Was Jesus Christ one of the most important people in the civilization known as Tartaria? Historians and their allies have said that no evidence can be found to show that Jesus Christ ever existed Is this really true? This paper will examine the history of the Cathars and the Knights Templar and the Original Christians. Historians and their friends have wasted time showing crazy theories found within the Bible and other scriptures. Who wrote these scriptures and why? Did the Crucifixion really happen? Is Christianity a big lie?
images showing the Last Supper of Christ from the Medieval or the Renaissance times.
2.87 MB
View full-sizeDownload
In many images, there is a table with a cup at the center which is known as the Holy Grail. Jesus Christ is known all over the world today and people are asking- Who was Jesus Christ? Millions of people around the world are asking this question. Why are people asking questions? There is the Bible and there are scriptures and there is the Church. Many people show verses in the Bible and think it is a very important book. Many people think that they can find the history of Jesus Christ in the Bible or the Church or in the scriptures or in historical manuscripts. If that is the case… why are people asking questions?
Because:
many people do not believe the Bible or the scriptures or the Church.
Why? Millions of people around the world have studied the Bible or the scriptures and have concluded that Jesus Christ did not exist. Who wrote the Bible and the scriptures? Why did they write the Bible and the scriptures?
The Bible in Matthew 16:17 says that Simon found out from a revelation from heaven.
And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona:
for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.
But when people check the Bible carefully, they find that in John 1:41 in the Bible, it says something different:
He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ.
it says that Simon found out because his brother Andrew told him.
image.png
2.42 MB
View full-sizeDownload Andrew is the English form of the given name, common in many countries. The word is derived from the Greek: Ἀνδρέας, Andreas, itself related to Ancient Greek: ἀνήρ/ἀνδρός aner/andros, "man" (as opposed to "woman"), thus meaning "manly" and, as consequence, "brave", "strong", "courageous", and "warrior". In the King James Bible, the Greek "Ἀνδρέας" is translated as Andrew.
George Bush said that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. People found out that this was not true. Many people now say that George Bush was a liar. George Bush did not always tell lies. He said the President of Iraq was named Saddam Hussein. This is true. But many people say George Bush told lies, and this is why many people do not believe him. A liar normally mixes truth with lies.
How did Simon Peter find out that Jesus was the Christ:
from a revelation from heaven?
Or:
from his brother Andrew?
Which story is true? The Bible says one thing in one place, and another thing in another place. The Bible said that Jesus Christ was a man and not a woman. This is true. But the Bible says one thing in one place and then says something different, and this is why many people do not believe the Bible Millions of people have clearly said that the Bible is full of lies, and they show this evidence. But many people still believe that the Bible speaks the truth. Many people are now using the Bible to explain science and history. Millions of people - even after they have found hundreds of lies in Christianity, they still insist that Jesus Christ is the son of God.
If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true.
What is going on here?
In the Bible, same book, the Book known as the Gospel of John:
it says in one place that Jesus said that his witness is true, but in another place, it says that Jesus said that his witness is not true. The Gospel of John seemed like it was a joke. Was Jesus Christ a liar? Or Was the Gospel of John and the Bible - a big lie? We cannot make excuses, we must choose an answer. According to historians, the Gospel of John is believed to be written by the same man who wrote the Book of Revelation (another part of the Bible). If the Gospel of John had problems, then the Book of Revelation must have problems. Historians and the Church do not even know who wrote the Gospel of John or the Book of Revelation. They think or they believe that it was written by a man called John. They do not even know?
Saint John the Evangelist on Patmos by Hieronymus Bosch, 1505
2.41 MB
View full-sizeDownload John of Patmos (also called John the Revelator, John the Divine, John the Theologian; Ancient Greek: Ἰωάννης ὁ Θεολόγος, romanized: Iōannēs ho Theologos) is the name traditionally given to the author of the Book of Revelation. Revelation 1:9 states that John was on Patmos, an Aegean island off the coast of Roman Asia, where according to most biblical historians, he was exiled as a result of anti-Christian persecution under the Roman emperor Domitian. Christian tradition has considered the Book of Revelation's writer to be the same person as John the Apostle, though some Christian scholars since medieval times have separated the disciple from the writer of Revelation (the view of modern scholars). A minority of ancient clerics and scholars, such as Eusebius (d. 339/340), recognize at least one further John as a companion of Jesus, John the Presbyter.
John of Patmos - Wikipedia Bill Clinton, ex-President of the United States of America told lies about his relationship with a woman named Monica Lewinsky.
Millions of people’s lives were at stake and therefore, -Bill Clinton was put on trial and the truth came out and an apology was made. The Bible said one thing in one place and then says another thing. Why has the Bible not been placed on trial or investigation? Millions of people’s lives are at stake. Social media applications such as Facebook take action against what they call false information. Social media is regulated by the nation states.
They choose and decide what they think is false information. And these nation states have decided not to take action, and not to put the Bible and the scriptures on trial. The words of the Bible are allowed to be used by official organizations such as Churches for their own advantages. Nation states have regulated social media applications, and they have regulated the Bible and scriptures and Churches. They allow and block information according to their wishes. It was like a game, a big joke. It had nothing to do with justice or the truth.
And as he passed by, he saw Levi the son of Alphaeus sitting at the receipt of custom, and said unto him, Follow me.
And he arose and followed him.
This man was named:
Levi.
What is going on here? In the Bible, it says in one place that Jesus chose a man called Matthew, but in another place the Bible says that Jesus chose a man called Levi. Is anyone telling lies Who did Jesus Christ really choose? Did this event really take place? Shall we guess? Does God want you to guess the truth? Or Was the Bible - a big scam? Was the Bible written and organized by idiots who wanted to destroy the truth about Jesus Christ and also to cheat the world? The people who wrote these scriptures - probably knew that you will find these lies. Did they do this deliberately to destroy the true history of Jesus Christ?
In most countries, you will go to prison if you told lies.
Lies hurt people. Lies are serious. But the Bible and Christianity are protected in most nation states. They can teach the Bible and other scriptures to people openly. They will not go to prison for what they are teaching. They are teaching many people that the Bible speaks the truth. They are allowed to do this, because the people in power clearly want this to happen. The evidence shows that Christianity has contradictions. Why has Christianity not been put on trial? There are people all over the world teaching Christianity. Many Churches and Christian organizations and tourism companies are making huge amounts of money, and the Bible has been used as a political tool to control people for many centuries.
What did the Roman soldier say when Jesus died at the Crucifixion?
And when the centurion, which stood over against him, saw that he so cried out, and gave up the ghost, he said, Truly this man was the Son of God.
What is going on here?
In the Bible, it says in one place that the Roman soldier said that Jesus Christ was righteous, but in another place, it says that the Roman soldier said that Jesus Christ was the son of God. Is anybody telling lies here? What did the Roman soldier really say? Did the Crucifixion really take place? Was Jesus the son of God? or Was Jesus a normal man? Shall we guess? Does God want you to guess the truth? Or Was the Bible - a big scam? Was the Bible written and organized by idiots who wanted to destroy the truth about Jesus Christ?
People will be angry if their wife or husband told them lies.
Millions of people separate or divorce because someone is telling lies.
The story in the Bible says 2 different things about who wanted to kill John the Baptist.
Saint John the Baptist, a 1540 painting by Titian
2.34 MB
View full-sizeDownload John the Baptist (c. 6 BC – c. AD 30) was a Jewish preacher active in the area of the Jordan River in the early first century AD. He is also known as Saint John the Forerunner in Eastern Orthodoxy and Oriental Orthodoxy, John the Immerser in some BaptistChristian traditions, and as the prophet Yaḥyā ibn Zakariyā (Arabic: النبي يحيى, An-Nabī Yaḥyā) in Islam. He is sometimes alternatively referred to as John the Baptizer.
Is this Bible, really the book of God?
God does not tell lies, - and it is clear that God did not write the Bible, but men wrote it.
