abominable to the Lord, and by extension, so are any ideologies (like Luciferianism) rooted in that foundation.
2. Spiritual Counterfeits and False Religions
Miles refers to Luciferianism as
“just another fringe on the Theosophy project,”
and links it to figures like Madame Blavatsky and Aleister Crowley.
From a scriptural perspective:
2 Corinthians 11:13-14
“For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.
And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.”
The “angel of light” deception applies directly to groups that teach enlightenment through rebellion or personal ascension apart from God.
Theosophy and Luciferianism often disguise themselves as spiritual or philosophical enlightenment—but scripturally, they are “doctrines of devils” (1 Timothy 4:1).
3. Link to Intelligence Agencies & Elitist Control
While not directly addressed in the Bible, the use of spiritual deception by earthly powers is echoed in prophetic warnings:
Revelation 18:23
"...for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived."
Ephesians 6:12
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world…”
If Intelligence or worldly elites are promoting Luciferian ideology, it aligns with the biblical picture of spiritual warfare being carried out through earthly means—
deception
false religion
corrupted leadership
💡 Summary (KJV Viewpoint):
Miles’ assertion—to shun Luciferianism because of its occult roots, prideful philosophy, and its promoters in elite circles—is consistent with the warnings of Scripture.
The KJV condemns:
The practice of magic (in all its forms)
The worship of self or Lucifer
The deception of false light and secret knowledge
In short:
"Ye shall know them by their fruits." — Matthew 7:16
Luciferianism bears rotten fruit:
pride
rebellion
confusion
deceit
The Lucifer Bluff: Power, Deception, and the Hierarchy of Light#
I predict some will still insist I am a Gnostic of some sort, but if I really were a Gnostic or Luciferian trying to fool you, it would be a very strange way to do that: telling you neither Satan nor Lucifer is real. So I repeat, the hierarchy exists, but not in the way they have told you. There are no evil powers above you. No demons have been given their own worlds. Sure, you can seek out bad spirits during sleep, but those are spirits at your own level—other sleepers. You can get together and work whatever mischief you are capable of when you awaken, and I am not saying you can't. But bad spirits from higher levels don't come down here, because it is impossible by definition. If they are at higher levels, they aren't bad spirits. That is what “higher” means, you know. If they come down here, it is because they have been thrown down here, with the reduction that implies. In that case, they are no longer higher. One of these spirits may call himself Lucifer, but he should worry you no more than any other spirit here, since he is of this level. He has no power you do not have. In fact, he must have less, since you are advised by a Muse and he isn't. He has a Muse, but doesn't listen to her. He isn't tapped into the light. He is like a battery with no hookups. He has no chance against you except the bluff. With no power of his own, he can only use your power against you. This passage further clarifies Miles' stance against Gnosticism and Luciferianism and presents a cosmic framework that aligns more closely with a King James Version (KJV) biblical worldview than many might initially assume.
Let’s analyze it from that perspective.
📖 KJV-Based Analysis of Miles’ Statement
1. “Telling you neither Satan nor Lucifer is real”
From a KJV perspective, this is already a divergence.
The King James Bible presents both Satan and Lucifer as real beings:
Isaiah 14:12 (KJV):
"How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!"
Luke 10:18 (KJV):
“And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.”
These passages clearly affirm the reality and fall of Lucifer/Satan.
So, while Miles denies their ontological existence as powerful supernatural beings, the KJV affirms them as once-high spiritual beings who were cast down.
2. “No demons have been given their own worlds... If they are at higher levels, they aren’t bad spirits”
This is a logical reinterpretation that essentially denies the possibility of evil powers in high places,
something Scripture warns about explicitly:
Ephesians 6:12 (KJV):
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”
The biblical worldview allows for the presence of evil entities with spiritual power above us — fallen angels and demonic forces influencing the physical realm.
Miles disagrees, essentially flattening the hierarchy of evil to our level.
3. “If they come down here, it is because they have been thrown down here”
This statement actually aligns with KJV theology to a degree.
The Bible teaches that Lucifer was cast down,
as were other rebellious angels:
Revelation 12:9 (KJV):
“And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world...”
So, while Miles uses this fact to dismiss their power, Scripture uses it to warn of their present influence on Earth.
