In diving into this paper, it will help if you have already read my long paper exposing Karl Marx as a probable hidden agent of the 19th century European financiers, since the fakes I will expose in this paper are closely related to that fake.
You should also have read my paper on the Paris Salon and the Armory Show.
The problem I came across was that although modern events tied to Rosicrucianism and Freemasonry seem to be run by financiers, not the aristocracy, we are told Bacon was (possibly) the bastard child of Queen Elizabeth I.
Elizabeth I (7 September 1533 – 24 March 1603) was Queen of England and Ireland from 17 November 1558 until her death in 1603. She was the last monarch of the House of Tudor.
Since the financiers and aristocrats have been long enemies, this reading of history was inconsistent.
But regardless of whether Bacon was the son of the Queen or not, he was definitely known to have very close ties to the aristocracy, and it is difficult to believe he was a tool of the financiers.
It is not out of the question, but in my mind it required more study.
My first assumption was that the Freemasons had been infiltrated and turned over the centuries, so the initial goal of my research was to confirm or refute that theory.
In support of that, we know both the Freemasons and the financiers were opposed to the Vatican, though for different reasons.
The early Freemasons were opposed to Rome because the Catholic Church was anti-science.
The financiers were opposed to Rome because it was anti-Jewish, and many of the top financiers were Jewish.
Therefore, it would be reasonable to assume the two groups might form an alliance very early on.
Since all these societies were secret, it would be very easy for one of the allies to infiltrate and subvert the other over time.
I have mentioned in that previous paper that secrecy is a two-edged sword, since the dark can hide many things.
It can hide good information from a bad party, but it can also hide bad information from a good party.
In other words, it is far easier to infiltrate and subvert a secret society than to subvert a society that is completely open.
Since the current secret societies don't resemble the secret societies formed by those such as Bacon in the 17th century, we know they have turned for some reason.
Did they turn by natural causes, responding to changes in the world, or were they subverted?
Oliver Cromwell (25 April 1599 – 3 September 1658) was an English statesman, politician, and soldier, widely regarded as one of the most important figures in the history of the British Isles. He came to prominence during the 1639 to 1653 Wars of the Three Kingdoms, initially as a senior commander in the Parliamentarian army and latterly as a politician. A leading advocate of the execution of Charles I in January 1649, which led to the establishment of The Protectorate, he ruled as Lord Protector from December 1653 until his death in September 1658. Cromwell remains a controversial figure due to his use of the army to acquire political power, and the brutality of his 1649 campaign in Ireland.
This was just a few decades after Francis Bacon and his Restauration.
What you aren't always told in the common histories is that Cromwell was financed by major Jewish bankers in Amsterdam, who wished to open up England to Jewish settlement as well as interest banking.
Since this is my first mention of the Jews, I should probably pause to prevent you from rushing ahead with your own prejudices.
None of my papers have been anti-Jewish, and this one won't be, either.
I simply wish to know the truth, and the chips will fall as they may.
However, since the Jewish financiers are going to look pretty bad over the next several pages, it is worth backing up a bit and asking why they did what we will see they did.
For many centuries the Jews had been bottled up by the Catholic Church.
And I don't just mean that the bankers had been bottled up by rules against usury.
Hitler certainly wasn't the first to do any of that, and by the year 1600, say, the Jews had already suffered many centuries of holocausts major and minor.
I let this stand so that you can see how my views have developed. So, you have to understand that the Jews had very real grievances.
If they hated both Rome and the aristocracy, I think you can understand why.
What we are going to see is a long-running war, one in which the Jews prevailed (in many ways) against ferocious odds.
They did this with incredible cunning, long-term planning, and—often—superior intelligence (or should we say, superior Intelligence).
This doesn't mean I am on their side.
In fact, I am not.
I am not on anyone's side, especially a group that has relied so heavily on lies and deception.
But the Jews have no monopoly on lying or deception.
All sides have deceived one another and themselves at all times, and to the honest historian history now begins to look like a swamp with very few heroes.
I have shown in previous papers that the financiers and their accomplices have destroyed art in the 20th century on purpose, and I can never forgive them for that.
They have destroyed many other things it would have been best to have kept.
But we will see here that they have also been responsible for creating other useful and beautiful things, so, again, it becomes harder to judge the more you know.
Although I am ferociously opposed to the current schemes and regimes, it may be that the rise of the financiers was a necessary step in the cultural evolution of our species.
It has been a swamp, assuredly, but perhaps a swamp we had to wade.
So, as we proceed, remind yourself that the actions of the Jews, no matter what they were, were only part of a very long war—a war in which neither side can claim either innocence or a higher ground.
But back to Cromwell and Charles I.
The Jews had been expelled from England since Edward I banned them in 1290, but with the rise of Cromwell this finally ended.
Edward I (17/18 June 1239 – 7 July 1307), also known as Edward Longshanks and the Hammer of the Scots, was King of England from 1272 to 1307.
Cromwell lifted the ban on Jews.
He was both a Rosicrucian and a Millenarian, and although we haven't yet discovered whether the Rosicrucians had been subverted by the Jews by the 1640s, we know the Millenarian movement was mainly a brainchild of the Jews.
The movement was promoted in England by Menasseh Ben Israel, among many others.
image.png
304 KB
View full-sizeDownload Manoel Dias Soeiro (Dutch pronunciation: [maːˈnul ˈdijɑ(s) ˈsʋeːroː]); (1604 – 20 November 1657), better known by his Hebrew name Menasseh ben Israel (מנשה בן ישראל) or Menashe ben Israel, also known as Menasheh ben Yossef ben Yisrael, also known with the Hebrew acronym, MB"Y or MBI, was a Jewish scholar, rabbi, kabbalist, writer, diplomat, printer, publisher, and founder of the first Hebrew printing press (named Emeth Meerets Titsma`h) in Amsterdam in 1626.
Menasseh was a Jewish intellectual from the nearby Netherlands, and he had connections to Jews living secretly in London.
image.png
18 MB
View full-sizeDownloadRobert Boyle FRS (/bɔɪl/; 25 January 1627 – 31 December 1691) was an Anglo-Irish natural philosopher, chemist, physicist, alchemist and inventor. Boyle is largely regarded today as the first modern chemist, and therefore one of the founders of modern chemistry, and one of the pioneers of modern experimental scientific method. He is best known for Boyle's law, which describes the inversely proportional relationship between the absolute pressure and volume of a gas, if the temperature is kept constant within a closed system. Among his works, The Sceptical Chymist is seen as a cornerstone book in the field of chemistry. He was a devout and pious Anglican and is noted for his writings in theology.
Boyle's tutor had been Isaac Marcombes, said to be a Huguenot but probably a crypto-Jew.
Samuel Hartlib may also have been a crypto-Jew, since he promoted a College of Jewish Studies in London and since his ancestry is hidden.
His name also leads us in that direction, since the name was originally the German Hartlieb, which could be Jewish like the name Gottlieb.
Hartlib was also admitted being an Intelligencer, which is basically an early Intelligence agent.
In many ways, Hartlib's famous circle was the direct successor of Bacon's societies, so we are already getting somewhere on that question.
We will look more closely at Hartlib below.
But even without final proof of any of that, we can tell the Millenarian movement came from Jewish agents due to its form alone.
One of the main components of Millenarianism had always been the Zionist desideratum of a return of the Jewish homeland, which by itself pretty much decides the question.
Non-Jews would have no reason to put that at the top of their list, and so we see that other parts of the Millenarian movement were created by the Jews to entice Gentiles into doing their work for them.
As we know, this is still going on.
I don't have to provide a lot of footnotes for these assertions, since the outcomes by themselves are proof enough of the schemes and schemers.
We don't need notarized documents when we have the incontestable facts that the ban on Jews in England did end with Cromwell in 1657.
More than that, we have the fact that interest banking in England began its rise at the very same time.
It can be no coincidence that all this began after King Charles I confiscated the gold in the Royal Mint a few years earlier.
We are usually told by historians that the Civil War was caused by religious strife or other causes, but in my opinion, it was these moves by the King in 1640 against the Mint (which was the bank of time—holding much capital of the merchants and goldsmiths) and against major companies that doomed him.
Certainly, this is what caused the Jewish bankers in Amsterdam to move against him, bankrolling Cromwell and running other less obvious schemes.
Since Charles had just stolen their money in broad daylight, we can understand why they were a little upset.
Which brings us to the way they moved against him.
They financed armies and generals like Cromwell, yes, but they did much more than that.
As now, they moved in more indirect and clandestine ways.
We have already seen that with the Millenarian movement, which they promoted and probably invented.
This is where we tie back into Bacon and the Rosicrucians, since this Millenarian movement has many parallels to the Rosicrucian movement.
Besides being anti-Catholic, both were said to be interested in Hermetic knowledge or the Occult.
And this leads us back to Samuel Hartlib already.
As I stated, Hartlib's Circle was in many ways the immediate successor to Bacon's Restauration, although the movement from one to the other has not previously been uncovered.
It is known that Hartlib's Circle was composed not only of prominent British locals like John Dury, but also of refugees from Poland and Bohemia.
Who would be fleeing from Poland or Bohemia at that time?
Jews, of course.
Hartlib and these other Jews who were promoting the Millenarian movement and Bacon's Rosicrucianism at the same time were also promoting a third thing:
This pushes us smoothly to perhaps the biggest fake in this history of hoaxes and fakes.
Although the history of the Kabbalah is said to go back thousands of years, it is also said to have been written by Moses de Leon in Spain in around 1290 AD.
image.png
458 KB
View full-sizeDownloadMoses de León (c. 1240 – 1305), known in Hebrew as Moshe ben Shem-Tov (משה בן שם-טוב די-ליאון), was a Spanish rabbi and Kabbalist who first publicized the Zohar. Modern scholars believe the Zohar is his own work, despite his claim that he took traditions going back to Shimon bar Yochai and committed them to writing. His other works include Sefer ha-Rimon, written in Hebrew, and hundreds of pseudepigraphic responsa, commentaries, and Kabbalistic tracts which he falsely attributed to earlier authorities.
