Additional information, images, videos & links from LOR on June 6, 2024.
As usual, this is just my opinion, arrived at by personal research.
I have no proof of anything concerning John Reed, I am just here telling you how things look to me.
Reed c. 1915
114 KB
View full-sizeDownload John Silas Reed (October 22, 1887 – October 17, 1920) was an American journalist, poet, and communist activist. Reed first gained prominence as a war correspondent during the Mexican Revolution for Metropolitan and World War I for The Masses. He is best known for his coverage of the October Revolution in Petrograd, Russia, which he wrote about in his 1919 book Ten Days That Shook the World.
I will give you plenty of evidence, but my reading of this evidence is just my reading:
as usual you are free to dismiss it if it doesn't make sense to you.
It makes sense to me.
John Reed was a journalist and alleged Communist activist in the period of WW1.
Finding out how closely Marx was tied to the financiers of the middle 19th century should make anyone suspicious and taken with all the other evidence I showed you in that paper, the best reading is that Marx was a mole and an agent.
I will show you most of the same markers here with John Reed.
Two, the movie Reds also sent me scurrying to the bios and history books.
Beatty in 2001
2.66 MB
View full-sizeDownload Henry Warren Beatty (né Beaty; born March 30, 1937) is an American actor and filmmaker. His career has spanned over six decades, and he has received an Academy Award and three Golden Globe Awards. He also received the Irving G. Thalberg Award in 1999, the BAFTA Fellowship in 2002, the Kennedy Center Honors in 2004, the Cecil B. DeMille Award in 2007, and the AFI Life Achievement Award in 2008.
Warren Beatty plays John Reed in the film, remember.
So, the grandfather has already gone from “leading Portland citizen” to “Portland industrialist”.
He started Portland Gas & Light, controlled Portland Waterworks, and was the director of the Oregon Iron Works (later Oregon Iron and Steel)—one of the first smelters on the Pacific coast.
image.png
14.1 KB
View full-sizeDownload Oregon Iron Works, Inc. (OIW) is an American manufacturer of complex structural components and systems and specialized vehicles, located in the Clackamas area in the southeastern suburbs of Portland, Oregon (within the Portland metropolitan area). Established in 1944, it is involved in a number of different industries, supplying products ranging from high-speed boats for military use to purpose-built girders for roadway bridges. It has production facilities in Clackamas and in Vancouver, Washington, and currently employs about 400 people. In May 2014, the company announced that it was merging with Portland-based Vigor Industrial.
We also find the required and expected military links: one year after the alleged death of Henry Green, his other daughter Katherine married Edward Burr (1886).
This Edward Burr went on to become a brigadier general.
It is also informative to go back even further than Henry Green.
In the bios, they don't tell you how Green arrived in Oregon in 1850 with so much money to invest.
I was only able to uncover partial answers to that, the best being that Green was somehow related to Joseph Gaston.
Gaston wrote a history of Portland that you can read parts of at Google Books, and he was more importantly an early railroad tycoon, being the first president of the Oregon Central Railroad.
The Gastons were an extremely prominent family, having a member who was the chief justice of the Supreme Court of North Carolina and one who was governor of Massachusetts.
It is also important that Joseph Gaston was editor of the Oregon Sentinel.
He was a ranking journalist, which, as we know, is another red flag in these events.
We have all the connections here, including connections to the press.
Without the press, it is difficult to sell these stories, you see.
Patrick Joseph Kennedy would soon become a major stockholder in this Columbia Trust Company.
P. J. Kennedy, c. 1900
642 KB
View full-sizeDownload Patrick Joseph Kennedy (January 14, 1858 – May 18, 1929) was an American businessman and politician from Boston, Massachusetts. He and his wife Mary were the parents of four children, including future U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chair and U.S. Ambassador to the United Kingdom Joseph P. Kennedy Sr. Their grandchildren through Joseph include U.S. President John F. Kennedy, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Senator Robert F. Kennedy, and longtime U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy.
His son Joseph would be president of the Columbia Trust Company in 1914.
image.png
1020 KB
View full-sizeDownload Kennedy in 1938 - Joseph Patrick Kennedy (September 6, 1888 – November 18, 1969) was an American businessman, investor, philanthropist, and politician. He is known for his own political prominence as well as that of his children and was a patriarch of the Kennedy family, which included President John F. Kennedy, Attorney General and Senator Robert F. Kennedy, and longtime Senator Ted Kennedy.