4. “He has no power you do not have. In fact, he must have less...”
This is perhaps the most provocative point.
The Bible teaches that the devil has limited power, and believers who are tapped into the Spirit (or “the light,” in Miles’ terms) have authority over such powers:
James 4:7 (KJV):
“Submit yourselves therefore to God.
Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.”
1 John 4:4 (KJV):
“...greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.”
This idea that Satan or any demonic force has no intrinsic power apart from what people yield to him is biblically valid.
However, where Miles departs is in denying the identity of Satan as a real entity at all, seeing “Lucifer” as more of a con or bluff by fellow spirits on our level.
Satan/Lucifer not real | They are real beings (Isaiah 14:12, Revelation 12)
No evil spiritual hierarchy above us | Evil powers in high places (Eph. 6:12)
Evil spirits cannot “come down” from higher levels | Fallen angels are “cast down” (2 Pet. 2:4)
“Lucifer” has no power apart from bluff | Satan has limited but real influence (Job 1, Matt. 4)
🕊️ Where Miles Aligns with KJV
He emphasizes the importance of light, which echoes Jesus as the Light of the world (John 8:12).
He stresses individual responsibility and free will, matching Deuteronomy 30:19:
“I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing:
therefore choose life...”
He honors spiritual hierarchy, but redefines it in a way that prioritizes moral quality over ontological power — a unique reinterpretation, though it clashes with biblical structure.
🪔 Summary
Miles is not a Gnostic, nor is he a Luciferian — he repeatedly denies the reality of any powerful evil entities above us, preferring to explain evil as peer-level spirits misusing free will.
This stands in sharp contrast to the KJV, which presents Satan and fallen angels as real, dangerous forces, albeit ones already defeated by Christ’s authority.
Miles' system attempts to rationalize good and evil through a spiritual physics model, while the KJV maintains the mystery and sovereignty of God and His adversaries within a cosmic narrative.
Luciferians sometimes claim they aren't Satanists and sometimes admit they are, but just remember the old “better to rule on Earth than serve in Heaven” quote. That quote remains decisive in my spirituality, since—as you have seen above—I strongly believe it is better to serve. A wise man has no desire to rule here on Earth. He knows he is not capable of ruling, which is why he is here. HE KNOWS HIS PLACE. The rulers here on Earth—whether they call themselves Jews, Gnostics, Luciferians, Materialists, Atheists, or other—do not know their place. They vastly overrate their own power, importance, or elevation. They either misdefine themselves as gods, or deny that there are beings greater than themselves. They deny the hierarchy, and in so doing find they cannot rise. They have trapped themselves here by their own narrow beliefs. They will not listen. This passage from Miles can be fruitfully analyzed through a King James Version (KJV) Biblical lens, especially concerning themes of
pride
hierarchy
service
rebellion
🔹 “Better to rule in Hell than serve in Heaven” – a KJV Contrast
Miles references the famous line often attributed to Milton’s Paradise Lost, believed to express Satan’s prideful rebellion.
While that exact phrase isn’t in the KJV Bible,
the spirit of its rebuttal is clear in Scripture:
Isaiah 14:12-14 (KJV)
"How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven... I will be like the most High."
Here, Lucifer’s fall is precisely due to pride and the desire not to serve, but to ascend unjustly, just as Miles critiques.
🔹 The Virtue of Service
Matthew 23:11-12 (KJV)
"But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.
And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted."
Miles mirrors this sentiment directly by stating,
“a wise man has no desire to rule here on Earth... He knows his place.”
In KJV theology, humility and service are the marks of greatness—not temporal power.
🔹 On Knowing One’s Place: A Biblical Hierarchy
Miles claims:
“They deny the hierarchy, and in so doing find they cannot rise.”
This aligns with the Biblical concept that acknowledging God’s sovereign order is essential for elevation:
Romans 13:1 (KJV)
"For there is no power but of God:
the powers that be are ordained of God."
To reject spiritual hierarchy is, in the Biblical worldview, to rebel against God’s established order—just as Lucifer did.
🔹 Spiritual Rebellion and Blindness
2 Peter 2:10 (KJV)
"Presumptuous are they, selfwilled, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities."