That's pretty recent for a major religious work, and the date should surprise you.
De Leon tells us he is just transcribing an older manuscript of Simeon bar Yochai from the 2nd century AD, but since there is no reason to believe that and a million reasons not to, I suggest you don't.
As just one example, De Leon quotes from many fictitious works, including many Sifras that never existed.
He also mentions many things that happened after the 2nd century, so the possibility he found the manuscript in a cave is preposterous.
But it is even worse than that, since we have no evidence De Leon wrote it, either.
The book of Kabbalah is the Zohar, which wasn't published until 1557.
No manuscript by De Leon survives, and every bit of evidence in the mystery before that is based on word of mouth.
You will tell me about a few manuscripts from 1290 have survived, but that isn't true.
It is admitted that De Leon wrote many books, and most of the manuscripts did survive, including the Sefer ha-Rimon and the Ha-Mishqal.
In fact, the current Wikipedia page on De Leon is a red flag in itself, and I suggest you visit it.
In the section where his known works are listed, the Zohar does not appear.
Each of his known works has a specific date on it, such as 1287 for the Sefer ha-Rimon, but we are given no date for the Zohar.
It is always said to be from the 13th century (except when it is said to be from the 11th century), but no year is given.
My conclusion after leaning all the lies against one another is that the Zohar was written in the early Renaissance by the same people who faked the Corpus Hermeticum, and for the same reasons.
Both appear to me to have been written by agents of the early bankers, who wished to weaken both Christianity and mainstream Judaism, since both were getting in the way of trade.
To pursue this line of reasoning, we have to go back to these bankers and to the finding of the Corpus Hermeticum in 1463.
Like the writer of the Zohar, the writers of the Corpus are a mystery, given to us only as the words of untrustworthy sources.
The Corpus—the “foundational document of the hermetic tradition”—is said to have been written by Hermes Trismegistus of Egypt in the 3rd century AD.
No substantiation of that exists, either of the person or of the date.
Mainstream sources now admit this Hermes is mythical at best.
Wikipedia tells us a 14th century manuscript of the Corpus has been preserved, but when we take the footnote for that, we find this:
Anon, Hermetica – a new translation, Pembridge Design Studio Press, 1982.
That's a curious reference for such an important claim, isn't it?
Why would such a work need an anonymous author or translator in 1982?
We find that historically nothing is known for sure until a manuscript is found by monks in Byzantium (or Macedonia) and delivered to agents of Lorenzo de' Medici.
image.png
942 KB
View full-sizeDownloadLorenzo di Piero de' Medici (Italian: [loˈrɛntso de ˈmɛːditʃi]), known as Lorenzo the Magnificent (Italian: Lorenzo il Magnifico; 1 January 1449 – 8 April 1492), was an Italian statesman, the de facto ruler of the Florentine Republic, and the most powerful patron of Renaissance culture in Italy. Lorenzo held the balance of power within the Italic League, an alliance of states that stabilized political conditions on the Italian Peninsula for decades, and his life coincided with the mature phase of the Italian Renaissance and the golden age of Florence. As a patron, he is best known for his sponsorship of artists such as Botticelli and Michelangelo. On the foreign policy front, Lorenzo manifested a clear plan to stem the territorial ambitions of Pope Sixtus IV, in the name of the balance of the Italian League of 1454. For these reasons, Lorenzo was the subject of the Pazzi conspiracy (1478), in which his brother Giuliano was assassinated. The Peace of Lodi of 1454 that he supported among the various Italian states collapsed with his death. He is buried in the Medici Chapel in Florence.
Piero di Cosimo de' Medici, known as Piero the Gouty (Italian: Piero "il Gottoso"), (1416 – 2December 1469) was the de facto ruler of Florence from 1464 to 1469, during the Italian Renaissance.
But again, why a de' Medici?
Why would a monk be dealing with a de' Medici instead of, say, the Pope, a cardinal, or a monastery.
Any monastery worth its name is a collector of manuscripts and would not tend to be giving or selling important manuscripts to bankers.
None of this makes any sense, until you realize that the Corpus Hermeticum was exactly what the de' Medicis needed at the time.
Why?
Because the de' Medicis were probably crypto-Jews themselves.
One, they were a prominent banking family.
Two, they had very semitic features:
image.png
393 KB
View full-sizeDownload Cosimo di Giovanni de' Medici (27 September 1389 – 1 August 1464) was an Italian banker and politician who established the Medici family as effective rulers of Florence during much of the Italian Renaissance. His power derived from his wealth as a banker and intermarriage with other rich and powerful families. He was a patron of arts, learning, and architecture. He spent over 600,000 gold florins (approx. $500 million inflation adjusted) on art and culture, including Donatello's David, the first freestanding nude male sculpture since antiquity. Despite his influence, his power was not absolute; he was viewed by fellow Florentine politicians as first among equals rather than an autocrat. Florence's legislative councils resisted his proposals throughout his political career, even sending him into exile from 1433 to 1434.
Agnolo di Cosimo (Italian: [ˈaɲɲolo di ˈkɔːzimo]; 17 November 1503 – 23 November 1572), usually known as Bronzino (Italian: Il Bronzino [il bronˈdziːno]) or Agnolo Bronzino, was an Italian Mannerist painter from Florence. His sobriquet, Bronzino, may refer to his relatively dark skin or reddish hair.
He doesn't look Italian to me.
And I say that as a portrait painter myself.
In fact, Bronzino may have been Jewish as well, his nickname indicating his semitic coloration and therefore his heritage.
It is curious that both his real name and his ancestry have been lost or more likely suppressed.
Three, as is admitted today at the online Jewish Virtual Library, the de' Medicis and the Jews were expelled from Florence at the same time.
In the first paragraph on that linked page, the Jewish Library says this:
The fate of Tuscan Jewry in the early modern period was inextricably linked to the favor and the fortune of the House of Medici.
Though a Jewish presence was registered in Lucca as early as the ninth century and a network of Jewish banks had spread throughout the region by the mid-fifteenth, the organized Jewish communities of Florence, Siena, Pisa and Livorno were political creations of the Medici rulers.
And like the Medici Grand Dukedom itself, these communities took shape in the course of the sixteenth century.
That pretty much says it all, but we are also given this:
When the Medici returned to power in 1512, the Jewish ban fell into abeyance, until the next expulsion of the Medici in 1527.
Why would the fate of the Jews and de' Medicis be so closely linked, if the de' Medicis were not Jewish themselves?
Added May 28, 2022:
Have you ever asked why there is an apostrophe after the “de” in de Medicis?
They want you to think de' Medicis means something like “of the doctors”, but that would be dei medici.
The apostrophe normally indicates something left out, so I now think the name has been garbled on purpose to throw us off.
If you run through the alphabet, about the only letter that could be left out is “l” or “r”.
Try it.
I would say “r” is much more likely, since it is leaves us with Dermed(icis), which starts to look like a normal name.
If we Anglicize it slightly, we get Dermet, or variously Dermot.
As in MacDermot, the famous Irish nobles, see the Kings of Moylurg.
They were the Kings of Connacht back to 950AD, the name originally being Diarmad.
Diarmad=Dermed.
And where did they come from before that?
Accord to legend, they came from Spain, see Mil Espaine, Phoenician/Spanish founder of Ireland, and ancestor of all kings of Ireland afterwards.
image.png
433 KB
View full-sizeDownload In Irish origin myths, Míl Espáine or Míl Espáne (later Latinized as Milesius) is the mythical ancestor of the final inhabitants of Ireland, the "sons of Míl" or Milesians, who represent the vast majority of the Irish Gaels. His father was Bile, son of Breogan. Modern historians believe he is a creation of medieval Irish Christian writers.
Also see Milo, Archbishop of Trier and Riems in the 700s, a Merovingian and therefore also a Phoenician, with a line going back through Rome, Italy.
There have always been strong links between Spain and Italy, so you can see the possible link between Dermot and de(r)Medicis.
Trier is also not an accidental link here, since we have seen Trier is also a spooky place, being a Phoenician stronghold from the beginning.
Do we have anything else?
We do, since we find that Milo of Trier was allegedly killed by a wild boar in a hunting accident.
As it turns out, the wild boar is the insignia of the MacDermot's.
So, although they want you to believe the Medicis came out of nowhere to take the top spot in banking in Italy in the late 1300s, they had actually been running all of Europe under other names for millennia.
But for some reason they decided to change their name at that time, in order to hide.
But they had cousins all over Europe even then. Once we understand who the de' Medicis were, we understand why the Corpus Hermeticum came to them in 1463.
It came to them because they paid for its creation.
All this Hermetic and Occult stuff, including the Zohar, was created in the 14th and 15th century as part of the Jewish bankers' war with Rome.
Notice I say Jewish bankers and not Jews.
That is because we know the rank-and-file Jews of the time—although always under pressure from Rome—were not in favor of the Kabbalah, the Occult, or any of the other “Hermetic” ideas being promoted.
This also applies to the real Jewish religious leaders, who banned the Kabbalah and it's teaching as heretical.
But since the bankers were not practicing Jews, they couldn't care less about the Bible or the Talmud.
They thought they were doing their fellow Jews a favor but couldn't really divulge what they were up to.
They couldn't very well go to synagogue and admit the whole Kabbalah thing was a hoax.
We may assume most rabbis at the time weren't in favor of such religious hoaxes, even as part of a holy war.
Some rabbis have since changed their minds about this, but in the early days we must assume these hoaxes were a hard sell for those such as the de' Medicis, and they preferred to simply promote the Kabbalah as real, both to Christians and to their fellow Jews.
I assume they figured most religious Jews wouldn't bite on it, so no harm done.
In many ways that was a just assumption, and to this day many or most orthodox and practicing Jews aren't interested in the Kabbalah.
So why would the Jewish bankers in Italy in the early Renaissance be trying to sell the Occult as part of a holy war?