This is the same Joseph Kennedy who would own RKO studios, scheme against Roosevelt, work with the mob, and become the father of the 35th President:
Oval Office portrait, 1963
4.79 MB
View full-sizeDownload John Fitzgerald Kennedy (May 29, 1917 – November 22, 1963), often referred to as JFK, was an American politician who served as the 35th president of the United States from 1961 until his assassination in 1963. He was the youngest person elected president. Kennedy served at the height of the Cold War, and the majority of his foreign policy concerned relations with the Soviet Union and Cuba. A Democrat, Kennedy represented Massachusetts in both houses of the United States Congress prior to his presidency.
Portrait of Mabel Dodge Luhan by Carl Van Vechten, 1934.
160 KB
View full-sizeDownload Mabel Evans Dodge Sterne Luhan (pronounced LOO-hahn; née Ganson; February 26, 1879 – August 13, 1962) was an American patron of the arts, who was particularly associated with the Taos art colony.
Joseph Verner Reed, Sr. was the son of Verner Zevola Reed, a billionaire mostly from Colorado, where he owned much of Colorado Springs.
He was involved in the Western Sugar Land Company, which ties him to many of the people we have looked at, including John Reed's grandfather Henry Green, who imported sugar from Hawaii, and Charlie Bluhdorn, whom will we meet below.
He was also involved in the oil fields in Wyoming.
Colorado Springs links him to William Jackson Palmer, whom we first saw in my paper on Tiger Woods.
We just saw the Wolfes above, related to John Reed, which gives us another link between these Reeds. As you see, John Reed had some extraordinary connections, and I have only shown you a small part of them so far.
So, let me ask you an early question:
does this young man seem like the sort who would become a revolutionary?
He's from a billionaire family, connected to all the old wealth in the country, so he doesn't seem like a likely candidate for a communist journalist, does he?
You will soon think it even less likely.
Little Johnny was sent off to Morristown School in New Jersey.
“Saw the purpose of journalism as 'intelligence work'.”
Yes, I bet he did.
Wikipedia admits Lippmann was with military intelligence during WW1 (captain, AEF headquarters, France).
Now declassified documents admit Lippmann was working with the BSC (the American arm of British Intelligence—see my paper on John Lennon for more on the BSC*) as far back as the 1930s, and he also worked with both the OSS and CIA—as did all journalists of the time.
The long and short of it is that by the time Lippmann and Reed were pretending to be Socialists at Harvard in 1910, all the Socialist movements had long since been infiltrated and undermined by military intelligence.
What had started out decades earlier as workers' unions had by then morphed into Marxist organizations.
These fake organizations had a dual purpose:
one, they undermined and bottled up the unions by creating internal strife and political bickering.
Rather than focusing on wages and workers' rights, these organizations pushed their members into fake international politics and armchair philosophies.
These politics and philosophies were created on purpose to cause multiple splintering.
Two, by replacing the truly popular revolutions of the 1840s and 1850s with these manufactured revolutions of Marx, the financiers were able to misdirect any and all revolutionary spirit.
Leftists and progressives were pushed away from Republicanism [not the Republican party, but Republicanism as a form of anti-fascist government] and towards Marxism, moving them away from a viable form of government to one that was completely fanciful and unworkable.
After traveling through Europe after graduation from Harvard, Reed returned and immediately got published all over the place, including:
He was a member of the ACCF, joining at the invitation of agent Sidney Hook.
image.png
101 KB
View full-sizeDownload Sidney Hook (December 20, 1902 – July 12, 1989) was an American philosopher of pragmatism known for his contributions to the philosophy of history, the philosophy of education, political theory, and ethics.
By age 26, John Reed is supposed to be hanging out with Mabel Dodge Luhan and interviewing President Wilson about the Mexican Revolution.
Notice that although we are told Goldman conspired to murder industrialist Henry Frick, and her lover Berkman was convicted and allegedly spent 14 years in prison, Goldman mysteriously skated.
The whole story reads like an early fake.
Like Reed, Goldman's whole life looks like a fake—except that she kept it up a bit longer.