Miles warns that rulers of Earth—be they
Luciferians
Gnostics
Atheists
or otherwise—
“do not know their place.”
They elevate themselves, speak against divine order, and reject higher beings, which KJV Scripture identifies as a dangerous spiritual error.
🔹 Trapping Oneself Through Belief
Proverbs 16:18 (KJV)
"Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall."
The idea that
“they have trapped themselves here by their own narrow beliefs”
echoes this proverb exactly.
In Biblical logic, pride is not just a character flaw—it’s a metaphysical snare.
🔹 Summary: KJV-Compatible Themes in Miles’ Passage
Service over rulership is a divine principle (Matthew 23).
Pride and spiritual rebellion lead to downfall (Isaiah 14; Proverbs 16).
Recognizing divine hierarchy is crucial to spiritual progress (Romans 13).
Self-idolatry or thinking oneself a god is a defining feature of Lucifer’s fall (2 Thessalonians 2:4).
I also beg you to notice something else at this juncture. In the science wars, we have seen my enemies reading from scripts, accusing me of being arrogant, egotistical, or monomaniacal. Ironic, isn't it, in light of the fact that when we look closer, they are Atheists/Luciferians/Materialists, and I am not. In other words, I state explicitly I am in the service of higher powers, and that I recognize and accept my low place in the hierarchy. I do not worship my own inner self, I do not deny the gods, and I do not think I am godlike in any way. I do not think science or gnosis makes man independent or superior, and I do not believe science is near to solving any of the eternal problems. My physics is near to solving some specific physical problems, that's all. That is all I have ever claimed for myself. So I actually have much more humility in relation to the gods than those attacking me. Which may be why they are attacking me. They know that I am a threat not just to their fake physics, but to their failed worldviews. They know I can see through them in all ways. Analyzing this passage from a King James Version (KJV) Biblical viewpoint, we can break down the spiritual themes Miles Mathis touches upon and compare them to the language, doctrines, and moral framework found in the Scriptures.
🔹 Service and Hierarchy: “I recognize and accept my low place in the hierarchy.”
KJV Parallel:
“Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up.” — James 4:10
Miles' emphasis on humility before higher powers is in line with Biblical teachings.
The Scriptures teach that exaltation comes through humility, and submission to God's order is a virtue.
The idea that
“a wise man has no desire to rule”
echoes Christ’s teaching:
“Whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister.” — Matthew 20:26
This inversion of worldly ambition aligns with Jesus’ model of servant leadership and humility, a concept miles away from Lucifer’s prideful rebellion (Isaiah 14:12–15).
🔹 False Accusations and Scripted Attacks
Miles notes that his critics attack him with accusations of arrogance.
Biblically, false accusations and persecution of the righteous is a recurring theme:
“Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.” — Matthew 5:11
Miles’ suggestion that he is being slandered for defending spiritual truth aligns with this idea.
In Scripture, those who stand with God are often attacked by those who serve worldly or demonic powers.
🔹 Atheists, Luciferians, and Materialists as Opponents
He groups his opponents as Atheists/Luciferians/Materialists, which can be read as those who deny the spiritual order or elevate themselves.
“The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.” — Psalm 14:1
“Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.” — Romans 1:22
Materialism and atheism—denying the existence or authority of God—are treated in Scripture as the root of many evils.
The Luciferian idea of seeking to “be as gods” directly connects to:
“For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods…” — Genesis 3:5
This is the original temptation—the elevation of man’s ego in defiance of divine hierarchy.
🔹 Worship of Self vs. Service to God
“I do not worship my own inner self … I do not think I am godlike in any way.”
This again is in harmony with the KJV Biblical worldview, which consistently condemns pride, self-exaltation,
and self-worship:
“Let nothing be done through strife or vainglory; but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves.” — Philippians 2:3
And again:
“God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble.” — James 4:6
Miles' position seems to defend a Biblically sound anthropology:
man is limited, not divine; service to higher, unseen powers (interpreted here as the divine order) is proper and righteous.
