Copyright © 2023 Allan Cornford. (Standard Copyright License.) All rights reserved. Independently Published through KDP

---

The history we study in school is largely made up, and much is based around guesswork.

In fact, what we call:

etc. cannot really be trusted.

If indeed we are currently living in the Little Season, it would be quite naïve to think that certain historical figures, dates and times have not been in some way distorted.

If for no other reason, than to hide the fact that the second coming, and the millennial reign of Christ have already occurred.

Hence the big question remains, as to what extent our perception of history, and even the timeline itself, has been manipulated and artificially shortened, or even extended?

We know for example, that we live in the year 2022 because our calendar dictates this.

But do we really live a little over two thousand years since the time of Jesus Christ?

Yes, I realize such a question sounds quite ridiculous.

Yet believe it or not, there's a fair amount of evidence which would suggest that the ''Church'' and ''Christianity'' has been made out to be 1,000 years older than it actually is, and Jesus lived not much more than around 1,000 years ago.

Whilst a great deal of controversy has always surrounded the 'Shroud of Turin' for example, it has been carbon-dated to between 1260 and 1390 AD, suggesting that Jesus lived roughly 1,000 years later than claimed.

This world-famous length of cloth, which was said to have come from the actual tomb of Christ, was taken from Judea to Constantinople, where it was stored and kept safe for several centuries, until it was discovered in France in 1353.

There is a spear mark on his side and nail marks through the wrists and feet, and a crown of thorns.

There are no pigments on the linen, and the image depicts depths, i.e., it's not two-dimensional like a painting would be, suggesting the source casting the imagery was made by different distances from the cloth.

Many believe that the 3D quality - and the negative print quality (rather than 'positive' ) image of such nature, could only be made with unbelievable amounts of energy but within an infinitesimally short space of time.

I have no doubt in my mind, that this is the image of the body of Christ recorded in time at the moment it transcended into Light - and passed through the cloth.

Many of course, will scream out that the shroud is fake, a forgery completed in the 13th century, but without one scrap of evidence to support such a claim.

Over the decades millions of dollars have been offered to anyone who can prove the shroud is a forgery, but thus far there have been no takers.

To quote 'Come Alive Ministries':

Personally, I find it impossible to believe that a thirteenth century mastermind, had the ability and technology to create a forgery that cannot be shown to be a forgery with today's modern technology.

Which only leaves one option, the Shroud of Turin is genuine, but because it only dates back to between 1260 and 1390 AD, this would suggest that Jesus lived roughly 1,000 years later than claimed.

Which would mean the Western Church was still in its infancy in 100 AD, and hence much of history was to be rewritten to create the illusion that it was nearly a thousand years old.

Even much of the supposed first millennium history of the early western church, which was written by its own members is fraudulent, and was documented for its own benefit.

To this very day the majority of Catholics, including Pope Francis, still believe that the apostle Peter was the first Pope, and the rock upon which the church of Rome was founded.

From this initial deception, developed the unbroken succession of the popes, each claiming the divine right to occupy ''the throne of saint Peter,'' the fictitious first Bishop of Rome.

One massive problem here, for Peter was never in Rome.

Nor did Peter establish a church in Rome, nor did he become Bishop of Rome, nor did he meet Jesus in Rome, nor did he create a line of succession by the laying of hands to future Bishops of Rome.

The first was Pope Linus, a Gnostic named after Linus, the son of Apollo aka Apollyon/Abaddon ('Destroyer') of Revelation 9:11.

Pope Linus (/ˈlaɪnəs/ ⓘ; Greek: Λῖνος, Linos; died c. AD 80) was the bishop of Rome from c. AD 68 to his death in AD 80. He is generally regarded as the second Bishop of Rome, after St. Peter. As with all the early popes, he was canonized.  According to Irenaeus, Linus is the same person as the one mentioned in the New Testament. Linus is mentioned in the valediction of the Second Epistle to Timothy (2 Timothy 4:21) as being with Paul the Apostle in Rome near the end of Paul's life.

Russian researcher and mathematician, Anatoly Fomenko (born 1945) dates the Book of Revelation to 1486, a little under 1500 years later than currently accepted.

Anatoly Timofeevich Fomenko (Russian: Анато́лий Тимофе́евич Фоме́нко; born 13 March 1945 in Stalino, USSR, now the city of Donetsk) is a Soviet and Russian professor of Mathematics at Moscow State University. He is well-known as a topologist and member of the Russian Academy of Sciences. He is a painter and illustrator of original artworks inspired by topological objects and structures.  Fomenko is also widely known as a conspiracy theorist. He originated a fictitious and pseudoscientific history called New Chronology, based on works of Russian-Soviet writer Nikolai Alexandrovich Morozov.

As foretold by Jesus, Jerusalem aka Babylon fell in 70 AD, yet men waited until the eleventh century to form the Knights Templar, the Cathars, etc. and go after the Holy Land by force.

Why the 1000 year gap?

Then we have the Patricians for example, who were noble family members of the Roman Republic, and who, it is said, disappeared between 0-100 AD, and appeared again in the 11th or 12th century in Europe, so exactly 1,000 years later.

Again, why the thousand year gap?

Those who hold with the past fulfilment of prophecy, will claim the thousand year gap was the millennial reign of Jesus Christ, yet it turns out that there wasn't more than a 10-12 year gap, and Fomenko proves it using astronomy.

