Noah’s Ark and the Judgment of God: A Scriptural Rebuttal to Secular Mockery

Rick Last updated 
Rick
image.png Download

BY VCG @ LOR ON 12/15/2025


“As in the Days of Noah: Defending God’s Word Against the Scoffers”

“By Faith Noah: The Ark, the Flood, and the Foolishness of the Wise”

“Let God Be True: A Biblical Answer to Bill Nye’s Attack on Noah’s Ark”

Sola Deo Gloria!

I found the video you shared and what it’s about so we can break it down together for thoughtful analysis.

During a debate with Creationist Ken Ham at the Creation Museum in Kentucky.


📌 What This Video Is

The YouTube video titled “Bill Nye Destroys Noah’s Ark” appears to be a secular critique of the biblical account of Noah’s Flood, specifically focused on scientific arguments against a literal global flood and the feasibility of Noah’s Ark.

It is typically circulated by skeptics or critics of biblical literalism and creationism.

According to descriptions and community discussions:

It presents arguments claiming the Noah’s Ark story in Genesis is “mythical” or scientifically impossible.

Discussions around the video often bring up common secular objections such as logistics of housing all animals, transporter issues, and geological/evidential arguments.

Noah's Ark deserves just as much ridicule as the flat earth conspiracy. : r/exchristian

🧠
How to Break It Down Biblically and Logically

As Library of Rickandria, let’s examine this from Scripture and sound reasoning, anchored in the authority of God’s Word.

1. The Bible Does Present the Flood as Historical

Scripture clearly treats Noah’s Flood as a real,

historical event:

Genesis 7:17–19 (KJV)

And the flood was forty days upon the earth; and the waters increased… and the waters prevailed upon the earth.

And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills that were under the whole heaven were covered.

The text factually reports the event without mythic framing — as real history from the voice of Holy Scripture.

2. Scientific Arguments Don’t Nullify God’s Acts

The video likely frames its challenge around scientific feasibility:

Could a boat of that size be built?

Could all animals fit?

Is there enough water to cover all mountains?

These objections assume scientific naturalism, but the biblical narrative includes active supernatural intervention — God provided the waters and caused them to rise (Genesis 7:11, 17).

Scripture does not state the Flood was a purely natural phenomenon bound by current observable conditions.

Genesis 7:21–23 (KJV)

And all flesh died that moved upon the earth… only Noah and they that were with him in the ark remained alive.

The means are not bound to present scientific parameters when Scripture affirms God supernaturally acted in judgment and preservation.

3. Faith and Evidence

Belief in Noah’s Flood isn’t blind.

It rests on the authority of Scripture and the testimony of the One who created the heavens and the earth:

Hebrews 11:7 (KJV)

By faith Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear… prepared an ark to the saving of his house.

Noah’s obedience before empirical evidence was visible is held up as an example of faith — not credulity.

4. Addressing Common Objections

Often secular critiques fail to account for:

“Kinds” vs. species:

Biblical “kinds” may be broader than modern species.

Supernatural provision:

God provided what was needed — water and space.

Purpose of the account:

Genesis is theological and historical, not merely a scientific manual.

Such debates should be engaged redemptively, pointing to Christ’s lordship over history — not merely refuting a point with another theory.

🧿 Biblical Response vs Secular Mockery

When engaging such material:

Do not dismiss Scripture based on worldly arguments.

Do not accept atheistic paradigms as default evaluators of truth.

Affirm God’s sovereignty and Christ’s fulfillment of redemptive history.

Psalm 19:1 (KJV)

The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.

The world and Scripture both testify — but Scripture interprets the world, not the other way around.

📌 Summary for Your Breakdown

If you want to break down the video:

Play the video segment → identify the claim (e.g., Ark size, water volume).

Quote Scripture that speaks to God’s power and historical Truth.

Show why a supernatural event cannot be dismissed by naturalistic standards.

End with the central truth:

God judges the world in righteousness (Acts 17:31)

🔥 "Professing Themselves to Be Wise..."


Romans 1:22 (KJV)

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.

Bill Nye’s approach is not a neutral analysis — it is an assault on the testimony of Scripture.

He elevates naturalistic assumptions above the supernatural power and revelation of God.

But the Word of the Lord is sure, and no amount of mockery can undo it.

📜 1. "A Worldwide Flood That Influenced Everything"

This is not just Mr. Hamm's view —

it is God's:

Genesis 6:17 (KJV)

And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh...

2 Peter 3:5–6 (KJV)

The world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished.

Examining the Authorship of 1 & 2 Peter: Apostolic Truth or Literary Divergence? – Library of Rickandria

The global flood is not just a story — it is a divine judgment on sin, preserved by inspiration.

🧱
2. "A 500 Foot Wooden Boat..."

Nye claims such a feat is unreasonable.

Yet what is impossible for man is not for God.

Genesis 6:14–16 (KJV) gives exact blueprints:

Make thee an ark of gopher wood... the length of the ark shall be three hundred cubits...

Noah didn’t build by trial and error — he built by command.

God sustained the Ark, just as He sustained Israel in the wilderness — not by man’s wisdom, but by His own might.

🦘
3. "Where Are the Kangaroo Fossils?"

This argument falsely assumes:

  • Uniformitarian natural history is true
  • Fossilization is guaranteed
  • No supernatural guidance occurred

God commanded the animals to come (Genesis 6:20), and preserved them for His purpose.

The Bible does not say kangaroos had to die on the way to Australia.

Fossil distribution is selective, and fossil absence is not disproof.

🌍
4. "No Evidence of a Land Bridge?"

If the waters of the deep were opened and then receded (Genesis 8:3), this would include massive geological changes, tectonics, and the rising and falling of land masses.

The continents were likely connected during the Ice Age, which followed the Flood.

Bill Nye's standard is faulty —

he demands natural evidence for a supernatural act, but the Word tells us:

Hebrews 11:3 (KJV)

Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God...

🪵 5. "Wooden Ships Couldn’t Be Built That Big"

Bill Nye references the Wyoming, a failed wooden ship.

But Noah’s Ark:

Was not a sailing ship — it needed no propulsion, only flotation.

Had internal structural divisions (Genesis 6:14 mentions "rooms") to reinforce it.

Was not built by “unskilled” men — Noah was chosen by God, and received divine instruction.

Even more, the Lord Himself preserved the Ark:

Genesis 7:16 (KJV)

And the LORD shut him in.

👑 6. "Is That Reasonable?"

Not to the carnal mind.

1 Corinthians 2:14 (KJV)

But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God...

Bill Nye does not see reason because he rejects revelation.

Reason is made captive to God’s truth — not the other way around.

⚔️ Final Rebuke and Call

Psalm 14:1 (KJV)

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.

Yet even Bill Nye can repent. God is long-suffering:

2 Peter 3:9 (KJV)

Not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.