Same reason they do it now.
Why are the financiers still trying to sell you the Occult on a daily basis, in a thousand corrupt forms?
One, because they still haven't finished off Christianity.
As we saw in my paper on Theosophy, they were still trying to kill Christianity in 1875 with various gambits, including importing a bastardized Buddhism or Hinduism.
And they are still doing it today, with:
Buddhism
Wicca
Satanism
Kabbalah
Isis
and a million other forms of mysticism and misdirection.
All three have been attacked and continue to be attacked on a daily basis.
As it turns out, they are all being attacked by the financiers.
If you look closely, you find that the religions are not mainly fighting one another, and never have been.
The holy wars are not Christian versus Jew, or Jew versus Muslim, or Muslim versus Christian.
It is the merchants against all three.
The merchants wish to destroy the trio, and to do that they often use cunning to pit one against the other, and one sect against another sect within each religion.
So why aren't they attacking the Hindus or Buddhists?
Well, in India, they are.
But here they don't need to, since here the religions are just fads.
The merchants knew the Eastern religions couldn't take deep root here in so short a time period, and they haven't.
Here those religions only act as temporary pacifiers, keeping their adherents confused and passive.
But back to the Renaissance.
They try to tell you that Kabbalah influenced the Neo-Platonists or even Plato himself, but that is just another reversal.
To invent Kabbalah and Hermeticism, the bankers hired many top writers of the time. Remember, they are still doing it, and we have seen in previous papers that the current financiers have hired most of the top writers of the 20th century, paying them to move the various projects along.
They have also taken over all the top:
literary magazines
the political journals
the museums
and all other cultural institutions. In the Renaissance, the writers hired by the bankers to manufacture the Occult naturally went to non-Christian and pre-Christian texts to crib from.
As later happened with Theosophy, they stirred together a crazy pot of the wildest and sexiest ideas they could find and sold it as a variant religion.
These writers were instructed to seek out ideas in the past that would cause Rome the most trouble.
image.png
254 KB
View full-sizeDownload Marsilio Ficino (Italian: [marˈsiːljo fiˈtʃiːno]; Latin name: Marsilius Ficinus; 19 October 1433–1 October 1499) was an Italian scholar and Catholic priest who was one of the most influential humanist philosophers of the early Italian Renaissance. He was an astrologer, a reviver of Neoplatonism in touch with the major academics of his day, and the first translator of Plato's complete extant works into Latin. His Florentine Academy, an attempt to revive Plato's Academy, influenced the direction and tenor of the Italian Renaissance and the development of European philosophy.
Ficino is the one who supposedly translated the Corpus Hermeticum.
It is curious that he came into possession of that manuscript, since even before it came to him his mission was to revive the ancient teachings of the:
Chaldeans
Egyptians
Platonists
etc.
We are told in the common history that he was already working on a translation of Plato when the Corpus was found.
Although this Plato translation was an important project, de' Medici ordered him to pause and concentrate on the Corpus.
Curiously, no one ever stops to analyze that statement.
Of course, the Kabbalah and other Hermetic works resemble Platonism and Neo-Platonism:
the same guys were working on both.
Plato wasn't influenced by Kabbalists, since we have absolutely no evidence of any Kabbalists working in 400BC, in Athens or anywhere else.
As we see, Plato influenced early Italian Renaissance writers, who then manufactured the Zohar and other Hermetic texts.
That is the obvious source of any parallels, not any link between Plato and ancient itinerant Kabbalists.
We have more evidence of that, since Ficino is known to have invented other Occult artifacts, including the Tarot.
That's right.
The Tarot deck is said to have been invented by Ficino in the 15th century.
Ficino was also an astrologer, and he was accused of magic by the Pope in 1489, narrowly avoiding a condemnation of heresy.
image.png
133 KB
View full-sizeDownload Giovanni Pico dei conti della Mirandola e della Concordia (/ˈpiːkoʊ ˌdɛlə mɪˈrændələ, -ˈrɑːn-/ PEE-koh DEL-ə mirr-A(H)N-də-lə, Italian: [dʒoˈvanni ˈpiːko della miˈrandola]; Latin: Johannes Picus de Mirandula; 24 February 1463 – 17 November 1494), known as Pico della Mirandola, was an Italian Renaissance nobleman and philosopher. He is famed for the events of 1486, when, at the age of 23, he proposed to defend 900 theses on religion, philosophy, natural philosophy, and magic against all comers, for which he wrote the Oration on the Dignity of Man, which has been called the "Manifesto of the Renaissance", and a key text of Renaissance humanism and of what has been called the "Hermetic Reformation". He was the founder of the tradition of Christian Kabbalah, a key tenet of early modern Western esotericism. The 900 Theses was the first printed book to be universally banned by the Church. Pico is sometimes seen as a proto-Protestant, because his 900 theses anticipated many Protestant views.
He used the parallels between Hermeticism and Kabbalah as evidence, but I have shown you that is inverted.
There are parallels between Kabbalah and Pythagoras for the same reason there are parallels between Kabbalah and Plato:
Kabbalah was manufactured almost two millennia later by Italian crypto-Jews using ideas they got from Pythagoras and Plato.
Pico studied:
Hebrew
Aramaic
Arabic
with Elia del Medigo, a Jewish Averroist, which of course was not normal for an Italian of the time.
image.png
4.59 MB
View full-sizeDownload Elia del Medigo, also called Elijah Delmedigo or Elias ben Moise del Medigo and sometimes known to his contemporaries as Helias Hebreus Cretensis or in Hebrew Elijah Mi-Qandia (c. 1458 – c. 1493). According to Jacob Joshua Ross, "while the non-Jewish students of Delmedigo may have classified him as an “Averroist”, he clearly saw himself as a follower of Maimonides". But, according to other scholars, Delmedigo was clearly a strong follower of Averroes' doctrines, even the more radical ones: unity of intellect, eternity of the world, autonomy of reason from the boundaries of revealed religion.
Why would the son of an Italian Duke bother to learn Hebrew and Aramaic?
To understand it, it helps to know what an Averroist was.
An Averroist was a follower of Averroes, and Averroes was a Spanish Muslim of the 12th century who was widely considered to be a dangerous heretic.
image.png
16.5 MB
View full-sizeDownload Ibn Rushd (Arabic: ابن رشد; full name in Arabic: أبو الوليد محمد ابن احمد ابن رشد, romanized: Abū l-Walīd Muḥammad Ibn ʾAḥmad Ibn Rušd; 14 April 1126 – 11 December 1198), often Latinized as Averroes (English: /əˈvɛroʊiːz/), was an Andalusian polymath and jurist who wrote about many subjects, including philosophy, theology, medicine, astronomy, physics, psychology, mathematics, Islamic jurisprudence and law, and linguistics. The author of more than 100 books and treatises, his philosophical works include numerous commentaries on Aristotle, for which he was known in the Western world as The Commentator and Father of Rationalism.
He combined the ideas of Islam and Aristotle, famously promoting the idea of monopsychism—that all humans share a single great soul.
This idea influenced many, from Spinoza to Jung.
But in Renaissance Italy, Averroes ideas were anathema.
Bishop Tempier had listed 219 ideas in Averroes that were considered anti-Catholic.
That is why Pico della Mirandola was studying with an Averroist, and why Pico was a student of Ficino, supported by the de' Medici.
It was all about undermining Rome.
Of course, it wasn't just through writers promoting Kabbalah and other Hermetic texts that the de' Medicis succeeded in undermining Rome.
The de' Medicis were able to achieve more lasting damage by infiltrating the Vatican itself.
In 1513, Lorenzo de' Medici bought his son Giovanni the Papacy.
Pope Leo X (Italian: Leone X; born Giovanni di Lorenzo de' Medici, 11 December 1475 – 1 December 1521) was head of the Catholic Church and ruler of the Papal States from 9 March 1513 to his death, in December 1521.
If you wish to read one of the most incredible whitewashes in the history of propaganda, go read the Wikipedia page for Leo X.
We are told that Leo was,
“One of the most illustrious princes that ever sat on the papal throne.
Humane, beneficent, generous, affable; the patron of every art, and friend of every virtue.”
That is quoted from David Hume, which should help you judge Hume.
David Hume (/hjuːm/; born David Home; 7 May NS [26 April OS] 1711 – 25 August 1776) was a Scottish Enlightenment philosopher, historian, economist, librarian, and essayist, who is best known today for his highly influential system of philosophical empiricism, skepticism, and naturalism. Beginning with A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–40), Hume strove to create a naturalistic science of man that examined the psychological basis of human nature. Hume followed John Locke in rejecting the existence of innate ideas, concluding that all human knowledge derives solely from experience. This places him with Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and George Berkeley as an empiricist.
In truth, with the possible exception of the Borgia Pope, this de' Medici Pope was the most:
corrupt
venal
disgusting
pervert ever to sit in a chair.
Pope Alexander VI (born Rodrigo de Borja; 1 January 1431 – 18 August 1503) (epithet: Valentinus ("The Valencian") was head of the Catholic Church and ruler of the Papal States from 11 August 1492 until his death in 1503. Born into the prominent Borgia family in Xàtiva in the Kingdom of Valencia under the Crown of Aragon (now Spain), Rodrigo studied law at the University of Bologna. He was ordained deacon and made a cardinal in 1456 after the election of his uncle as Pope Callixtus III, and a year later he became vice-chancellor of the Catholic Church. He proceeded to serve in the Curia under the next four popes, acquiring significant influence and wealth in the process. In 1492, Rodrigo was elected pope, taking the name Alexander VI.
What is more, that was his assignment.
Lorenzo clearly bought the Papacy for the express purpose of corrupting it.
He no doubt instructed his son to act as anti-holy as humanly possible.
For the record, it is likely the de' Medicis also bankrolled the Protestant response to Leo X.
That is, there is some evidence Martin Luther was the controlled opposition, paid to publicize the atrocities of the Pope throughout Europe.