Which is not to say the millennial reign has not yet occurred, but rather that one thousand years have been covered up or deleted from the timeline.

Either way, this has been accomplished for the sole reason of hiding the reality that the prophesied thousand years has already been fulfilled.

Beyond sending Western Rome 1000 years back however, there is no conclusive evidence yet for a recently added 1,000 years.

When first starting out to investigate the official historical timeline, it really doesn't take too long, before one begins to realize they've entered a vast and sprawling, web of deceit.

For much of the early history of the first millennium is either based on guesswork, or in some cases, even forged documentation.

In fact, it's reached the point, whereby some investigative historians are now asking such questions as, how fake is Roman Antiquity?

and how real is Julius Caesar?

Miles Williams Mathis: ROME – Library of Rickandria

Writes editor-in-chief and publisher, Ron Unz, in the 'Unz Review, An Alternative Media Selection':

What about the Augustan History (Historia Augusta), a Roman chronicle that Edward Gibbon trusted entirely for writing his Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire?

Edward Gibbon FRS (/ˈɡɪbən/; 8 May 1737[1] – 16 January 1794) was an English essayist, historian, and politician. His most important work, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, published in six volumes between 1776 and 1789, is known for the quality and irony of its prose, its use of primary sources, and its polemical criticism of organized religion.

It has since been exposed as the work of an impostor who has masked his fraud by inventing sources from scratch.

However, for some vague reason, it is assumed that the forger lived in the fifth century, which is supposed to make his forgery worthwhile anyway.

In reality, some of its stories sound like cryptic satire of Renaissance Moors, others like Christian calumny of pre-Christian religion.

How likely is it, for example, that the hero Antinous, worshipped throughout the Mediterranean Basin as an avatar of Osiris, was the gay lover (eromenos) of Hadrian, as told in Augustan History?

Such questions of plausibility are simply ignored by professional historians.

But they jump to the face of any lay reader unimpressed by scholarly consensus.

For instance, just reading the summary of Suetonius’ Lives of the Twelve Caesars on the Wikipedia page should suffice to raise very strong suspicions, not only of fraud, but of mockery, for we are obviously dealing here with biographies of great imagination, but of no historical value whatsoever.

Writes one of the admins at ''stolen history'':

Indeed, it appears that the first millennium has effectively been padded out, so as to expand the events of the 8th to 10th centuries, so that they encompass the entire millennium.

This has been accomplished through the phantom duplication and mirroring of historical events.

Gifted historian, mathematician and researcher Gunnar Heinsohn, is a professor emeritus at the University of Bremen, Germany.

Gunnar Heinsohn (21 November 1943 – 16 February 2023) was a German author, sociologist and economist and professor emeritus at the University of Bremen where he had a chair in social pedagogy from 1984.  Heinsohn published on a wide array of topics, starting from economics, demography and its relationship with security policy and genocide, and revisionist chronology theories in the tradition of Immanuel Velikovsky.

He focuses on hard archaeological evidence and insists that stratigraphy (layers created by man) is the most important criterion for dating archaeological finds.

He shows that, time and again, stratigraphy contradicts history, and that archaeologists should have logically forced historians into a paradigm shift.

When they dig up the same artefacts or building structures in different parts of the world, they assign them to different periods in order to satisfy historians.

And when they find, in the same place and layer, mixtures of artefacts that they have already attributed to different periods, they explain it away with the ludicrous “heirloom theory,” or call them “art collections”.

Heinsohn proposes that as much as 700 years are missing from early Roman and Jewish history, stating:

In an article titled Jerusalem's First Millennium AD: 1000 years long or only 300? (October 2022; 2nd edition) Heinsohn writes:

In the city of Rome, archaeology shows, no new

and water pipes were built between the 230s and 930s AD.

All churches dated to these 700 years also use the style and construction technology of the period before 230 AD.

These puzzling facts may be ignored, but only if the missing 700 years of hard evidence show up in the archaeology of regions that are considered to be even more eternal than the Eternal City itself.

However, even the Hebrew City of the Patriarchs, Hebron, suffers from about 700 years without settlement layers in the first millennium.

Similarly, the people of Samaria-Sebaste build no new residential quarters between the 3rd and 10th centuries. [….]

Can Jerusalem, at least, fill the missing 700 years?

Of course, say the historians, who date ancient archaeology with Anno Domini chronology.

However, these scholars never explore or explain the origins of AD dating.

Though they always firmly believe it, they never ask who introduced this chronological system, or when and where it originated.

First published in 1991, The Phantom Time Hypothesis is a historical conspiracy asserted by the Bavarian-born historical revisionist, Heribert Illig.

Phantom time conspiracy theory - Wikipedia

It suggests a conspiracy by the Holy Roman Emperor Otto III, Pope Sylvester II, and possibly the Byzantine Emperor Constantine VII, to fabricate the Anno Domini dating system retroactively.

This tinkering with the timeline was done in order to place them at the special year of AD 1000, and to rewrite history, in order to legitimize Otto's claim to the Holy Roman Empire.

Illig believed that this fabrication was achieved through the:

of documentary and physical evidence.

According to this scenario, the entire Carolingian period, including the figure of Charlemagne, is a fabrication, with a "phantom time" of 297 years (AD 614–911) added to the Early Middle Ages.

