Testing the Nephilim Narrative: A Forensic Examination of Methodology, Psychological Persuasion, and Biblical Interpretation in Modern Giant Narratives
Our goal is not mockery, hostility, or blind dismissal.
Instead, we are applying careful discernment—examining:
the methodology
the psychology
the theological
claims presented in the video.
Because truth does not fear investigation.
And neither should those who claim to speak it.
The Rise of the Nephilim Narrative
Across social media and video platforms, a particular genre of content has exploded in popularity.
These videos often claim that:
Giants once ruled the earth
Ancient civilizations possessed advanced technology
Modern institutions are hiding evidence of this past
Biblical events explain mysterious structures and archaeological discoveries
At first glance, these narratives can appear compelling.
They reference:
history
archaeology
Scripture
But the real question is not whether a story is fascinating.
The real question is whether it is true.
And truth must be tested.
The Method Behind the Narrative
When we examine the “Parents of the Nephilim” video closely, a clear pattern begins to emerge.
The video presents a series of historical details—
people
institutions
buildings
orphanages
railroads
folklore
archaeological claims
Each piece, taken by itself, may be factual.
But the conclusions drawn from those facts are where the problem begins.
Instead of presenting evidence and then forming conclusions, the video does the opposite.
It begins with a conclusion—an assumed hidden history involving Nephilim and a reset of civilization—and then interprets every piece of information through that lens.
Normal historical events are treated as secret admissions.
Missing information becomes proof of conspiracy.
Speculation slowly transforms into certainty.
This method creates the illusion of discovery, even when the underlying evidence is weak.
The Psychology of Persuasion
To understand why these videos are so persuasive, we must look beyond the claims themselves.
The real power lies in the psychology being used.
The video builds momentum by connecting many unrelated elements into a single narrative.
Railroads.
Orphanages.
Architectural ruins.
Folklore.
Ancient statues.
Biblical passages.
Each element is presented as another piece of a massive puzzle.
The viewer begins to feel that a hidden truth is being uncovered.
But the human mind is naturally drawn to patterns—even when those patterns are not real.
This phenomenon is known as pattern recognition bias.
When enough unrelated details are presented together, the brain begins to perceive connections whether they exist or not.
And once that sense of discovery takes hold, skepticism begins to fade.
The Role of Speculation
Another key feature of the narrative is the way speculation is introduced.
The video often begins statements with phrases like:
“Perhaps…”
“It could be…”
“In my opinion…”
At first, these phrases signal uncertainty.
But as the video progresses, the language shifts.
Possibilities become probabilities.
Probabilities become assumptions.
And assumptions eventually become declarations.
By the end of the presentation, speculative ideas are spoken of as established facts.
This gradual escalation is subtle, but extremely powerful.
It allows the audience to travel from curiosity to conviction without realizing that the evidence never truly changed.
The Use of Scripture
For many viewers, the most compelling part of these narratives is the appeal to the Bible.
0:00–0:39 — Opening thesis: “These are the parents of the Nephilim”
Testing the Nephilim Narrative - Part 1_ The Opening Claim.mp4
Download
What he claims:
He opens by identifying Josephinum / Joseph Jessing / orphan care in Columbus as one of the most important narratives yet, then floats the idea that 1800s orphans were part of a repopulation tactic.
Rebuttal:
This is an opening assertion, not a demonstration.
He begins with a conclusion and immediately frames ordinary orphan care as covert repopulation.
No direct evidence is given that the orphans were not actual orphans, or that the institution was a Nephilim-linked operation.
Method error:
Begging the question.
He assumes the reset/repopulation theory at the front door.
Psychological tactic:
Shock opening.
He starts with a huge claim to seize attention before evidence is weighed.
Biblical testing point:
A matter this serious requires witnesses and proof, not insinuation.
“Against an elder receive not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses.”
0:39–1:02 — “Who would have questioned Joseph?”
Testing the Nephilim Narrative - Part 2_ Rhetoric vs. History.mp4
Download
What he claims:
A German priest appears, has money, buys property, and therefore looks suspicious.
The implication is that the lack of suspicion in that era proves covert coordination.
Rebuttal:
He turns ordinary administrative history into criminal implication by tone alone.
“Who would have questioned him?”
is not evidence.
It is rhetoric.
