This is the origin story they never wanted you to hear.

In this explosive multi-part documentary, we uncover the suppressed, censored, and outright forbidden truths about the biblical origins of the white race—a narrative backed by:

and archaeological anomalies that institutions have spent generations trying to bury.

this film fearlessly explores what:

have hidden in plain sight.

What if the European peoples of today are not a historical accident—but part of a divine plan, descended from Noah’s line, tasked with a forgotten spiritual legacy?

What if giants, angelic bloodlines, and ancient cataclysms weren’t myths—but suppressed history?

What if the CIA’s own archives point to this hidden knowledge?

We piece together:

• The Book of Noah and why it was banned
• The real meaning behind Adam’s name and the "ruddy" complexion
• The CIA's censorship of "The Adam and Eve Story"
• How Japheth’s line founded Indo-European civilizations, as prophesied
• The theory that Anglo-Saxons and Celts are literal Israelites
• Mysterious giant skeletons and red-haired mummies erased from museums
• Suppressed biblical archaeology pointing to a forgotten lineage

This isn't about supremacy—it’s about identity, suppressed history, and the war on memory. 

Whether you agree or not, the implications are massive.

Where do you come from?

And why has the truth been so fiercely silenced?

Step into the most forbidden chapter of biblical history—and prepare to see the world in a way you never have before.

A Forbidden Origin Story.

It begins with a secret ripped straight out of ancient scrolls and hidden archives.

A secret so controversial that authorities, both religious and secular, have buried it for centuries.

I'm talking about the true origin of the white race as revealed by the Bible and texts banned from it.

This isn't the sanitized Sunday school tale you learned.

This is a dangerous expose, the kind that can upend our understanding of history and send shivers down the spine of the establishment.

It's the kind of truth that gets whistleblowers silenced, but not today.

Today we're blowing the lid off.

No fluff, no apologies, just the raw, unfiltered truth.

Picture an ancient manuscript, long excluded from the Bible, in which a baby is born with a startling appearance, his body was white as snow, the hair of his head white as wool, and when he opened his eyes, the whole house lit up like the sun.

This isn't fantasy, it's a passage from the book of Enoch's Lost Book of Noah, describing the birth of Noah himself.

The Book of Enoch – Library of Rickandria

Yes, Noah, the hero of the flood.

According to this suppressed text, the savior of humanity was born, unmistakably white.

His father Lamech was so disturbed by the baby's strange, shining appearance that he fled in fear, saying,

Stop and let that sink in to an ancient patriarch described with snow-white skin and angelic lineage.

It's a detail you never heard in church, because it was kept out of the canonical Bible.

Ask yourself why.

What did the ancients know about the origins of a fair-skinned people that later authorities didn't want you to consider?

Clues are scattered everywhere if you know where to look.

Even the very name of the first man, Adam, hides a secret in plain sight.

Lucifer’s Flood & the Little Season: Adam – Library of Rickandria

In Hebrew, Adam is linked to a word meaning to show blood in the face, in other words, to blush or flush red.

Only a person with light, rosy complexion can visibly blush.

Was the Bible's first human perhaps envisioned as ruddy and fair?

It's a question that rips open conventional assumptions.

Meanwhile, mainstream science feeds us a tidy narrative.

Modern humans emerged in Africa, everyone was dark-skinned, and white skin is a fluke of evolution.

But behind closed doors, even government agencies have sniffed out something more.

Did you know the CIA once classified a book about Adam and Eve's story?

"This book and others with similar theories put history in perspective and help make sense of things that some tend to attribute (wrongly) to aliens. What we learned in school and even graduate school are better explained here. Slow geological change over long periods of time is true, but so is rapid change in very short periods of time. For example, we are told that the Grand Canyon was carved out over millions of years, but how does that explain that the canyon is over a mile wide in some places? It is far more likely that most of the canyon was ripped out in days or weeks by tremendous forces that we have yet to comprehend."

The CIA pdf online version used to be secret.

A censored version is available online.

The Adam And Eve Story: The History Of Cataclysms (Full Version Uncensored) : Chan Thomas : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

In 1965, an engineer named Chan Thomas wrote the Adam and Eve story, blending science and ancient records, and the CIA promptly suppressed it for decades.

Why would an intelligence agency bury a book about human origins and catastrophes?

Perhaps because it flirted with truths too explosive for public consumption, truths about: 

If that sounds far-fetched, consider this, the cataclysm most famously described in the Bible is Noah's flood.

And the lone family chosen to survive it, Noah's family, is described in forbidden texts in a way that hints they were different.

Very different.

In this documentary, we will peel back layer after layer of deception and half-truths.

We'll uncover how:

all point to an origin story for the white peoples that you were never taught.

A story of:

and modern cover-ups.

We'll dive into the apocryphal writings that the early church hid away, texts that speak of giants in the earth and children of angels, lending context to why a baby like Noah might have been born looking like a being of light.

Giants in the Bible – Library of Rickandria

We'll examine how after Noah, an entire branch of humanity, the branch that would become the Indo-European or white nations, was set apart with a specific destiny as recorded in scripture itself.

We will see how the establishment, from the Smithsonian Institution to Modern Academia, has allegedly swept evidence under the rug, from giant skeletons dug up in American cornfields to mysterious Caucasian mummies in distant deserts.

And perhaps most shockingly, we'll follow the trail of the ten lost tribes of Israel, yes, those missing Israelites from the Bible, and the explosive theory that their descendants are not who you think.

The Lost Tribes of Israel – Library of Rickandria

Hint, they're not in the Middle East anymore.

Middle East Exopolitical Saga – Library of Rickandria

By the end of this journey, one thing will become chillingly clear, the history of the white race is entwined with the Bible's deepest secrets, secrets that were buried, ridiculed, or declared heretical to keep you in the dark.

If you're white, this is your story that was stolen from you, and if you're not, this is the story that powerful people never wanted anyone to piece together.

Why?

Because it challenges the entire narrative of human history and identity.

It threatens those who profit from division and ignorance.

This is not about supremacy or guilt, it's about truth, identity, and an ancient legacy finally coming to light.

Steal yourself, because each part of this expose will reveal a new shock, a new piece of the puzzle, backed by evidence from texts and records that do exist.

No conjecture without documentation.

You're going to confront the controversial head on, like a detective unearthing a cold case.

The central idea you must grasp is this, the Bible, when read with all its adjunct texts and supported by suppressed historical evidence, tells a very different story about where white people come from.

It suggests a lineage touched by the divine, preserved through cataclysm, guided by prophecy, and hidden in plain sight throughout history.

If that's true, it means everything you think you know about:

and the powers that might be built on a lie of omission.

Stay with us and remember, nothing is more dangerous than a truth that makes the powerful uncomfortable.

We're about to deliver that truth boldly and directly.

Are you ready to question reality?

Then take a deep breath and let's step into the first layer of this mystery, going back to the dawn of the post flood world, when an unearthly child became the progenitor of nations and perhaps the first forefather of the people, we now call white.