BOOK: EXCERPT: European Royal Bloodline of the American Presidents – CHARLEMAGNE – Library of Rickandria

Illig concludes that the AD era had counted roughly three centuries which never even existed.

The main problem with Charlemagne is with architecture.

His Palatine Chapel in Aachen, Germany, exhibits a technological advance of 200 years, with for example arched aisles not seen before the eleventh century.

On the contrary, Charlemagne's residence in Ingelheim, Germany, was built in the Roman style of the second century, with materials supposedly recycled from the second century.

Both Heribert Illig, and the German scholar, Hans-Ulrich Niemitz challenge such absurdities and conclude that Charlemagne is a mythical predecessor invented by the Ottonian emperors to legitimize their imperial claims.

All Carolingians of the eighth and ninth centuries and their wars are also fictitious, and the timespan of roughly 600-900 AD, is a phantom era.

In 2008, Steve Mitchell, a British amateur archaeologist, argued that the English monk Bede, who was the first to use the AD system of Dionysius Exiguus for historical purposes in his Ecclesiastical History of the English People (completed, according to the author, in AD 731) may have made an error with the date which has resulted in a corresponding error in the AD system we use today.

Mitchell noted how it appeared from Bede's history, that almost nothing of note had happened in England between the reigns of the Roman emperors, Marcian and Maurice, whose accession dates, according to Bede, were AD 449 and AD 582, a span of 133 years.

From here, and on the basis of perceived archaeological and historical gaps, Mitchell began to develop arguments that the 250 year-long Early Anglo-Saxon Period (which encompassed the reigns of Marcian and Maurice) may have been artificially extended by up to 200 years.

In 2013, Gunnar Heinsohn argued for a much greater shortening of the first millennium.

In Heinsohn's view, the artificial stretching of the first millennium was not a consequence of the deliberate invention of false histories, but of the chaos caused by a major catastrophic event.

According to Heinsohn, a number of minor events which are believed to have occurred in different parts of Europe during the 230s, the 530s and the 930s, were manifestations of a single huge catastrophic event which brought an end to civilized life throughout Europe.

In this scenario, the activities of the emperors regarded as ruling from Rome between AD 1-230 and those ruling from further east between AD 290-520, as well as the activities of rulers in northeastern Europe between AD 701-930, were all taking place at the same time.

This triplication of the history of a single 230-year period would in itself result in a false extension of the timescale amounting to 460 years, and, considering the situation as a whole, around 700 years of history, from the third to the tenth centuries, would already have been completed before the date when it was supposed to have started.

Between the years 535 and 536, a series of major climatic events did indeed take place, and not just in Europe, that could rightly be described as a single world-wide cataclysm with catastrophic consequences.

Numerous accounts from all over the world from that period describe the sun as getting dimmer and losing its light.

Many also described it as having a bluish color.

The effects were also observed with the moon, which is recorded to have lost some of its brightness.

The reduction of the light resulted in the reduction of heat, no rain, and a very long winter which resulted in crop failures and for birds and other wildlife to perish.

Famine and plagues struck many areas and there were a huge number of deaths.

The catastrophic event struck:

and Australia.

While written records do not exist for all countries, archaeological and geological data revealed evidence of the climatic changes.

Studies done on the trunks of trees, for example, showed that 536 AD had been the coldest in 1,500 years.

This may well have been the time of the mud-flood, evidence for which can be found across most of the earth, and which buried many towns and cities, and wiped-out entire populations.

However, there are so many discrepancies with regard to the accuracy of the timeline, it's quite possible that this series of cataclysmic events actually took place at the close of the first millennium, rather than half the way through it?

In fact, Heinsohn's research, along with that of others, presents the evidence of a worldwide cataclysm in the tenth century that totally redefines the first millennium, reuniting history with: 

and mythology.

Gunnar Heinsohn is not the first and certainly won't be the last historian to question the official chronology.

Nor is he the first to propose that due to the vast number of inconsistencies and anomalies in the official historical record, a new chronology is required.

While other authors have written on new chronology, it is most commonly associated with, Anatoly Fomenko, and the concept is most fully explained in his book, History: Fiction or Science? originally published in Russian.

3 History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy's Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs.: New Chronology ... (History: Fiction or Science? Chronology) - Anna’s Archive

Every theory it contains, no matter how unorthodox, is backed by solid scientific data.

What if someone told you that there isn’t a single piece of firm written evidence or artefact that can be:

dated to before the eleventh century?

Well, that is exactly what Anatoly Fomenko is saying!

Furthermore, he claims that many historical events do not correspond mathematically with the dates they are supposed to have occurred on.

He states that all of ancient history (including that of Greece, Rome, and Egypt) is simply a rewriting of events that occurred in the Middle Ages and that Chinese and Arab history are fabrications of the seventeenth and eighteenth century Jesuits.

Miles Williams Mathis: The Jesuits – Library of Rickandria

Fomenko only mentions shifts of events, not a calendar change.

More precisely, Fomenko discovered three important chronological shifts, of about 333 years, 1053 years and 1800 years.

According to Fomenko's claims, the written history of humankind goes only as far back as AD 800, there is almost no information about events between AD 800–1000, and most known historical events took place in AD 1000–1500.