Suspicion is being substituted for documentation.
Method error:
Argument from incredulity.
Psychological tactic:
He invites the viewer to feel smarter than the historical record.
1:02–1:22 — Railroad move as “paragraph of admission”
Testing the Nephilim Narrative - Part 3_ Logistics & Pattern Illusion.mp4
Download
What he claims:
Moving the orphanage closer to the railroad is treated as an admission that children were being dispersed into society as part of a repopulation program.
Rebuttal:
Rail access for institutions in the nineteenth century was normal and practical.
He offers no document saying the move was for population engineering.
He simply assigns hidden intent.
Method error:
Reinterpretation by suspicion.
Psychological tactic:
He uses the language of “admission” to make inference sound like confession.
Testing the Nephilim Narrative - Part 4_ Escalation of Language.mp4
Download
What he claims:
Churches imported managers from Europe, gave them buildings from a previous civilization, trained orphans in trades, and reset society’s technology level.
Rebuttal:
This is a chain of leaps:
priest = imported handler
church = hub of social engineering
existing building = inheritance from lost civilization
trade education = technological throttling
None of those steps is proven.
He narrates a system into existence.
Method error:
Stacked speculation.
Each weak assumption is used to support the next.
Psychological tactic:
Over-systematization.
Everything becomes part of one master plan.
Biblical testing point:
“Study to shew thyself approved unto God… rightly dividing the word of truth.”
2:22–3:00 — “The teacher is not the principal”
Testing the Nephilim Narrative - Part 5_ Institutional Distrust.mp4
Download
What he claims:
Joseph was merely a teacher taking direction from higher powers in a national operation.
Rebuttal:
This is pure conjecture.
He has no evidence of a controlling body behind Joseph beyond his own theory.
Method error:
Invisible-cause fallacy.
A hidden controller is asserted whenever a gap appears.
3:00–3:55 — “This shows exactly how they repopulated the USA”
What he claims:
He declares the whole operation proven:
orphans
teaching programs
technological control
and a long-running hidden elite.
Rebuttal:
Notice the shift from “possibly” earlier to “shows exactly” now.
The evidence did not suddenly become stronger.
Only his certainty increased.
Method error:
Escalation from conjecture to certainty.
Psychological tactic:
Confidence transfer.
Viewers mistake certainty of tone for certainty of proof.
3:55–4:17 — Fires, decline, demolition
What he claims:
A Baltimore infant asylum declined, changed use, suffered fire, and was later demolished; this is framed as obvious destruction of evidence.
Rebuttal:
Old buildings are routinely repurposed, damaged, abandoned, or demolished.
He gives no direct evidence connecting these events to concealment of Nephilim history.
Method error:
Post hoc conspiracy framing.
4:17–5:21 — Haunted buildings and endless orphan operations
What he claims:
“Haunted” labels were tactics to keep people from investigating old-world buildings; numerous orphan operations prove repopulation; family trees ending in similar periods confirm it.
Rebuttal:
He offers three unproven claims at once:
hauntings were cover stories
orphans were social implants
family trees converge due to reset
None is demonstrated.
Method error:
Associative overload.
Psychological tactic:
He floods the hearer with patterns so objections feel smaller than the total emotional impression.
Narrative control is everywhere, banks can shut people off, Rumble wallet is protection, and viewers should financially support creators directly.
Rebuttal:
This section matters because it shows the emotional architecture of the episode:
create distrust
intensify siege mentality
offer channel/platform/financial refuge
Method error:
Not an evidential claim, but it reveals incentive structure.
Psychological tactic:
Fear plus community plus monetized escape route.
7:30–8:04 — Parents in insane asylums
Testing the Nephilim Narrative - Part 6_ Speculation & Reality.mp4
Download
What he claims:
The parents of the orphans may have been in insane asylums for not going along with the reset.
Rebuttal:
This is a severe accusation with no evidence presented.
He simply takes another institution and assigns it a conspiratorial function.
Method error:
Speculative defamation of the past.
Biblical testing point:
Christ answered a similar false instinct directly:
“Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents.”
8:04–9:34 — Kindergarten as indoctrination, Germany link
What he claims:
Kindergarten in Germany was a tactic to install brand-new social structures, remove children from family influence, lower self-esteem through testing, and enslave populations.