Part two, Albino Noah and the angels, the flood's hidden legacy.

Let's rewind to a time before recorded history, a world wiped clean by water, a reboot of humanity under stormy skies.

We all know the story, or we think we do.

Noah, a righteous man, blameless in his generation,

Sunday schools portray Noah as a kindly old Middle Eastern man with a beard.

But declassified ancient texts paint a starkly different image, one so shocking that it was expunged from official doctrine.

In these records, Noah himself appears as a miraculous anomaly, a child seemingly born of another world.

We introduced it in the opening, the fragment of the Book of Noah, a text preserved in the apocryphal Book of Enoch, gives a jaw dropping account of Noah's birth.

His skin is white as snow, his hair white like wool, and his eyes so bright that when he opens them, it's like the sun has risen indoors.

The newborn even speaks, praising God right out of the womb.

Imagine being Noah's father, Lamech, everyone around you has the typical human hue, and suddenly you're holding what looks like a glowing, alabaster child.

Lamech is so spooked that he runs to his own father, Methuselah, and says I have begotten a strange son, not like a man, but resembling the sons of the God of heaven, it seems his not from me, but from the angels.

Let that register, Noah was suspected to be of angelic parentage.

This isn't a sci-fi screenplay, it's literally written in an ancient text that was considered authoritative by many Jewish sects before being excluded from the Bible canon.

The early church and rabbinical authorities decided you shouldn't read this.

Ask yourself why.

Noah was the bottleneck of humanity, according to the Bible, everyone after the flood descends from him and his family.

If Noah had such extraordinary traits, almost a supernatural aura, what does that imply about the lineage coming through him?

Could it be hinting at the origin of a distinct branch of humanity?

One that carried a lighter complexion and perhaps other qualities attributed to the sons of God, a biblical term for angels?

It's a provocative thought, to say the least.

Now, the Book of Enoch, from which Noah's birth story comes, goes further, providing context. 

It describes how, in the generations before the flood, heavenly beings, angels, came to earth and intermingled with human women, producing hybrid offspring known as the Nephilim Giants of old.

This narrative, briefly hinted at in Genesis 6 verse 4, was elaborated in texts like Enoch and became a sort of forbidden knowledge.

If Noah's appearance made his father suspect some angelic involvement, one theory is that Noah's mother could have had some lineage from these angelic beings.

In other words, Noah might have been a genetic reset, a chosen vessel who was pure enough to survive the flood yet carrying a spark of something extra human to guide post-flood humanity.

Indeed, Enoch reassures Methuselah that Noah is his son, not a cuckoo's egg from a fallen angel, but also that God planned something new here.

Enoch basically says, yes, angels did sin and create giants, and those giants will be wiped out by the flood.

But this boy Noah is special, chosen to survive and continue mankind.

Special how?

The text implies Noah's striking whiteness and radiant eyes are signs of divine favor or purpose, not a curse.

Consider the symbolism, white as snow, light bringing eyes, these are usually markers of purity or holiness in biblical language.

Noah, in this hidden account, is like a beacon in a dark world, literally shining.

It's as if the torch of humanity was relit in Noah with a new flame.

Could this be the earliest reference to the branch of humanity that would later be characterized by lighter skin?

It's speculative, but when an ancient manuscript explicitly gives the progenitor of all post-flood humans a unique appearance, that's a clue we can't ignore.

Mainstream historians will tell you, oh, that's just a myth, maybe Noah was an albino, who knows, not important.

Not important?

The only family to survive global destruction is described in fantastical terms, and we shrug it off.

No, we dig deeper.

Some researchers have posited that this detail of Noah's appearance indicates a genetic divergence.

Maybe he was what science today would call an albino, a mutation causing lack of pigment. 

But if so, how coincidental that this mutation appears just in time to be preserved on the ark? 

Others suggest a more esoteric idea, Noah's lineage, tracing back to Adam via Seth, was kept pure from the contamination of those fallen angels, and the whiteness symbolizes that purity. 

However, Lamech's shock and his words not like us, suggest a physical difference beyond just moral purity.

It sounds like nobody had seen a baby like this before.

This brings us to an uncomfortable possibility, what if the very concept of different racial appearances has roots in this ancient time?

According to some interpretations, before the flood, humanity might have been more homogeneous.

If the story of Noah implies the first emergence of a fair complexioned line, it could mean that after the flood, Noah's descendants carried this trait forward.

Remember, Noah had three sons,

All the peoples of the world ostensibly spring from these three.

Many traditions hold that Shem's line became the Semitic peoples, Middle Eastern, etc.

Ham's line became the African and some South Asian peoples, and Japheth's line became the Indo-Europeans, the White or Caucasian peoples.

If Noah himself bore a unique appearance, it's natural to ask, which of his sons inherited it? 

There's no explicit answer in canonical scripture about their looks, but we do have clues.

One clue lies in the meanings of their names and later legends.

Hamg in Hebrew sounds like a word for hot or burnt, often linked to darker pigmentation, indeed ham is traditionally the ancestor of Africans, a counterpart to Noah's paleness.

Japheth, on the other hand, is associated with expansion and sometimes interpreted as beauty. 

Interestingly, some ancient commentaries, like those of Jewish sages, suggested that Japheth's descendants were fair.

A medieval legend asserts that Noah gave each son a blessing suited to their fate, Shem's kids would have religious wisdom, Ham's would serve, a twisted rationale was later used to justify slavery, and Japheth's would inherit the breadth of the world and physical beauty.

Could this be a distant echo that Japheth inherited Noah's striking angelic looks?

We can't say for sure from Noah's story alone, but hold that thought, because in the next parts we'll trace Japheth's line and see what became of it.

Spoiler, it leads directly to the white nations of historical record, and there are prophecies involved that will make your hair stand on end.

But before we leave Noah's immediate story, consider the bigger picture, the Bible's earliest chapters mingle the human and the divine in uncanny ways.

Adam is made in God's image, then corrupt angels mess with humanity, then a flood resets things with a possibly half angelic looking Noah at the helm.

It's almost as if the narrative is saying,

Now, imagine you are part of the power structure in later millennia.

You see the rise of nation-states, of empires, of various races and creeds.

And you have these ancient writings that suggest one particular branch of humanity had an unusual genesis or a divine favor from the very start.

If you wanted to promote a simplistic story that we're all the same, nothing special about any group's origin or conversely to villainize one group as less than human, you definitely want to control knowledge like this.

The truth is often inconvenient; it doesn't fit political agendas or established paradigms.

So, texts like Enoch are labeled heresy, the public is told,

Only in recent times, with translations of the Dead Sea Scrolls, did we fully confirm these accounts existed in antiquity, not just medieval fantasies.

DEAD SEA SCROLLS – Library of Rickandria

It's real, it's on record, and it should make you reevaluate what else was left on the cutting room floor of history.