He also presents a reasonable argument, that world history prior to 1600 AD has been widely falsified to suit the interests of a number of different conspirators including the Vatican, the Holy Roman Empire, and the Russian House of Romanov, all working together to obscure the "true" history of the world.

Along with his associate, the Russian mathematician Gleb Nosovsky, Fomenko has produced tens of thousands of pages of painstaking research in support of his ''New Chronology.''

One major discovery of Fomenko and Nosovsky is that our conventional history is full of doublets, produced by the arbitrary end-to-end alignment of chronicles that tell the self-same events, but are

I recall once listening to a lecture on YouTube by an astrologer, whose name now escapes me, who talked about a group of Russian scientists, including:

and others, who had also looked at astrological charts and descriptions of various battles, as well as natal charts of various famous historical figures, and that in these accounts they found overlapping pieces of information, causing them to suspect that i.e. Hero A and Hero B or Ruler A and Ruler B were most likely then one and the same person.

In which case there's a high probability, that various famous historical figures may not have been different people at all, but due to oral histories may have been given different names in different regions.

Rather than try to paraphrase the following, I will quote directly from the website Stolen History.

Whole periods have been thus duplicated.

For example, drawing from the previous work of Russian Nikolai Morozov (1854-1946), Anatoly Fomenko and Nosovsky show a striking parallel between the sequences of Pompey/Caesar/Octavian and of Diocletian/Constantius/Constantine, leading to the conclusion that the Western Roman Empire is, to some extent, a phantom duplicate of the Eastern Roman Empire.

Nikolai Aleksandrovich Morozov (Russian: Николай Александрович Морозов; 7 July 1854, Borok – 30 July 1946) was a Russian revolutionary who spent about 25 years in prison for revolutionary activities against the Tsarist government. He was also an academic, publishing works in various fields of science and history, and a pioneer of aviation in Russia. At age 88, he briefly served in the Red Army as a sniper during World War II, becoming the oldest known combatant of the war.

According to Fomenko and Nosovsky, the capital of the one and only Roman Empire was founded on the Bosporus some 330 years before the foundation of its colony in the Latium. 

Starting from the age of the crusades, Roman clerics, followed by Italian humanists, produced an inverted chronological sequence, using the real history of Constantinople as the model for their fake earlier history of Italian Rome.

A great confusion ensued, as

both being commonly called Rome or “the City”.

A likely scenario is that the prototype for Titus Livy’s History was about Constantinople, the original capital of the “Romans”.

The original Livy, Fomenko conjectures, was writing around the tenth century about Constantinople, so he was not far off the mark when he placed the foundation of the City (urbs condita) some seven centuries before his time.

But as it was rewritten by Petrarch and reinterpreted by later humanists, a chronological chasm of roughly one thousand year was introduced between the foundation of the two “Romes” (from 753 BC to 330 AD).

The new chronology also contains a reconstruction, an alternative chronology, radically shorter than the standard historical timeline, because all ancient history is "folded" onto the time period known as the Middle Ages.

Fomenko argues that the events of antiquity generally attributed to the civilizations of the Roman empire, ancient Greece and ancient Egypt, actually occurred during the Middle Ages, more than a thousand years later.

Even the Russian-Jewish catastrophist, Immanuel Velikovsky, who preceded Fomenko by 30 years, stated the chronology of history can be off by as much as a staggering 1600 years.

Immanuel Velikovsky (/ˌvɛliˈkɒfski/; ‹The template Lang-rus is being considered for deletion.› Russian: Иммануи́л Велико́вский, IPA: [ɪmənʊˈil vʲɪlʲɪˈkofskʲɪj]; 10 June [O.S. 29 May] 1895 – 17 November 1979) was a Russian-American psychoanalyst, writer, and catastrophist. He is the author of several books offering pseudohistorical interpretations of ancient history, including the U.S. bestseller Worlds in Collision published in 1950. Velikovsky's work is frequently cited as a canonical example of pseudoscience and has been used as an example of the demarcation problem.

He described this in great detail in his "Ages in Chaos Series" (Vol. I – III) and also proposed a revised chronology for ancient:

and other cultures of the ancient Near East.

As noted earlier, when setting out to investigate the historical timeline, it soon becomes apparent that something is suspiciously wrong with the official record.

Trying to determine which parts of history, or historical figures are genuine and which parts are fraudulent, or at best distorted, goes way and above and far beyond the definition of complexity.

Even during history lessons back in my schooldays, it seemed there was little known about the early Anglo-Saxons, but plenty of information about the Roman era in Britain, and then all of a sudden, history jumped forward to the Norman invasion of 1066.

Beyond which there was very little once again, until the 15th and 16th centuries when we get to:

etc.

Are there a number of centuries of history unaccounted for? It would be far too easy to sit back and criticize folk from centuries past, who first fell for the time-line deception.

For the majority most likely didn't even have a paper calendar hanging from their kitchen wall.

Let alone a reminder of the precise:

and year, on a mobile device sitting in their pocket.

Even the wristwatch wasn't invented until the nineteenth century, and then only worn by the elite.

Published in 2009, and written on the basis of retro-calculations of eclipses and other astronomical phenomena, author Zoltán Hunnivari claimed that AD 960 was the same year as AD 1160, and almost two centuries of history have been fabricated to fill the space between these two dates.