He even questions whether Froebel was real.
Rebuttal:
He turns education itself into proof of a global reset.
Questioning whether historical figures were real without evidence is a hallmark of conspiratorial method:
dissolve the record, then rebuild it with speculation.
Method error:
Radical skepticism used selectively.
Psychological tactic:
Destabilizing every authority structure so the creator becomes the trusted guide.
Modern borders and travel controls imply a former freer civilization before the reset.
Rebuttal:
He treats dissatisfaction with modern controls as evidence for an erased civilization.
That is not history; it is projected longing.
Method error:
Wishful reconstruction.
10:29–11:29 — Technology stolen, nuns, suffering as mind-reset
What he claims:
A former civilization was wiped out, its technology stolen, and children in orphan systems were deliberately made to suffer to demoralize and control them.
Rebuttal:
He moves from institutional criticism to total civilizational overthrow with no hard bridge.
Again, suffering in institutions is used to validate the reset myth even though abuse can exist without proving the myth.
Method error:
Grand synthesis from scattered abuses.
11:29–12:35 — “Factual evidence” for the reset
What he claims:
Because orphanages peaked in the early 1900s, he now says we have factual evidence for when the reset happened.
Rebuttal:
No.
He has evidence that orphan institutions expanded.
He does not have evidence that America was repopulated after a hidden civilizational wipeout.
Method error:
Category error:
institution growth is treated as proof of a secret historical replacement.
12:35–13:48 — Six fingers, giants, statues with hands removed
What he claims:
Biblical giant references, myths, and damaged statues all converge.
Missing hands and feet on statues supposedly conceal six-fingered/six-toed truth.
Rebuttal:
There is a biblical reference to a giant warrior with six fingers and six toes, but one biblical instance does not justify a worldwide theory that broken statues were mutilated to hide giant anatomy.
Method error:
Single data point inflated into civilizational key.
Psychological tactic:
Visual anchoring.
Damaged statues are vivid and memorable, so they become persuasive symbols.
13:49–14:21 — Quoting the giant of Gath
What he claims:
He quotes the text about the man of great stature with six fingers and six toes, then asks,
“All of this is a myth.
Are you sure?”
Rebuttal:
The biblical text supports that one man existed in that narrative.
It does not support all the later claims he attaches to it.
Method error:
Illicit expansion from text to theory.
14:21–14:35 — “Seven full books removed”
What he claims:
Seven books and parts of others were removed from the Protestant Bible, and more than seven were really removed.
Rebuttal:
This is misleadingly framed.
The issue is canon and placement, not secret erasure of truth from a formerly complete public Bible.
Also, the very KJV tradition included Apocrypha in historical forms, which undercuts the insinuation of one simple hidden-removal narrative.
The uploaded Bible file itself shows an Apocrypha translator company in the KJV production history.
The Bible is an old-world book that has been altered; Egyptian mummies with extra digits prove Nephilim leadership.
Rebuttal:
He piles conjecture on conjecture:
Bible altered
extra digits in tombs
elites therefore Nephilim
Nephilim therefore rulers of the old world
No direct documentary chain is established.
Method error:
Mythic interpolation.
Biblical testing point:
“All scripture is given by inspiration of God.”
The right response is reverent handling, not using the Bible as a springboard for whatever theory feels dramatic.
15:58–16:54 — Late excavations, statues chopped with saws
What he claims:
Modern excavations found extra digits; statues were deliberately sawed to hide giant traits.
Rebuttal:
He infers motive from damage patterns without proving who did it, when, or why.
Broken statues have many ordinary explanations:
weathering
iconoclasm
transport loss
vandalism
restoration damage
Method error:
Motivation assigned without proof.
16:54–18:04 — Mound builders, North America, “we are just getting started”
What he claims:
Ohio, Illinois, and the Mississippi Valley fit the puzzle and take the story further.
Rebuttal:
This is transitional hype.
He primes the viewer to expect a dramatic synthesis before giving one.
Psychological tactic:
Serial revelation.
Keep the audience feeling that the biggest proof is always one minute away.
21:25–21:47 — Nephilim explain old-world construction
What he claims:
Bigger people with more fingers and more toes better explain major ancient construction.
Rebuttal:
This is not explanation; it is speculative substitution.
“It makes more sense to me”
is not engineering proof.