And when the sixth hour was come, there was darkness over the whole land until the ninth hour.
Where was Jesus Christ on the sixth hour of that day? The Bible says 2 different stories. This is the Bible, the book of God? We have to guess where Jesus was. God wants you to guess. Was he being crucified or was the whole story a joke? The evidence from the Bible shows that the people who wrote the scriptures, did not even know where Jesus Christ was on the sixth hour of the day of the crucifixion. How can they say that Jesus Christ was murdered or crucified, when they do not even know where he was?
The Arabic Koran explains the history of Jesus Christ in a different way compared to the Bible. The Arabic Koran says that Jesus Christ was not crucified for example. Muslims say that God loved Jesus Christ and God saved him from the crucifixion. How? Muslims generally say that another man was crucified. Muslims say that God created a resemblance to appear exactly like Jesus Christ, - who was crucified instead of Jesus Christ. An incredible story... The Church and its allies said that these people were crazy. Researchers decided to investigate this matter further.
Changing things in the Bible and scriptures was very common, it was nothing new.
Men wrote whatever they wished. But millions of people around the world still say that the Bible is the word of God and that Jesus Christ is the son of God. Historians give their theories for why the name Jesus Barabbas was changed. It was clear that something was wrong with the full story of the crucifixion. Criminals normally hide evidence or change the evidence. It was clear that they were hiding something. Why change the name? Researchers noticed that historical evidence showed that whoever wrote the scriptures had combined different characters into the stories of Jesus Christ. This is why there were divisions amongst the followers of Jesus Christ. These divisions were created deliberately by people who wanted power and control.
Pontius Pilate asked the people - which Jesus shall he set free? Jesus the Terrorist Jesus Barabbas - the son of the Father Jesus - the son of God? Or Jesus - the Messiah Jesus - the son of Man? Jesus the Prophet. Confusing? Yes. Many historical traditions say that the 2 men were identical in appearance. Many people have said that they can both be the same person. Really … No, they are not the same person. The Bible and many Christian scriptures clearly say that 2 people were at the trial. Which one is the real Jesus?
While the trial was taking place, the wife of Pontius Pilate, sent a message and warning to her husband saying that Jesus Christ was a good man and not to hurt him.
This story is mentioned in the Gospel of Matthew.
She told her husband that she dreamed about Jesus Christ and was suffering because of Jesus Christ.
image.png
322 KB
View full-sizeDownload Pontius Pilate said that Jesus Christ was innocent and this can be found in the Bible in several places.
Today the police will move crowds away if you do not obey the people in power.
Pontius Pilate killed them if they did not obey him.
He was not scared of them.
The evidence shows that Pontius Pilate did not want to crucify Jesus Christ and wanted to set him free.
The evidence shows that the wife of Pontius Pilate warned him to set Jesus Christ free.
The evidence showed that Pontius Pilate did not care what anyone said, and he did what he wanted.
The evidence shows that 2 similar men called Jesus were at the trial.
The evidence shows that the Jewish leaders did not see who was inside the trial But the Bible and Church historians say that Pontius Pilate wanted to satisfy the crowd, so he let them crucify Jesus Christ.
The story in the Bible and in historical manuscripts did not make sense.
The evidence showed that Pontius Pilate must have set Jesus Christ the Messiah free.
The evidence showed that the man who was crucified must have been Jesus the Terrorist, Jesus Barabbas, the son of the Father.
Researchers decided to investigate this matter further.
The Greek Father of the Church, who was called Bishop Irenaeus, wrote a book called - Against Heresies.
In this book, Irenaeus wrote that many early Original Christians said that Jesus Christ was not crucified, - but another man was crucified, - who looked the same as Jesus Christ.
These Original Christians were called crazy people or insane by the Church and its allies.
The Church and its allies, were the people who had power at that time.
This is nothing new.
In the world today, people who do not accept the official story about September 11th or Coronavirus or about vaccines, - have been called crazy or evil by the people in power or by modern historians who work for the media.
The history for tomorrow, - is being written today, - by the people in power and their allies.
The Cathars said that Jesus Christ was a prophet of God, same like other prophets.
The Cathars said that Jesus Christ was not crucified.
The Cathars said that Jesus Christ was not the son of God.
They refused to accept the Pope and the Catholic Church.
The Cathars believed that the Bible which the Church was giving to the people in Europe, was a fraud and full of lies, and said that the Bible was created by the command of Satan, - the Devil.
The Cathars were destroyed by the Church.
The Church and its allies said that these people believed in 2 Gods:
God and Satan.
They were devil worshippers.
There is no evidence to show this, except from the history that was created and written by the Church and its allies.
Researchers found evidence which showed that the Church was telling lies about the Cathars.
This information was recorded by Church historians.
But Church historians also said that the Cathars were crazy people who believed that Jesus Christ did not have a real physical body.
What was clear was that historians, who wrote for the Church, wrote crazy things about the Cathars.
Why?
They had to justify the murder and rape of the Cathars which was done by the Church and its allies.
When the Church raped and murdered people, it always made an excuse why.
It was clear that the Cathars believed that: - Jesus Christ was a man,- and Jesus Christ was a prophet of God, - and Jesus Christ was not crucified.
It was also clear that the story that the Cathars believed in 2 gods or that Jesus Christ had no real physical body was a lie that was created by the Church and its allies.
The Church wrote many other negative things about the Cathars.
The Cathars believed that Jesus Christ was a real man who got married, not an invisible man.
You cannot get married if you have no physical body.
Even a child can see that the Church and its allies are talking rubbish here.
The Church and its historians, wrote the same type of lies, that can be seen in the Bible and in history.
Imagine if historians in the future said that the American people followed a leader named Donald Trump.
Donald Trump was invisible, but he got married and had children.
A pathetic story…
It is strange that many people today do not think carefully and believe what historians say.
Even a child will know that this type of history is a big joke and a big lie.
The history created for the Cathars was this - they were crazy - they were bad - they had God, but - they were devil worshippers.
The full history of the Cathars that is available today was written by the Church and its allies and was nothing but a fraud.
Toulouse in France was at the heart of the war against the Cathars.
Researchers such as Anatoly Fomenko (a very famous professor from Moscow State University) and others, - have shown that the history of Europe was falsified by the Church and its allies.
Anatoly Fomenko presented much evidence which showed that the Cathars were really destroyed in the 17th century, - and not in the 13th century.
After the Cathars were defeated in the 17th century by the Church, many of their children and their families were separated and taken as slaves by the new powers.
Many other bad things happened in Europe to destroy this history in the 18th and 19th and 20th centuries, but that story is too long to mention here.
Researchers have pointed out that there is mud-clay that is over the walls of the castle as if it was thrown onto the building and they are questioning what may have happened there.
What type of weapons was used to attack the Cathars?
Were these buildings just ordinary castles, or did they have other functions?
How did they build such castles?
Or, was the clay actually part of the outer building?
Was the building attacked by advanced modern weapons which caused the outer walls to melt?
Many similar castles can be seen in many places around the world.
Based on population statistics for that city, the story of who built the Gothic Cathedral in Albi city did not make sense.
Why would anyone build such a big cathedral and how did they build it, when very few people lived there?
What sort of technology was used to construct this amazing grand building?
The population of the entire south of France was much lower in the 15th century and there are many huge castles and churches and many other amazing buildings in the area.
Historians say that many other churches were also damaged around that time in France.
Historians say that Albi Cathedral was restored between 1849 and 1876.
The history of the 18th century and the 19th century was full of lies and falsifications, but that story is too long to mention here.
Many researchers found it impossible that very few people could have built Albi Cathedral.
The people who constructed the original cathedral must have done mining to get the materials to build the cathedral and probably had advanced technology.
Researchers concluded that the Cathars were destroyed in the 17th century by the Church and its allies and this was when Albi Cathedral was damaged.
The contents of the cathedral must have been stolen by the Church and its allies.