Luther was even accused by his Catholic enemies of being a crypto-Jew himself, out to destroy Rome.
In support of that, we find that Luther's mother was née Lindemann.
Walter Kaufmann, in his book Tragedy and Philosophy says this:
“Lindemann is a name that would strike most Germans as Jewish.”
But rather than pursue that to its bitter end, I simply suggest to you it is not beyond imagining that the de' Medicis controlled both the action and the reaction.
We know the financiers have done that again and again, and are doing it now on a daily basis, so why not in 1517?
What could be better for the de' Medicis and their Jewish allies than to create a wicked Pope and then pay someone to list his vices?
Even better if that someone is then excommunicated, since it adds to the scandal and gets it in more papers.
If TV had been around then, it would have generated 24-hour coverage.
If that reading is correct, it is doubtful the bankers really thought it through.
It is doubtful they intended to create a second nest of Christians, one that would become in many ways more zealous than the first nest.
Probably they thought Protestantism would be fleeting, a temporary pawn against the Papacy, as Buddhism is now a pawn against American fundamentalism.
They must hope Western Buddhism doesn't spin out in the same way, and given a few more centuries, it may.
Humans are naturally zealous creatures, tending to overthink and oversell everything, except the truth.
But let us return to the problem at hand.
Before I show you other hoaxes, it might be best to pause for a moment and remind ourselves that the Renaissance was not a total loss, to say the least.
Since I have thrown the death of art in the 20th century at the feet of the Rockefellers and other merchant and banking families, and since I am a practicing realist artist, it is worth giving the 15th and 16th century banking families credit where credit is due.
Obviously, they didn't destroy art.
They were patrons of some of the greatest artists in history.
Like the current financiers, they fought the aristocrats, Rome, and all the major religions; but unlike the current financiers, they did it without turning art into a nasty burp.
Like the current financiers, they were neck-deep in all the culture wars, manufacturing many of them from whole cloth; but unlike the current financiers, they did not feel the need to jettison all high culture in the process, turning their milieu into a vulgar tissue of:
image.png
789 KB
View full-sizeDownload Galileo di Vincenzo Bonaiuti de' Galilei (15 February 1564 – 8 January 1642), commonly referred to as Galileo Galilei (/ˌɡælɪˈleɪoʊ ˌɡælɪˈleɪ/ GAL-il-AY-oh GAL-il-AY, US also /ˌɡælɪˈliːoʊ -/ GAL-il-EE-oh -, Italian: [ɡaliˈlɛːo ɡaliˈlɛːi]) or simply Galileo, was an Italian astronomer, physicist and engineer, sometimes described as a polymath. He was born in the city of Pisa, then part of the Duchy of Florence. Galileo has been called the father of observational astronomy, modern-era classical physics, the scientific method, and modern science.
But in less 30 years, the two senses of “occult” had been conflated, and it appears that Bacon's new science had been subverted by fake mystics and Intelligencers and paid hoaxers.
The tricks Bacon had used to hide from the Inquisition were turned and used by his false followers as feints in the holy wars between Jews and Christians, financiers and aristocrats.
By the time of Cromwell, Freemasonry had already been flipped.
By then the Jewish financiers had already infiltrated it and used it to subvert Christian institutions.
In this way it was just an earlier example of later manufactured and subverted movements like:
Mormonism
the Jehovah's Witnesses
Theosophy
OTO
Wicca
Scientology
and many, many others.
Not all of these were created or subverted by Jewish interests (I assume), but all were created as some form of misdirection.
Some of these movements include many earnest followers who I really have no wish to insult, but that doesn't change the fact the movements were created by agents and operatives.
I intend to educate, not insult, and if you aren't in a position to hear what I have to say, I suggest you walk away quietly.
You may be where you need to be for the time, and I have no intention of suggesting otherwise.
You can progress even while existing in a completely fake world, as I know from my own experience.
The world being what it is, no one can do otherwise.
If we all required a perfect reality in order to exist day to day, we would all be dead on the morrow.
So, it looks to me as if Bacon's secret society was subverted about 30 years later by Jewish interests.
But was this just a subversion of science by politics, or was more going on?
To answer that, it is worth remembering that Bacon was the protégé of John Dee.
image.png
16.6 MB
View full-sizeDownload John Dee (13 July 1527 – 1608 or 1609) was an English mathematician, astronomer, teacher, astrologer, occultist, and alchemist. He was the court astronomer for, and advisor to, Elizabeth I, and spent much of his time on alchemy, divination, and Hermetic philosophy. As an antiquarian, he had one of the largest libraries in England at the time. As a political advisor, he advocated the foundation of English colonies in the New World to form a "British Empire", a term he is credited with coining.
Dee was a top counsellor of the Queen, an alleged magician, and many other things besides.
He had invented the Enochian language, which he said he learned from conversing with angels.
Since that looks like a cover, we should ask what the Enochian language really was.
It turns out there is some evidence it was an early code used by British Intelligence.
Yes, British Intelligence has existed as long as England has existed:
it was not invented in the 19th century.
In fact, John Dee of the late 16th century was the inspiration for Ian Fleming'sJames Bond in the 20th.
image.png
167 KB
View full-sizeDownload Ian Lancaster Fleming (28 May 1908 – 12 August 1964) was a British writer, best known for his postwar James Bond series of spy novels. Fleming came from a wealthy family connected to the merchant bank Robert Fleming & Co., and his father was the Member of Parliament (MP) for Henley from 1910 until his death on the Western Front in 1917. Educated at Eton, Sandhurst, and, briefly, the universities of Munich and Geneva, Fleming moved through several jobs before he started writing.
Fleming came from British Intelligence himself, and that is now admitted, so he was simply giving the nod to previous agents.
John Dee signed his letters to Queen Elizabeth as 007, which meant that they were,
“For her eyes only.”
Well, if Dee was Intelligence, then his protégé Bacon must have been also.
Which means Bacon's secret society was not what we have been told.
This adds a third meaning to the word “Occult”.
In this sense, Bacon wasn't mainly interested in the Occult as ancient esoteric teachings of the Hermetic or Chaldean sort; when it related to his work in Intelligence, the Occult was simply another word for “clandestine”.
These were covert operations, in other words.
Bacon's secret society was, perhaps among other things, British Intelligence.
Remember, Bacon had his hand in everything.
He was Lord Chancellor, the highest position in England outside of court; and, given what we have uncovered, he must have also been head of British Intelligence.
This reading gives us the key for unlocking a thousand mysteries of the time.
It even gives us another way to read Shakespeare, although we won't go there in this paper.
So, when Bacon's secret society was subverted 30 years later by Jewish interests, we may be seeing British Intelligence changing hands.
I would assume that some part of British Intelligence definitely changed hands, but whether the whole department was flipped is hard to say.
In the same way, it is possible that some Freemason and Rosy Cross lodges avoided the subversion.
It is possible we are still seeing covert battles among various secret sects to this day, and these sects go all the way back to this split 400 years ago.
From my previous papers, we have seen that Intelligence is split to this day, although I haven't seen the possibility of splits along these lines until now.
Undoubtedly, newer alliances and splits have taken place, but the main lines of the old conflicts may still be traced beneath them.
Regardless of what we find there, you can see that the Intelligence reading of history is just as fruitful in the distant past as it is now.
I had asked how far back we could trace these strange events, and as it turns out we can trace them as far back as we wish to go.
The battle between aristocratic wealth (mainly from land and taxation) and merchant wealth (from trade and interest) goes way back, and we see here probable signs of that battle in early British Intelligence.
As I first assumed, the battle was indeed between those parties, but as usual science and philosophy and the Occult were just false fronts, behind which the real battle was raging.
These battles were primarily for control of Intelligence.
As now, Intelligence was a fundamental tool of governance and statecraft, and governance and statecraft were tools of wealth accumulation.
As usual, this was spy versus spy and rich versus rich.
In case you missed it, I wish to draw your attention to the fact we have just seen Intelligence hiding behind the Occult once again.
We have seen it more recently and more obviously in my papers on:
Charles Manson
the Zodiac
Son of Sam
and the Night Stalker.
where the CIA hid behind:
Satanism
OTO
the Process Church
“ritual sacrifice”
and other instances of the manufactured Occult.
We have seen that none of those things were really going on.
In every case we studied, we found that Occult was always just a curtain Intelligence could hide behind.
Well, we just saw the same thing 400 years earlier.
This means any time you are being pushed into the Occult as the explanation for anything, you should understand that the real perpetrator is Intelligence.
Every time you see the word Occult, substitute the word Intelligence.
With that in mind, let's look at some other events in this period.
Not long before his death, John Dee was sent to Prague to consult with Rudolph II, Holy Roman Emperor.
image.png
4.34 MB
View full-sizeDownload Rudolf II (18 July 1552 – 20 January 1612) was Holy Roman Emperor (1576–1612), King of Hungary and Croatia (as Rudolf I, 1572–1608), King of Bohemia (1575–1608/1611) and Archduke of Austria (1576–1608). He was a member of the House of Habsburg.
Prague at that time was said to be the center of the study of the Occult in Europe.
It was also a Mecca for European Jews, as well as a hotbed of Kabbalah studies.
Alchemy and Witchcraft also proliferated at that time and place.
But we can now despin all these things.
Let's despin the last first.
As we know, Witchcraft also proliferated in the middle of the 20th century, and in my paper on the Unabomber, we found out why.
There, we saw Witchcraft promoted by Gerald Gardner, the founder of Wicca.
image.png
96.4 KB
View full-sizeDownload Gerald Brosseau Gardner (13 June 1884 – 12 February 1964), also known by the craft name Scire, was an English Wiccan, author, and amateur anthropologist and archaeologist. He was instrumental in bringing the modern pagan religion of Wicca to public attention, writing some of its definitive religious texts and founding the tradition of Gardnerian Wicca.
I exposed Gardner as protégé of Aleister Crowley, an earlier promoter of Witchcraft and Satanism.