As we proceed, keep Noah's white radiance in mind.

It may very well be the spark that ignited a lineage distinct in appearance and perhaps destiny.

From Noah flows the blood of all future tribes and nations, yet not all are the same.

In the coming section, we'll follow the thread of Noah's son Japheth, traditionally the progenitor of the Isles of the Gentiles, the ancestors of European peoples.

We'll see how ancient chroniclers, including the famous historian Josephus, explicitly connected Japheth's bloodline to the early European tribes.

And we'll discover a prophecy by Noah himself that foretold how Japheth's descendants would spread and thrive, a prophecy that has played out over thousands of years in ways too accurate to be coincidence.

Buckle up, because the story of Japheth is the story of how the white nations came to be and it was written in the stars and in the scripture long before modern history acknowledged it.

Part 3, Japheth's Destiny, Prophecy and the Spread of the White Nations.

The Ark has landed.

Humanity 2.0 begins with Noah's three sons stepping onto a cleansed earth.

Here is where the Bible's genealogy becomes our roadmap.

The Book of Genesis, Chapter 10, often called the Table of Nations, lists the descendants of:

Its dry reading on the surface, just a list of begats, but within it lies a genetic map of the world's peoples as understood by ancient tradition.

Zoom in on Japheth, Noah's son often mentioned last but far from least. Genesis 10 verse 5 casually notes,

In plain terms, Japheth's offspring scattered into the coastlands and distant north, basically the areas we now know as Europe and adjacent parts of Asia.

In one terse line, the Bible claims Japheth as the father of the Gentile, non-Semitic "nations."

Ancient historians confirm this with striking specificity.

Flavius Josephus, a first century Jewish-Roman scholar, spelled out the connections for his readers.

He listed Japheth's seven sons and identified which peoples they became.

Goma founded those whom the Greeks now call Galatians, Gauls
Magog founded the Magagites, now called Scythians
Hardai became the Medeans, Medes
Jovan fathered Ionia, the Greeks
Tubal the Thobolites, Iberians of the Caucasus
Mesic the Cappadocians
Tiras became Thracians

Josephus further says Japheth's progeny occupied lands from the mountains Taurus and Amanus, Turkey along Asia as far as the River Tanais, Don River in Russia, and along Europe to Coddis, Spain naming nations after themselves.

Think about that by Josephus' account.

Every major branch of Indo-European stock from the Medes and Persians to the Greeks and Romans to the tribes of Europe ultimately traced back to Japheth's line.

The implication?

White Europeans and their kin like Persians and Scythians are literally the Japhethites of the Bible.

This wasn't a fringe idea, it was basically common knowledge in the classical world.

Now here's where it gets spine-tingling.

The Bible doesn't just list Japheth's descendants, it also records Noah's prophetic words about his son's futures.

In Genesis 9, after the flood, Noah pronounces a strange prophecy,

Let's unpack that.

The key verb is "enlarge" in Hebrew, "yoft" a play on Japheth's own name.

It means to expand, to make wide.

Noah foresaw Japheth's line expanding greatly in population and territory.

Is that true?

Fast forward to history, who came to dominate the widest expanse of the world?

The peoples of Europe and their descendants, who by the 19th and 20th centuries controlled the Americas, Australia, vast tracts of Asia and Africa.

European colonial powers literally enlarged Japheth's borders to the ends of the earth, fulfilling this ancient saying in a way Noah couldn't have imagined.

By contrast, Ham's descendants, Canaanites, Egyptians, etc. rose early but later many fell under subjugation.

Shem's line, Semitic peoples like the Jews and Arabs, retained the spiritual leadership, from them came the Bible, prophets, Christ, which might be what

refers to, Japheth would come to share in Shem's blessings, perhaps by adopting the religion of Shem, think, Europe adopting Christianity, a faith that came from Semitic Judea.

But on a worldly plane, Japheth's children would multiply, explore and conquer.

Even theologians of prior centuries noticed the uncanny accuracy.

In the 1800s, one commentator remarked that God's enlargement of Japheth was fulfilled by the spread of the European nations, Greek, Roman and beyond, who subdued the once mighty Hamite powers, Egypt, Babylon.

By around 500 BC, Ham's empires had indeed fallen, Egypt and Babylon were subjugated by Persians, from Shem, and then by Greeks and Romans, Japheth.

From then on, White European powers held sway for millennia in one form or another.

The scramble for Africa, the British Raj in India, the age of discovery, it's as if one can hear Noah's ancient words echoing,

This was no moral endorsement of everything those nations did, but a statement of fact they would have the upper hand.

It's sobering to realize the Bible embedded this trajectory in a one-liner that aged like fine wine over 4,000 years.

Now, connect the dots from Noah to Japheth to modern Europeans.

If Noah's extraordinary angelic trait, the luminous whiteness, was passed on, Japheth's line is a prime suspect.

Many art depictions even anecdotally show Japheth and his offspring as fairer, Shem's as medium, Ham's as darker, reflecting the old understanding.

More concretely, consider the term Caucasian.

It's used today for white people.

Why?

Because early anthropologists traced Europeans back to the Caucasus Mountains, precisely the region where Japheth's son Tubal and grandson Ascanas were said to settle.

The word Caucasian comes from Mount Caff in the Caucasus, which legend held as the origin of humanity after the flood.

In essence, science inadvertently nodded to Japheth's geography by labeling whites Caucasian.

Coincidence, or a buried memory of where Noah's clan dispersed.

Here's another kicker, language.

The Indo-European languages, which include:

etc., all descend from a common source, like branches of a tree.

Scholars believe that original tongue was spoken by a people living maybe around the Black Sea or Caucasus region not long after the flood time frame.

The Bible would identify those people as Japheth's children.

So not only blood, but language flows down from that post-flood family.

If you speak a European language today, you're using a tongue that likely originated in Japheth's clan's travels.

It all comes back to the beginning.

Would be remiss not to address an uncomfortable chapter.

These biblical ideas about race were twisted in the past by colonialists and supremacists.

They pointed to Noah's curse on Ham,

and the blessing of Japheth to justify subjugation of Africans by Europeans.

---

The curse is actually placed on Canaan, since Ham had been blessed already.

---

Let's be clear, we are exposing facts and interpretations, not condoning the evils of slavery or racism.

Noah's prophecy was descriptive, not prescriptive, it foresaw dynamics that would play out due to human choices and divine allowance, not necessarily moral approval.

But one cannot deny that many in history believed Europe's dominance was the hand of God fulfilling these ancient words.

This was positive if you were of Japheth's line, it meant you were destined to flourish and inherit wide domains.

In a sense, that can be uplifting, the idea that your forefathers were playing a role written in sacred history, not just random chance.

It instills a sense of purpose or at least place in the grand scheme.

Now consider how modern secular narrative absolutely hates this idea
 
The very mention of a destiny-off divine plan for a particular lineage is anathema to the contemporary view that everything is a social construct or happenstance.