According to Hunnivari in From Harun Al-Rashid up to the Times of Saladin:

Writes Hunnivari (p. 87)

If Hunnivari is correct with his estimations, and a phantom two hundred years were added to the historical timeline ''at a stroke'', and to suit the personal interest of Pope Innocent III, this would bring the whole Roman papal succession into question.

For Pope Innocent was considered one of the most powerful and influential of the medieval popes.

He exerted a wide influence over the Christian states of Europe, claiming supremacy over all of Europe's kings.

This field of influence however, according to Hunnivari, was wielded by the Pope, a full two centuries earlier than we're told.

The Gregorian calendar in use today, did not exist before October 15, 1582.

Gregorian dates before that are proleptic, that is, using the Gregorian rules to reckon backward from October 15, 1582.

The Gregorian Calendar we use today was first introduced by Pope Gregory XIII in 1582, and amidst a most peculiar run of events, which we will return to later.

Pope Gregory XIII (Latin: Gregorius XIII; Italian: Gregorio XIII; 7 January 1502 – 10 April 1585),[b] born Ugo Boncompagni, was head of the Catholic Church and ruler of the Papal States from 13 May 1572 to his death in April 1585. He is best known for commissioning and being the namesake for the Gregorian calendar, which remains the internationally accepted civil calendar to this day.

Almost two centuries later, on September 2, 1752, the Gregorian Calendar was adopted in England, and the country skipped ahead 11 days.

According to Encyclopedia Britannica, the current discrepancy between the Julian and Gregorian calendars is 13 days, which will become 14 days in 2100.

There are documents from the early Middle Ages that are dated 987 and when we refer to such documents, we say they were written in 987.

Could that mean there are days that would be missing between 987 and 1582 that were never calculated or accounted for between the two calendar systems?

Quite frankly, I've no idea.

Some however, have suggested the discrepancy amounts to hundreds of years, or possibly even a thousand.

Because none can go back in time to check what really happened, we can only speculate, and it has been proposed that folks who went to sleep on Sunday, October 4th, 582 AD, woke up on Monday, October 18th, 1582, AD.

They were not aware that an extra one thousand years had been added to their calendars because they didn't have access to calendars.

Their source of the date and time was the Church of Rome.

Hence, they were led to believe that the Julian date of Sunday, October 4th, 582 AD, was followed by Friday, October 15th, 582 AD, on the new Gregorian calendar.

Today, we believe that the Julian date of Thursday, October 4th, 582 AD, was followed by Friday, October 15th, 1582 AD, on the new Gregorian calendar with no change in weekday continuity.

It was originally feasible for the entire Christian Church to receive the date of Easter each year through an annual announcement made by the Pope.

For according to Wikipedia, as a moveable feast, the date is determined each year through a complex astronomical calculation to ensure that Easter is celebrated on the first Sunday after the Paschal full moon, which is the first full moon on or after 21 March, a fixed approximation of the March equinox.

Determining this date in advance requires a correlation between the lunar months and the solar year, while also accounting for the month, date, and weekday of the Julian or Gregorian calendar.

Writes Qmeta at Stolen History.net:

In order to maintain the proper day of the week for Easter when jumping from year 582 to 1582, ten days needed to be added.

Easter of the following year, 583, was April 20th, while Easter of 1583 fell on April 17th.

The question the Church must have asked itself is,

The correct answer evidently, would have been ‘thirteen days’, but if they added that many days then in the following year (1583), Easter would have fallen on a Wednesday.

In order to keep Easter on a Sunday, they added only ten days.

Today, we see this as an error of judgement, rather than the genius that it actually is.

Why Genius?

Apart from the fact that it wouldn't have aroused any suspicion amongst the majority of folks, it kept the emphasis on Good Friday and Easter Sunday, when everyone knows it's impossible to cram the three days and the three nights when the lifeless body of Jesus lay in the tomb, between the two days.

Jesus was adamant that his lifeless body would remain in the tomb for three nights and three days, and he would rise from the dead on the third day.

All four Gospels state that, on the evening of the Crucifixion, Joseph of Arimathea asked Pilate for the body of Jesus, and, after Pilate granted his request, he wrapped it in a linen cloth and laid it in a tomb.

And when Joseph had taken the body, he wrapped it in a clean linen cloth..... In all parts of the world a day and night is 24 hours, and 3x24=72.

and John stand in agreement. Jesus was buried in the evening, Wednesday evening to be precise.

However, one might try to juggle the numbers, three days and three nights, or 72 hours later can never equate to a morning, but can only possibly be an evening.

Why is it generally taught that the Lord rose from the dead in the early morning hours?

On the first day of the Jewish week, in the early hours of Sunday morning, the tomb was found to be empty, because Jesus had risen from the dead the previous evening.

The Jews recognize Saturday as the Sabbath, the seventh day of the week.

In most Gentile countries however, Saturday is considered the Sixth Day and is the only day of the week that retained its Roman origin in English.

Saturday=Saturn's or Satan's Day.

From a Jewish perspective Jesus rose from the dead on the seventh day, toward the close of the Jewish Sabbath.

From a Gentile perspective, having defeated him who held the power of death, Jesus rose back to life on Saturn's or Satan's Day.

As noted by one of the moderators at the website Stolen History:

If no one added 1,000 years to the calendar, another possibility is that the Julian calendar itself was just created out of thin air and imposed on the previous calendars.

So the church at one point simply said

and people believed it.