Both were British Intelligence agents, and they promoted Witchcraft and Satanism as cover for Intelligence projects, as well as general disruptors of culture.
We don't know if Witchcraft was being used as a general disruptor of culture in the 17th century, but we may assume it was.
The creation of fear was just as useful to the governors back then as it is now.
But we now definitely can see that Witchcraft was used as a cover for Intelligence back then, and John Dee is our proof.
John Dee was the Gerald Gardner or Aleister Crowley of his time, promoting the Occult while being a top agent.
He wasn't in Prague to discuss the Occult.
He was in Prague to discuss a joint Intelligence project with the Emperor.
We get the same clue from the study of the Kabbalah.
We have seen that the Kabbalah was created by writers in Italy in the early Renaissance, at the behest of Jewish bankers.
So, we may assume the Kabbalah was mainly one more Intelligence project.
Not only did it provide cover for agents Jewish and non-Jewish, but it provided a means of covert communication between them.
I haven't studied the “scholarly” treatises on the Kabbalah of the time, but my first assumption would be that these treatises often contained code—code that allowed for messages to be passed covertly to those who knew the breaker.
This would indicate that most gematria was not “sacred”, but rather profane in the extreme, being no more than Intelligence code.
As usual, even those who claim to be providing you with a novel and revolutionary reading of history always fail to tell you the truth.
In researching these topics, I found many authors—some of them anonymous or writing under obvious pseudonyms—who pretended to be publishing forgotten history or non-mainstream opinion.
But none of them went anywhere near where I am going.
They provided some of the same facts, but never succeeded in collating these facts into the most likely conclusions.
We have seen the same sort of failures in more recent history, with alternative theories of recent events selling you the same main lines as the mainstream theory.
We saw it in my Manson paper, where Mae Brussell divulged some extraordinary facts and opinions on the events, but somehow never got near the obvious truth.
We saw it in my Kennedy paper, where hundreds of alternate theorists somehow managed to miss the main pieces of evidence and the obvious conclusion.
Both the action and the reaction have been controlled.
Both the mainstream theory and the alternate theory have been controlled.
I have shown you that the witch and warlock trials of the 20th century were all faked:
The first witch trials to look at would be the Salem witch trials, of course, since a lot of documentation exists for those.
But I see red flags before I even get there or log into Wikipedia, since I remember that Arthur Miller was hired to sell them in the 20th century.
image.png
4.19 MB
View full-sizeDownload Arthur Asher Miller (October 17, 1915 – February 10, 2005) was an American playwright, essayist and screenwriter in the 20th-century American theater. Among his most popular plays are All My Sons (1947), Death of a Salesman (1949), The Crucible (1953), and A View from the Bridge (1955). He wrote several screenplays, including The Misfits (1961). The drama Death of a Salesman is considered one of the best American plays of the 20th century.
Strange that The Crucible came out in 1953.
The Witchcraft Act was repealed in England in 1951 and Gerald Gardner started Wicca in 1954, so we already see the first signs of a project.
Miller was Jewish and he was married to Marilyn Monroe, who faked her death in 1962.
image.png
12.9 MB
View full-sizeDownload Marilyn Monroe (/ˈmærəlɪn mənˈroʊ/; born Norma Jeane Mortenson; June 1, 1926 – August 4, 1962) was an American actress, model, and singer. Known for playing comic "blonde bombshell" characters, she became one of the most popular sex symbols of the 1950s and early 1960s, as well as an emblem of the era's sexual revolution. She was a top-billed actress for a decade, and her films grossed $200 million (equivalent to $2 billion in 2023) by the time of her death in 1962. Long after her death, Monroe remains a pop culture icon. In 1999, the American Film Institute ranked her as the sixth-greatest female screen legend from the Golden Age of Hollywood.
Since it involved alleged Communists working in the entertainment industry, since the entertainment industry was controlled by the CIA, and since Communism itself was an Intelligence project, we may deduce that all the HUAC events were manufactured.
This would indicate Miller was an agent, which gets us started on the bigger question.
But I must leave that hanging and return to the 17th century.
As I do that, I simply draw your attention to the fact that the Salem witch trials occurred in 1692.
That is also the 17th century.
But we are returning not to Salem, but to Germany.
Once there, we should find it curious that the Renaissance Church was not interested in witches until after 1484, when the Inquisition suddenly got involved.
Up until then, the Church dismissed witches as ignorant pagans.
So, is it a coincidence that witch trials suddenly became popular at the same time that the Occult began being promoted by:
intellectuals
government officials
Jewish bankers
We should ask why the government would promote the Occult via the:
Why would the same leaders promote the Occult and burn people at the stake for it?
You will say it is because it wasn't the same leaders doing the promoting and the convicting.
The Catholic Church was running the Inquisitions, while the enemies of Rome like the bankers and Kings were promoting the Occult.
Yes, that is the correct answer, but it requires refinement.
We have already seen that the Occult was cover for other things going on, so although we have the right parties, we don't have the right casus belli.
We lack the correct cause of the war between Rome and the Jewish bankers.
Do you really think Rome didn't know who its enemies were or what they were up to?
Do you really think Rome didn't know of the Jewish bankers and the State intellectuals promoting the Occult?
Do you think they weren't aware of British Intelligence or John Dee or Francis Bacon?
The Vatican had its own spies and secret agencies, of course, and they were very well aware of who their enemies were.
They knew good and well that long-haired ladies in small villages or pretty wenches showing too much ankle were no threat to them.
Nothing had changed in that regard between 1483 and 1484.
Assuming anyone was really being tried and hung or burned, the ones being burned couldn't have been witches.
That was another cover story.
They had to be either spies for the State, or covert operatives working against Rome.
As you should read Intelligence whenever you see Occult, you should read Agent whenever your read Witch.
Once we see the right answer, everything clicks.
Of course, the agencies of the time couldn't just admit they were killing spies, since to do that would be to blow their own cover.
Until recently, Intelligence was fearful enough of its existence that it had to remain in the shadows.
Only now is Intelligence so secure it can write about itself in the movies and on TV.
Back then, cover was the first rule of existence, so the public reports could never tell the truth.
For the masses, Intelligence wasn't even a word they knew.
They knew about government officials, and some knew what spying was, but the idea that an entire arm of government operated completely in the black would never have occurred to them.
It doesn't occur to a lot of people now, and if it does occur to them, they dismiss as it as either fanciful or beyond their comprehension.
They would sooner believe in witches and do.
Even today, most people are more comfortable talking to you about Witchcraft than talking to you about Intelligence.
So, for many reasons, it was and is easier to tell people events involve the first rather than the second.
They are more likely to believe the lie than the truth anyway.
They would rather hear about witches than agents, so it works out for all parties.
I also beg you to notice the parallels in terminology.
We just saw it when I said, “operated in the black”. Intelligence operations today are known as black ops.
Well, the Occult also operates in the black, doesn't it?
It is composed of the black arts.
The parallel in language is no coincidence.
As we have seen above, Intelligence and the Occult are the same thing.
The Occult has been hiding Intelligence since the beginning.
As more proof of this, let us look at where the biggest witch trials in Germany were in that period.
We are told they were in:
Trier
Bamberg
Fulda
and Wurzburg.
These are all highly suspicious places to find major witch trials.
For example, Trier was a major intellectual center, with a large university and an educated populace.
The Archbishopric of Trier was one of the largest and most powerful in the Holy Roman Empire, and was an electorate.
It hosted the Imperial Diet (Reichstag) in this period, which was like a Senate of the HRE.
Finding a large witch trial in Trier in the 17th century would be like finding a large witch trial in Boston in the 19th century.
But it would be a very likely place to find agents, and a trial of State spies.
In support of that, I remind you that Karl Marx was later from Trier, and that I have outed him as a spy.
I have also shown you that New Trier High School outside Chicago is named for Trier and has as its emblem the Black Gate of Trier.
Many of its prominent alumni are probable spies or agents.
As we have seen, the rise of the German witch trials coincided with the rise of the Rosicrucian movement across Europe.
So, at the same time witches were being convicted of magic, the wealthiest and most privileged people in the realm were promoting magic.
Does that make any sense?
Not until you realize that both Rosicrucianism and Witchcraft were covers for Intelligence.
There was no Witchcraft going on—at least not in the places or in the levels of society were told.
image.png
1.2 MB
View full-sizeDownload Johannes Valentinus Andreae (17 August 1586 – 27 June 1654), a.k.a. Johannes Valentinus Andreä or Johann Valentin Andreae, was a German theologian, who claimed to be the author of an ancient text known as the Chymische Hochzeit Christiani Rosencreutz anno 1459 (published in 1616, Strasbourg; in English Chymical Wedding of Christian Rosenkreutz in 1459). This became one of the three founding works of Rosicrucianism, which was both a legend and a fashionable cultural phenomenon across Europe in this period.
This came out in 1614 and was followed by other Manifestos soon thereafter.
John Dee's trip to Prague was said to have been the antecedent and proximate cause of these publications, and Francis Bacon may also have been involved.
The Manifestos promoted “Magia, Cabala, and Alchymia”.
This is strange because the Fama was later published as part of a Protestant treatise called the Universal and General Reformation.
This linked the Rosicrucians to the Protestant movement, a thing admitted by lodges of the time.
This is not to be wondered at, since Bacon was also making alliances with the Protestants at the same time, allegedly to resist the power of Rome against science.
It is also worth noting that Martin Luther used a rose and cross as his personal seal, which takes us back to our previous musings about Luther and his true background.
Why would those founding the Protestant movement link themselves to:
magic
Kabbalah
alchemy
Not only does it not seem to be a very politic move, but it also seems outright foolhardy.
If you really wished to convert Christians away from Rome and to a “cleaner” form of worship, would you link yourself to the Occult?
What sense does it make to accuse the Pope of:
venery
profligacy
unholiness
and then ally yourself to:
magicians
witches
wizards
As with Luther's rose and cross, it smacks of overconfidence and base hypocrisy.
Clearly these people were very sure of their positions and cared nothing for the opinions of the masses.