Method error:
Preference masquerading as inference.
21:48–22:21 — “Donkey and chisel” ridicule of conventional history
What he claims:
Conventional explanations for cathedrals and monuments are absurd; therefore giant-builders are more logical.
Rebuttal:
He caricatures mainstream history so that his alternative feels stronger.
Mockery is used where evidence should be.
Method error:
Straw man.
22:22–22:52 — Adena mound, extra digits, moon people, cave giants
Testing the Nephilim Narrative - Part 8_ Folklore & Archeology.mp4
Download
What he claims:
Extra-digit remains
Cherokee moon people
Paiute cannibal giants
Choctaw cave/tunnel ideas all converge in the USA
Rebuttal:
He merges separate:
traditions
sites
peoples
into one narrative stream.
Similarity is not identity.
Method error:
Folklore conflation.
22:52–23:39 — Texas jawbone report and Adena builders
What he claims:
Large bones in Texas and jawbones fitting over a man’s face connect to Adena mound builders and moon people.
Rebuttal:
Sensational reports are treated as settled archaeology.
“Many historians speculating”
is not the same as established fact.
Method error:
Sensational anecdote promoted to historical conclusion.
23:39–24:25 — Moon people become Watchers
Testing the Nephilim Narrative - Part 9_ The Watchers.mp4
Download
What he claims:
Cherokee moon people were Nephilim; they ascended to the moon and were the Watchers, who are the parents of the Nephilim in the Bible.
Rebuttal:
This is one of the weakest and most dangerous moves in the whole video.
He fuses:
Cherokee lore
moon imagery
Watchers
Genesis 6
angelic offspring theory
The Bible does not say in Genesis 6 that “watchers” were the parents of the Nephilim.
That language is imported from later interpretive traditions, not stated plainly in the Genesis text.
The KJV uses “watchers” in Daniel/Jeremiah contexts differently, not as a simple code word for Genesis 6 parents.
Method error:
Extrabiblical system imported into the text.
Biblical testing point:
“Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.”
24:25–25:51 — Buried giants sent back to the moon
What he claims:
Moon people/Nephilim were too powerful to remain on earth, were sent back to the moon, but are also found buried here; lack of photographs proves suppression.
Rebuttal:
This is internally unstable.
He wants them both ascended and buried.
He also assumes that absence or scarcity of photos proves concealment, which is not a safe historical method.
Method error:
Contradictory synthesis.
25:52–26:19 — Skeletons with six fingers and six toes in mounds
What he claims:
Archaeologists uncovered large skeletons with six fingers and six toes; local legends confirm giant status.
Rebuttal:
He still has not provided a documented chain from excavation report to verifiable specimen to peer-confirmed conclusion.
Legend is being used to reinforce rumor.
Method error:
Legend plus report equals “proof.”
26:19–27:12 — Hexadactyl definition
What he claims:
True target cases are bilateral six fingers/six toes on both hands and feet; he labels this more specifically as hexadactyl.
Rebuttal:
This is technical language doing rhetorical work.
He sounds more rigorous, but the central historical claims remain unproven.
Method error:
Terminology inflation.
Psychological tactic:
Pseudo-precision.
Specialized terms create an illusion of scientific weight.
27:13–28:28 — Rare births today
What he claims:
Since people with such traits are still born today and are very rare, this supports the giant/Nephilim line of inquiry.
Rebuttal:
Rarity does not prove Nephilim ancestry.
A rare congenital trait remains a congenital trait unless independently demonstrated otherwise.
Method error:
From rarity to supernatural lineage.
Overall verdict on the episode
Testing the Nephilim Narrative - Part 10_ Hidden Knowledge.mp4
Download
This video’s core engine is:
suspicion treated as evidence
speculation escalated into certainty
folklore fused with Scripture
isolated anomalies inflated into total history
emotional pattern-recognition used as substitute for proof
The most serious doctrinal issue is that it collapses extrabiblical Watcher tradition into “what the Bible says” and then builds a giant hidden-history system on top of it.
That is not safe handling of Scripture.
One-line rating grid
Historical method: poor
Use of evidence: weak
Use of psychology: strong
Use of Scripture: unsound
Risk to unstable hearers: high
Best closing line for the rebuttal
Testing the Nephilim Narrative - Part 11_ Final Conclusion.mp4
Download
This is not careful historical investigation.