But this could only happen once the memories of the biblical times were already gone.

And if the events of the Bible happened 500-1000 years ago, the church could have only introduced the new dating system sometime after- between 1500 and 1600, for example.

Then sometime later they realized that the Julian calendar had several issues and introduced an updated version - The Gregorian calendar.

This probably happened within a few generations.

The Gregorian Calendar is of itself an enigma and somewhat confusing.

For whilst the first seven months are named from pagan gods and pagan festivals, the remainder of the year is out of sync.

Some believe there is an occult significance to this, namely the pagan false gods of old bring confusion to the entire year.

Miles Williams Mathis: Kabbalah, Hermeticism & the Occult – Library of Rickandria

January is named for the Roman god Janus, the protector of gates and doorways.

Janus is depicted with two faces, one looking into the past, the other into the future.

February is named from the Latin word februa,''to cleanse,'' and Februalia, was a festival of purification and atonement that took place during this period.

Lupercalia - Wikipedia

March is named for the Roman god of war, Mars.

This was the time of year to resume military campaigns that had been interrupted by winter.

March was also a time of many festivals, presumably in preparation for the campaigning season.

April is named from the Latin word aperio, “to open (bud),” because plants begin to grow in this month.

In essence, this month was viewed as spring's renewal.

May is named for the Roman goddess Maia, who was considered a nurturer and an earth goddess.

June is named for the Roman goddess Juno, patroness of marriage and the well-being of women.

July is named to honor the Roman dictator Julius Caesar (100 B.C.– 44 B.C.) who was considered a god or demi-god.

August is named to honor the first Roman emperor Augustus Caesar (63 B.C.– A.D. 14) who many also considered a god or demi-god.

September (which means seventh) is the ninth month of the year, October (which means eighth) is the tenth month, November (which means ninth) is the eleventh month and December (which means tenth) is the twelfth month of the year.

Jonathan Cahn who has been fooling Christian Zionist for years, has recently published his latest book, 'Return of the Gods', which has become a best-seller.

Jonathan David Cahn (born 1959) is an American Messianic rabbi, author, and novelist known for his debut novel The Harbinger. He is the founder and leader of the Beth Israel Worship Center in Wayne, New Jersey. His ministry weaves together contemporary American politics with right-wing Christian beliefs and the text of the Christian Bible. He is a controversial figure among Christians, Jews, and secular historians.

In it, he proposes that the pagan gods of ancient Rome etc. are very real entities that have operated in history and are clearly operating in the tragic developments of modern-day society.

Is it possible that behind what is happening to America and the world lies a mystery hidden in the ancient inscriptions of the Middle East? Is it possible that the ancient entities known as the “gods” are more than fiction and possess an independent reality? Is it possible that they have returned to our world?Could these entities lie behind what we see on our television screens and computer monitors, what we find in our shopping centers, what our children are being taught in their classrooms, what our leaders announce and implement? Could they lie behind the current events, news, and movements of our times, and behind what is even now influencing our lives without our realizing it?Is it possible that one of these ancient entities once paid a visit to NewYork City and started a cultural revolution that is still transforming our world?Who are the Possessor, the Enchantress, the Destroyer, and theTransformer? And what do they have to do with what is now taking place in our culture?We will now embark on a journey beginning with the ancient entities known as the shedim. We will remove the veil to uncover the first and most important revelation underlying the mystery of the gods. We will see the ancient transformation concerning the gods that changed world history. We will open up a two-thousand-year-old warning involving a house of spirits and what it foretells concerning the modern world.

The Return of the Gods - Anna’s Archive

Although I've not read this book personally, I believe he is right about this and have watched a 20 minute video in which he talks about the subject matter.

Cahn states that records of past events reveal that there was a time when the kingdoms all over the world collapsed, and all the powers of their gods no longer had any power.

It seems that Cahn, who is both a futurist and dispensationalist, puts this loss of power down to the spread of the gospel.

But I think it far more likely that man's real enemy, the principalities and powers, lost their strongholds and power over the nations when Jesus Christ cast Satan into the bottomless pit for a thousand years.

And it is this period of time which has been largely falsified and covered up.

We tend not to question the ''official'' historical narrative because we grossly underestimate the deceptive nature of the ancient principalities and the powers which war against us.

An argument against the change from Julian to Gregorian calendar being accompanied by an added 1,000 years is that some countries still had the Julian calendar until the 20th Century, and the inhabitants would have remembered the added years.

Unless of course the hundreds of thousands of folks back in the nineteenth century, who were declared insane by their respective governments, and committed to spend the rest of their lives in a Lunatic Asylum, were actually the folks who recognized and spoke out against the tinkering with the calendar?

We looked at this world-wide phenomenon in my previous book and noted how no realistic and justifiable explanation is given for the thousands of lunatic asylums which appeared on the scene across:

and Canada during the 1800s.

BOOK: EXCERPT: Tartarian Rule? Or Millennial Kingdom? – The Insane & the Orphan – Library of Rickandria

Reason and logic demand there must have been a determining factor behind this massive world-wide outbreak of supposed severe mental health issues.

For if not, then individual governments must have been working together, committing multitudes of folks to spending the rest of their lives in lunatic asylums for political reasons. 

Furthermore, this act of locking away hundreds of thousands, or possibly millions of adults, was the most likely reason for the millions of orphans who seem to have suddenly appeared, as if out thin air.