Many people are questioning why cathedrals had such large spaces inside and why they had big doors.
The Gothic Cathedral of Cordoba has Arabic writing inside it, and was originally a Muslim mosque which was built by Spanish Muslims.
What did Muslims have to do with Christianity and Gothic cathedrals?
In Spain, the Church and its allies were fighting the Muslims.
Historians advertise the Spanish Inquisition and greatly mention the war against the Jews in Spain, and this is why many people do not realize that the greatest war by the Church and its allies in Spain was against Original Islam and the Muslims.
The English word “castle” came from this Arabic word.
Historians claim that the word “cazar” in Arabic came from Latin, but Latin was a dead language for centuries and the history of Latin is too long to mention here.
Researchers such as Anatoly Fomenko and others have shown evidence that the history of the Phoenicians was lie and was invented during and after the Renaissance.
The claim that the word “cazar” in Arabic came from Latin, was nothing but a tale that was invented by historians to hide the true meaning of Cathar.
What was clear was that “cazar - cathar” castles in Spain and Cathar castle in France and other places in Europe were being attacked by the Church.
Church historians called the Muslims of Spain:
devil worshippers and many other things Both these people had similar beliefs.
The Muslims in Spain were called Arab people and the Cathars were called the Albi people.
The Muslims in Spain were not Arab people from the Middle East, evidence shows that many of them were local people from Spain who spoke the Arabic language and therefore they were called Arabs.
The Cathars were known to be in northern Spain in the region known as Catalonia.
Even the word Catalonia comes from the word Cathar, - Cath - alonia.
Achad Allah or Ahad Allah or Khod Allah, - depending on your pronunciation Khod Allah or Cath Allah means “One” God in Arabic
Cath - Goth - Gott - God
Allah Cath-olou, Cath-ally, Cath-allah, Goth-allah
All these words basically meant “One” God, depending on your pronunciation.
The Pope and their allies invaded almost every part of the world, with their colonial empires and had many inquisitions and forced millions of people to convert or die.
Researchers concluded that the Church took over the Cathars and took the name Cath-Allah or Cath ally and created a fake religion with fake history for the whole of Europe Who were the Albi people?
Researchers concluded that Albi people meant - Alabi people or Arabi people.
The Albi people or Cathars were known for building castles on mountains and hills.
The Arab Muslim people in Spain were known for building Cazars - castles in Spain.
The Arab Muslim people were known for saying that Jesus Christ was a prophet.
The Albi people or Cathars were known for saying that Jesus Christ was a prophet.
The Arab Muslim people were known for denying the Crucifixion.
The Albi people or Cathars were known for denying the Crucifixion.
The Arab Muslim people were known for saying that the Bible was a lie.
The Albi people or Cathars were known for saying that the Bible was a lie.
Arab Muslims were at war with the Church at the time Albi Cathars were at war with the Church at the time.
There was inquisition against Arab Muslims.
There was inquisition against Albi Cathars.
Both of these people lived next door to each other: - Spain and France.
It was clearly the same war by the Church against the same type of people in different places throughout Europe and the world.
The map above shows an example of people throughout Europe who had similar beliefs to the Cathars.
These types of people were in:
Holland
Belgium
Germany
Italy
Hungary
Bosnia
Serbia
Albania
and Macedonia.
This is based on the evidence found in the history that was created by the Church and its allies.
Church historians claimed that the other half of European people were Catholics, but researchers found evidence that the history of Europe was fraudulently invented.
Eastern Europe and Russia were supposed to be ruled by Kievan Rus or Russia, and the history of that region has another long story.
The people in Southeast Europe, who had similar beliefs to the Cathars, are called Bogomils by Church historians.
The information we have about the Bogomils, is what is told by the Church and its allies.
And what are we told?
They are devil worshippers.
The same rubbish that the Church said about anyone it did not like.
The Bogomils were known to be very big in Bulgaria and Romania and the Balkans, but a war against them was taking place, which was organized by the Church and its allies.
Bosnia soon became the heart and center of the Bogomils.
The Bogomils were attacked by the Church and its allies, but many survived in mountain areas in the Balkans region, - where the Church and its allies found it difficult to find them.
Researchers then found a big problem with what historians said.
No evidence whatsoever can be found in original documents in Bosnia to show the existence of these so called Cathars or Bogomils or the story of 2 Gods.
No evidence could be found to show the existence of these Cathar or Bogomil devil worshippers in the original documents of the Original Christians of Bosnia.
It was clear that historians who wrote for the Church and their allies were telling lies.
There was no evidence of 2 gods or devil worship or the existence of the Cathars except for what was said by Church historians.
This meant that the Bogomils and Cathars and other Original Christians, did not call themselves Bogomils or Cathars.
These were the names chosen for them by the Church and its allies.
They were simply the followers of Jesus Christ or:
the Original Christians.
Historians say that the Bogomils of Bosnia and Serbia and Albania and Romania and Macedonia and Bulgaria and Greece and Croatia became Muslims.
The people were forced to obey the states and pay taxes and to become serfs which was nothing but slavery.
Property and land were taken by the Church and its allies and they created fake states or rulers to manage and rule these people.
In the world today, modern historians, - which include television and media sources, show the world that modern Muslims are involved with the policy of:
“convert or die.”
Evidence shows that many modern Muslim groups are agents and actors linked to the world powers who provide these groups with funding and with military weapons.
Many of them have weapons that are made in:
America
Russia
Germany
China
and France.
Do you think it is easy to find millions of dollars to buy weapons and fund a militant organization and train people and then start military activities?
These groups are causing havoc and chaos in many places around the world.
But anyone who thinks for a moment and examines these military organizations, will realize that it was all a game planned by the global world order.
There are many modern Muslim organizations that organize protests.
Researchers found that they have literature which was created and published by the world powers in the last 2 centuries.
Anatoly Fomenko and other researchers have shown that many fraudulent Muslim history books were created by the Jesuits and their allies, who were working for the Church.
Their families were separated, and they were forced into serfdom or slavery.
Today these lands are known as Christian lands.
The Church historians called these people Waldensians, who were together with Cathars.
There were many more similar peoples throughout Europe, who had the same beliefs as the Cathars, which are the same beliefs that are found in the Arabic Koran.
The history of the Waldensians was written by Church historians and their allies, who wrote bad things about these people.
The Original Waldensians were defeated and destroyed.
Church historians wrote about many other sects and groups that did not accept the Church or the Bible.
Much of the history of these people was a lie.
The people that wrote this history, for the Church and its allies, wrote as they were told.
Anything that the Church did not like was burnt or destroyed.
Basically, they destroyed the evidence.
This is what all criminals normally do after they commit a crime.
The evidence showed that the people in France did not even speak French in the 16th century at all, - and the language was artificially created during and after the Renaissance.
Even by the year 1789, around 250 years after the Bible was translated into French, the evidence showed that more 50 percent of the people did not speak French at all in France.
Only an estimated 10 percent of the people spoke the French language
“in basic terms only.”
This means that around 90 percent of the people in France did not speak French.
The evidence shows that Church and its allies took over France in recent centuries and gave the people a new language by force and changed the history.
They then gave the people a book called the Bible, in the French language.
The big problem is this - the Bible was translated into French.
Who did they translate the Bible for?
Evidence shows that no one could speak French in 1535.
Did they translate the Bible for ghosts?
Or are they telling lies about the dates of historical events?
The answer was not very difficult.
They did not translate the Bible for ghosts to read.
They lied about the dates of historical events.
The history of the Church and the Bible was nothing but a lie.
Photo above - First Italian Bible - published 1603-1607
But… we have a serious problem here.
The evidence showed that the people in Italy did not even speak Italian in the 16th century at all and the language was artificially created during and after the Renaissance.
Even by the year 1861, around 250 years after the Bible was translated into Italian, the evidence showed that more 97 percent of the people did not speak Italian in Italy.
Researchers concluded that most of these books were forgeries that were created in the late 19th century and the early 20th century.