Everything done at the time was done as a shallow political feint, meant to be read by other agents and not by any religious people whatsoever.
Luther's rose and cross seal reminds me of Arnold Schwarzenegger's Nazi belt buckle, which he wore on the cover of TIME magazine.
That is a man clearly not posturing for the average voter, in California or anywhere else.
That is an agent posturing for other agents.
Luther's rose and cross seal indicates the same thing.
Someone who was not completely created and protected would have to be more careful than to give himself away like that.
But let us return to the Rosicrucians.
Like the texts of Hermeticism and Kabbalah, the texts of Rosicrucianism are suspect in the extreme.
image.png
18.9 KB
View full-sizeDownload Idries Shah (/ˈɪdrɪs ˈʃɑː/; Hindi: इदरीस शाह, Pashto: ادريس شاه, Urdu: ادریس شاه; 16 June 1924 – 23 November 1996), also known as Idris Shah, né Sayed Idries el-Hashimi (Arabic: سيد إدريس هاشمي) and by the pen name Arkon Daraul, was an Afghan author, thinker and teacher in the Sufi tradition. Shah wrote over three dozen books on topics ranging from psychology and spirituality to travelogues and culture studies.
According to agents like Gerald Gardner and his companion Idries Shah, the Order of the Rosy Cross started in the 1300's when Christian Rosenkreutz traveled to Turkey and convened with the Sufis.
image.png
560 KB
View full-sizeDownload Christian Rosenkreuz is seen to have been Lazarus/St. John in his previous life, the Beloved Disciple whom the Christ had "raised from the dead" and who would remain active until the Lord's return.
How much positive evidence for that do we have?
None.
How much negative evidence do we have?
Well, we have the word of Gardner and Shah, which is worth precisely nothing.
We can dismiss the story based on the reputation of the storytellers alone.
And this applies to all the previous storytellers of the Rosy Cross.
The story arose in the 17th century from these murky sources, but the murky sources always spring from the same suspicious characters in the same suspicious localities, which indicates it was manufactured by European Intelligence like everything else, as a tool against Rome.
However, from the Jewish perspective, the wonderful thing about these various texts and gambits is that they cut in both directions.
They were initially created to use against Rome, and Jewish agents sold the gambits to Protestant:
Kings
Queens
Princes
in the north with that goal in mind.
image.png
393 KB
View full-sizeDownload Christina (Swedish: Kristina; 18 December [O.S. 8 December] 1626 – 19 April 1689) was a member of the House of Vasa, and the Queen of Sweden in her own right from 1632 until her abdication in 1654. She succeeded her father Gustavus Adolphus upon his death at the Battle of Lützen in 1632 but began ruling the Swedish Empire when she reached the age of eighteen.
Not only did Elizabeth I and Rudolph II bite on these schemes, but many other monarchs did also as well, including Queen Christina of Sweden, who became a disciple of Sabbatai Zevi (who we will look at in a moment).
image.png
6.81 MB
View full-sizeDownload Sabbatai Zevi (Hebrew: שַׁבְּתַי צְבִי, romanized: Šabbĕṯai Ṣĕḇî; Turkish: Sabetay Sevi; August 1, 1626 – c. September 17, 1676, was an Ottoman Jewish mystic, and ordained rabbi from Smyrna (now İzmir, Turkey).[3][4] He was likely of Ashkenazi origin. Active throughout the Ottoman Empire, Zevi claimed to be the long-awaited Jewish Messiah and founded the Sabbatean movement.
As we have already seen with Charles I, these schemes did the Royals no good, whether they became disciples or not.
They were not intended to do the Royals any good.
They were intended to create havoc upon anyone who handled them.
They cut Rome first and the aristocrats second, which left the field to the merchants.
We have already seen evidence of that above and we will see more below.
Sabbatai Zevi has so many red flags on him he is a Rosy Cross from the first word.
Although from Smyrna (Ottoman Empire, later Turkey), his father was the wealthy agent of a English trading house.
The words “agent” and “English” are your first clues.
My reading of those clues is that British Intelligence was active in Smyrna, and Zevi's father was their contact or front.
This would indicate Sabbatai Zevi was groomed for his role from an early age, and nothing that later happened was an accident.
We have seen in my recent papers that these young agents are always the sons of wealthy merchants. See my paper on John Reed to see what I mean by that. At age 22, in the year 1648, Zevi claimed he was the Messiah and began flouting Jewish law.
He was at first put under cherem and then banished.
He went immediately to Constantinople, which is also curious.
Those banished by rabbis in a smaller town don't normally proceed to a larger town, where they will be even more conspicuous.
Even worse, he was immediately taken in by obvious agents like Abraham Yachini, whose published bio makes absolutely no sense.
Yachini is supposed to have forged many documents in support of Zevi's claims, but neither the rabbis of the city nor the Muslim officials ever brought him up for this.
Zevi then proceeded to Cairo, where he immediately came under the protection of Raphael Joseph Halabi, a very wealthy Jew who held the high position of Mint Master and Tax-Farmer.
In other words, he was an Egyptian Federal Banker.
You should be highly suspicious of that relationship, since why would an Egyptian Federal Banker take in and promote a 33-year-old Messiah claimant?
Can you say,
“Intelligence Project”
We are told Zevi then moved on to Jerusalem, where he continued to attract crowds of listeners.
By this time, he was famous all over Europe and Asia, but we are supposed to believe the rabbis of Jerusalem just left him alone?
Instead, we are supposed to believe Zevi was elected as community envoy, convincing his patron Halabi in Cairo to pay Jerusalem's taxes to the Ottomans.
The reason Zevi was left alone by Church and State officials is that they knew he was an agent of the bankers, just pretending to be the Messiah in order to mess with all the Millenarian boneheads in Europe who were buying into this scam.
Remember, we saw the Jewish Bankers and Gentile Intelligence agents in Western Europe promoting Millenarianism for many reasons, the main ones being promotion of the Jewish state, promotion of Jewish settlement, and promotion of interest banking.
The Gentiles were promoting it because they wanted the backing of Jewish bankers, who were bankrolling their wars.
The Gentiles failed to see the deeper and longer consequences of these schemes and were fooled into supporting them.
Those Gentiles in the West who were working for the fall of the aristocracy didn't even have to be fooled, since they wanted pretty much what the Jews wanted:
open trade and the fall of both Rome and the Royals.
Zevi then married a very young (admitted) whore, but they were even able to work that into the story.
Given the power of his backers, Zevi could have married a 10-year-old boy, or 3-year-old donkey and they would have been able to find scriptural justification for it.
Soon after, Zevi met Nathan of Gaza, misnamed since he was actually from Germany.
image.png
1.55 MB
View full-sizeDownload Nathan of Gaza (Hebrew: נתן העזתי; 1643–1680), also Nathan Benjamin ben Elisha Hayyim haLevi Ashkenazi or Ghazzati, was a theologian and author born in Jerusalem. After his marriage in 1663 he moved to Gaza, where he became famous as a prophet for the Jewish messiah claimant Sabbatai Zevi.
This is the first clue with Nathan, since what are the odds Zevi is going to take up with a German Jew in Gaza?
Nathan's father, Elisha Hayyim ben Jacob, was a distinguished rabbinic intellectual who served as an envoy of Jerusalem collecting donations for impoverished Jews.
Livorno was built by the de' Medicis in the late 16th century, and when Hagiz was there in 1646-56, the de' Medicis still ran the place:
In order to populate his new city Ferdinando de’ Medici passed a number of laws, known as the Leggi Livornine, primarily intended to invite Sephardic Jews fleeing persecution in Spain and Portugal to settle in the city.
In the same year he left Smyrna to go to Constantinople again, and we are told he was forced to flee Smyrna by city officials.
What about “his power”?
One minute he has it, the next minute it is mysteriously fled.
Nathan then prophesied that Zevi would place the Sultan's crown on his own head—another failed prophecy.
Instead, the Sultan threw Zevi in jail and forced him to convert to Islam.
Curiously, after he converted, Zevi was hired by the Sultan to be his doorkeeper, with a generous salary.
I will give you ten seconds to see what that means. . . . . . . . . .
It means the Sultan was in on the ruse. †
Since Zevi wasn't the Messiah, they couldn't go on claiming he was much longer.
Even Jewish Intelligence can't create a Messiah.
So, it was time to end the project.
They had accomplished what they wished to accomplish, and it was time to ease their agent Zevi into retirement.
This wasn't easy to do, given the ruckus they had caused, and they had to very soon fake the deaths of all these people, including Zevi's fake wife-whore.
She supposedly died in 1674, at age 33 (of course).
He allegedly died two years later at age 50.
Nathan of Gaza allegedly died at age 37.
I say that Intelligence had achieved what it wished to achieve.
What was that?
By 1666, they had achieved major destabilization of both the Vatican and Europe as a whole.
The de' Medicis got three more Popes on the throne after Leo X, four if you include Paul V, whom they also owned.
image.png
1.62 MB
View full-sizeDownload Pope Paul V (Latin: Paulus V; Italian: Paolo V) (17 September 1550 – 28 January 1621), born Camillo Borghese, was head of the Catholic Church and ruler of the Papal States from 16 May 1605 to his death, in January 1621. In 1611, he honored Galileo Galilei as a member of the papal Accademia dei Lincei and supported his discoveries. In 1616, Pope Paul V instructed Cardinal Robert Bellarmine to inform Galileo that the Copernican theory could not be taught as fact, but Bellarmine's certificate allowed Galileo to continue his studies in search for evidence and use the geocentric model as a theoretical device. That same year Paul V assured Galileo that he was safe from persecution so long as he, the Pope, should live. Bellarmine's certificate was used by Galileo for his defense at the trial of 1633.
At the same time, Jewish agents had achieved the death of Charles I in England, replacing him with Cromwell and permanently damaging the English line.
Once the bankers got in, England would never be the same.
England was so destabilized by 1666 London was almost in ruins.