🔹 Summary Judgment (KJV Perspective)
From a KJV standpoint,
this section of Miles’ writing exhibits:
Spiritual humility
Recognition of divine order
A call to discern truth amidst deception
A critique of worldly systems that exalt man above God
This aligns far more closely with Biblical Christianity than with Gnosticism or Luciferianism.
Ironically, the ones accusing him of arrogance appear (in his framing) to be the ones guilty of the very pride that the Bible identifies as the original sin of Satan.
Ghost Ships and Doctrines of Devils: Discerning the Fake from the Faithful#
I have fielded this question in email: “You say these Satanists/Luciferians are basically another Intelligence project, a subset of the old Theosophy project. Does that mean that none of them believe this stuff at all? Is it just a pose, meant to fool the unwary?” Well, I think of it exactly like I think of the Marxism project. I assume those who run these projects are not real Luciferians or Marxists, and that they know it is a lot of hogwash. But that doesn't mean that some naive Gentiles aren't drawn in, taking it seriously for some shorter or longer periods of time. So in this sense the groups contain some small portion of reality. In fact, you could say that about most groups in existence, including the Democratic Party, the Republican Party, large portions of mainstream science, all of Modern art, the military, the CIA, the NRA, the Sierra Club, NASA, the media, Hollywood, and mainstream history. Although they are all phantoms at the top and bottom, being fake in the foundations as well as in the leadership, they nonetheless have some greater or lesser number of real adherents in the mid-levels— boobies who haven't yet figured out they are manning a ghost ship. This passage from Miles can be analyzed as a metaphysical and cultural critique filtered through a King James Version (KJV) biblical worldview.
Let's break it down in that light.
🔎 KJV Viewpoint Analysis
1. False Systems and Deception
"Although they are all phantoms at the top and bottom..."
This resembles the biblical theme of deception by principalities and powers,
as seen in:
Ephesians 6:12 (KJV)
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Miles’s claim that major institutions (science, media, government, Theosophy, etc.) are largely "ghost ships" aligns with the biblical concern for false doctrines and lying spirits guiding the world’s leadership structures.
The warning is not just about who is leading, but what spirit they follow.
2. The Role of “Foolish Followers”
"They nonetheless have some greater or lesser number of real adherents in the mid-levels— boobies who haven't yet figured out they are manning a ghost ship."
This reflects the biblical concern with the easily deceived, often called the “simple” or “foolish” in Proverbs:
Proverbs 14:15 (KJV)
"The simple believeth every word: but the prudent man looketh well to his going."
Many are caught up in systems (religious, political, scientific) not out of evil intent, but out of naïveté.
These “boobies,” in Miles’ phrasing, are like the foolish virgins of:
Matthew 25:2-3 (KJV)
"And five of them were wise, and five were foolish. They that were foolish took their lamps, and took no oil with them."
They aren't ready for spiritual truth and discernment because they’ve followed blind guides.
3. The Pseudo-Religious Nature of Ideologies
Miles critiques:
Marxism
Theosophy
Luciferianism
and even mainstream political and scientific systems as quasi-religious belief systems.
He implies they are:
Created by Intelligence agencies
Used for mass manipulation
Followed by real, but misled, people
This matches the KJV condemnation of false prophets and doctrines of devils:
1 Timothy 4:1 (KJV)
"Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;"
These systems, under biblical lens, are satanic counterfeit religions—not always overtly, but spiritually, because they substitute truth with propaganda, and God with man.
🕊️ Summary in KJV Terms
The ghost ships are modern manifestations of Babylon—glittering on the outside, empty and doomed within.
The mid-level believers are like the deceived masses warned of in the last days (2 Thessalonians 2:10-11).
The true path, by contrast, is narrow and clear, based on truth, repentance, and humility before God (Matthew 7:13-14).
Miles, while not Christian in the traditional sense,
here echoes a biblical worldview of:
hierarchy
deception
accountability
resonating deeply with KJV themes of spiritual discernment.