The same can be said of Louise Bryant, who, like Reed, was connected to both fantastic wealth and to ranking journalists. She was played by Diane Keaton in the movie Reds.
Her father was a journalist —probably also linked to Intelligence—and her step-grandfather, with whom she lived as a girl, was a very wealthy rancher and miner in Nevada.
He also directed the overland stage station in that region.
He is probably the one who bankrolled and advised her early on.
Right out of college, Bryant began working for the Oregonian (Joseph Gaston's paper, remember), as well as the Portland Spectator.
This indicates she had probably already been recruited in college, or before.
With that in mind, we can back up a few sentences in her bio and look at this strange quote:
Depressed after the death of Say in 1906, Bryant left school for a job in Jolon, California, where for a few months she boarded at a cattle ranch and taught children, mostly young Mexicans.
That summer she moved again, this time to Eugene, Oregon, where her brother Louis worked for the Southern Pacific.
The major sites tell us Hearst didn't buy the entire valley until 1920, but it turns out that isn't true.
Hearst Castle was some distance to the south in San Simeon, but by the time Louise Bryant was in Jolon in 1906, Hearst already owned much of the area around Jolon.
We are told it was owned by James Brown Cattle Company at that time, but with a bit more research we find that Hearst owned that Company.
Shortly after the turn of the century Hearst Jr. began buying up properties in the Santa Lucia's.
Hearst Sunical Land and Packing Corporation included James Brown Cattle Company which owned most of the large Rancho Milpitas.
It is usually done to address cancer or other serious illnesses, none of which Reed seemed to have up to then.
My guess is he had a kidney stone removed and paid the doctor to fudge the report.
He then had a scar and a piece of paper to show the army.
Nephrectomy could keep you out of service, but not a removed kidney stone.
Then we get this:
On August 17, 1917, Reed and Bryant set sail from New York to Europe, having first provided the State Department with legally sworn assurances that neither would represent the Socialist Party at a forthcoming conference in Stockholm.
Then as now, the State Department doesn't take legally sworn assurances like that.
Such things would be worthless, as they know.
If the magazines Reed had written for had been real, the State Department would never allow him to leave the country at such a time.
That he was allowed to leave is all the proof we need that the State Department knew very well who he was and what he was really up to.
Reed and Bryant arrived in Petrograd again just in time for the October Revolution, but it is never explained why they weren't considered spies this time.
Many of the Bolshevik leaders were wide travelers, and they spoke English as well as German, French, and other languages.
So, the position should have gone to a Russian.
If Reed were really there—and this isn't just a story made up from whole cloth—it of course indicates that Reed was a liaison from the Western financiers who were bankrolling the Russian Revolution.
They wanted one of their own sons as eyes on the ground.
In support of that hypothesis, we can return to the whitewashed pages of Wikipedia, which is nice enough to tell us Reed was close to the inner circle of the new government.
If that is true, you should ask how he managed that.
He was just 29 and had red flags all over him, so how could he be close to the inner circle?
You should also ask when he had managed to create those relationships.
In the previous paragraphs of his bio, we are not told of any meetings with Lenin, Trotsky, or others.
In fact, we are told he met them for the first time in January 1918.
OK, so how was Reed close to the inner circle, and why?
What was his entrée into all this?
We are never told.
We are told he just showed up in Petrograd in October and was immediately admitted to the inner sanctum.
After that, we are told
“By December [1917] his funds were nearly exhausted.”
What?
He was the grandson of a billionaire.
He couldn't have exhausted all his funds in 200 years.
Besides, he had only been in Russia two months and there was nothing to buy there.
You couldn't even buy a loaf of bread or a quart of milk.
Reed took employment [in Russia] with an American, Raymond Robins of the Red Cross.
Robins wished to set up a newspaper promoting American interests; Reed complied, but in the dummy issue he prepared he included a warning beneath the masthead:
"This paper is devoted to promoting the interests of American capital."
You have to be kidding me!
Does that sound like a good thing to do in Russia in 1918?
If it is true (which I doubt), we see that only the son of a financier could get away with such a thing.
And the absurdity continues:
The dissolution of the Constituent Assembly left Reed unmoved, and two days later, armed with a rifle, he joined a patrol of Red Guards prepared to defend the Foreign Office from counter-revolutionary attack.