Remember, 1665-1666 were the years of the Great Plague, in which over 100,000 people died—25% of the population of London.
I am not claiming Jewish agents caused either the plague or the fire.
They hardly needed to, since they had already won before that.
They had created such great levels of destabilization in England that the plague and fire could be seen as a natural outcome of this depression.
London was already spinning out of control in 1664, and if there had been no plague and no fire another catastrophe might have occurred.
However, it is worth pointing out that the mainstream British Jewish historian Cecil Roth has admitted that both the fire and plague seemed to spare the Jewish quarters of London. *
Roth was never accused of anti-Semitism, that I know of.
In fact, he was Jewish himself, and is promoted by other Jewish scholars.
So, I am also not claiming Jewish agents didn't cause the plague or the fire.
I consider all questions I haven't yet researched myself to be open.
As with the Salem trials, I haven't time to get into it here.
But before I move on, I point out that the Jews of London certainly had cause to light the city aflame, although they lived there themselves.
Remember, the Inquisition was still hot at the time, with news of fresh autos-da-fe being reported monthly or weekly, with Jews as common candidates for these fiery deaths.
You would think they would go burn Lisbon or Madrid, but the poor Jews didn't have that reach, of course.
And although London was supposed to be some refuge for them, many of them didn't find it that different than Spain.
They weren't immediately arrested for being Jews, no, but they still faced many lesser indignities, including most of the old list short of burning.
In Germany, (HRE) the same sort of collapse was at hand.
The Thirty Years' War had decimated the Empire by 1648, with losses of 1/3 of all inhabitants; and, not surprisingly, the Catholic Habsburgs were the big losers.
As with WWI, it all started when Archduke Ferdinand of Austria was elected Crown Prince in 1617. Remember, we are taught WWI started with the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria in 1914.
Add up those numbers.
Both dates equal 15.
Curious. This could be because, as with Cromwell in England at almost the same time, the Jewish bankers were funding the Protestants and the revolutionaries.
This is one reason we saw the Ottoman Empire as a big player in the Sabbatai Zevi hoax:
the Sultan was also an ally of the Protestants in the Thirty Years' War.
While Spain was backing the Habsburgs and Ferdinand, Turkey was backing Frederick, Elector Palatine.
We may assume the Medici's and other Jewish bankers were bankrolling Turkey as well, as we see from the to-ing and fro-ing between Livorno and Turkey.
Curiously, although all the other players in the saga are always listed in the current histories, the bankers are left out.
You have to deduce their existence and actions by careless words dropped here and there by historians being paid to misdirect.
Not only were the Jewish bankers bankrolling Frederick and the Ottomans, by the end of the war they had also funded:
the Danes
the Swedes
the French
and the Portuguese.
Then as now, war suited the bankers just fine, since it was an investment that always paid off.
Another reason the Sabbatai Zevi project was ended in 1666 was due to the end of the Austro-Turkish War about a year earlier, which the Turks are said to have lost, but which had ended advantageously to the Sultan, nonetheless.
In Turkish history, they claim to have won that war, which is not altogether surprising in that they left the war with more territories than they had coming in.
It is admitted in the West that the noble Croatian families Zrinski and Frankopan viewed the treaty as particularly supplicating to the Ottomans, with them actually having to give the territories that had just been liberated back to the Ottomans as terms of the treaty, some of which belonged to them before occupation.
As this was considered a victory by the Sultan, it was also considered a victory by the Jewish bankers, who were glad to see any losses by the Habsburgs or Croats.
The Jews especially hated the Zrinskis and Frankopans, since it is those houses that had forced the Jews out of Croatia 200 years earlier.
Up until 1456, Jews had lived prosperously in Croatia, but in that year, they were suddenly banned and forced from the country in toto, and all their possessions were confiscated by the ruling families.
You will say that wasn't so singular, since the Jews were being expelled from many cities and countries at the time, and that is true.
I didn't say the Jews' hatred was limited to the Croats.
They were bankrolling these wars because they had been expelled from large parts of Europe.
So, they naturally had a grudge against those places and were scheming against them.
And the defeat of these Croats was complete, since those two families ended up revolting against the Emperor Leopold and being totally wiped out.
image.png
11.5 MB
View full-sizeDownload Leopold I (Leopold Ignaz Joseph Balthasar Franz Felician; Hungarian: I. Lipót; 9 June 1640 – 5 May 1705) was Holy Roman Emperor, King of Hungary, Croatia, and Bohemia. The second son of Ferdinand III, Holy Roman Emperor, by his first wife, Maria Anna of Spain, Leopold became heir apparent in 1654 after the death of his elder brother Ferdinand IV.
The formerly wealthy Zrinski family went extinct by the end of that century!
Other minorities have been persecuted in the same way, and they didn't kill Jesus or lend money on interest.
Blacks didn't kill Jesus, did they, and yet they were treated like garbage.
The Huguenots didn't kill Jesus, did they, and yet they were burned at the same stake.
Joan of Arc didn't kill Jesus, did she, and yet she was burned at the stake.
image.png
13.4 MB
View full-sizeDownload Joan of Arc (French: Jeanne d'Arc [ʒan daʁk]; Middle French: Jehanne Darc [ʒəˈãnə ˈdark]; c. 1412 – 30 May 1431) is a patron saint of France, honored as a defender of the French nation for her role in the siege of Orléans and her insistence on the coronation of Charles VII of France during the Hundred Years' War. Claiming to be acting under divine guidance, she became a military leader who transcended gender roles and gained recognition as a savior of France.
Native Americans didn't kill Jesus or lend money, did they, and yet we wiped them out like locusts.
All these religious people, Jew and Christian, seem to forget their own scriptures whenever it is convenient, and they quote,
“You reap what you sow.”
one moment and then sow discord the next.
I have to think that if early Jews and Christians had treated one another as fellow human beings rather than as sub-humans, they would have reaped an entirely different history of Europe and the Americas than the one we have to read about.
By uncovering all these fake events, my intention is not to sow more discord.
It is to clear the air.
You may not see what I mean by that, since it may seem to you that truth telling is bound to sow more discord, no matter my intention.
But think of it this way.
If you want to clean a room, what is the first thing you do?
You turn on the lights.
If the sun is up, you open all the curtains, so that you can see what you are doing.
To sweep away the dirt, you have to first know where it is.
If you clean a room in the dark, you are just wasting your time.
Truth telling is turning on the lights in a dirty room.
It is what allows for the clean-up in the first place.
We cannot know where to go if we do not know where we are and where we have been.
And we cannot know where we are or where we have been by groping around in the dark, with shades drawn and doors and windows closed.
The posted histories are cloaked histories.
They read to me like a tissue of half-truths and lies.
Half-truths and lies will always sow more discord than truths fully told.
At the least, full truths inform you whom you should be most resisting and least trusting.
As you have seen, I am giving you an entirely different list than the one you have been sold since childhood.
Having said that, I am going to jump right back into the belly of the beast.
If the de' Medicis were crypto-Jews, is it possible the Rockefellers are as well?
Only one way to find out: ask the question and seek the answer.
As usual, a straight Google search turns up only misdirection and contradictory claims.
Many conspiracy sites say they are, but they all link to back to one article that provides no documentation or other evidence.
The only early red flag worth anything is the fact that the Nazis claimed the Rockefellers were Jewish, but we are told the Nazis were mistaken.
Yes, the mainstream admits the Nazis said it, since we have to be told they were mistaken.
If the Nazis never said it, the mainstream wouldn't say,
“They were mistaken.”
they would say,
“The Nazis never said it.”
So maybe the Nazis were mistaken, maybe they weren't.
As we now know, the Nazis worked with a lot of these American billionaires, especially the ones of German heritage—which the mainstream says the Rockefellers were.
Yes, the mainstream debunkers tell us the Rockefellers came from the German Rockenfelders, of the area of the Palatine.
Unfortunately, this debunker I link to provides links to Wikipedia for the ancestors of Rockenfeller, and they go nowhere.
So that is also a dead-end from the other direction.
However, as I was saying, since the Rockefellers were allegedly billionaires of German extraction, it is surprising the Nazis were “wrong about them”.
This is something the Nazis were normally right about.
The Nazis might be wrong about Jews, but they were normally spot-on when it came to knowing prominent German families in Europe and the US. So that red flag has grown.
It is flapping quite loudly, leading us to continue.
Another red flag is that the debunking article is written under a pseudonym:
PowerElite.
Another red flag is that this debunker refers to a book by Malcolm H. Stern, which conspiracy theorist Henry Makow has claimed outs the Rockefellers as Jews.
“So what, Jews and Christians marry all the time now.
It is no big deal and proves nothing.”
Well, the marriages are more common, but it is not common for the woman to convert to Judaism.
It is much more common in both Jewish homes and Christian homes for the family to follow the faith of the woman, and for the children to take the faith of the mother.
Instead, we find that Eileen has converted to Judaism, attending the shul for ten years, and that the children have been brought up Jewish, being Bar Mitzvahed.
Again, not definitive, but a definite clue.
But there is a bigger one they may be hiding:
Laura Celestia "Cettie" Spelman Rockefeller (September 9, 1839 – March 12, 1915) was an American abolitionist, philanthropist, schoolteacher, and prominent member of the Rockefeller family. Her husband was Standard Oil co-founder John D. Rockefeller. Spelman College in Atlanta, Georgia, and the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial were named for her.
image.png
3.07 MB
View full-sizeDownload John Davison Rockefeller Sr. (July 8, 1839 – May 23, 1937) was an American business magnate and philanthropist. He was one of the wealthiest Americans of all time and one of the richest people in modern history.
As a portrait artist, I couldn't help sharing that early photo of Rockefeller, Sr.
I suggest you study it closely.
There looks to be something very wrong with that young man, something we haven't been told.
He looks to me like a mental patient.
I am reminded of the pictures of Walt Whitman we looked at in my paper on him, which struck me the same way.
It crossed my mind that perhaps they have substituted pictures of mental patients for these famous people, to see if any of us would notice.