And predominantly in those nations with the greatest number of recently opened lunatic asylums.

Which might also explain the existence of the early photographs which reveal towns and cities being virtually empty.

Either way, and however the controllers managed to pull it off, this calendar change was only part of the timeline deception.

The fact that even in Christian Europe there are no AD-dated coins before 1234 AD is sheepishly passed over.

Furthermore, there seems to be no definitive answer as to why numerous old coins and other artefacts have a non-numeric character included in the date.

I have been looking at a range of old English coins from the Georgian era.

Up until 1771 the coins have the prefix i or J instead of the 1, but it appears that everything after 1787 has a number 1.

There are other artefacts, including:

and items of wooden furniture, which have the letter i or j preceding the year that can be found on the Internet.

From the moment the letter j is presumed to be the number 1, one thousand years has been added to the date of that coin etc.

An old coin which is date-stamped i592 for example, is passed off as being 1592.

Many believe that the letter i or j preceding the numerical year, denote the millennial reign of Jesus or Iēsous.

For Jesus said in Matthew 26:11:

which would indicate there would be a monetary system in place during the Millennial Reign.

Time loop?

Immanuel Velikovsky argued that electromagnetic effects play an important role in celestial mechanics, whilst in more recent times, historical revisionist, Michelle Gibson, proposes that an artificial time-loop was created between the years 1492 and 1942, with the mid-point being the year 1717.

Whilst on the face of it, this might sound completely absurd, Michelle's research into precise dates and matching historical characters and events is quite meticulous, and she goes into great detail.

In a recent presentation she proposes that a rift in space-time resulting in a 3-dimensional time loop, was caused by the Philadelphia Experiment carried out by the US Navy, on October 28, 1943.

TECHNOLOGY: BLACK PROJECTS: Philadelphia-Montauk – Library of Rickandria

The goal was to create an electromagnetically charged invisibility cloak, to make ships invisible to enemy radar, but the result exceeded all expectations.

The USS Eldridge was wrapped in steel cables with high voltage energy produced by large generators running through them which produced an extremely powerful electromagnetic field.

The Naval destroyer completely disappeared, not only from the radar screens but also from our reality.

The ship materialized once again hundreds of miles from Philadelphia at the military base in Norfolk.

Witness reports claim that all of a sudden, the Eldridge materialized in the waters around Norfolk.

It was seen for only moments, then suddenly it was sitting right back in the water where it started with a crazed, insane crew on board.

Legend holds that some of the sailors were literally fused with the steel components of the ship when it rematerialized in Philadelphia.

Although the U.S. Navy maintains that no such experiment was ever conducted, many eyewitnesses have claimed the Philadelphia, and similar types of experiment did indeed take place.

This might sound a little farfetched, but I suspect that behind all the confusion over our true timeline, supernatural powers have been at work.

For Daniel the prophet warned of a person, which honored the God of forces, and thought to change times and laws. (Daniel 7:25.)

An inference to the seven Noahide Laws maybe?

I think, at this point, it is impossible to ever pin down a firm timeline, for to achieve this we would probably need whatever hidden archives are stashed away in the Vatican Vaults, or the:

etc. of the controllers, that are kept hidden from the uninitiated.

Yet the consensus of opinion offered by multiple researchers and alternative historians appears to be, that a phantom seven hundred to one thousand years have been added to the historical timeline.

As previously mentioned, this doesn't necessarily mean that we are not living in 2022, but that a fictitious thousand years have been added, to replace the millennial reign of Christ.

This includes what we've been taught about the Middle Ages, much of which is utter nonsense.

Gallant knights on horseback in full body armor rescuing fair maidens is merely a fantasy, a back-dated hoax to account for a period of roughly 500 years.

Mark Twain aka Samuel Clemens left a trail of clues to indicate this in his 1889 satirical novel, A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court.

Miles Williams Mathis: What About Mark Twain? – Library of Rickandria

In the book, a Yankee engineer from Connecticut named Hank Morgan receives a severe blow to the head and is somehow transported in time and space to England during the reign of King Arthur.

After some initial confusion and his capture by one of Arthur's knights, Hank realizes that he is actually in the past, and he uses his knowledge to make people believe that he is a powerful magician.

He becomes a rival of Merlin, who appears to be little more than a fraud, and gains the trust of King Arthur.

Hank attempts to modernize the past in order to make people's lives better.

Twain wrote the book as a burlesque overview of romantic notions of chivalry, after being inspired by a dream in which he was a knight himself, severely inconvenienced by the weight and cumbersome nature of his armor

Which if thought about, is quite ridiculous.

Reenacting medieval battle-scenes for an hour or so is one thing, but a day spent by a metal-clad knight dehydrating in his own body sweat is another.

There is also a possibility that Samuel Clemens himself, played the role of the nineteenth US President, and high-ranking Freemason, Rutherford B. Hayes.

Rutherford Birchard Hayes (/ˈrʌðərfərd/ ⓘ; October 4, 1822 – January 17, 1893) was the 19th president of the United States, serving from 1877 to 1881.

BOOK: European Royal Bloodlines of the American Presidents – Library of Rickandria

As suggested by an 84% facial similarity meter.

Which proves nothing of course, apart from the uncanny similarity between the two.