Reed then attended the opening of the Third Congress of Soviets, where he gave a short speech promising to bring the news of the revolution to America, where he hoped it would:
"call forth an answer from America's oppressed and exploited masses."
An American rich boy joins a patrol of Red Guards!
The shit they expect you to believe!
This is the same John Reed who was in the Glee Club and the cheerleading squad at Harvard.
This is a guy who faked a kidney operation to avoid serving in the US military, but we are supposed to believe he is carrying a rifle to defend the Russian Foreign Office?
C'mon.
And why would he be allowed to speak at, much less attend, the Third Congress of the Soviets?
Was he a Soviet?
Look at the title of the meeting.
It is for Soviets, not rich American spies.
By April both Reed and Bryant were back in the US.
Two trials for sedition were awaiting him, but both conveniently ended in hung juries.
Within the month he was arrested for inciting a riot, but again was acquitted.
To me these all look like show trials, of the sort we saw later with:
Or perhaps they most resembled the fake Chicago 8 trials.
It is hard to say, there are so many fake trials to compare them to.
Reed then had more fake show hearings before Congress, which then as now was convened by Military Intelligence to blow smoke and do nothing.
Think of your Congressmen acting tough when they recently grilled the bankers who caused the financial meltdowns, and who then did precisely nothing about it (besides raise the debt ceiling so the bankers could steal more).
As was planned, in 1919 the Socialist/Communist parties in America used the Russian Revolution and Reed's fake grandstanding to splinter into many pieces.
During this splintering, Reed was instructed to use the phrase:
“Dictatorship of the proletariat.”
as often as humanly possible.
See my paper on Marx to understand why this phrase was chosen, and why it so perfectly undercut any chance the underclasses ever had of rising.
He was a billionaire's son, and supposing he was actually traveling in Europe at the time (which is doubtful), this would be a perfect way to buy things when all the currencies were worthless.
Finland would have to prove the diamonds were stolen, but a billionaire's son doesn't need to steal diamonds.
He can easily buy them or borrow them from mommy.
We are then told Reed was illegally detained by Finland.
Again, unlikely, considering he was the son of a billionaire and under the protection of US military intelligence.
This whole story is obviously made up to give you a reason for his upcoming death:
they need him cold and starving in some prison somewhere, getting sick.
Finland is supposed to have fed him only dried fish in jail, causing him to acquire scurvy.
Right.
Because Finland is known for being such a monstrously unfair country, with hellish jails and no standards of humane conduct.
Reed allegedly returned to Moscow for the Second Comintern, but in the bios we aren't told what organization he was representing.
We have to look at the delegate list, where we find him listed fourth for the Communist Labor Party.
This is curious for a couple of reasons.
One, Reed had been AWOL from the party for almost a year.
It is doubtful that after such a long absence they would elect him in absentia for this important post.
At that time, he wouldn't have seemed a very good choice, or a very reliable delegate.
Two, he wasn't at the first Comintern, though it would have been fairly easy for him to have stayed in Russia and attended in the summer of 1919.
He did nothing that year in the US but get arrested and go to trials.
Supposing that there were any chance he might have been convicted, it seems foolish for him to have returned to the US at all.
Would you return to a country that was just waiting to arrest you and try you for sedition?
Three, it is strange to find four delegates from the CLP in 1920 while the other US parties only have two delegates each.
Remember, at the first Comintern in 1919, before the US splintering, there had been only one American delegate (Boris Reinstein).
Since there were three parties invited from the US at the second Comintern, it is likely the Comintern committee would have requested each US party to send only three delegates.
Due to the difficulty in getting past the blockade and into Russia that year, the other two parties apparently could only manage two of their three allowed delegates.
So how did the CLP get four?
I suggest Reed's name was added to the list after-the-fact.
I don't believe he was really there.
His speeches were inserted into the script later by Intelligence.
We have more indication of that by the absurdity of the next chapter of the story, when Reed is supposed to have been ordered by Radek and Zinoviev to travel to Baku for the Congress of the Peoples of the East.
Again, was Reed a “person of the East”?
No.
According to my world map, the US is not in the East.
According to the survey of attendees (see the ethnicity chart posted online), no Americans attended this Congress, as would be expected.
And the absurdity continues, as we are told Reed returned to Moscow after the Congress to meet Bryant.