The same problem was found in books written in other languages throughout the world.
A close examination of books before the 20th century and after:
shows that most of the books were full of historical lies and contradictions and forgeries.
It was well known that thousands of books were being printed in the late 19th century and were sold to people with false historical dates.
The people in power, who regulated the printing industry and controlled publishing, - made big money from these books.
This is one of the major reasons why many books from the 16th century and 17th century and 18th century and 19th century, cannot even show the history of the world for that time properly.
If they were actually written at that time, then they would have more accurate details.
But - instead we find many lies and many contradictions and many problems within their writings.
The full history of the people who wrote these books, - and when, and why, - was also a forgery.
Researchers found that the history of the world was a lie, but that story is too long to mention here.
It is well known in traditional history that the Cathars were connected to the Knights Templar.
Evidence showed that William the Conqueror who invaded England in 1066 from Normandy, not far from Holland, was a fake story and the full history of England was created after the 1688 invasion.
Researchers also found that the dates of these events were artificially created.
The history of England is too long to mention here.
What most people do not realize was that Arabic was the international common language for the world in Medieval times and most languages today have many Arabic origin words, - but many people think these words are from Hebrew.
The Church and its allies translated Arabic European books into languages such as Latin.
They changed many books and destroyed everything they could find.
This was done through war and inquisitions and colonial empires.
The French language mysteriously has many Arabic words and also many French words are clearly words that were modified from the Arabic language.
Historians say that these Arabic words were in the original Old French language.
This was the language spoken by the Cathars and the Knights Templar.
Many of these words are in many European languages such as English and German and Dutch.
Historians say that they are words that were borrowed from the Arabic language.
Evidence shows that the French people did not even speak French.
The history of the French language was falsified.
Researchers found that the French language did not borrow Arabic words, but evidence shows that people spoke Arabic before the modern French language was introduced.
The Arabic Koran mentions that Jesus Christ requested from God to send down a table with food from heaven.
Because the table came down from the sky or the heavens, this is probably the reason why the constellations were added to the story by the historians and artists in the city areas.
The Holy Grail or Cup of Christ became important because it came to earth from the heavens.
It was not superstition but based on a story mentioned in the Arabic Koran.
This explained why the heavens or constellations were shown in the painting of Da Vinci and why the Holy Grail was important.
It is normal for Muslims to say that the Holy Grail is important, because this story is in the book that they follow.
If the Knights Templar and Original Christians did not follow the Arabic Koran, why did they place such importance on the Holy Grail?
According to the Arabic Koran, Jesus was born beside a tree.
This explained why the symbol of a tree is so important for the birth of Jesus Christ.
It is normal for Muslims to say that this story is important, because this story is in the book that they follow.
But where did Christians get this idea from?
The answer is not hard to figure out.
The tradition of the Christmas tree is such a big tradition and according to modern historians, they tell you it is probably a pagan tradition from many centuries ago and say many different things which greatly confuse you, none of which make sense.
Some researchers say that such things were designed on purpose to hide the truth - and to create such confusion and difficulty for researchers to eventually give up - or to finally think that there is no truth out there.
Historians who wrote for the Church and its allies said that the Muslims were spitting on the crosses used by the Church and its allies, but not on normal crosses.
The evidence from the writings of Church historians and their allies,- clearly shows that the Islam and the Original Christians were not a separate religion during the Middle Ages.
The Original Muslims and the Original Christians were the same people, fighting against the Church and its allies.
The Original Muslims were the Original Christians.
Original Islam was Original Christianity.
The Original Muslims were Christians in the eyes of the Church and its allies.
This can be clearly seen in the history that was written by the Church and its allies.
The Church and its allies defeated the Original Christians or Original Muslims in Europe.
They wrote the history.
In their words they say that Christianity or Christians were fighting against the Original Muslims.
The truth is simple and not hard:
it was the Church and its allies who were against the Original Muslims, and the Original Muslims were Original Christians.
This is why we see, the Church and its allies fighting these people everywhere and these people had the same beliefs.
After the Church and its allies murdered and killed the Cathars and Knights Templar and Original Muslims on mainland Europe, they gave the children and the people a new history and the Bible and new languages.
This new history shows that Muslims are people that are outside Europe and shows them as a separate religion.
There are Christians in the Middle East today who follow the Bible, - and evidence shows that these groups were also created by the Church and its allies, but that history is too long to mention here.
The Knights Templar were accused of loving “Baphomet”.
Baphomet was later turned into mystical pagan figure in the 19th century.
Researchers believe that this was done deliberately to hide the history of the Knights Templar and the history of Europe.
According to historians: - the first known mention of the Baphomet was in 1098, - which says that the Church Crusaders used the word Baphomet, - to describe the Turks shouting the word Baphomet.
The Turks, actually say Mahomet - and the Arabs say Mohamed.
Researchers also found that the dating of the Crusades against Original Islam had been falsified, but that story is too long to mention here.
In simple words, Baphomet was Mahomet or Mohamed.
The Knights Templar were followers of Mahomet or Mohamed.
At the time the Knights Templar were arrested, they were accused by the Church and its allies of loving a bearded man called Baphomet.
It was clear that the Knights Templar were accused of following the Prophet Mohamed.
They were accused of being together with the Original Muslims.
To demonize them, the Church historians and their allies created crazy stories about them and said that they were devil worshippers and wrote lies about them.
New stories were created in the 19th century to show that Baphomet was a pagan idol, in order to make sure that people did not find true history.
New organizations were created using the name and legacy of the Knights Templar, but these people had nothing to do with the original Knights Templar.
It was a great way to change and destroy, - the original history of the Knights Templar.
What historians have told us about him is that he was a so-called leader who lived in the mysterious Dark Ages - and because that period in history is dark - we don’t have much accurate information about him if any.
Almost as if he did not exist - or as if he is a mythical character from the past.
Researchers claim that there is a similar problem when studying Jesus Christ and Alexander the Great, and many other historical figures.
Either we have don’t have much information about the great man called Charlemagne or at one point in the past - there was a deliberate campaign to erase his true historical identity or maybe it was deliberately changed or hidden - for the purpose of politicians or French Nationalists.
Victor Hugo says Notre Dame’s construction began in Charlemagne’s time.
Researchers question when Victor Hugo lived - and if that was his real name - and if we really have his original writings - or have they been modified or even created after 1860.
Researchers ask who was this Charlemagne - and say that it is very important to identify this so-called Charlemagne - because the Notre Dame is a very important building with Tartarian style architecture - and many buildings of similar architecture can be seen around the world.
Who really built them or where did the technology come from to build such amazing buildings?
Many of them show advanced construction methods, and many may even be difficult to duplicate or construct even today.
Also, there are many buildings in some countries which are town halls or city halls that look very similar to churches or show similar construction designs.
Researchers are asking how did the church acquire such buildings?
Did they occupy the buildings after a global disaster or mud flood - and what was the original function of these churches?
Who was Charlemagne?
Many people from eastern countries immediately pronounce his name - Sharleyman - and they immediately think of Shuleyman or Suleyman in their history and religions.
Suleyman is known as Solomon in English.
Researchers began to question if the story of Charlemagne had been copied and modified from the story of King Solomon.
Is Charlemagne - King Solomon?
It was not hard to see that Charlemagne - Sharleyman - Suleyman was:
King Solomon.
It is well known that the Knights Templar were involved in constructing and financing many castles and Gothic buildings.
The words Goth and Cath are connected to the word Cathar.
Because the Church and its allies destroyed the history of the Knights Templar, many lies were written about who built the Cathedrals, and how they built them and why they built them.
The construction of Notre Dame Cathedral of Paris took place around the time of the Knights Templar.
Many traditions say that the actual workers who built many of the Gothic cathedrals were known as the Children of Solomon, - because they were named after King Solomon.
Looking at the type of people who lived in the Middle Ages and these amazing grand buildings, it was clear the history of these buildings was a lie.