If I am the first, please send me the prize.
Something else is very curious.
The old picture of Nelson Rockefeller on the cover of LIFE magazine from 1942 that I published in my Kennedy paper has been scrubbed off the internet searches.
It doesn't come up at all on a Google photo search.
If the Rockefeller's aren't hiding anything, why are scrubbing pictures off the internet in direct response to my papers?
Very strange in so many ways, not the least of which is that David Rockefeller has never had the least interest in World Brotherhood.
But the red flag is not definitive, since the JTS has given awards to other non-Jews, such as George Meany (George Meany? Really? Prominent Jews and Jewish organizations aren't known for being pro-union, especially the conservative ones like JTS).
image.png
1.36 MB
View full-sizeDownload William George Meany (August 16, 1894 – January 10, 1980) was an American labor union leader for 57 years. He was the key figure in the creation of the AFL–CIO and served as the AFL–CIO's first president, from 1955 to 1979.
In 1928 Rockefeller gave 2 million for its construction, and it bears his name to this day.
It is an archaeological museum and is an integral part of the Israel Museum.
I would say that is a definitive clue, although some will say it still doesn't decide the issue.
For more clues, we go to Rockefeller University and see that the philanthropy goes goth ways.
Billionaire Henry Kravis recently gave the University $100 million.
image.png
14.8 MB
View full-sizeDownload Henry R. Kravis (born January 6, 1944) is an American businessman, investor, and philanthropist. He is a co-founder of KKR & Co. Inc.
Kravis is Jewish.
Another clue is the Rockefeller Foundation's assistance to Italian Jewish refugees coming to the US after WWII.
This is a clue because there were many refugees after WWII, but the Rockefeller Foundation assisted only the Jews.
image.png
10.2 MB
View full-sizeDownload Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller (July 8, 1908 – January 26, 1979), sometimes referred to by his nickname Rocky,[1] was an American businessman and politician who served as the 41st vice president of the United States from 1974 to 1977 under President Gerald Ford. A member of the Republican Party and the wealthy Rockefeller family, he previously served as the 49th governor of New York from 1959 to 1973.
At this link, you can see a picture of Nelson Rockefeller with Eleanor Roosevelt at the United Jewish Appeal of Greater New York, a fundraising dinner in 1960.
image.png
1.04 MB
View full-sizeDownload Anna Eleanor Roosevelt (/ˈɛlɪnɔːr ˈroʊzəvɛlt/ EL-in-or ROH-zə-velt; October 11, 1884 – November 7, 1962) was an American political figure, diplomat, and activist. She was the first lady of the United States from 1933 to 1945, during her husband President Franklin D. Roosevelt's four terms in office, making her the longest-serving first lady of the United States.
Of course they are going to have Jewish business connections.
OK, but that doesn't explain all the connections to Israel and to Jewish charities.
It doesn't begin to explain the shock-proofing of Israeli cities.
It doesn't explain the Rockefeller Museum in Jerusalem, all the way back to 1930.
If my readers have other solid evidence I missed, I would be happy to look at it, but please don't send me any links to the websites claiming the Rothschilds and Rockefellers are:
blood-drinking Satanists
child molesters
baby killers
Those sites are also out there by the thousands, but in my opinion most of them are run by the Rockefellers and Rothschilds as opposition control.
They make their opponents look bad, which makes people stop asking questions.
Those sites are also useful when someone like me comes along:
they can lump me in with all those teeth-gnashers, dismissing us all in the same breath.
I will be told,
“What difference does it makes whether the Rockefellers are Jewish or not?
If you aren't anti-Jewish, why do you care?”
Well, in one sense it is true that it doesn't really matter.
However, knowing the truth is always useful, since we can then better understand who the Rockefellers are, and why they do what they do.
Unwinding all the fakes is much easier when we understand the motives of the players involved, and their true histories.
I will then be asked,
“OK, but why would the Rockefellers hide their heritage?
Many other rich and powerful people are Jewish, and they don't hide that they are.”
The answer is easy:
the Rockefellers wanted to run for office.
Most prominent Jewish families weren't interested in running for office, especially if we are talking about the time period before, say, 1950.
Although he never ran for office, John D. Rockefeller considered it.
We must assume he wished to keep his options open.
His grandson Nelson Rockefeller became four-term governor of New York and Vice-President of the United States.
He first entered political life in about 1940.
At that time, it would have been very difficult or impossible to run for major office as a Jew, even in New York.
Joe Lieberman was the first observant Jew to run on a major party Presidential ticket.
image.png
2.36 MB
View full-sizeDownload Joseph Isadore Lieberman (/ˈliːbərmən/; February 24, 1942 – March 27, 2024) was an American politician and lawyer who served as a United States senator from Connecticut from 1989 to 2013.
image.png
15 MB
View full-sizeDownload Albert Arnold Gore Jr. (born March 31, 1948) is an American politician, businessman, and environmentalist who served as the 45th vice president of the United States from 1993 to 2001 under President Bill Clinton.
They lost.
Rockefeller's 1964 run for President didn't go anywhere for other reasons, but had he admitted he was Jewish, it would have exploded even sooner.
We may assume his chances of being nominated for VP in 1974 would have also been destroyed by admitting he was a Jew.
In fact, he wasn't nominated, he was appointed, which is an important difference in this context.
And when Ford ran in 1976, he had to dump Rockefeller from the ticket in favor of Bob Dole, due to opposition in the Republican party.
image.png
15.4 MB
View full-sizeDownload Robert Joseph Dole (July 22, 1923 – December 5, 2021) was an American politician and attorney who represented Kansas in the United States Senate from 1969 to 1996. He was the Republican Leader of the Senate during the final 11 years of his tenure, including three non-consecutive years as Senate Majority Leader. Prior to his 27 years in the Senate, he served in the United States House of Representatives from 1961 to 1969. Dole was also the Republican presidential nominee in the 1996 election and the vice-presidential nominee in the 1976 election.
Why?
We are told it was because Rockefeller was too “moderate”.
Right.
Rockefeller was sold as moderate—as an inside joke, I guess —but the Rockefellers were always about as moderate as Francisco Franco.
image.png
1.11 MB
View full-sizeDownload Francisco Franco Bahamonde[f] (Spanish: [fɾanˈθisko ˈfɾaŋko βa.aˈmonde]; 4 December 1892 – 20 November 1975) was a Spanish military general who led the Nationalist forces in overthrowing the Second Spanish Republic during the Spanish Civil War and thereafter ruled over Spain from 1939 to 1975 as a dictator, assuming the title Caudillo. This period in Spanish history, from the Nationalist victory to Franco's death, is commonly known as Francoist Spain or as the Francoist dictatorship.
Remember, Rockefeller's closest buddy was Henry Kissinger, who is about as moderate as Idi Amin.
Wikipedia says,
“Kissinger was later to be described as his closest intellectual associate.”
Curious that Kissinger was also a Jew, no?
Anyway, Rockefeller was dumped from the Ford ticket because he was unpopular, even in the Republican Party.
It was known that his name wouldn't help any ticket.
OK, so that was a rather long diversion from this historical paper, but I think you can see why it was pertinent.
The Rockefellers were the Medicis of our times in so many ways, except that the Medicis patronized real artists instead of ones manufactured by Intelligence.
His wife was also not an Arab, a Turk, or a Muslim.
She was born a Christian and had red hair.
Suleiman's chief financial advisor and Grand Vizier was a guy named Frenk Ibrahim (Frank Abraham), known as “the Westerner”.
image.png
323 KB
View full-sizeDownload Pargalı Ibrahim Pasha ("Ibrahim Pasha of Parga"; c. 1495 – 5 March 1536), also known as Frenk Ibrahim Pasha ("the Westerner"), Makbul Ibrahim Pasha ("the Favorite"), which later changed to Maktul Ibrahim Pasha ("the Executed") after his execution in the Topkapı Palace, was the first Grand Vizier of the Ottoman Empire appointed by Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent.
According to the famous portraits of Suleiman, he also had rather curious features for an alleged Turkish Muslim:
image.png
168 KB
View full-sizeDownload Suleiman I (Ottoman Turkish: سليمان اول, romanized: Süleyman-ı Evvel; Turkish: I. Süleyman; 6 November 1494 – 6 September 1566), commonly known as Suleiman the Magnificent in Western Europe and Suleiman the Lawgiver (Ottoman Turkish: قانونى سلطان سليمان, romanized: Ḳānūnī Sulṭān Süleymān) in his Ottoman realm, was the longest-reigning sultan of the Ottoman Empire from 1520 until his death in 1566. 541–545 Under his administration, the Ottoman Empire ruled over at least 25 million people.
image.png
9.88 MB
View full-sizeDownload John Winston Ono Lennon (born John Winston Lennon; 9 October 1940 – 8 December 1980) was an English singer, songwriter and musician. He gained worldwide fame as the founder, co-songwriter, co-lead vocalist and rhythm guitarist of the Beatles. His work included music, writing, drawings and film. His songwriting partnership with Paul McCartney remains the most successful in history.
That portrait is attributed to Titian, but it doesn't look like any Titian I have ever seen.
It doesn't look Modern, but it is definitely misattributed, probably on purpose.
This was 100 years before Zevi, but it is still pertinent.
The Sultan at the time of Zevi was Mehmed IV, who ruled for almost 40 years.
image.png
23 MB
View full-sizeDownload Mehmed IV (Ottoman Turkish: محمد رابع, romanized: Meḥmed-i rābi; Turkish: IV. Mehmed; 2 January 1642 – 6 January 1693), also known as Mehmed the Hunter (Turkish: Avcı Mehmed), was the sultan of the Ottoman Empire from 1648 to 1687.
Strangely, there is no mention of Zevi on his Wiki page.
Mehmed's father was named Ibrahim, which is of course a variant of Abraham.
Mehmed's Vizier, who actually dealt with Zevi, was a Koprulu, and he also was not Turkish or otherwise Middle Eastern.