Wikipedia tells us,
“He looked older, and his clothes were in tatters.”
Despite that they went to visit the ballet and the galleries.
Right.
I hate to sound like a broken record, but this was the grandson of a billionaire.
Why would his clothes be in tatters?
Supposing his diamonds were stolen from him in Finland by the police, his family could send him more.
International mail hadn't been stopped in 1919.
They hadn't closed all the banks in Russia.
Reed could be sent whatever he needed in any number of ways; or he would have been issued credit by anyone, due to his family.
Remember, his family had connections to all the biggest banks in the US, which had connections to all the biggest banks in Europe.
This story is like the story you are told about Marx and his wife supposedly living close to the bone in France in England, despite both being from huge wealth.
The Necropolis at that time was for Bolshevik soldiers.
Was Reed a Bolshevik soldier killed in battle?
No.
He was still a prominent American citizen, and as such his body should have been returned to his home country.
We are supposed to believe that because he was a member of the Communist Party, US officials just gave his body up to Russian authorities to do with as they pleased.
But that is not how it works.
If these events had been real, the US Government should have applied strong pressure for the return of the body, if only because they didn't wish Reed to become a symbol of successful conversion to Communism.
Basically, we are supposed to believe that the US just allowed the Bolsheviks to kidnap Reed's body without protest.
I for one do not believe it.
Given what I have read and the multiple inconsistencies in the story, I believe Reed was never in Russia in 1920.
My best de-spinning of the given story is this:
Reed was an agent all along and his project unravelled in 1919.
Rather than face his complete outing in the US, he was swept out of the country and his death faked.
This created a sort of closure and prevented most people from asking any more questions.
Non-Communists already weren't very interested in him, and once they were told he had been buried in the Kremlin Necropolis, these people would write him off completely as a traitor.
Many or most US Communists (who were not agents themselves) had become suspicious of him, and the story of his heroic funeral in Moscow might appease them somewhat.
And for the rest—those who had become aware he was an agent—they could be further marginalized.
Denied places to publish, they could not get the truth out except by word of mouth.
I assume the word on the streets in 1919-1920 was that Reed was an agent, and for those who knew this, the story of the final year was probably no more believable than it is to me.
But since they weren't writing the history books, their beliefs were lost.
It was always difficult to see what Hollywood hoped to do with this, after bashing Communism for decades.
Why spend all that time and money trying to rehabilitate a Communist?
We are told it had something to do with Hollywood's left-leaning sympathies, but that was never believable.
Hollywood has always been in the pocket of Intelligence, and its progressive claims are just a feint—much like the progressive claims of Walter Lippmann.
Hollywood is “left” only in the sense that its main function is fooling the ninnies in the democratic party and others who consider themselves to be progressive—without actually being so at all.
It wasn't to promote Communism; it was to whitewash Reed himself.
He and his family, although patriotic enough in their own ways, had never been happy with the history Intelligence came up with for them.
Although he is now sold as a hero of the left, back then he was mostly considered to be a traitor.
The mainstream story protected him from ultimately being outed, and achieved some other things Intelligence wished to achieve, but it made Reed himself look pretty bad.
Since Reed lived on for decades and probably had a family of his own—which would still be around— it is likely it is these people who wanted to clear their names.
It would be interesting to know who they are—under what aliases—but I suspect they are in Hollywood right now.
And there are other near branches of the family that have had to live with the Reed story hanging over them for more than a century.
We must assume they are still prominent, and we should also assume they still have ties to Intelligence and Hollywood.
All these people would naturally wish to rehabilitate Reed and Bryant and all the rest.
I suggest that is what the movie was about.
Which should make us look more closely at Warren Beatty.
Might the Beaty family be linked somehow to Reed?
Why else would Warren Beatty be making that movie, if not to rehabilitate a recent ancestor?
He was never a Socialist of any kind.
Like Reed, he was always a privileged rich kid.
We are told his parents were unexceptional, with his father being a public-school administrator (what, like a principal?), but that was never believable.
Due to his career arc, we can tell he was some kind of Hollywood royalty from the beginning.
He was on TV from the time he was 20; and although he couldn't act for sour apples, he was already being nominated for major awards (like the Tony) by the time he was 23.
At the same age he was chosen as the lead in Splendor in the Grass, where he looked good but had one expression the entire movie.