There are billions of people in thousands of similar villages in the world today, and not even 1 village in the world has been able to build a similar building in the last 100 years without the use of modern machinery.
But - historians and their allies have told the world that many small villages with a few hundred people - built thousands of castles and churches in the Middle Ages without the help of machinery.
Sounds like rubbish.
And guess what… people believe it.
Anatoly Fomenko pointed out that the Cathars and Knights Templar and the Original Muslims and their allies had many cities and castles and cathedrals.
After the Church and its allies took over these buildings, they modified the buildings.
They called it restoration.
The original items found in the buildings were removed or destroyed.
Many false statues and false objects were added to the buildings to create a false history and to hide the original function and purpose of the buildings.
The same thing was happening all over the world.
Buildings and monuments were modified to create a false history to hide the truth.
Many of the windows had new decorations added to them, called restorations.
These decorations were added to create a new history for these buildings.
In many buildings, the windows were blocked or modified.
Many Gothic churches are empty and closed and hardly anyone goes to them.
In the 19th century more people went to churches because they were forced to go by the schools and orphanages that were controlled by the Churches, - but that story is too long to mention here.
Many Gothic Cathedrals and churches have been destroyed, and their ruins can be seen around the world.
The Church and its allies destroyed many of these buildings, claiming that they were used by devil worshippers such as Cathars and the Knights Templar and Original Muslims, who were the Original Christians.
The story that historians said was a big joke.
It was clear that they were hiding true history.
The history of Gothic Cathedrals was a lie.
There are many different types of cathedrals and churches, and they may have had different types of functions.
Regarding Western Europe in the Middle Ages:
The Knights Templar were mostly in the north and the west of Europe - England and France.
The Cathars were mostly in the center and the west of Europe France and Italy.
The Original Muslims were mostly in the south and the west of Europe - Italy and Spain.
Historians who worked for the Church and its allies gave these people names such as Cathars and the Knights Templar, but it is clear that were the same type of people, with the same beliefs.
The Church saw them all as enemies.
The Church and its allies were fighting against all of these people during the same time period.
They all had similarities in their beliefs, and they all built amazing buildings.
Historians and the media have promoted and advertised many different theories and ideas about how these castles and churches were built.
They say that the methods of construction have been lost or they tell crazy stories which show that these buildings took decades or hundreds of years to build.
Many different stories are told and they say there are many secrets and mysteries.
Millions of dollars have been made by historians and their allies from such stories.
The word “knights” also had a suspicious history, many similar “knights” were known as “khanates” that were seen in cities in Eastern Europe and Asia at the time, but that history is too long to mention here.
The Church and its allies totally destroyed the Cathars and the Knights Templar and their history.
One historical document from the Original Muslims survives today called the Arabic Koran.
The Arabic Koran does not hide the secrets of King Solomon.
It tells the story of the construction secrets of King Solomon.
The Original Muslims were known as the Original Christians.
The Original Muslims classified themselves as the knights of Jesus Christ, fighting against the Church and its allies.
After the Church and its allies took over Europe, they changed the history and the languages of the people.
They told the children in schools that Christianity saw Islam as a false religion, because it does not accept that Jesus Christ is the son of God and does not accept the Crucifixion.
They advertise this and promote this.
What they don’t advertise or promote is that the Church killed and murdered everyone who did not accept these beliefs.
It was murder.
What they don’t advertise or promote is that the Original Muslims were known as the Original Christians.
The Arabic Koran mentions the history of King Solomon or the Prophet Solomon.
In the Arabic Koran, it states that a race of alien creatures lives on earth beside humans.
The Arabic Koran also describes the capabilities of many of these alien creatures.
These capabilities are practically the same as the capabilities of Artificial Intelligence (A I = 19)
The Arabic Koran says that these alien creatures are alive and that they were working for King Solomon.
The Arabic Koran says that they constructed palaces and fortresses and castles and temples and waterways and water bowls and heating machines, - that are fixed in their locations.
These alien creatures in the Arabic language are called Jinn.
There are many stories regarding the alien creatures called Jinn, but many have been falsified to make sure that people do not find out who they really are.
The Arabic Koran also says what these alien creatures are created from.
The Arabic Koran states that humans were made from solid and liquid and that the alien Jinn, - they were created from a type of flame, a flame that shows no smoke, a type of radiated flame, - or an invisible flame.
The Arabic Koran clearly states that the alien creatures called Jinn did construction work and many other types of work for King Solomon Construction with the help of electrical beings, - and the existence of advanced technology, - is mentioned in the Arabic Koran.
This is the secret and mystery of King Solomon.
The full story is described in detail in the Arabic Koran regarding this matter.
The Arabic Koran tells you to go and examine the world.
The Arabic Koran says that these people are liars.
The Arabic Koran says that the world was advanced in the past.
But, - historians say that the world was not advanced in the past and the Church historians show in their writings that the world was not advanced.
The Arabic Koran does not hide the history of technology and construction and mining.
The Arabic Koran does not say that it is a secret or mystery.
The Jinns or alien creatures described in the Arabic Koran are seen as a type of invisible and electrical being.
The Gothic Cathedrals and Cathodes and electricity all have a connection, and researchers have presented much evidence about this, but that story is too long to be mentioned here.
King Solomon was the leader of a great advanced civilization according to the Arabic Koran.
There must be evidence of this civilization around the world, and historians do not mention it.
Historians and the Bible say that King Solomon was a local leader in the Middle East of a tribal small nation.
The Bible and historians generally show that King Solomon had his horses and donkeys and show a civilization that was not advanced.
It is clear why the Church and its allies did not like the Original Muslims or the Arabic Koran.
They were called devil worshippers by the Church and its allies.
The people who destroyed the Cathars and the Knights Templar wanted to hide this history and keep it a secret and keep this technology for themselves.
The Church and its allies formed ruling nations and states.
Most of these states and their historians told the world that humans may have originated from monkeys and there was no technology in the past.
But, the Arabic Koran says that they are liars and says a totally different history.
It is clear why the Church and its allies wanted to destroy the Original Muslims who were known as the Original Christians.
It is clear why the Church and its allies wanted to destroy the Arabic Koran, and this war continues today.
The Church and its allies, and Church historians of the past, and modern historians, have verified and checked their historical manuscripts.
The evidence shows these manuscripts have been modified and have many mistakes.
They cannot hide this.
They made sure that the world focused on these books.
What they don’t say very much is that the Church and its allies murdered people in Europe and they burnt the evidence - this was called verifying and checking by the Church and its allies Inquisitions.
Criminals normally destroy evidence.
The Knights Templar were famous for their relationship to the secrets and mysteries of the construction technology of King Solomon.
The Arabic Koran clearly says that King Solomon and his civilization built grand fortresses and castles, - and built many lakes, water basins, waterways, - and heating machines, - that were built on the land, fixed in their locations.
King Solomon did this by using the Jinns or alien creatures or electrical beings to construct them.
Many people noticed that the shapes of rivers and forts, have a connection to the stars and water and electricity, but that story is too long to mention here.
It was clear that the Knights Templar were linked to the stories of the Holy Grail and the secrets of King Solomon and the Prophet Mohamed.
These stories are found in the Arabic Koran.
The Knights Templar were Original Christians.
They were seen as close to the Original Muslims, who were Original Christians.
They were close to the Cathars, who were Original Christians.
Around the time the Cathars were destroyed, the Church and its allies went south from France and into Spain.
Slowly they killed and murdered people who refused to accept that Jesus Christ was the son of God.
They burnt people who refused to accept that Jesus Christ was crucified.
Spain was the territory of the Original Muslims at the time, and these people were classified as Original Christians.
There were not seen as a different religion or separate religion.
The Original Muslims were the Original Christians According to historians - the Church and its allies then arrived in Granada the south of Spain, and in 1499, they were burning the Arabic Koran and other books in the Arabic language or anything they did not like.