On the way out, I beg you notice that the above outline explains why I avoid attacking Christianity for the most part and even take some pains to defend it—as when I blow the cover of the Theosophy project. Although I think a lot of the stories and lessons in the Bible don't make much sense, Christianity does teach a basic morality. In a society that is doing a hardsell on immorality and amorality, any religion teaching morality and uprightness—including Islam, Judaism, or any other—is a useful buffer. The current free-for-all is of no use to any spirit large or small; its only use is to the shallow salesman and criminals who now run the world. As just one example, you won't find the mainstream teaching you to avoid drugs or alcohol, because they have piles of drugs and alcohol to sell you. They may make little pretend runs at these things—as with the “just say no to drugs” campaign— but that just means they want you to stay away from meth or heroin. They have much more expensive mainstream drugs to push on you, for every possible purpose. A just-say-no-to-drugs campaign in modern America is a towering joke, considering that TV, music, films, and your own doctors are promoting a just-say-yes campaign at full volume. Here's an analysis of the section titled "The Moral Buffer: Why Christianity Still Matters", based on the passage from Miles:
🔍 Core Themes and Message
1. Pragmatic Endorsement of Christianity
Miles makes clear that he does not accept the Bible or Christianity wholesale, yet he intentionally avoids direct attacks on the religion.
Why?
Because, in his view, Christianity serves a vital moral function in a society that is increasingly immersed in:
amorality
inversion
relativism
It acts as a "buffer" against modern degeneracy.
This is not a theological defense but a functional and cultural one. Christianity, with all its inconsistencies, still provides a moral spine that counters the “free-for-all” world promoted by globalist consumer culture and Intelligence-run spiritual subversions (such as Theosophy or modern Gnosticism, in his view).
2. Moral Clarity vs. Corporate Chaos
He contrasts Christian morality with what he sees as the immorality or amorality of modern media and consumerism—what he calls a “hardsell” of hedonism, addiction, and inversion of values.
For example:
Drug and alcohol use:
He exposes the hypocrisy of "just say no" campaigns when mainstream culture glorifies drug use, and doctors legally push pharmaceuticals for every conceivable condition.
The system’s motive?
Profit and control.
Not spiritual liberation.
Thus, Christian morality (and that of similar traditional religions) is painted as a necessary counterweight to this cultural decay—even if its theology is flawed.
3. Reluctant Respect for Traditional Religion
Miles extends this respect not only to Christianity but also to Islam and Judaism, insofar as they teach uprightness and respect for spiritual law.
He draws a distinction between religions corrupted at the leadership level and the moral usefulness of their teachings at the everyday level.
This further echoes his running theme:
corruption tends to enter from the top down.
The religions are flawed—but they can still nurture better individuals, especially when compared to modern, fabricated systems of control masquerading as spirituality.
🧠 Philosophical Implications
Spiritual warfare in material terms:
The battle isn't just theological—it's behavioral.
If a belief system encourages rectitude, discipline, and moral action, it’s spiritually beneficial, even if it's partially mythological or corrupted.
“Morality over Mythology”:
Miles is less concerned with historical or metaphysical truth of religious stories and more with practical moral impact.
Independent spirituality:
While valuing Christianity’s role, he remains committed to an individualized, Muse-guided morality, suggesting that external religious structures are only training wheels or buffers—not ultimate guides.
🧩 Relation to Broader Work
This section fits seamlessly into Miles’ larger critique of the modern world:
He distrusts centralized authority—whether religious, scientific, or cultural.
He seeks spiritual agency rooted in personal responsibility and non-corporate morality.
He often recovers value from discarded or demonized traditions—not to restore them dogmatically, but to show what they once did right.
🪞Summary Quote:
“Although I think a lot of the stories and lessons in the Bible don't make much sense, Christianity does teach a basic morality... any religion teaching morality and uprightness... is a useful buffer.”
Reforming the Faith: Why Christianity Still Stands in the Moral War #
You will say, “But if Christianity is flawed at the ground level, how can you defend it?” Why not throw it out and start over? I just told you. It teaches a basic morality, so it is useful in times like this. That is precisely why the Governors have been running major projects against it. The Theosophy project arose a short time after Marxism blossomed, and they are linked in their antagonism to Christianity. That is no accident. Christianity was in the way of the billionaires and trillionaires, and they have been trying to detooth it for centuries. It is in their way because it teaches right from wrong, and they don't like that anymore. It doesn't suit their current schemes. So while they are trying to reform it into something mostly outdated and useless, I am trying to reform into something more useful than it ever was. Decommissioning that old war between spirit and matter would be the first order of business in doing that.