In this way, he was very much like John Reed's grandfather.
We are told that Beatty fooled him into backing Reds, but of course that is not believable at all.
We see the same fascists backing the movie Reds that were backing John Reed, Walter Lippmann, and everyone else famous you have ever heard of, so we can't pass that off as coincidence.
Bluhdorn was even involved in importing sugar, just like Reed's grandfather.
Remember the scene in Heaven Can Wait, when they tell us the rich guy Farnsworth is thinking of buying Haiti?
Well, this is a reference to Bluhdorn, who all but owned the Dominican Republic nearby.
He imported sugar and cigars from there, and many big Paramount movies were filmed there, including Apocalypse Now [which I have written about recently] and The Godfather Part 2.
One of his great grandparents was a Mary Lavinia Pomeroy, daughter of William Pomeroy of Virginia.
She died in 1931, and he died in 1890.
Does that name Pomeroy ring a bell?
We have seen it in this paper already, haven't we?
Remember John Reed's grandfather Henry Green?
He and his brother John worked for a company called Pomeroy and Leonard before they came west.
That Leonard then went into business with the Green brothers, importing sugar from Hawaii under the company name Leonard and Green.
The Pomeroy in Pomeroy and Leonard was named Benjamin, according to Joseph Gaston, but maybe he was the brother or other near relation of William.
The ages are right.
We find more links with Daniel Pomeroy Rhodes, billionaire Cleveland Industrialist specializing in coal mining.
His son-in-law Mark Hanna inherited the business and then went into politics, buying the Presidency for McKinley in 1896.
Instead of competing with existing bosses in the North, Hanna had the brilliant idea of buying the votes of whole States in the South, large parts of which were still impoverished after the Civil War.
At any rate, this links Beatty to the Rhodes family as well.
You will say,
“Well, you have only shown that the Greens worked for the Pomeroys, not that they were related.”
True, but you often get work through relatives, so I will pursue that possibility.
Again, we find confirmation of links between the two families in the genealogy records.
Their daughter Nancy Ring married Robert Green in 1850.
The Greens and Pomeroys were also linked through Emily Pomeroy, who married Oliver Bourne Green in about 1845.
We see more evidence linking the two families with a William Pomeroy Green born in 1874 and another William Pomeroy Green in 1907.
Following these links, we find that the Pomeroys were also related to James Fenimore Cooper, who wrote The Last of the Mohicans and The Deerslayer—a book that Mark Twain rightly trashed (although mostly for the wrong reasons).
Sounds like Marx, infiltrating and undercutting the revolutions in the 1850s.
With the help of Pomeroy, they lost the war and the Americans remained in the Philippines.
We are told Pomeroy spent several years in prison in the Philippines, but we have no possible proof of that.
We are told he was imprisoned by the ruling government, but the Americans were ruling the Philippines at that time from behind the curtain (and still are).
Why would we imprison our own man?
I will be told it is because he crossed over and started helping the rebels.
But he was in the Philippines on our dime, first during the war as a soldier and then as a student with a US grant.
The Army knew he was (an avowed) Communist going in, so we must assume they were using him in some project.
Why else would they give a grant to a Communist to go to a country where Communist rebels were threatening US hegemony?
The story we are told makes no sense, as usual.
Addendum May 9, 2017:
while researching something entirely unrelated, I tripped across a book called The History and Genealogy of the Pomeroy Family.
not linked to the famous Spencers, but she was one.
See this reprint of her Chicago Tribune obituary from 1937, which admits that she was a wealthy socialite before she married Marshall Field, and that King Edward VIII attended her London parties, along with
“Numerous other members of the British Royal family.”
Given that Beatty also made the movie Bonnie & Clyde, I suggest we have to consider the possibility that whole story was faked by Intelligence and the press as well.
From my Tate/Manson paper, we now know Sebring took part in one of the greatest government hoaxes in recent history, and probably came out of Naval Intelligence.
So Beatty has been involved in a string of Intelligence projects.
That being so, we should look at all his other work with the same eye. * Where we learn, among other things, that Sgt. Pepper was head of the BSC in the 1950's.
No, really.
He was actually a major, but his name was Pepper.
“It was 20 years ago today, Sgt. Pepper taught the band to play.”