The date 1499 was falsified, but that story is too long to mention here.
Of course, the Church and its allies saved the books that they wanted, and these books had information about the science and construction of the castles and churches that the Spanish Muslims had built.
This means that the manuscripts and books that are available today,- are the ones that the Church and its allies gave to the world.
They burnt the evidence.
They burnt the history.
This was called verifying and checking.
The Church and its allies have verified and checked the manuscripts in Europe.
They have verified and checked the history.
So, the only history that you will find, is:
The history that the Church and its allies gave to Europe.
The history in the Arabic Koran which was originally seen as a book that was used by the Original Christians.
The Arabic Koran has not been checked and verified by the Church and its allies.
They failed to destroy this book.
They rejected this book.
This book is available today if anyone wants to see and understand who the Church and its allies were fighting against.
The Arabic Koran says that the true name of Jesus Christ was Isa.
During the Renaissance the letter “J” was introduced.
The Bible clearly says that Judah Iscariot or Judas Iscariot betrayed Jesus Christ.
In simple words:
Judah or Judas gave Jesus Christ to the Jewish leaders and priests.
According to the Bible, Jesus Christ was arrested and taken to the Sanhedrin, which was mostly made of Sadducees - Pharisees and priests, and their leader was the High Priest.
This is why the followers of the Prophet Moses who were also known as Jews, got blamed for the actions of Judas Iscariot and the Jewish Sanhedrin - who were a group of priests and aristocratic ruling families and businessmen.
It was clear that they wanted to make sure that the ordinary common Jewish people got the blame for what happened.
Why…?
Then people will not realize who was behind the arrest of Jesus Christ.
It was not the ordinary Jewish people, but a group of priests and aristocratic ruling families and businessmen.
Anatoly Fomenko pointed out that evidence found in medieval texts in Eastern Europe in Slavonic writings showed that the word “Jew” and the word “priest” was the same word in the Middle Ages.
The Bible clearly says that a group of Jewish priests and aristocratic ruling families and businessmen wanted Jesus Christ dead.
These people were the Priests and their allies.
It was not the ordinary Jewish people, and not the followers of the Prophet Moses.
image.png
402 KB
View full-sizeDownload The people who fought against the Cathars and the Knights Templar and the Original Muslims, were the priests and aristocratic ruling families and businessmen.
They slowly took over many parts of the world and gave the world a new history and new languages and a global system.
They are the ruling powers today in many parts of the world Many researchers concluded that the Church is the group of priests that wanted Jesus Christ dead.
This is why they killed anyone who did not accept the death and crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
They fought against Jesus Christ from the beginning and the war continues today.
There are many different stories about Jesus Christ found in many historical manuscripts and scriptures.
What was clear from these stories is that Jesus Christ was the leader of a resistance movement against the people in power and their system of rule and way of life.
There are many resistance movements throughout the world, against the people in power today and their system of rule and way of life.
Many people in these resistance movements, - looked very similar or identical, - to the people of Jesus Christ, that are described in the historical manuscripts and scriptures.
What is strange is that many of these resistance movements today are known as Muslims or followers of Islam.
These people were followers of the Arabic Koran.
These modern Muslims claimed that they were following the example of Jesus Christ and other prophets of God.
Modern historians have labelled these people as crazy or insane.
There are a lot of politics involved, and the people in power are doing everything to destroy these resistance movements, - and the true story of why they are fighting is hidden by the media and the people in power.
Fake Islamic groups and organizations have been created by world powers to make sure that these people are destroyed, but that story is too long to mention here.
Who wrote the Bible and the history of Europe?
According to historians, there were many different organizations in Europe that had monks between the 15th and 17th centuries.
Most of these organizations that we are told about by historians, are related to Christianity and different church organizations.
Monks were trained to write books and also to draw pictures.
Therefore, almost all the manuscripts that we have today are made by the Church.
This means that the history, which is found in Europe today, was written and created by one group of people called - the Church.
The Church burned and destroyed everything else.
These monks wrote thousands of copies of the Biblical manuscripts, so that they can be sent to all the villages and towns and cities in Europe, - which were taken over by the Church and its allies by force.
This is why we have so many manuscripts Latin was the language that the Churches used in the west and Greek in the east.
After the Church destroyed all the evidence, this is what murderers normally do, - they wrote crazy tales about the Cathars and Bogomils and Knights Templar and Original Christians and Original Muslims of Europe.
The people in the cities that were taken by force by the Church and its allies, were referred to as:
“Urban” people in the Latin language (English - urban, French - urbain, Spanish - urbano, Italian urbano).
This word comes from an Arabic word, which means Arabean or Eropean or common people or Arab language speaker.
The common people in Spain for example and France and Italy, were commonly known as the Arrabales or Arabs, by the ruling powers who took over by force, during and after the Renaissance.
An Arab is basically a person who speaks the Arabic language.
Not an Arab by race.
The Urban-Arban people and Arrabales:
it is not hard to guess who these people were and what their language and religion was, - before modern languages were created.
There are so many historical remains in Europe such as Arabic coins which show that Original Christians also known as Original Muslims were part of Europe, but that story is too long to mention here.
Historians say that the Church and its allies created the First Crusade in the 11th century - 1095, - against the Original Muslims, who were known as the Original Christians.
Researchers such as Anatoly Fomenko have shown much evidence that the history of Jesus Christ and Christianity and the Bible and the manuscripts was a lie.
They pointed out how stupid was world history according to Church historians and their allies.
The people of the world are told by historians that Jesus Christ was murdered and crucified 2000 years ago, and that 1000 years after the death of Jesus Christ, the Europeans wake up after they were sleeping.
They were sleeping for 1000 years.
Wow!
They then woke up and went to fight and started Crusades.
They fought in Europe and went to the Middle East, many of them walking for hundreds of miles in the Middle Ages.
At last, they went to take revenge for the murder of Jesus Christ, 1000 years later.
The people they found in the Middle East were mysteriously Muslims, - who were mysteriously the Original Christians, and these Muslims mysteriously built an international global empire called the Caliphate so fast from east to west.
The Europeans forgot to start the crusades for 1000 years.
What a joke.
Even a child will know that this history is a scam and a joke.
Imagine waiting 1000 years for the bus or train to come.
These people were waiting 1000 years, - according to historians.
They fought crusades and had inquisitions against the Cathars and Bogomils and Knights Templar and the Original Muslims who were known as Original Christians.
It was clear that on one side was the Church and its allies and on the other side was the people who said that the Bible was a lie and the people who said that Jesus Christ was a prophet and the people who said that the Crucifixion was a lie.
The Muslims and many Jewish people say the same words.
The majority of Christians do not say these words, except those mainly found in the Middle East.
Researchers found evidence which showed that the Aramaic, Syrian or Arab Christians, were not ancient, but were fraudulently created by the allies of the Church, with the help of colonial military empires.
This happened in the last 3 centuries.
The Church and its allies created many other Church groups, such as the Protestants in the 19th century and gave them a false history.
These groups were acceptable because they used the Bible and manuscripts that were created by the Church and its allies.
The Arabic Koran mentions a totally different history, so it was unacceptable.
The Original Muslims were seen as Original Christians.
The Bible even says that Jesus Christ prayed by falling on the floor in the Gospel of Matthew.
The Bible shows many examples of prayer which seem to be the same as the way that Muslims pray.
The Original Muslims have kept the traditions of Jesus Christ alive for centuries.
The whole history of Jesus Christ is nothing but a fraud.
A very serious question was:
When did Jesus Christ actually live?
Did he really live 2000 years ago?
Or did he live 1000 years ago?
They forgot the crusades for 1000 years.
Based on the history of the Bible and scriptures and historical manuscripts, - historians have said that they have found no evidence which shows that Jesus Christ ever existed.
This is very clear to understand.
The research of historians is based on historical manuscripts that were created by the Church and its allies.