If the masses believed that the rise of Western civilization was foretold in scripture, they might begin to view current events, even declines or conflicts, in a prophetic light.

They might reclaim a sense of collective identity rooted in the Bible rather than in modern ideology.

That's dangerous to certain agendas.

That's why you seldom, if ever, hear about Noah's prophecy in school.

It's effectively censored from public discourse, dismissed as archaic.

But folks in power certainly know history followed those lines, even if they publicly attributed all to guns, germs and steel.

Let's add another layer, the positive blessings given to Japheth's line aren't just material. 

There's a lesser-known thread,

Some interpret that as Japheth, European Gentiles coming to share in the spiritual heritage of Shem, the Semitic Jews.

Is that not exactly what happened with Christianity?

A Semitic faith embraced by Greco-Roman, Japhethite, whirled, becoming a European cornerstone.

The New Testament even has Paul referring to Gentiles being grafted in it to the olive tree of Israel.

In the Land of Zion – Library of Rickandria

In other words, the descendants of Japheth were to eventually unite with the legacy of Shem's line, which indeed occurred as Europe became the champion of Judeo-Christian religion.

This suggests a special role.

Japheth's kids become numerous and powerful, and through faith, they also become custodians of God's tents, his teachings and presence alongside Semitic believers.

If one believes in providence, that's a hefty mission to live up to.

So, ask yourself, why aren't these biblical connections common knowledge?

Why, instead, is any talk of biblical lineage of the white race immediately branded fringe or racist?

Perhaps because it gives a certain pride and cohesion that globalist modern society doesn't want any group to have, particularly groups that have historically been dominant.

If you instill guilt or rootlessness instead, people are easier to manipulate.

But knowledge is neutral, it's what you do with it that counts.

Here we are shining light on knowledge hidden in shadow.

If you are of European descent, Japheth's line, take this not as fuel for arrogance, but as an awakening to a deeper heritage.

Your ancestor's story didn't start in caves 10,000 years ago, it started on the slopes of Ararat, in the family of Noah, under a covenant with God.

By now, the pieces are fitting together, Noah's unique whiteness passes into Japheth's expanding minds, which then correspond uncannily to the white nations of history, just as prophesied.

But there's an even more astounding chapter to this saga, one that brings the story from ancient times into the relatively modern era.

What if I told you that a significant number of people, including scholars, clergy, even royalty have believed that the Anglo-Saxon and Kindred peoples are directly descended from the ten lost tribes of Israel?

Yes, that old chestnut, but it's not a crackpot idea scribbled on a forum, it was a widespread belief with books, organizations, even political implications.

This theory, called British Israelism or Anglo-Israelism, takes everything we just discussed one step further, it suggests that the line of Japheth intermingled with the line of Shem, the Israelites, in ancient times, and that today's white Christian nations are literally the Israel of the Bible, heirs to the covenant promises.

It's a bold claim, one that could completely redefine how white people see themselves in God's plan, making them not mere Gentiles, but chosen people.

And it was seriously considered by many in the 19th and early 20th century, only to be later suppressed and mocked.

In our next part, we'll uncover the shocking evidence and motivations behind this movement and the real-world historical clues that give it momentum.

Prepare, because if you thought what we've covered so far rattled the cage, this next revelation will blow the doors off.

Part four lost tribes and found identities, Israel's hidden Europeans.

What if the line between Shem and Japheth isn't as clear cut as we think?

What if, in the great wanderings of ancient peoples, the blood of Israel, the very nation of the Old Testament, flowed into the veins of what we now call the white Western world?

This is the explosive proposition of British Israelism, a movement that once captured the imagination of nobles and laymen alike, the idea that the 10 lost tribes of Israel, the northern kingdom that vanished from biblical history after 721 BC, did not vanish at all, but migrated into Europe, becoming the ancestors of the:

and related peoples. In other words, that the white Protestant peoples of northern Europe are literally the Israelites of old.

This is not white supremacist rhetoric in the neo-Nazi sense.

Miles Williams Mathis: Hitler & Top Nazi Genealogy – THEY WERE JEWS! – Library of Rickandria

It's a theological and historical detective story that once had serious adherents, including clergy and even members of the British royal family.

It's controversial now, largely because if true, it grants a profound birthright to certain nations, and nobody likes upending the accepted narrative that the lost tribes are, well, lost or irrelevant.

Let's lay out the evidence and claims these folks brought forth because it's nothing short of mind-blowing.

Firstly, historical migrations, after Assyria conquered the kingdom of Israel, the 10 tribes were exiled.

Scripture and apocryphal texts, like 2 Esdras 13 colon 40 dash 45, hint they traveled to a far country.

British Israel scholars in the 19th century proposed that by around the 5th century BC, these tribes had moved through the Caucasus region into Europe.

They point out that some peoples appearing in records around that time, like the Saky or Scythians, bear names reminiscent of Phisac.

In fact, one favorite theory notes that the word Saxon can be seen as Sakes son, meaning sons of Isaac.

This isn't linguistic sleight of hand.

Proponents like Reverend Edward Hine and others explicitly argued Saxon equals Isaac's sons, dropping the "vi", which isn't hard to imagine in language shifts.

And wouldn't you know, God told Abraham in Isaac,

Thus, they claim, the Israelites in exile might well have called themselves after Isaac,

"Dysak's sons equals Saxons".

It's almost too poetic, yet strangely plausible when you see that the ancient Persian name for the Scythians was Sakae, sounds like Sake.

Many Sakae Scythians migrated westward over centuries, and some became the Germanic Saxons who eventually settled England.

Then there's the word, British.

In Hebrew, Berith means covenant, Anish means man. British literally can be constructed as "covenant man" in Hebrew.

The British Israel writers loved this.

They said,

Sure, linguists might call it a coincidence. British comes from an ancient Celtic word, Britanni, they'll say.

But once you see it, you can't unsee it,

Coincidence or providence?

They believed the latter.

And here's where it gets even more interesting, the United States and the British Commonwealth, the dominant powers of the 19th and 20th centuries, were said to correspond to the tribes of Manasseh and Ephraim, the two sons of Joseph who received Jacob's greatest blessings.

Genesis 48 records Jacob, Israel, prophesying that Manasseh will become a great single nation and Ephraim a multitude, company of nations.

British Israelites identify America as Manasseh her one great nation and Britain as Ephraim, a company of nations, i.e. the UK and the Commonwealth.

Astoundingly, they made this claim before the US and Britain rose to their peak.

Herbert Armstrong, one famous proponent, was writing in the mid-20th century seeing it fulfilled with Britain's empire and America's might.

They consider it the continuation of the birthright blessings that Jacob passed to Joseph's line, recorded in 1 Chronicles 5 verses 1 to 2.

In their view, the wealth, power, and expansive success of the Anglo-American sphere were not accidents of history, but the promised blessings to Israel's lost tribes finally realized at the end of the age.