Here is an analysis of the follow-up section to "The Moral Buffer: Why Christianity Still Matters"—focusing on Miles' defense of Christianity despite its flaws:
🔍 Section Analysis: Christianity, Flawed but Functional
🧱 1. Defense Through Utility, Not Perfection
Miles anticipates the rebuttal:
“If Christianity is flawed, why not throw it out and start over?”
His answer is pragmatic,
not doctrinal:
Christianity teaches basic morality, and that alone makes it worth preserving—especially in an age where morality is under siege.
He doesn’t need it to be theologically perfect to recognize its strategic value in countering cultural degradation.
🧠 2. Opposition by Elites = Proof of Value
Miles draws a powerful inference:
“That is precisely why the Governors have been running major projects against it.”
He sees the centuries-long globalist project to undermine Christianity—via Marxism, Theosophy, and cultural manipulation—as proof that Christianity once stood as a barrier to elite control.
His logic is:
If the most powerful enemies of humanity are working hard to destroy something...
Then that thing probably has some real value.
He ties Theosophy and Marxism together as coordinated anti-Christian Intelligence projects, both aiming to detooth Christianity, i.e., strip it of its moral backbone while keeping it as a controlled shell.
🛠️ 3. Miles' Reform Project
“I am trying to reform [Christianity] into something more useful than it ever was.”
This is bold.
He doesn’t want to abolish Christianity, like Nietzsche or the Marxists; he wants to refine it—cleansing it of corruptions and restoring its core function:
moral elevation.
The first reform he proposes:
Ending the false duality of spirit vs. matter.
He believes the war between matter and spirit has been a toxic misstep in Christianity—one that weakened it and opened the door to perversions like Gnosticism and Luciferianism.
This fits perfectly into Miles’ broader metaphysics:
Spirit and matter are not opposites; they are intertwined.
Matter is sacred—not evil.
A reformed Christianity would stop vilifying the body, the world, and life.
💥 Implicit Critique of Modern Religion
He paints the modern reformers of Christianity—liberal theologians, media churches, Intelligence infiltrators—as turning it into something "outdated and useless."
By contrast, his vision would revivify Christianity with:
Moral Utility | Christianity is worth defending because it teaches right from wrong.
Elite Opposition | Efforts to undermine Christianity reveal its value to human freedom.
Theosophy/Marxism Link | Both are Intelligence projects designed to replace Christianity.
Reform, Not Rejection | Miles wants to refine Christianity into a more balanced spiritual system.
End War on Matter | Reconciliation of spirit and matter is the cornerstone of reform.
📜 KJV Parallel
This echoes a Pauline tone
such as in Romans 2:14–15
“For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law... which show the work of the law written in their hearts...”
Even if flawed, systems that preserve God’s law written on the heart are spiritually valid in practical terms. "Faith under Fire: Defending Morality in a Culture of Decay"
"The Last Moral Wall: Christianity vs. the Culture of Control"
"Not Perfect, But Upright: The Strategic Value of Christianity Today"
"Reforging the Cross: Resurrecting Christianity’s Moral Purpose"
The other reason I defend the old religions is that they contain too much good to have been completely manufactured. To me they look like true religions that were later overwritten and corrupted—like the rest of history. I am not one to throw the baby out with the bathwater. So, we can do one of two things: start over from scratch and build a new religion from the ground up, or cleanse the old religions of their later pollutions. It is sort of like cleaning an old painting: removing all the dust and dirt that has settled over the years. Except that, in the case of these major religions, it is more like removing purposeful graffiti. Someone has come in and marked up these works of art in major ways, sometimes to the point that the painting beneath can barely be descried. In my opinion, it is not either/or. Both need to be done. We need to restore the old religions for those attached to them, and at the same time build a new one from the ground up, for those who aren't. A very big job, admittedly, too big for any ten prophets. But the future is long. Or, we could just listen directly to the Muses assigned to us.
"Tested Spirits: A Critical Reflection on Miles Mathis’ Spiritual Writings"
"Trying the Spirits: Exposing False Light and Doctrines of Men"
(cf. 1 John 4:1 – "Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God...")