It is a speculative synthesis machine dressed in the language of discovery.
Forensic Breakdown of the "Parents of the Nephilim" Video: Methodology, Psychology, and Biblical Discernment #
this video uses a speculative-conspiracy method, not a truth-testing method.
It repeatedly turns ordinary historical facts into “admissions,” jumps from possibility to certainty, blends folklore with Scripture, imports Enochic material into the Bible without distinction, and trains the viewer emotionally before it trains him evidentially.
That is a dangerous pattern.
“Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.”
“Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God.”
The core method being used
The opening section frames Joseph Jessing, orphanages, railroads, and trade schools as proof of a hidden “repopulation operation” and technological reset.
In the transcript, the speaker moves from “possibly” to “obviously” to “this is how it worked” without supplying the missing proof.
That is the first tell:
1. Suspicion is treated as evidence.
He asks loaded questions like:
“who would have questioned Joseph?”
and then treats the existence of the question as proof of fraud.
2. Historical normalcy is reframed as covert design.
Moving an orphanage closer to rail lines is presented as evidence of a trafficking-style dispersal program.
But the historical record on Joseph Jessing says he moved the orphanage and his newspaper to Columbus for broader circulation and better railroad access for the paper and institution, and that the orphanage/trade-school model was openly part of his work.
“we are not told where the money came from, therefore hidden controllers”
is not evidence.
In fact, the available history states Jessing funded the orphanage in large part through his German-language newspaper, Ohio Waisenfreund, and later founded the Josephinum after 23 candidates responded to his published invitation.
4. The speaker uses narrative certainty to conceal evidential weakness.
Phrases like:
“this is a paragraph of admission,”
“this is how you reset a society,”
and
“we are connecting massive dots”
are persuasion language, not proof language.
Psychology and manipulation tactics
This is where the video is especially effective on unstable hearers.
Apophenia / pattern hunger
The whole piece is built on forcing unrelated things into one master plot:
orphanages
world’s fairs
railroads
asylums
kindergarten
giants
moon folklore
Enoch
mounds
damaged statues
missing photographs
The point is not to prove one chain solidly; it is to create the feeling that “everything connects.”
Escalating certainty
He starts with “in my opinion” and “possibly,” but then repeatedly lands on “obviously,”“this is proof,”“this is exactly why,” and “we now have factual evidence.”
That progression gives viewers permission to skip proof because the speaker sounds confident.
False dilemma
He implies:
either accept his hidden-reset theory, or be blind / “still on the fence.”
That pressures the hearer socially and emotionally.
Anti-institution reflex conditioning
Priests
schools
banks
platforms
archaeologists
publishers
churches
historians
and mainstream narratives are all cast as one coordinated enemy structure.
That makes the viewer dependent on the presenter as the only trustworthy interpreter.
Fear + exclusivity + monetization
The transcript pivots from hidden-history claims into a sponsorship pitch about banks canceling people, governments shutting them off, and Rumble wallet as protection.
That does not by itself prove bad intent, but it shows the emotional arc:
alarm the audience
isolate them from institutions
then direct them toward the creator’s ecosystem
Line-by-line breakdown by segment
0:00–3:55 — Joseph Jessing, orphanage, railroad, Josephinum
The transcript says Jessing came from Germany in 1867, became a priest, acquired property, took in 12 orphans, moved closer to the railroad, and this supposedly reveals a secret repopulation program.
What is true:
Joseph Jessing did immigrate from Germany in 1867, was ordained in 1870, began work connected to orphans, and moved the orphanage/newspaper to Columbus with rail access.
He later founded the Josephinum, and the first class indeed numbered 23 men.
He converts documented institutional history into coded confession.
That is not investigation; that is reinterpretation by suspicion.
3:55–5:21 — fires, demolition, haunted buildings
He treats later fires, demolition, and haunted-building stories as evidence of intentional cover-up and narrative management.
Problem:
This is a classic conspiracy move:
once the theory is assumed, any:
destruction
renovation
abandonment
or folklore becomes “proof” of suppression.
But no evidence is supplied tying those events to concealment of Nephilim or repopulation programs.
5:21–7:30 — sponsorship pivot
The sponsor section is important because it reveals the communication structure.