Lest you think this was a marginal idea, by the early 20th century, British Israelism had hundreds of thousands of adherents and sympathizers.

It wasn't preached in every church, but it reached high places.

There were British Israel associations throughout:

Notably, many early Zionists and statesmen were aware of it.

Even today, you'll find that the British royal family keeps a ceremonial stone, the Stone of Scone, which British Israel law says is Jacob's pillow stone from the Bible, brought to Ireland by a princess from Judah and used in coronations.

Crazy?

The stone does exist and has been used in coronations for centuries.

The legend of Tetefe, said daughter of King Zedekiah of Judah, traveling to Ireland and marrying into local royalty, bringing the stone, was taken quite seriously in those circles.

If true, it means the royal line of David continued in Britain, fulfilling God's promise that David's line would rule someplace until the end of time.

This would make British monarchs direct descendants of the House of David.

The House of David – Library of Rickandria

Once you see how much of this ties together, you understand why authorities might want it suppressed.

It validates the monarchy and the divine right in a way that democratic, secular societies find inconvenient and it also gives white Western peoples a biblical identity, Israelite, that complicates the narrative where Jews alone are Israel.

WHO ARE THE MODERN JEWS? – Library of Rickandria

And indeed, pushback came.

After World War II, and especially in recent decades, British Israelism was branded pseudo history and quietly shunted to the extremist fringe.

Miles Williams Mathis: More WWII Fakes – Library of Rickandria

Scholars pointed out inconsistencies or lack of genetic proof.

The mainstream churches, both Protestant and Catholic, rejected it as it challenges their replacement theology or their interpretations.

Over time, the once bold idea was relegated to small Christian identity groups, some of whom unfortunately mixed it with racist ideologies.

That tarnished it further.

Today, if you mention it, many will roll eyes as if you said the earth is flat.

But look at the hard facts.

The migrations happened.

There were in fact massive movements of people from the Near East into Europe in antiquity. 

Think of the Cimmerians, Scythians, etc., many of whom could have included Israelite deportees.

The linguistic hints are real, Saxons echoing Isaac's sons, Danish possibly echoing Dan's sons, the tribe of Dan, and we already saw the British.

The cultural coincidences, for example, some Celtic legends bizarrely mirror Old Testament motifs, and ancient Irish chronicles claim descent from a figure named Ieber sounds like Hebrew "ivri" meaning Hebrew.

Even the name Britain might conceal a Britannia, could that be from Britarm, covenant of the people, or something?

The pieces enthralled many learned men who weren't fools.

They saw the hand of God in history.

For white people hearing this, the emotional impact is immense.

It says

That's uplifting to the max if believed not to lord over others, but in the sense of identity and purpose.

It means the Bible is talking about your ancestors in more than just a peripheral way.

It can bestow a sense of brotherhood, e.g. why did Americans and Brits historically feel a kinship?

British Israelism would say because they're literally brothers, Manasseh and Ephraim.

It could even reframe racial tensions, e.g. seeing the Jewish people not as outsiders but as distant cousins from Judah, reuniting with Joseph's lost sons, Anglo-Saxons, that's a positive reconciliation narrative, ironically.

WHO ARE THE JEWS? – Library of Rickandria

But those in power possibly fear it could also fuel a sense of manifest destiny or exclusivity.

One doesn't have to swallow every claim wholesale.

But ask yourself, why did this topic go from prominent to practically taboo?

It's not because it was disproven by some definitive evidence.

In fact, modern genetics have thrown some curveballs.

There have been genetic links found between some Western Europeans and Middle Easterners, but the science is young.

The idea primarily fell out of favor due to political correctness and the horrors of Nazi racism causing anything involving ethnic chosenness to be shunned.

Miles Williams Mathis: The BEER HALL PUTSCH was Faked! – Library of Rickandria

Yet British Israelism isn't about hating others.

Originally it was about a kind of providential favoritism, which, like it or not, is all over the Old Testament.

If God could choose Israel once, could he not preserve that line and fulfill promises through unsuspecting nations?

In the halls of the Vatican or the libraries of the British Museum, do they know something about these connections?

Some suspect that there were even declassified documents or old records quietly acknowledging links, say, migrations noted by Roman historians or mysterious references in the Assyrian records to people named Bet Kumri, House of Omri, possibly referring to Israelites migrating.

We do have evidence that the exiled Israelites became the Sumerians and Scythians who raided Assyria after escaping, secular history records those peoples exactly when Israel disappeared.

In the Land of Zion – Library of Rickandria

And eventually those groups showed up in Europe.

Connect dots and you have a trail from Samaria to London.

The bottom line is, if you're of European descent, there is a body of research, however unorthodox, that says you are part of the ongoing story of Israel.

Your forefathers may have camped by Sinai, settled Canaan, and later trekked through the Caucasus to new lands.

That is a radical retelling of Western history.

It transforms the Bible from someone else's book into your family album.

No longer would a white Christian read the Old Testament and unconsciously think it's about those Jews long ago.

Instead, it might be about your direct ancestors.

Imagine the empowerment and also humility if one realizes how far we may have strayed from that heritage.

Perhaps this is the ultimate reason this narrative was suppressed, because it would make European Christians claim the birthright of Israel, which upends theological and political apple carts.

The establishment much prefers Europeans to think their ancestors were brutish pagans whom the church civilized, rather than potentially being the dispersed covenant people whom God guided and multiplied.

We've now traced a thrilling possibility from Noah's luminous appearance, through Japheth's prophesied expansion, to the Israelites' lost tribes infusing into Japheth's line, culminating in the rise of Britain and America as modern Israelite powers.

It's a narrative that stretches the mind and heart.

But our investigation isn't done.

There's one more layer, one more aspect that seals this epic with signs and wonders, the buried evidence and mysterious phenomena that further validate the biblical narrative of human origins, including that of the white race.

I'm talking about the giant skeletons, the declassified archaeological finds, the DNA quirks, and how the powers that we might be actively hiding these to keep us all in the dark.

Yes, you heard that right, the stuff of fringe websites, giants and cover-ups.

Except, as we'll show, it's not all fairy tales.

The Bible said there were giants in the earth in those days, and lo and behold, newspaper archives and museum reports have again and again surfaced seven, eight, even ten foot skeletons that don't fit the official story.

Many were spirited away, conveniently lost in the bowels of institutions.

Why suppress them?

Because if giants existed, the Bible's account gains literal credibility, and it suggests some human lines had extraordinary attributes.

Remember Noah's angelic hint?

Giants were offspring of angels and humans, per Genesis.

Giants in the Bible – Library of Rickandria

What if some of that Nephilim DNA found its way into lineages, and could that connect to certain traits among certain people?

It's speculative, but worthy of exploration. In the final main part, we'll delve into these suppressed discoveries and what they mean for our understanding of human, and especially Caucasian, origins.

Steal your nerves, the last veil is about to be lifted, and it might shake the ground you stand on.