These manuscripts showed nothing but the lies that were invented by the Church and its allies.
This is why they cannot find any evidence which shows that Jesus Christ existed.
Researchers such as Anatoly Fomenko found that the history of the Prophet Moses and Jesus Christ in the Arabic Koran was different compared to what historians said.
Anatoly Fomenko showed evidence from the Arabic Koran which shows that the Virgin Mary, the mother of Jesus Christ, was the sister of Aaron and the Prophet Moses.
This totally changed the timeline of world history.
Did the Prophet Moses live around the time of Jesus Christ?
Did Jesus Christ really live 2000 years ago?
Was the timeline of world history a lie?
The Arabic Koran showed a different timeline of world history.
The Arabic Koran did not agree with the timeline created by historians.
No wonder historians and their masters were against the Arabic Koran.
The story of Jesus Christ found in the Bible has many problems.
Below are some examples of the problems that researchers have found.
It says one thing in one place, and then says something different.
The Church says they are not lies.
People who did not accept this in the past, were murdered.
The Gospels say that Jesus cursed a fig tree. Did the tree wither (die) immediately? (a) Yes. (Matthew 21:19) (b) No. It withered overnight (Mark 11:20) ========================= Did Judas kiss Jesus? (a) Yes (Matthew 26:48-50) (b) No. Judas could not get close enough to Jesus to kiss him (John 18:3-12) ========================= Did Jesus carry his own cross? (a) Yes (John 19:17) (b) No (Matthew 27:31-32) ========================= Did Jesus die before the curtain of the temple was torn? (a) Yes (Matthew 27:50-51 and Mark 15:37-38) (b) No. After the curtain was torn, then Jesus crying with a loud voice, said, “Father, into thy hands I commit my spirit!” After he said that he breathed his last (Luke 23:45-46) ========================= Did Jesus say anything secretly? (a) No. “I have said nothing secretly” (John 18:20) (b) Yes. He said, “To you it has been given to know the secrets of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it has not been given” (Matthew 13:10-11) ========================= The gospels say that two thieves were crucified along with Jesus. Did both thieves insult Jesus? (a) Yes (Mark 15:32) (b) No. One of them insulted Jesus, the other defended Jesus (Luke 23:43) ========================= Did Jesus go to Paradise the same day of the crucifixion? (a) Yes. He said to the thief who defended him, “Today you will be with me in Paradise” (Luke 23:43) (b) No. He said to Mary Magdalene two days later, “I have not yet ascended to the Father” (John 20:17) ========================= When Paul was on the road to Damascus he saw a light and heard a voice. Did those who were with him hear the voice? (a) Yes (Acts 9:7) (b) No (Acts 22:9) ========================= When Paul saw the light he fell to the ground. Did his traveling companions also fall to the ground? (a) Yes (Acts 26:14) (b) No (Acts 9:7) ========================= Did the voice tell Paul what he should do? (a) Yes (Acts 26:16-18) (b) No. The voice commanded Paul to go into the city of Damascus and there he will be told what he must do. (Acts 22:10) ========================= When Jesus entered Jerusalem did he cleanse the temple that same day? (a) Yes (Matthew 21:12) (b) No. He went into the temple but it was very late He went to Bethany and then returned the next morning to cleanse the temple (Mark 11:1-17). ========================= What did Judas do with the blood money he received for betraying Jesus? (a) Judas bought a field himself (Acts 1:18) (b) Judas threw all of it into the temple and went away. The priests used it to buy a field (Matthew 27:5) ========================= How did Judas die? (a) After he threw the money into the temple he went away and hanged himself (Matthew 27:5) (b) After he bought the field with the price of his evil deed he fell headlong and burst open in the middle and all his bowels gushed out (Acts 1:18) ========================= Why is the field called the “Field of Blood”? (a) Because the priests bought it with the blood money (Matthew 27:8) (b) Because of the bloody death of Judas in the field (Acts 1:19) ========================= Who is a ransom for whom? (a) “The Son of Man came…to give his life as a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45). “Christ Jesus who gave himself as a ransom for all…” (1 Timothy 2:5-6) (b) “The wicked is a ransom for the righteous, and the faithless for the upright” (Proverbs 21:18) ========================= Is the law of Moses useful? (a) Yes. “All scripture is… profitable…” (2 Timothy 3:16) (b) No. “A former commandment is set aside because of its weakness and uselessness.” (Hebrews 7:18) ========================= What was the exact wording on the cross? (a) “This is Jesus the King of the Jews” (Matthew 27:37) (b) “The King of the Jews” (Mark 15:26) (c) “This is the King of the Jews” (Luke 23:38) (d) “Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews” (John 19:19) ========================= Did Herod want to kill John the Baptist? (a) Yes (Matthew 14:5) (b) No. It was Herodias, the wife of Herod who wanted to kill him. But Herod knew that he was a righteous man and kept him safe (Mark 6:20) ========================= Who was the tenth disciple of Jesus in the list of twelve? (a) Thaddaeus (Matthew 10:1-4; Mark 3:13-19) (b) Judas the son of James (Luke 6:12-16) ========================= Was Jesus crucified on the daytime before the Passover meal or the daytime after? (a) After (Mark 14:12-17) (b) Before. Before the feast of the Passover (John 1) Judas went out at night (John 13:30). The other disciples thought he was going out to buy supplies to prepare for the Passover meal (John 13:29). When Jesus was arrested, the Jews did not enter Pilate’s judgment hall because they wanted to stay clean to eat the Passover (John 18:28). When the judgment was pronounced against Jesus, it was about the sixth hour on the day of Preparation for the Passover (John 19:14) ========================= Did Jesus pray to The Father to prevent the crucifixion? (a) Yes. (Matthew 26:39; Mark 14:36; Luke 22:42) (b) No. (John 12:27) ========================= In the gospels which say that Jesus prayed to avoid the cross, how many times did he move away from his disciples to pray? (a) Three (Matthew 26:36-46 and Mark 14:32-42) (b) One. No opening is left for another two times. (Luke 22:39-46) ========================= Matthew and Mark agree that Jesus went away and prayed three times. What were the words of the second prayer? (a) Mark does not give the words but he says that the words were the same as the first prayer (Mark 14:3 9) (b) Matthew gives us the words, and we can see that they are not the same as in the first (Matthew 26:42) ========================= When Jesus said “My God, my God, why have you forsaken Me?” in what language did he speak? (a) Hebrew: the words are “Elah, Elah.” (Matthew 27:46) (b) Aramaic: the words are “Elah, Elah.” (Mark 15:34) ========================= According to the gospels, what were the last words of Jesus before he died? (a) “Father, into your hands I commit my spirit!” (Luke 23:46) (b) “It is finished” (John 19:30). ========================= When Jesus entered Capernaum he healed the slave of a centurion. Did the centurion come personally to request Jesus for this? (a) Yes (Matthew 8:5) (b) No. He sent some elders of the Jews and his friends (Luke 7:3-6) ========================= Apart from Jesus did anyone else go up to heaven? (a) No (John 3:13) (b) Yes. “And Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven” (2 Kings 2:11) ========================= Was Jesus’ body wrapped in spices before burial according to Jewish burial customs? (a) Yes and his female disciples witnessed his burial (John 19:39-40) (b) No. Jesus was simply wrapped in a linen shroud. Then the women bought and prepared spices “so that they may go and anoint him (Jesus)” (Mark 16:1) ========================= When did the women buy the spices? (a) After the Sabbath was past (Mark 16:1) (b) Before the Sabbath. The women prepared spices and ointments. Then on the Sabbath they rested according to the commandment (Luke 23:55 to 24:1) ========================= At what time of day did the women visit the tomb? (a) “Towards the dawn” (Matthew 28:1) (b) “After the sun had