The transcript moves from censorship, banks, and control narratives into Rumble wallet and instant creator support.
Why it matters:
The rhetoric primes the audience to feel embattled and cut off, then offers a financial and platform alternative connected to the same media ecosystem.
Even when the sponsor is real, the emotional sequencing is manipulative.
7:30–9:34 — parents in insane asylums, kindergarten as social engineering
He speculates that the parents of orphaned children may have been put into insane asylums for resisting “the reset,” then moves into kindergarten as an intentional mind-control structure, even questioning whether Friedrich Fröbel was “a real character.”
Problem:
This is unrestrained insinuation.
He offers no documentary link between orphan systems and psychiatric confinement.
He also treats normal educational history as proof of social enslavement because it fits the master narrative.
Psychological function:
This kind of content destabilizes natural trust bonds:
family
school
church
medicine
archives
and history itself.
11:29–14:35 — six fingers, six toes, statues, “removed books”
The speaker claims orphanage research proves a reset, then moves to six-finger/six-toe references, cites 2 Samuel, and uses damaged statues as visual corroboration.
He then says seven books were removed from the Protestant Bible and suggests more was hidden.
What is true:
There is indeed a biblical reference to a giant warrior with six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot in 2 Samuel 21:20 / 1 Chronicles 20:6.
Also, many early Protestant Bibles, including the 1611 KJV, did include the Apocrypha as a separate section, and later Protestant publishers often omitted it, especially after the British and Foreign Bible Society’s 1826 decision.
The existence of one biblical giant with polydactyly does not prove a surviving transhistorical race behind world architecture, statues, and American orphanages.
And saying books were “removed” is often used deceptively.
For Protestants, the dispute concerns canonicity and placement, not a secret 19th-century discovery that truth had to be hidden.
Biblical problem:
The speaker uses Scripture as a springboard for speculation, not as a boundary on speculation.
21:25–25:51 — Nephilim explain the old world, Adena mounds, moon people, watchers
This is the theological and mythic climax.
The video says Nephilim explain major ancient construction, points to Adena mound finds, connects extra digits to giants, then links Cherokee “moon people” to the Watchers and calls the Watchers “the parents of the Nephilim.”
This section is where the teaching becomes most unsound.
On the “moon people”
The commonly discussed “moon-eyed people” tradition is murky and heavily mediated through early white settler accounts, with differing descriptions and doubtful authenticity as a clean, stable Cherokee tradition.
Some versions describe them as small or pale, not giant moon-ascending Watchers.
It is rewriting folklore so it will align with Enochic material.
On the giant-skeleton / Adena claims
Archaeological and historical treatments have repeatedly noted that “giant skeleton” claims around Adena and related mound-builder lore are heavily mythologized, often arising from exaggeration, bad measurement, sensational reporting, or later retellings.
“In the Bible, the watchers were angels … then they fell in love with women and had children with them,”
it is collapsing extrabiblical interpretation into the biblical text.
That is not rightly dividing the word of truth.
25:52 onward — hexadactyly and visual overreach
The speaker tightens the claim by distinguishing generic polydactyly from bilateral “hexadactyl” cases on both hands and both feet, trying to make the argument sound more technical.
That is a persuasion trick:
technical vocabulary is being used to create the appearance of rigor, while the central evidentiary chain is still missing.
Biblical evaluation: false teacher, false prophet, or just reckless speculator?
I would separate this carefully.
As to false prophecy
From the material you gave me, I do not see a specific predictive prophecy to test under Deuteronomy 18.
So I would not rush to label him a false prophet in the narrowest predictive sense from this transcript alone.
As to false teaching
On this video’s content, I do see several marks consistent with false teaching or at least dangerously corrupt handling of truth:
1. He goes beyond what is written.
He presents an Enochic-Watcher framework as though it were simply “what the Bible says.”
That is not careful doctrine.
2. He bears false witness against facts.
He takes normal documented history and interprets it as sinister operation without sufficient evidence.
That violates the duty not to bear false witness.
3. He trades in “endless genealogies” and speculative myths.
This content thrives on grand:
hidden lineages
giant races
secret resets
and suppressed histories rather than the plain gospel of Jesus Christ.
4. He uses confidence, not proof.
Jeremiah warns of those who speak a vision:
“of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the LORD.”