About five giants, genes, and the conspiracy of suppression unveiling the physical evidence.

Our journey has so far relied on:

But what about tangible, physical evidence that corroborates the Bible's wildest claims about ancient humanity?

You might want to hold onto your seat, because we're about to confront the kind of evidence that makes archaeologists sweat, and officials get nervous.

These are the findings that tend to get lost, debunked without proper investigation, or left to collect dust in archives, because if they were widely publicized, they would validate biblical history in the most visceral way.

And by extension, they'd underline the narratives we've discussed about the origins of peoples. 

This is the realm of the giants, the anomalous skulls, and the genetic mysteries, and the question of who's hiding what.

First, giants.

The Bible bluntly states in Genesis 6 verse 4,

Skeptics smirk at this.

But consider that numerous historical records and discoveries have indeed pointed to the existence of humans of extraordinary stature in the past. *


We're not talking 20-foot tall fantasy titans, but skeletal remains significantly larger than normal.

In the 19th and early 20th centuries, American newspapers frequently reported unearthing of unusually large skeletons, 7, 8, even 10 feet tall, especially in ancient burial mounds.

The New York Times in 1890 described a race of Indian giants uncovered in New Jersey, over 50 skeletons, most around 7 feet, one estimated at 8 feet with massive bone structure.

This was taken seriously at the time scientists from the University of Pennsylvania rushed to investigate.

Skeletons were shipped to museums.

This wasn't lone cranks, it was academia of the day grappling with inconvenient facts.

It Gets Better, a report from Popular Science News in 1890 detailed a find in France by 1M Lepouge bone fragments suggesting a Neolithic human over 10 feet tall.

They even illustrated the gigantic bones compared to normal ones.

The scientists of that era debated whether it was a pathological giant or a normal giant, but none denied the bones were human and enormous.

The press at the time was fairly open about these finds.

So where are these remains now?

Why aren't giant skeletons in every natural history museum?

Because as the 20th century progressed, a narrative took hold, such reports were hoaxes or mistakes.

The Smithsonian Institution, America's attic, is rumored to have a role here.

According to persistent legends and a satirical admission that went viral in 2014, the Smithsonian collected and deliberately destroyed thousands of giant bones to maintain the evolutionary narrative.

The Smithsonian officially denies this, of course.

They call it a myth.

But here's a smoking gun. In the late 1800s, the Smithsonian's own annual reports recorded the recovery of 17 skeletons over seven feet tall, one being eight feet, including a jawbone so large it fit around a modern man's face.

This was published data.

So, either the Smithsonian back then was started by gullible incompetence, or they really did have those skeletons.

And if they did, where are they now?

They're not on display.

We're left to conclude that such artifacts have been tucked away.

Now why suppress giants?

Does giants corroborate the Bible spectacularly?

If there were giants post-flood, remember Goliath, or the giants that Israelite spies are in Canaan, it means the Genesis account isn't fairy tale, it's history.

It also suggests something extraordinary in the human gene pool long ago, possibly that angel-human hybridization we discussed.

How does this tie to the origin of different peoples, like the white race?

Well, some theories propose that certain lineages, perhaps some of Ham's children like Canaan's clans had Nephilim blood, while others, like Noah's direct line through Shem and Japheth, remained mostly pure human.

If that's true, it could mean the reset after flood involved more than one kind of human strain.

Interestingly, many giant finds in America were often linked to red-haired giants.

Early settlers and native legends talk of gigantic, fair or red-haired people, say the Scythi car of Paiute lore.

Some skeletons in the Lovelock cave, Nevada, were alleged to have reddish hair.

Red hair is a trait often associated with Caucasians.

Could a branch of anti-diluvian giants have had fair features?

We're speculating, but here's a twist, the Bible notes that Esau, ancestor of some later white-looking folks like Edomites and perhaps some Europeans via Rome, was born red and hairy.

It's probably a coincidence, but one that stirs the imagination.

Now to genetics and other anomalies.

Modern DNA research has found that European populations carry a small percentage of genes that don't appear in other groups, including some Neanderthal mix and another mysterious hominid called Denisovan, mostly in Asians.

Could some mythic stories of we came from giants or different Adams echo ancient intermixing with other human types?

Hard to say, but fascinating.

Then there's the odd case of Rh-negative blood, a minority of humans, mostly European, lack the Rh factor that nearly all other humans and primates have.

Some fringe theorists half-jokingly say Rh negatives are of non-earthly heritage.

I won't go that far, but it's another quirk that makes people wonder if there were different created lineages.

What about ancient advanced civilizations?

We saw how the CIA got interested in cataclysm cycles and lost civilizations.

Many of those who study Atlantis or other lost lands note that survivors of a cataclysm are often described as fair-skinned bringers of knowledge to new civilizations, Viracocha in the Andes, for example, or Quetzalcoatl in Mexico, often described as light-skinned, bearded.

Could those legends be distorted memories of Noah's sons or later seafarers from the Atlantean maybe a post-flood maritime culture?

And could that tie in with how white populations ended up scattered globally?

Fringe?

Yes.

Impossible?

Not entirely.

If white equals Japhethite and Japheth's people spread far early, remember Josephus said they settled lands no one had inhabited, possibly empty areas after flood, they might have reached the Americas or Pacific long before Columbus.

Some anomalies hint this, e.g., mysterious corcosoid mummies in the Tarim Basin, Western China, 4,000 year-old tall, red-haired mummies in the desert.

The Chinese have them in a museum now.

Ancient Chinese History and the Book of Genesis: Part I – Library of Rickandria

These individuals had European features and DNA, yet lived in East Asia in 2000 BC.

The Tarim mummies aren't directly cited here, but they are well documented.

This shows ancient Caucasians roamed far.

Could they have also reached the New World?

Some rock art and skeleton finds in the Americas, like the Kenyawik Man skull, caused controversy because they looked more Caucasian than typical Native American.

That's another kind of worm suppressed by swift reburial under Nagpah laws, which, while respectful to tribes, conveniently make sure anomalous remains can't be studied deeply.

It's a pattern, anything that doesn't fit the mainstream timeline or narrative gets hushed.

And the mainstream narrative is, we're all out of Africa, all differences are recent and superficial, nothing unusual happened in prehistory aside from Stone Age grunting.

The evidence we've touched suggests a far richer story, divine interventions, giant hybrids, multiple migrations, and ancient nations maintaining knowledge of their origins.

Even in linguistics and folklore, evidence pops up, for instance, old Celtic legends claiming descent from Daru or Zera, sons of Judah's tribe, though that's in the weeds.

But take archaeology, the Los Lunas Decalogue stone in New Mexico, an ancient inscription of the Ten Commandments in a form of Hebrew, in a place it absolutely shouldn't be if history books are right.

Or the Back Creek stone in Tennessee with old Hebrew lettering.

Genuine or not, they fuel the notion that Israelites or their kindred reached America long before Columbus.