risen” (Mark 16:2) ========================= What was the purpose for which the women went to the tomb? (a) To anoint Jesus’ body with spices (Mark 16:1; Luke 23:55 to 24:1) (b) To see the tomb. No mention of spices here (Matthew 28:1) (c) For no specified reason. In this gospel the wrapping with spices had already been done before the Sabbath (John 20:1) ========================= A large stone was placed at the entrance of the tomb. Where was the stone when the women arrived? (a) They saw that the stone was “Rolled back” (Mark 16:4). They found the stone “rolled away from the tomb” (Luke 24:2). They saw that “the stone had been taken away from the tomb” (John 20:1) (b) As the women approached, an angel came from heaven and rolled away the stone and talked with the women. Matthew said the women witnessed the amazing “rolling away of the stone” (Matthew 28:1-6) ========================= Did anyone tell the women what happened to Jesus’ body? (a) Yes. “A young man in a white robe” (Mark 16:5). “Two men … in dazzling apparel” later described as angels (Luke 24:4 and 24:23). (b) Yes. An angel, - the one who rolled back the stone (Matthew 16:2). In each case the women were told that Jesus had risen from the dead (Matthew 28:7; Mark 16:6; Luke 24:5 footnote) (c) No. Mary met no one and returned saying, “They have taken the Lord out of the tomb, and we do not know where they have put him” (John 20:2) ========================= When did Mary Magdalene first meet the resurrected Jesus? And how did she react? (a) Mary and the other women met Jesus on their way back from their first and only visit to the tomb. They took hold of his feet and worshipped him (Matthew 28:9) (b) On her second visit to the tomb Mary met Jesus just outside the tomb. When she saw Jesus she did not recognize him. She thought he was the gardener. But, when Jesus said her name, she recognized him and said “Teacher”. Jesus replied, “Do not hold me…” (John 20:11-17) ========================= What was Jesus’ instruction for his disciples? (a) “Tell my brethren to go to Galilee and there they will see me” (Matthew 2 8:10) (b) “Go to my brethren and say to them, I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God” (John 20:17) ========================= How many disciples did Jesus appear to after his resurrection? (a) Twelve (1 Corinthians 15:5) (b) Eleven (Matthew 27:3-5 and Acts 1:9-26, see also Matthew 28:16; Mark 16:14 footnote; Luke 24:9; Luke 24:33) ========================= Where was Jesus three days after his baptism? (a) After his baptism, “the spirit immediately drove him out into the wilderness. And he was in the wilderness forty days … (Mark 1:12 13) (b) Next day after the baptism, Jesus selected two disciples. Second day: Jesus went to Galilee – two more disciples. Third day: Jesus was at a wedding feast in Cana in Galilee (see John 1:35; 1:43; 2:1-11) ========================= Was baby Jesus’ life threatened in Jerusalem? (a) Yes, so Joseph fled with him to Egypt and stayed there until Herod died (Matthew 2:13 23) (b) No. The family fled nowhere. They calmly presented the child at the Jerusalem temple according to the Jewish customs and returned to Galilee (Luke 2:21-40) ========================= When Jesus walked on water how did the disciples respond? (a) They worshipped him, saying, “Truly you are the Son of God” (Matthew 14:33) (b) “They were totally shocked, for they did not understand about the loaves, but their hearts were hardened” (Mark 6:51-52) ========================= Who was the father of Joseph, husband of Mary? (a) Jacob (Matthew 1:16) (b) Hell (Luke 3:23) ========================= Jesus descended from which son of David? (a) Solomon (Matthew 1:6) (b) Nathan (Luke3:31) ========================= Who was the father of Shealtiel? (a) Jechoniah (Matthew 1:12) (b) Neri’ (Luke 3:27) ========================= Which son of Zerubbabel was an ancestor of Jesus Christ? (a) Abiud (Matthew 1:13) (b) Rhesa (Luke 3:27) But the seven sons of Zerubbabel were called: i. Meshullam, ii. Hananiah, iii. Hashubah, iv. Ohel, v. Berechiah, vi. Hasadiah, viii. Jushabhesed (1 Chronicles 3:19-20). Zerubbabel had no sons called Abiud and Rhesa ========================= Who was the father of Uzziah? (a) Joram (Matthew 1:8) (b) Amaziah (2 Chronicles 26:1) ========================= Who was the father of Jechoniah? (a) Josiah (Matthew 1:11) (b) Jeholakim (I Chronicles 3:16) ========================= How many generations were between the Babylonian exile and Christ? (a) Matthew says fourteen (Matthew 1:17) (b) But a careful count of the generations reveals only thirteen (see Matthew 1:12-16) ========================= Who was the father of Shelah? (a) Cainan (Luke 3:35-36) (b) Arphaxad (Genesis 11: 12) ========================= Was John the Baptist “the Elijah” who was predicted to come? (a) Yes (Matthew 11:14, 17:10-13) (b) No (John 1:19-21) ========================= Would Jesus inherit David’s throne? (a) Yes. So said the angel (Luke 1:32) (b) No, because he is a descendant of Jehoiakim (see Matthew 1: 11, 1 Chronicles 3:16). Because Jehoiakim was cursed by God that none of his descendants can sit on David’s throne (Jeremiah 36:30) ========================= Jesus rode into Jerusalem on how many animals? (a) One – a colt (Mark 11:7; compare Luke 19:35). “And they brought the colt to Jesus and threw their garments on it; and he sat upon it.” (b) Two – a colt and an ass (Matthew 21:7). “They brought the ass and the colt and put their garments on them and he sat thereon.” ========================= Where did Jesus first meet Simon Peter and Andrew? (a) By the sea of Galilee (Matthew 4:18-22) (b) On the banks of river Jordan (John 1:42). After that, Jesus decided to go to Galilee (John 1:43) ========================= When Jesus met Jairus, was Jairus’s daughter already dead? (a) Yes. Matthew 9:18 wrote, “My daughter has just died.” (b) No. Mark 5:23 says, “My little daughter is at the point of death.” ========================= Did Jesus allow his disciples to keep a staff on their journey? (a) Yes (Mark6:8) (b) No (Matthew 10:9; Luke 9:3) ========================= Did Herod think that Jesus was John the Baptist? (a) Yes (Matthew 14:2; Mark 6:16) (b) No (Luke 9:9) ========================= Did John the Baptist recognize Jesus before his baptism? (a) Yes (Matthew 3:13-14) (b) No (John 1:32-33) ========================= Did John the Baptist recognize Jesus after his baptism? (a) Yes (John 1:32-33) (b) No (Matthew 11:2) ========================= There are hundreds more problems found in the Bible and in Christian scriptures, too long to mention them here
Are these words in the Bible - the proof that the Churches and Christians use to show that Jesus Christ is the son of god? Are these words in the Bible - the proof that Jesus Christ was crucified?
Who wrote the Bible? We don’t know. Who said Jesus is the son of God? We don’t know Who said Jesus was crucified? We don’t know Who wrote all the manuscripts? We don’t know Who is: - Matthew Mark Luke and John? We don’t know The Cathars and the Original Muslims in Europe rejected the Bible they said that it was a lie Researchers concluded that the Church and its allies were nothing but a group of liars. They murdered the Cathars and the Knights Templar and the Original Christians and the Original Muslims. What type of history is this? They destroyed all the history they did not like. We only have “1” side of history, the side written by murderers. We must examine the history of the world from the other side It is not hard to see the truth. And yet, many people will still say that the Bible is the word of God and say that Jesus Christ is the son of God. They say that Jesus Christ was crucified. Where is their evidence? Why don’t they produce their proof, if they are speaking the truth?
The evidence showed that Christianity was based on many lies. And yet still, many people say the Bible is the word of God and believe that Jesus Christ is the son of God. And many people are using the Bible to explain science and history. And many people are now using Christianity and the Bible to explain Tartaria and subjects relating to Tartaria, - are they joking? Researchers concluded that the Bible and Christianity were not part of the previous civilization that many people call Tartaria, but they were fraudulently created and used as a weapon to destroy it. Jesus Christ JESUS CHRIST – Library of Rickandria