Some believe that a phantom 700 years were added to the timeline when the millennial reign ended in 1070 AD, making Satan's release coincident with July 4, 1776, his Independence Day, the year both the Illuminati and America were founded.

SECRET SOCIETY: ILLUMINATI: Order of the Illumined Wise Men – Library of Rickandria

Others believe the millennial reign ended in 1692, when a series of earthquakes occurred in: 

and most parts of Europe.

The same year an earthquake caused soil liquefaction in Jamaica, when Port Royal sank into the ground, and was over-swept by the sea.

During the main shock the sand was said to have formed waves.

Fissures repeatedly opened and closed crushing many people.

After the shaking stopped the sand again solidified, trapping many victims.

Liguanea (present day Kingston) and the Spanish town of St. Jago fared little better, and the majority of houses were destroyed.

According to Robert Renny in his 'An History of Jamaica' (1807):

the text at the top of this image reads:

An history of Jamaica : with observations on the climate, scenery, trade, productions, negroes, slave trade, diseases of Europeans, customs, manners, and dispositions of the inhabitants : to which is added, an illustration of the advantages which are likely to result from the abolition of the slave trade : Renny, Robert : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

What if the timeline we have been taught about in school, actually starts in the mid 1800s with a new false historic narrative superimposed onto the old world infrastructure?

One which brought:

and division to humanity?

When tying the threads together, or joining the dots, a fast-growing number of folks who are prepared to think outside of the box, have reached the inevitable conclusion, that yes, sadly, this has been the case.

We have all been deceived big time.

And I'm not talking just about the moon landing, 9/11, and the ongoing covid scam etc.

The last days for this world in general will not be a repetition of the horrific tribulation years suffered at the end of the age for Israel, or at least, not to the same degree of intensity.

For Jesus assured us of this.

As we approach the end of the ages, the world will become more corrupt, more delusional, and every form of ungodliness will abound.

Generally speaking, men will become increasingly lovers of:

until the point of opening themselves up to the strong delusion.

Which means to adopt a false sense of reality.

A delusion sent by God himself, not as a punishment per se, but as a reward for the heart of man.

For a time will come when men will desire to believe the Lie, rather than to believe the Truth.

And for this cause, God will send strong delusion. (2 Thessalonians 2:11.)

Over the decades paedophiles have infiltrated into all levels of western government, especially in the US and the UK. It has become so all-pervasive today because once these degenerates get into the very highest levels of government, then they are in a position to appoint others of like mind into all other important positions in the establishment.

Here in the UK, the Government has desperately tried to keep the lid on the true scale of ritual child abuse and rampant pedophilia perpetrated by the rich and the powerful, often at the very heart of the British Establishment.

Even the late 'Iron Lady' Margaret Thatcher was responsible for covering up the sordid exploits of government ministers, by choosing to ignore former Tory activist Anthony Gilberthorpe, who named countless MPs who were partaking in pedophilic activities.

Tory child abuse whistleblower: 'Margaret Thatcher knew all about underage sex ring among ministers' - The Mirror

Alleged Witness Claims Trump Didn't Grope Woman on Plane

In the mid 90's B.B.C. 'Crimewatch' presenter Jill Dando, tried to get her B.B.C bosses to investigate a VIP pedophile ring linked to the B.B.C. Government, and Royalty.

Jill Wendy Dando (9 November 1961 – 26 April 1999) was an English journalist, television presenter and newsreader. She spent most of her career at the BBC and was the corporation's Personality of the Year in 1997. At the time of her death, her television work included co-presenting the BBC One programme Crimewatch with Nick Ross.  On the morning of 26 April 1999, Dando was shot dead outside her home in Fulham, south-west London, prompting the biggest murder inquiry conducted by the Metropolitan Police and the country's largest criminal investigation since the hunt for the Yorkshire Ripper. A local man, Barry George, was convicted and imprisoned for the murder, but after eight years in prison he was acquitted following an appeal and retrial. No other suspect has been charged with Dando's murder and the case remains unsolved.

What happened?

On 26 April 1999 she was shot dead on the front doorstep of her home in Fulham, London.

The 'scapegoat', an innocent man by the name Barry George, was convicted and imprisoned for 8 years and denied compensation when he was eventually released.

Her killer is still at large, for where the state becomes involved in a crime, then the police who are run by the state will never be allowed to solve it.

But it would seem that to address the matter is strictly Taboo, as there's a deliberate conspiracy of silence.

For no:

of any major government has ever made any serious investigation into what surely amounts to the most heinous of crimes against humanity.

Media coverage gives us the impression that the investigations are honest and genuine, and on occasion they even name names, and throw the public a bone in the form of a Scapegoat.

Yet time and again the investigation into pedophile rings by the likes of the Metropolitan Police are deliberately hampered by pedophiles who hold positions of power within the very establishment under investigation.

As a nation, how did we ever allow ourselves to get into such a state?

Primarily, by turning our back on God and expelling him from our entire education system.

BOOK: EXCERPT: Lucifer’s Flood & the Little Season – Hidden Land – Library of Rickandria

---

BOOK: Lucifer’s Flood & the Little Season – Library of Rickandria

---

BOOK: EXCERPT: Lucifer's Flood & the Little Season - Fabricated Chronology

---

BOOK: EXCERPT: Lucifer’s Flood & the Little Season – Fabricated Chronology – Library of Rickandria