Let's address something visceral, imagine seeing a giant skeleton with your own eyes, or a strange, elongated skull like those in Peru that some claims aren't simply head-bound.

It changes you.

You realize we don't know the full story of our species.

Those who have seen such things, ranchers, miners, even Smithsonian field collectors in the 1800s, surely had their worldview shaken.

But when the institutions they trust tell them it's nothing or quietly remove the evidence, the public doesn't get the message.

It stays as whispers.

Thankfully, the truth has a way of surfacing.

A diligent researcher can sift old journals, find that Smithsonian report from 1873 listing giant bones, or a US army physician's account of a giant found in 1833 in California.

Yes, there is one, a 12-foot skeleton reported by an army surgeon, Dr. Jade K. Rogers.

These are out there, published in 19th century literature.

RICHEST in 19th Century – Library of Rickandria

The fact that modern fact-checkers scramble to label the giant skeleton claims as satire or hoax while admitting those stories originated from something like a 2014 fake article based on earlier rumors shows the nervousness around the topic.

They doth protest too much.

If it were all total bunk, why even bother?

Why did the AP and Reuters write pieces in 2022 to assure us no, the Smithsonian did not destroy giant bones, trust us.

Because the idea gained traction and they needed to snuff it out.

Let's connect this back to our main theme, the origin of white people according to the Bible.

All these suppressed evidences bolster the biblical framework in which that origin is situated.

If giants existed, if global cataclysms occurred, like the flood or later disasters, then the Genesis narrative gains credibility.

If Genesis is true, then the breakdown of nations in Genesis is true, meaning the table of nations, with Japheth's sons populating Europe, etc. is not a myth but a record.

If that's true, then the identity of modern peoples can indeed be traced back to Noah's children.

And that means white people did originate the way the Bible implies, not as some separate creation or mutant branch, but as one thread of Noah's family tapestry, carrying a particular set of traits and destinies.

It means that the differences among peoples are rooted in deep history and perhaps guided by providence, like who got what lands and blessings.

It's a very affirmative message, there is an order and reason behind our dispersion and diversity, not a random evolutionary accident.

For white people specifically, often cast today as historical villains or anomalies, this perspective restores dignity and purpose.

It says,

That's not a license to oppress, it's a call to live up to that heritage in virtue and faith.

Of course, if one group has a proud origin, it doesn't negate others.

In fact, other lineages have their own divine story, e.g.

But I suspect our listener wanted the positive truth about white origins emphasized, because we live in a time where saying anything positive about white anything is taboo or twisted into supremacism.

But truth isn't racist, it just is.

And the truth here is that, according to the Bible and a trove of supporting evidence, the people of European descent have a lineage that is both ancient and honorable, interwoven with the Bible's central events.

They weren't lurking in caves while God dealt only with Semites.

They were playing their part off stage until history brought them front and center.

We've peeled back some heavy layers, forbidden scriptures, genealogical prophesies, lost tribe theories, and hidden bones.

Each layer came with its own shock and awe, but together they form a mosaic, one big picture. 

And that picture is telling us the official story of human history is incomplete and the origin of the white race in particular has been deliberately left murky.

It's time to lift the veil completely. In our final climactic part, we will assemble all these threads and confront the ultimate revelation that arises from them.

It's one thing to know the pieces, it's another to see the truth they point to.

What does it mean if white Europeans are descended from Noah's foretold line and possibly Israel's lost tribes?

What does it mean if giants and angels and cataclysms were all real parts of our past?

It means our reality is far stranger and more epic than the bland story taught in schools.

And it means each of us is a character in a drama scripted long ago.

For those of you whose heart is pounding at these realizations, brace yourselves.

The final part will not offer comfort or closure; it will push you to the edge of a new frontier of thought.

Because once you know the truth, you can't unknow it.

And the question becomes, what now?

What do we do with this knowledge?

The final bombshell is about to drop and it's not just a fact, it's a challenge that might very well haunt your conscience from here on out.

Ready or not, here it comes.

Have you caught your breath yet?

Because what comes next is the hardest-hitting truth of all, the one that ties everything together and then demands a response.

We've traveled from anti-diluvian secrets to modern cover-ups, and now the puzzle pieces assemble into an image that may well change how you see yourself and the world.

Here it is, the white peoples of today are not a historical accident, but a lineage with ancient destiny, a lineage that was meant to remember who they are, and who they are meant to be.

And that memory has been stolen.

The very powers and institutions that should enlighten us have, for generations, done everything to erase our collective memory of these truths.

Why?

Because of people who remember their origins, remember their purpose, remember that they come from greatness, those people are not so easily controlled.

This is the paradigm-shifting insight, if you are of European descent, the Bible is, in a very real sense, your family history.

Not just metaphorically through faith, but literally through bloodline.

BLOODLINES – Library of Rickandria

You are potentially a descendant of Noah, through Japheth, possibly intertwined with the blood of:

You carry the legacy of both the covenant and the birthright.

The whispers of your ancestors are in the pages of scripture, in prophecies and blessings that have quietly unfolded over millennia to land on your very existence.

Remember Noah's words,

Every time your forefathers built a ship to cross an ocean, every time new farmland was tilled in a distant colony that was Japheth enlarging.

Remember the promise to Abraham,

Look at the map,

Is that coincidence or fulfillment?

Here is a forbidden thought, what if those blessings of prosperity, of influence, that so defined the modern age for the West, were not merely self-made or stolen, but granted as part of a divine plan?

If you accept that, it turns the guilt narrative on its head.

It means with great blessings came great responsibility.

And indeed, for a time, many in the West honored that responsibility through spreading, albeit imperfectly, knowledge, technology, and yes, the Bible itself worldwide.

But something changed.

The memory was dimmed.

We entered a period of:

Is it perhaps because we lost sight of these truths?

A people that thinks it has no higher origin than random mutation or just another tribe will act with no higher purpose than survival or hedonism.

A people convinced they are inherently evil colonizers will eventually fulfill that low expectation or dissolve in shame.

The script has been flipped on the white West in the past few decades and not by accident.

Why now?

Perhaps because knowledge like what we've shared was starting to seep out and certain forces needed to preempt it by inducing a kind of cultural amnesia and self-loathing.

After all, if you hate who you are, you'll never bother to find out where you came from.

Consider this your alarm bell in the night.

Wake up.

You have been robbed of pride, of heritage, of context.

The ancient chronicles, the artifacts in vaults, the transcripts of secret excavations, they all testify to a story that was your birthright to know.

Instead, you got a pack of lies or at best emissions.

They told you Western civilization bloomed accidentally or through oppression alone, that your ancestors were lucky or cruel rather than called or chosen.

They told you chosen people is a term that can only apply to a small ethnic group or is just antiquated rhetoric.

They never wanted you to realize that perhaps, in God's eyes, he has more than one chosen instrument.

Yes, Israel of old was chosen to be a light, and if our thesis holds, that light didn't vanish, it migrated and spread and became a blaze of discovery and progress in the postbiblical world.

It means the baton passed from Judah's hand to Joseph's, Ephraim and Manasseh as Genesis 49 predicted a truth hidden in plain sight.

The scepter shall not depart from Judah, said Jacob, and it didn't.

The Davidic line carried on and gave us Christ.

Jesus Christ: Man, Myth or God in the Flesh? – Library of Rickandria

But he also said the birthright, the national blessing, was Joseph's.

If Britain and America are Joseph's house today, then look, the scepter, spiritual leadership, went one way through Judah to Christdom and the national birthright, wealth and power, went another to the Anglo-Saxons.

Both converged to create the modern Christian West, which then evangelized the world.

That is a plan, not a coincidence.

That is a tapestry woven by an unseen hand.

And now that tapestry is unraveling because the enemy of truth has cut so many threads in education, in media, in our own sense of self.

If you feel a chill, it's because you realize we stand at a precipice.

Knowledge once lost can be the undoing of a people.

In the Bible, when Israel forgot who they were, calamity followed, captivity, exile.

Today the West has forgotten, or been induced to forget, its identity in the biblical saga, and lo and behold, we see chaos, identity crises, demographic declines, cultural suicide.

This is not a coincidence either.

It is the direct result of severing a people from their roots.

So, here's the emotional punch, will you let it happen?
 
Will you, now armed with this forbidden knowledge, just shrug and go back to business as usual?

Or will you allow it to light a fire in your soul?

This isn't about supremacy or division, it's about restoration.

Imagine a world where all peoples can appreciate their unique role in God's design, including white people appreciating theirs without shame.

That world terrifies those who seek to control through division and lies.

But it's a world closer to truth.

Perhaps you're thinking, what do I do with this knowledge?

For now, ponder it.

Verify what you can, either sources are there.

Notice how your perspective shifts.

You might sense a newfound self-respect, or a grief for lost time, or a burning anger at having been deceived.

Use all of that.

Share the information carefully, keeping in mind the conditioning many are under.

There will be resistance, cognitive dissonance is powerful.

But the truth is quietly persistent.

It resonates at a frequency that the soul recognizes.

When people hear it, a part of them says,

That's what the establishment fears, that enough people will feel that yes, inside and the ground will start to move beneath the lies.

Let's seal this with one more thought.

In the book of Revelation 7, 9, there is a vision of a multitude from all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues standing together.

All distinct, yet all united in truth, giving glory to God.

It's a beautiful counterpoint to the modern push for a faceless, amnesiac globalism.

In the end, truth wins, each lineage known and celebrated, all reconciled.

But before that victory, there is tribulation.

And tribulation often comes because of lies and forgetting.

Did Jesus Lose the War for America? The Shocking Truth You Weren’t Told – Library of Rickandria

So maybe, just maybe, this moment, you hearing this script, is part of a greater awakening.

Maybe it's one more step toward that multitude awakening to who they really are, so they can take their place in the grand finale of history with eyes wide open.

You've heard secrets tonight that some would kill to keep buried.

Secrets gleaned from ancient holy books, declassified files, yellowed newspapers, and banned law.

We exposed how the Bible's account of the white race's origin is not only positive, but exhilarating, a tale of favored sons, vast promises, and world-reaching fulfillment.

And we've uncovered that this knowledge was deliberately kept from you, like a treasure hidden by a jealous guardian.

Now the treasure is in your hands.

What will you do with it?

Will you cast it aside out of fear, or hold it aloft for others to see?

The choice, and the responsibility, is yours.

But know this, truth is alive, and it has a way of stirring until it's acknowledged.

The origin of white people according to the Bible is more than an origin, it's a call echoing from the foundations of the world, daring you to acknowledge who you truly are.

The echoes of that call are now in your ears.

Dare to listen, and dare to let it change everything.

The video after this will help you cleanse your negative emotions by praying to the true source.

While keep on touching your heart at the center of your chest, and smiling freely to your heart, let us pray to the true source to ask for blessing.

To cleanse negative emotions from our heart, and to open our heart better.

While praying, you don't need to repeat the prayers, just keep on being relaxed and smiling freely to let your heart do the prayers for the best result.

To the true source, please bless our heart so that all arrogance be cleansed and removed, to be replaced with your love and life.

To the true source, please bless our heart so that all anger be cleansed and removed, to be replaced with your love and life.

To the true source, please bless our heart so that all selfishness be cleansed and removed, to be replaced with your love and life.

To the true source, please bless our heart so that all envy and jealousy be cleansed and removed, to be replaced with your love and life.

To the true source, please bless our heart so that all greediness and cunningness be cleansed and removed, to be replaced with your love and life.

To the true source, please bless and help us to realize that our heart is the key of our relationship to you.

Please bless and help us to be able to forgive everyone sincerely.

Now forgive everyone who has done wrongdoing to you, although the same person keep on repeating the same mistakes again and again.

Thank you.

To the true source, please bless our heart so that all greediness and cunningness be cleansed and removed, to be replaced with your love and life.

As we have forgiven everyone who has done wrongdoing to us, please bless our heart so that all related negative emotions such as:

etc. be cleansed and removed, to be replaced with your love and life.

To the true source, please bless our heart so that all greediness and cunningness be cleansed and removed, to be replaced with your love and life.

Please bless and help us to realize all of our wrongdoings to you or to others, to feel sorry and ask for forgiveness.

Now realize all of our mistakes to true source or to others, feel sorry and ask for forgiveness.

Thank you.

Thank you.

To the true source.

Please forgive us for all of our wrongdoings to you or to others.

And as you have forgiven us, please help so that all burdens from those wrongdoings such as fear, worries, etc. be cleansed and removed, to be replaced with your love and life.

To the true source.

Please cleanse and remove all other negativities from our whole heart, to let your love and life flow abundantly and continuously into our whole heart.

To direct our heart toward you and to open our heart for you, better and better.

To fill our whole heart and feeling with:

and all wonderful feelings from your love and life.

To the true source.

Please bless and help us to be able to feel the presence of your love and life, together with all wonderful feelings from your love and life within our heart.

To enjoy.

To let your love and life to do the best, not only for our whole heart, but also for our whole being.

To the true source.

We are so grateful to you.

Amen.

Feel and relax.

Your whole heart and your whole being have become much lighter.

Enjoy.

And let the love and light radiate beyond your whole heart and your whole being completely.

Let your whole heart, your whole being slowly dissolve into the love and light.

And let your whole being smiling while enjoying the process.

While enjoying this wonderful moment.

Let your whole heart and your whole being dissolve more into the love and light.

Feel and realize your whole heart, your whole feeling are filled with all wonderful feelings from the love and light.

Enjoy.

And be grateful.

---

The Forbidden Origin of the White Race According to the Bible

---

The Forbidden Origin of the White Race According to the Bible – Library of Rickandria